Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • its not a good thing or a bad thing its ongoing. mines gone the same route. these new notifications are equally meaningless.
    • Shein has been linked to unethical business practices, including forced labour allegations.View the full article
    • Hi I have to agree with @unclebulgaria67 post#3 For the funding side of moving to a new area and it being private supported accommodation I would also suggest speaking to private supported accommodation provider about funding but also contact the Local Council for that area and have a chat with them about funding because if you are in receipt of Housing Benefit certain Supported Accommodation that meets a certain criteria is treated as ‘exempt accommodation’ for Housing Benefit purposes but you need to confirm this with that relevant Council in your new area especially since it is Private Supported Accommodation as each Council can have slightly different rules on this. If you have a certain medical condition look up the charities and also have a wee chat with them as they may be able to point you to different Grants to assist with moving costs and your question about funding for private supported accommodation as well.
    • Hi Just to be clear a Notice to Quit is only the very start of the Housing Association going down the Eviction route there is a long process to go. Also to be clear if you leave at the Notice to Quit date only and go to the Council claiming you are Homeless they will more than likely class you as Intentionally Homeless therefore you have no right to be given temporary housing by the Council. The only way that works is when the Court has Granted a Possession Order then you can approach the Council as Homeless with the Court Order. As for the Housing Association issuing the Notice to Quit because there investigation has proved it's not your main residence but you have witness statement to prove otherwise. From now on with the Housing Association you need to keep a very good paper trail and ensure to get free proof of posting from the post office with anything you send to them. You now need to make a Formal Complaint to the Housing Association and please amend the following to suit your needs:   Dear Sir/Madam FORMAL COMPLAINT Reference: Notice to Quit Letter Dated XX/XX/2024, Hand Delivered on XX/XX/2024 I note in your letter that you stated that the Housing Association has carried out an investigation into myself and came to the conclusion that I am not using this property as my main residence and have evidence of this and have therefore issued a 'Notice to Quit' by XX/XX/2024. I find the above actions absolutely disgraceful action by the Housing Association. 1. Why have I never been informed nor asked about this matter by my Housing Officer. 2. Why have I never been given the opportunity to defend myself before the Housing Association out of the blue Hand Delivered a Notice to Quit Letter. 3. I have evidence and witnesses/statements that prove this is my Main Residence and more than willing provide this to both the Housing Association and the Court. I now require the following: 1. Copy of your Complaints Policy (not the leaflet) 2. Copy of your Customer Care Charter (not the leaflet) 3. Copies of your Investigation into this not being my main residence.    As well as the above you need to send the Housing Association urgently a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that in whether it be letters, email, recorded calls etc. The Housing Association then has 30 calendar days to respond but that time limit only starts once they acknowledge your SAR Request. If they fail to respond within that time limit its then off with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO).     
    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

MRI Results received - please help translate jargon!


mrjackderges
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4261 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there

 

I have just received my MRI scan results for my lower back & I have no idea what it means!

 

I injured my back deadlifting in the gym over a year ago, so the lower back problem has been present for some time.

 

Findings of MRI are as follows:

 

"The conus is sited at the T12-L1 disk level.

The visualised cord and cauda return normal signal.

Normal visualised vertebral marrow signal.

The canal is capacious throughout the lumbar and sacral levels.

 

Bulky moderate multilevel facet OA present and this is particularly pronounced at the L4-L5 and L5-S1 levels.

 

The upper 2 lumbar disks are slightly dehydrated but there is no compromise seen to nerve roots at these levels.

The L3-L4 disk is dehydrated with a broad-based disk bulge and focal central protrusion which is small but effaces thecal sac.

No definite compromise seen at this level however.

 

The L4-L5 disc is dehydrated witha broad-based disk bulge. This accompanies bulky facet OA particularly on the left side narrowing lateral recess and there is some mild effacement of the left L5 nerve root in this region.

However, there is a moderate left foraminal stenosis in which the foraminal L4 root on the left side does appear to be impinged to some degree. This is predominantly due to bulky facet osteophytosis.

 

The L5-S1 disk is reasonably well-preserved. There is sacralisation of the L5 vertebral body. Focal high signal in the pars on each side may reflect some low-grade stress.

 

Conclusion: evolving degenerative changes within the facets and lower lumbar disks as detailed above. Moderate to"

 

(The report literally finishes like that... not sure what the "moderate to" was about to refer to.)

 

Any doctors on the forum?? Can you advise??

 

Kind regards,

 

Jack

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hope the site don't mind me recommending another to you where you can be given very detailed advice, and a thorough breakdown of everything on the MRI report. You have some pretty major Osteoarthritis going on there. Major to severe is the highest grading according to severity. You also have nerve impingement due to the extra bony growths which would most likely need surgery if symptoms persist so as to prevent permanent damage.

 

I use this site as also have lower back issues, and they will happily interpret your results for you, and give you an idea of what possible treatments may be available to you.

 

 

** EDIT ** and visit the forum section and all the health conditions are listed alphabetically.

All the very best.

Edited by citizenB
removed website
Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like CAG have removed your link!

 

I'll keep looking. Thanks for trying to help - seems odd that the site has edited your post, despite you helping with a medical issue!!

 

Got Docs appointment tomorrow (GP), will have to follow the route through to see a specialist I'm sure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there.

 

You may find information on the BBC health website, which I find useful. They also have links to non-commercial organisations who provide help for specific conditions.

 

Hopefully though, your GP will be able to explain.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

 

I have just received my MRI scan results for my lower back & I have no idea what it means!

 

I injured my back deadlifting in the gym over a year ago, so the lower back problem has been present for some time.

 

Findings of MRI are as follows:

 

"The conus is sited at the T12-L1 disk level.

The visualised cord and cauda return normal signal.

Normal visualised vertebral marrow signal.

The canal is capacious throughout the lumbar and sacral levels.

 

Bulky moderate multilevel facet OA present and this is particularly pronounced at the L4-L5 and L5-S1 levels.

 

The upper 2 lumbar disks are slightly dehydrated but there is no compromise seen to nerve roots at these levels.

The L3-L4 disk is dehydrated with a broad-based disk bulge and focal central protrusion which is small but effaces thecal sac.

No definite compromise seen at this level however.

 

The L4-L5 disc is dehydrated witha broad-based disk bulge. This accompanies bulky facet OA particularly on the left side narrowing lateral recess and there is some mild effacement of the left L5 nerve root in this region.

However, there is a moderate left foraminal stenosis in which the foraminal L4 root on the left side does appear to be impinged to some degree. This is predominantly due to bulky facet osteophytosis.

 

The L5-S1 disk is reasonably well-preserved. There is sacralisation of the L5 vertebral body. Focal high signal in the pars on each side may reflect some low-grade stress.

 

Conclusion: evolving degenerative changes within the facets and lower lumbar disks as detailed above. Moderate to"

 

(The report literally finishes like that... not sure what the "moderate to" was about to refer to.)

 

Any doctors on the forum?? Can you advise??

 

Kind regards,

 

Jack

 

Jack, I can't believe that you have been sent this as your MRI result! That is appalling! How in heavens name are you supposed to understand this!

Make an appointment with your Consultant for a proper, and understandable result and further advice.

Keep up the fight against Bank Charges.

 

 

Got Debt problems?

Don't panic, put the kettle on and read this

 

:-) Everything I write comes from my heart and head! The large filling cabinet that is my knowledge of life, however warped that may be!! :-)

 

<<< Please tickle my star!! if I have managed to help you or just made you chuckle!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes defo get your consultant to explain this to you as an MRI is just a number of many tests which are firstly used to diagnose what might be causing the pain in order for the correct treatment to be identified (which even in the case of severe degeneration may not be surgery.

 

In some instances conservative therapy can achieve the same outcomes as surgery, reduction in pain and disability).

 

The problem with MRI alone is that degeneration in the discs and facets is as normal as grey hair and wrinkles, but for some it causes pain and for others it doesn't cause any pain (ie dark discs and facet OA are seen on MRI scans of people without back pain).

 

"The conus is sited at the T12-L1 disk level. - NORMAL, THIS IS THE END OF YOUR SPINAL CORD, BELOW WHICH IT BECOMES MORE LIKE A HORSES TAIL AS THE NERVES SEPERATE OUT (and this part is called cauda equina - horse!)

 

The visualised cord and cauda return normal signal. - NORMAL Normal visualised vertebral marrow signal. - NORMAL The canal is capacious throughout the lumbar and sacral levels.- YOU HAVE A GOOD SPACE AROUND YOUR SPINAL CORD IN YOUR LOWER BACK

 

Bulky moderate multilevel facet OA present and this is particularly pronounced at the L4-L5 and L5-S1 levels. DEGENERATION OF JOINTS BETWEEN THE VERTEBRAE THAT ARE CALLED FACETS. THE FACETS SLIDE OVER EACH OTHER WHEN YOU MOVE YOUR BACK. DEGENERATION OF THE FACETS CAN SOMETIMES CAUSE BONY OUTGROWTHS WHICH CAN IMPINGE ON NERVES AND CAUSE PAIN, BUT NOT ALWAYS. DEGENERATION OF FACETS IS NORMAL - DEPENDING ON YOUR AGE, USED TO THINK IT WAS DUE TO WEAR AND TEAR, BUT GENETICS PLAY A BIG PART TOO.

 

The upper 2 lumbar disks are slightly dehydrated but there is no compromise seen to nerve roots at these levels. DEPENDING ON YOUR AGE COULD BE NORMAL, DEHYDRATED DISCS ALONE DO NOT CAUSE PAIN (RECENT RESEARCH WHICH I CAN QUOTE IF YOU WANT ME TO) THE PROBLEM IS WHEN THE DISC LOOSES ITS TURGIDITY(HARDNESS) THROUGH DEHYDRATION IT CAN 'COLLAPSE' WHICH THEN PRESSES ON NERVE ROOTS - BUT THAT HASN'T HAPPENED AT THESE LEVELS

 

The L3-L4 disk is dehydrated with a broad-based disk bulge and focal central protrusion which is small but effaces thecal sac. THE DEHYDRATED DISC HERE HAS COLLAPSED A BIT AND IS PRESSING ON THE SAC WHICH SORROUNDS THE SPINAL CORD AND CAUDA EQUINA. THE BULGE IN IN THE MIDDLE AND GOES IN TOWARDS YOUR SPINAL CANAL (THE BULGES CAN BULGE IN ANY DIRECTION) THIS MAY CAUSE PAIN IF IT IS ALSO IRRITATING A NERVE ROOT (AND YOU CAN'T ALWAYS SEE NERVE ROOTS ON MRI)

 

No definite compromise seen at this level however.(SEE ABOVE, THEY CANNOT SEE WHETHER A NERVE ROOT IS ALSO AFFECTED The L4-L5 disc is dehydrated witha broad-based disk bulge. AS ABOVE BUT A BIGGER BULGE This accompanies bulky facet OA particularly on the left side narrowing lateral recess THE OA ON THE LEFT SIDE HAS NARROWED THE EXIT CANCAL THROUGH WHERE THE NERVE PASSES and there is some mild effacement of the left L5 nerve root in this region. AND IT IS IRRITATING THAT NERVE TO A MILD DEGREE

 

However, there is a moderate left foraminal stenosis in which the foraminal L4 root on the left side does appear to be impinged to some degree. This is predominantly due to bulky facet osteophytosis.SAME ASA BOVE, A FORAMINA IS A HOLE BETWEEN TWO BONES THROUGH WHICH NERVES AND OTHER STRICTURES OASS (LIGAMENTS ETC) IN YOUR CASE THIS HOLE IS NARROWED AND IT IS IMPINGING ON THE NERVE (A STENOSIS IS A NARROWING)

 

The L5-S1 disk is reasonably well-preserved. There is sacralisation of the L5 vertebral body NORMAL ANATOMICAL VARIANT, YOUR L5 VERTEBRAL BODY HAS A DIFFERENT APPEARANCE TO 75% OF THE POPULATION, BUT IT IS NOT ABNORMAL, JUST A VARIANT.IT MEANS THE TRANSVERSE PROCESSES (STICKY OUT BITS ON THE SIDE) ARE WIDE

 

Focal high signal in the pars on each side may reflect some low-grade stress THIS VARIANT MAY BE CAUSING YOU EXTRA MECHANICAL STRESS (IE WHEN YOU MOVE AROUND) DUE TO ITS SIZE Conclusion: evolving degenerative changes within the facets and lower lumbar disks as detailed above. Moderate to"

Edited by slick132
layout sorted
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much for this - it has really helped me.

 

I am seeing a specialist soon. Being 25, it seems the degenerative stuff going on is too soon for someone my age. Obviously don't want surgery, but these 'boney growths' sound like they need removing!

 

I do a lot of work in the gym with weights and hate the thought this is going to affect that.

 

Thanks again for the help!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just like grey hair, some people get this sooner than others - and its the same inside our bodies too. As I said, genetics play a big part.

 

The bony growths (osteophytes) cannot be simply removed, because they grow back! It is a case of making the hole through which the nerves and other structures pass (foramen) either larger or more stable (or sometimes both). Can be achieved by surgery (but a possible side effect is that scar tissue can form in the space created and press on the nerve so your symptoms return), and in some cases by good rehabilitation and conservative therapy (i.e structured and supervised excercise programs, not merely seeing a physio once a week for 10 mins then not continuiung with exercises and stretching/strengthening whilst at home).

 

Given your age I would try to avoid any large operations such as a fusion or disc replacement (especially the latter as the long term performance of these is not yet known), your surgeon may offer a discectomy which is a relatively minor op (although still needs aneasthetic with associated risks).

 

I would try GOOD conservative management for 6 months (discuss with your surgeon as to what GOOD conservative management is, its not a physio appt once a week) and then consider surgery.

 

That said, its YOUR decision taken in conjunction with YOUR healthcare practitioner. Advice on the internet is always superficial and shallow. Good luck

Edited by slick132
layout sorted
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi FFF,

 

Not sure why your excellent replies stayed compressed but I've entered paras for you.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...