Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Have we seen your court bundle?   If we haven't then it's probably an idea to post it up here especially the index page and the witness statement so we can see if there is anything which might need adding or changing 
    • "Care to briefly tell someone who isn't tech savvy - i.e. me! - how you did this?" Its pretty simple although not obvious. You open the google maps app > click your profile picture > Click Timeline from the list > click today > choose the date you want to see the timeline from. Then you'll see your timeline for that day. Often, places you have visited will have a question mark beside them where google wants you confirm you have actually visited. You either click 'yes' if you have, or you click 'edit' to enter the actual place you visited. Sometimes, you'll see 'Missing visit' This probably happens if your internet connection has dropped out at that time. You simply click 'Add visit' and enter the place. The internet on my crappy phone often loses connection so I have to do that alot.   OK dx, understood mate. 
    • I have now been given a court date vs Evri, 4th Sept 2024. I have completed my court bundle, when am I expected to send copies to the court and Evri and should it be in hard copy or electronic? The Notice of Allocation states that no later than 7 days before the directions hearing both parties must send to the other party their final offers to settle. Does this mean I will have to tell Evri what I'm willing to settle? Rgds, J
    • Sorry  Noted x   Ok how about this to the CEO? I know it sounds super desperate but lets call a spade a spade here, I am super desperate: Dear Sir, On 29th November 2023 I took out a loan of £5000 with you. Unfortunately very early into 2024 I found myself in financial difficulty (unexpected bills and two episodes of sickness and the tax office getting my tax code wrong resulting in less pay for two months) and I contacted you (MCB) on 13th February 2024 asking if there was any way I could extend the length of my loan to 36 months. I fully explained why I was requesting this and asked for your help. I did not receive a reply to that email so I again contacted you on 7th March 2024 to advise you of a change in my circumstances which resulted in me having to take out a DMP and asking you to confirm that the direct debit had been cancelled. You would have also received confirmation of this DMP from StepChange but you did not acknowledge receipt of my email. I have only managed to make one payment from my loan but did try and contact MCB to discuss extending my loan, help etc.  I have now therefore fallen behind on several of my debts, yours included, and as a result you have lodged a Cifas marker against my name for "evasion of payment", which has resulted in me having to change banks, which has been an extremely difficult process because of the Cifas marker. I do not feel you have been fair or given me the opportunity to fully explain my situation to you before you lodged the marker against my name. I appreciate it is a business and you have acted accordingly, but I did try to make contact to arrange alternative arrangements and at no point, not even to this day, did I ever intend to not repay my loan. I cannot stress to you enough how much this has affected my mental health. I am having trouble sleeping and my existing health condition has been exacerbated by all of this. What I would like you to do is to please, please remove the Cifas marker and let me make arrangements to pay the loan back through a DMP.  Please sir, I am begging for your help here. I am not a dishonest person and I have never been in a situation like this before. I am desperately trying to make things right but this marker is killing me. Please can you help me? I look forward to hearing from you. Yours faithfully,
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

MORE Bizaare behaviour from B Carter re alleged debt. Court Paper


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4125 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

I have a very similar issue to this thread

 

Bryan Carter Solicitors acting on behalf of Arrow Globel Guernsey Ltd have been chasing me for £679 for some time.

 

I was first contacted regarding this debt around 6 months ago, they were wanting me to confirm who I was. I ignored all these phishing letters.

 

I then received several letters threatening litigation which I also ignored as the wording was always "we may".

 

The next letter I received dated 12/07/12 was a notice of balance reduction. They had reduced what they wanted to £499.

 

On the 28/07/12 I received court papers from Northampton CC for the following;

 

Amount claimed: £499

Court fee: £30

Solicitor's costs: £50

Total amount £579

 

Particulars of claim.

The claimant's claim is for the balance due under an agreement which is now all due and payable.

 

The defendant agreed to pay monthly instalments under account number AGGLXXXXXXXXXXXXX but has failed to do so.

 

And the claimant claims the sum of 499.00.

 

The claimant also claims interest thereon pursuant to S.69 county court act 1984 limited to one year to the date hereof at the rate of 8% per annum amounting to 0.00.

 

I have sent an acknowledgment of service online.

 

I am today sending the following to Bryan Carter via recorded delivery.

 

PLEASE CONFIRM THE CLAIM IS BELOW £5000

 

Re: (Claimant's name) v (Your name)

 

Case No:

 

CPR 31.14Request

 

On (date) I received the Claim Form in this case issued by you out of the(Name) countycourt.

 

I confirm having returned my acknowledgement of service to the court inwhich I indicate my intention to contest all of your claim.

 

 

Please treat this letter as my request made under CPR31.14 for the disclosure and the production of averified and legible copy of [each of the following / the] document(s)mentioned in your Particulars of Claim:

 

1 The agreement.

 

You will appreciate that in an ordinary case and by reasonof the provisions of CPR PD 16 para 7.3, where aclaim is based upon a written agreement, a copy of the contract or documents constitutingthe agreement should be attached to or served with the particulars of claim andthe original(s) should be available at the hearing. Further, that any generalconditions incorporated in the contract should also be attached.

 

2 The deed of assignment.

 

3 The notice of assignment including proof of service.

 

 

4 The default notice.

 

5 The termination notice. (not mentioned in the POC but no harm asking just might not get)

 

 

Although your claim is for a sum which is not more than £5,000.00 and willin all likelihood be allocated to the small claims track for determination uponmy delivering a defence, at this moment in time I have not delivered my defenceand the case has not been allocated to a track. In consequence the provisionsof CPR 27(2) are of no effect and you should not seek to avoid compliance with your CPR 31 dutiesby claiming otherwise

 

You should ensure compliance with your CPR 31duties and ensure that the document(s) I have requested are copied to andreceived by me within 7 days of receiving this letter. Your CPR 31 duties extend to making a reasonable andproportionate search for the originals of the documents I have requested, thebetter for you to be able to verify the document's authenticity and to provideme with a legible copy. Further, where I have requested a copy of a document,the original of which is now in the possession of another person, you will havea right to possession of that document if you have mentioned it in your case.You must take immediate steps to recover and preserve it for the purpose ofthis case.

 

Where I have mentioned a document and there is in your possession more thanone version of that same document owing to a modification, obliteration orother marking or feature, each version will be a separate document and you mustprovide a copy of each version of it to me. Your obligations extend to making areasonable and proportionate search for any version(s) to include an obligationto recover and preserve such version(s) which are now in the possession of athird party.

 

In accordance with CPR 31.15© I undertake tobe responsible for your reasonable copying costs incurred in complying withthis CPR 31.14request.

 

If you require more time in which to comply with this request you must tellme in writing. You must tell me before the time for compliance with thisrequest has expired. In telling me you require more time you must tell me whatsteps you have taken and propose to take in order to comply with this requestand also state a date by when you will comply with this request. In additionyour statement must be accompanied with a statement that you agree to anextension of the time for me to file my defence. Your extension of time must benot less than 14 days from the date when you say you will have complied with myrequest and you must state the new date for filing my defence.

 

If you are unable to comply with this request and believe that you willnever be able to comply with this request you must tell me in writing.

 

Please note that if you should fail to comply with this request, fail torequest more time or fail to agree to an extension of time for the filing of mydefence, I will make an application to the court for an order that theproceedings be struck out or stayed for non-compliance and a summary costsorder.

 

I do hope this will not be necessary and look forward to hearing from you.

 

yours faithfully (print name)

 

I guess its all a waiting game now.

 

 

So what should I expect to happen?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Carter very often backs down and withdraws at the first sign of a defence.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Carter very often backs down and withdraws at the first sign of a defence.

 

 

I do hope so, this is spoiling my 2 weeks holiday.

 

BC do appear to like taking on lost causes.

I feel sorry for the people who get bullied into paying or end up with CCJ's because of them.

 

This site is a god send with nothing but great advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i see you have started your own thread now

 

thats good, keep an eye on the other thread as well

 

regards

 

Yeah I will bud, we cant let people use bullying tactics to make money :wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Always try to get a defense in so you can hit him for costs!

 

Never thought of that, what costs could I claim for? Suppose, postage and stationary costs would be on the list. Not sure what else.

Shame you cant put a price on stress and how much this whole thing is spoiling my time off. Time off I should be enjoying with my kids but I have BC at the back of my mind.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Never thought of that, what costs could I claim for? Suppose, postage and stationary costs would be on the list. Not sure what else.

Shame you cant put a price on stress and how much this whole thing is spoiling my time off. Time off I should be enjoying with my kids but I have BC at the back of my mind.

 

LIP costs @ £18 ph.

 

20 hrs looking for advise soon pays for a decent week with the kids!

Link to post
Share on other sites

LIP costs @ £18 ph.

 

20 hrs looking for advise soon pays for a decent week with the kids!

 

I knew I would be able to claim costs but didn't know it would be that much.

 

So does the clock start ticking for BC as soon as my CPR31 letter arrives at his office?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Been out fishing today with my son. When I arrived home there was a letter from Bryan Carter.

 

I will copy the contents of the letter within the next hour.

 

Lets just say they have failed to confirm anything or to agree to an extension.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, here goes.

 

Below is contents of the letter received From Bryan Carter in response to my CPR 31 letter.

 

6 August 2012

 

Dr Mr xxxxxxx

 

ARROW GLOGAL LIMITED v

ACCOUNT NUMBER: XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX

CLAIM NUMBER: XXXXXXXX

OUTSTANDING BALANCE: £579.00

 

We write further to your recent request for disclosure under Part 31 of the Civil Procedure Rules.

 

We confirm the claim form was issued by the Northampton County Court Bulk Centre and the

Court's protocol was followed when issuing the Claimant's Particulars of Claim. Practice

Direction 7C point 1.4 (3A) eliminates the requirements to attach the documents to the Particulars

of Claim when they are issued by this Court.

 

We Confirm that this matter would most properly be allocated to the Small Claims Track and Part

31 of the Civil Procedure Rules will not apply. We Confirm that we have nevertheless requested

documentation from our client and hope to revert to you shortly, although this will not be within seven days.

 

We will revert to you in due course with our client's instructions in relation to your request for an

extension of time for filing your defence.

 

It was the policy of Capital One, the original creditor, to issue agreements on or around the date of

the contract and statements throughout the duration of the agreement. The Claimant believes a

notice of assignment was sent to you in or around the time of assignment, and therefore in this

regards we ask you to refer to your own records.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Bryan Carter

 

****************************************************

 

So whats next?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well sent the Royal Mail and email via their site due to the lack of update regarding the status of this delivery.

 

I advised them that it was extremely important I know what date the letter was delivered as time scales were involved due to a pending court case.

 

I received the following reply.

 

*********************************

 

Thank you for contacting Royal Mail regarding a Recorded Signed ForT item, with reference number ***********.

 

My investigations into your enquiry have included checking all available service information and I can confirm that:

 

. full details of our inability to provide a signature have been logged and reported

. these details have been passed to my colleagues in our delivery operation

. a book of stamps will be sent to you shortly as a gesture of our goodwill

 

Please accept my sincere apologies on behalf of Royal Mail for our inability to provide you with a copy of the signature you required. I am very sorry that no signature was obtained - please be assured that we take letting our customers down seriously and will use this information to make further improvements.

 

I hope that this explanation resolves your enquiry and concludes this matter for you. However if you are unhappy with my response you can contact the Escalated Customer Resolution Team who will re-investigate your complaint. They can be contacted by emailing: [email protected]. Alternatively you can write to: Escalated Customer Resolution Team, Royal Mail, PO Box 466, Plymouth, PL9 7HJ. If you do contact the team please can I ask you to quote your reference number ***********.

 

Regards

***************************************

 

I am appalled and I will be escalating.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi, I have sent the same letter as you and also it says that its going through royal mail delivery network, I am lucky in that I have received a response to my letter. I would suggest sending it again and also just a regular letter, but get a certificate of postage.

 

I am a bit confused also of my next step but need to sort it today

 

:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi, I have sent the same letter as you and also it says that its going through royal mail delivery network, I am lucky in that I have received a response to my letter. I would suggest sending it again and also just a regular letter, but get a certificate of postage.

 

I am a bit confused also of my next step but need to sort it today

 

:-)

 

Hi OHW

 

I have also received a reply to my letter, I have posted the letter on post number 17 of this thread. I think it is the exact same letter you have received.

 

We need to know the dat the letter was delivered so we can keep to our time scale regarding CPR31.

 

Like you I am now at a loss as to what to do.

 

I will probably start typing up my defence so I am prepared in a least some way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am assuming that if i posted my letter first class recorded and have received a response that I can narrow it down, I dont want to wait till last minute to defend. I will be typing up a defence also but I beleive I can do N244 as he is using as a method of debt collecting 'vexticious' (is that the right word). If they had played by the book in the first instance I wouldnt be in this situation, but I guess it makes life interesting...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advice seems to have dried up at the moment.

 

As I cannot get proof of when my letter was delivered due to a royal mail problem I am going to take my 7 days from the date of the letter in reply from BC. So tomorrow is 7 days.

 

He has not yet requested any further time to get the paper work I required he only stated it would take longer than 7 days.

 

Should I now go for a strike out?

 

Incidentally this debt is Statute Barred. I finally found my paper work for this debt and it was defaulted in August 2005. Should I send BC the SB letter???

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I don't think it's RM mess up, I 'think' they will get rec delivery letters in bulk and so that's why there is no signature for individual letters (?wild guess).

 

If its SB I 'think' that's an absolute defence. However it's from last payment not default date. So it's important to know if you have made any payments to the account. Although I have read on here that if you pay a DCA that u may not be paying against original debt.

 

Hope someone has definite answer for you soon :/)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Andy, if it's Stat barred (and you are 100%) sure, get your defense in ASAP!

 

Something like

 

1. The Claimant's claim was issued on xth August 2011.

 

2. The Defendant contends that the Claimant's claim so issued is a claim in contract and is statute barred pursuant to the provisions of section 5 of the Limitation Act 1980. The claimant should already be aware more than 6 yearslink3.gif have elapsed between cause of action accrued and the court claim by their court submission.

 

3. The Claimant's claim to be entitled to payment of £xxxx.xx or any other sum, or relief of any kind is denied.

 

I AM ABSOLUTELY CERTAIN THAT THE CONTENTS OF THIS DEFENCE ARE TRUE.

 

Signed:

 

Dated:

 

May be worth sending SAR to OC. Just in case BC wants to push it all the way.

 

Jogs

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...