Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Shein has been linked to unethical business practices, including forced labour allegations.View the full article
    • Hi I have to agree with @unclebulgaria67 post#3 For the funding side of moving to a new area and it being private supported accommodation I would also suggest speaking to private supported accommodation provider about funding but also contact the Local Council for that area and have a chat with them about funding because if you are in receipt of Housing Benefit certain Supported Accommodation that meets a certain criteria is treated as ‘exempt accommodation’ for Housing Benefit purposes but you need to confirm this with that relevant Council in your new area especially since it is Private Supported Accommodation as each Council can have slightly different rules on this. If you have a certain medical condition look up the charities and also have a wee chat with them as they may be able to point you to different Grants to assist with moving costs and your question about funding for private supported accommodation as well.
    • Hi Just to be clear a Notice to Quit is only the very start of the Housing Association going down the Eviction route there is a long process to go. Also to be clear if you leave at the Notice to Quit date only and go to the Council claiming you are Homeless they will more than likely class you as Intentionally Homeless therefore you have no right to be given temporary housing by the Council. The only way that works is when the Court has Granted a Possession Order then you can approach the Council as Homeless with the Court Order. As for the Housing Association issuing the Notice to Quit because there investigation has proved it's not your main residence but you have witness statement to prove otherwise. From now on with the Housing Association you need to keep a very good paper trail and ensure to get free proof of posting from the post office with anything you send to them. You now need to make a Formal Complaint to the Housing Association and please amend the following to suit your needs:   Dear Sir/Madam FORMAL COMPLAINT Reference: Notice to Quit Letter Dated XX/XX/2024, Hand Delivered on XX/XX/2024 I note in your letter that you stated that the Housing Association has carried out an investigation into myself and came to the conclusion that I am not using this property as my main residence and have evidence of this and have therefore issued a 'Notice to Quit' by XX/XX/2024. I find the above actions absolutely disgraceful action by the Housing Association. 1. Why have I never been informed nor asked about this matter by my Housing Officer. 2. Why have I never been given the opportunity to defend myself before the Housing Association out of the blue Hand Delivered a Notice to Quit Letter. 3. I have evidence and witnesses/statements that prove this is my Main Residence and more than willing provide this to both the Housing Association and the Court. I now require the following: 1. Copy of your Complaints Policy (not the leaflet) 2. Copy of your Customer Care Charter (not the leaflet) 3. Copies of your Investigation into this not being my main residence.    As well as the above you need to send the Housing Association urgently a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that in whether it be letters, email, recorded calls etc. The Housing Association then has 30 calendar days to respond but that time limit only starts once they acknowledge your SAR Request. If they fail to respond within that time limit its then off with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO).     
    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

I have been dumb-ass re Housing benefit and am worried sick - can anyone advise - ** RESOLVED **


acfoster29
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4291 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

WOW -my thread has been busy since I last posted!

 

I appreciate all advice and different opinions can give me a bit thinking material. I have already cancelled the appointment which was supposed to be on 20th as i cannot make it on that day, and was told that the person i was having the appoint with will ring me on Tuesday (tomorrow) to re-arrange. I do think I should attend as I really believe I have made a mistake and would want to get that across instead of it being judged on a one-sided story. Even so, I am absolutely bricking it. I suffer from anxiety/depression and have had to double by tablets and take rescue remedy to stop me from way overthinking things - which I do a lot.

 

I also wrote to the council on 3rd August asking for a breakdown of the income figures they have - also they actually calculated and shown me that I WAS entitled to some benefit, but just not the amount I was paid. I had 28 days to make the payment from 24 July.

 

With regard to Estellyn's question about 'other issues' i have just read the letter asking me to attend and it says

 

' The interview will be conducted under caution because you have failed to declare changes in your financial circumstances for the purpose of your claim'.

I am a little confused here because I DID telephone them in July to advise of the changes albeit late. And in the overpayment notice letter it says

 

'We have recalculated your entitlement to Housing benefit because we have received information which shows that you have had several changes to your Tax Credits and earnings since 3 January 2011. After checking our records we can find no trace of you telling us about these changes in your income at that time'

 

Any further thoughts on these details will be helpful.

 

Finally, I think I would cope better at the interview if I did have a prepared statement as I really get easily flustered - go bright red - shake and will probably sob and might not even be able to speak. Is this a sensible idea?

 

Thanks everyone

Link to post
Share on other sites

So from what I can understand, it appears that an automatic overpayment notice was generated due to your informing them about your wage changes. then due to the fact you failed to notify changes an IUC has been triggered.

 

Yes, a prepared statement is a very sensible idea, as I feel it would be easier to get across the difficult circumstances that made you neglect to notify all changes - not through any deliberation. And also detail the other changes that took place regarding your tax credits that you also didn't notify (but not in your favour). In my experience when the caution is read, the person feels really freaked out, which makes it difficult to think clearly - heck on my first IUC as a rep, knowing nothing, I was freaked out by the caution - which the investigator who was friends with my boss laughed at with her later, saying I looked like a bunny in headlights! Just be prepared for the caution, and it won't scare you so much.

 

The other thing is the fact that you did eventually notify them yourself. HOWEVER, if this happened after they asked your employer for pay details, then it won't hold any weight, as they will just assume you acted to inform them once you thought you were under investigation. If they contacted your employer after you notified the change of circs, then it is worth mentioning your voluntary notification albeit very late!

 

Its also worth being very sorry in the statement. Genuine remorse and full co operation can, in my experience, go a long way.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Benefits bod - I have to firmy agree with Jabba.

 

In a straightforward working and claiming case - if the IUC is attended and the overpayment is under "£2k then the case can be disposed of with either a caution or an ad pen. Caution if fully admitted and Ad Pen if not.

If the overpayment is in excess of £2k and it is clear from the IUC that a prosecution would not succeed then again it would be dealt with without recourse to the Courts. Either closed down with no sanction or an ad pen.

 

If someone refuses IUC then there is no option but to refer for prosecution (witness statements will be obtained from as many people as possible to support the case) or if the overpayment is believed to be substantial then the police will be asked to arrest and seach for evidence on behalf of the DWP/LA.

 

It is up to the individual which course of action they would prefer to take, but IN MY OPINION I cannot see what someone could possibly gain by refusing to be IUCd in circumstances as outlined by the OP.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

The other thing is the fact that you did eventually notify them yourself. HOWEVER, if this happened after they asked your employer for pay details, then it won't hold any weight, as they will just assume you acted to inform them once you thought you were under investigation. If they contacted your employer after you notified the change of circs, then it is worth mentioning your voluntary notification albeit very late!

 

 

I notified them in the same week as my Tax Credits Renewal because I completed and submitted my Tax Return so had the up to date figures. It appears they contacted my employer in the same week and perhaps on the same day so I can see they might think I reacted to this. Does this go against me in a major way?

 

I have just been in such a mess....normally I usually complete my tax Return on 6 April and renew my Tax credits as soon as the pack comes through but this year I have left everything so late and this is really unusual for me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

How did you get on? Have you been to the interview yet? I did speak with a benefit solicitor when I was in a similar situation as you. Luckily a friend had used him when he did have to go to court for benefit fraud, so gave me his number.

He did say IUC's can be a bad thing for someone with an obvious benefit fraud case, but not in this situation. In the obvious fraud ones he does advise people not to go, simply because that tape can make his job harder in court.

My IUC didn't end up with me going to court & my OP was more than yours. I didn't even have any mention of caution or penalties, but did have to pay it back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jadeybags,

 

The interview is tomorrow morning....yikes. I am going on my own and will take all my medical letters and things which support the fact that I have now been diagnosed with Multiple Sclerosis and also Anxiety and just hope for the best. I did not fail to disclose intentionally and will just tell them that. The officer did call me to re-arrange the interview and could tell that I was upset and said that I shouldn't worry too much, it was just because it was quite sizeable that someone like him gets involved - which did reassure a little.

 

I will post on tomorrow to update everyone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just wanted to wish you all the best for tomorrow. Haven't caught up with the thread and have missed all the debate. Which, tbh, I'm rather grateful for. My own personal view is to relax, go in there with an honest and open mind. Be truthful. (All this is far easier said then done!). The IUC is generally your first opportunity to actually see all the evidence that the DWP feel they have for their case. Don't forget that this is also your opportunity to ask questions on the record, this can and should be a two-way process. If they bring anything up that you are not expecting or cannot comment on with sufficient authority, don't be afraid to say so and ask for further time to look into what has been mentioned. Best wishes ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I'm back from the interview. It was quite harrowing to be honest - I just ended up sobbing throughout. There were two people there and to honestly they did try to put me at ease and gave me time to answer the questions.

 

I know they have a job to do but I couldn't help feeling a little intimidated. I found it hard to explain why my illness had impacted on the reason for not reporting the increase in wages sooner and they seemed to insinuate that because I was still working in my job and had not taken any time off sick, then this could perhaps be disputed :-( I offered them the contact details of my Neurologist but he said he didn't that was necessary.

 

When I mentioned about not telling them about the decrease in tax credits, he just said that that had actually decreased the level of overpayment so didn't seem bothered.

 

When I mentioned that I did actually call to report the change he said that they had already started the overpayment proceedings.

 

So, at the end, he said that because i had been so upset he would call me personally in the next few days to let me know what the decision is which he hopes will put my mind at rest a little.

 

I have come to the conclusion that I am NEVER claiming benefits again because I will be so scared of making the same mistake again and the thought of another IUC just terrifies me.

 

Thank you all for your advise and support so far (albeit a bit heated at times?!) x

Link to post
Share on other sites

....and as he promised he rang Friday to say that the council have decided to avoid court action but instead will deal with by way of a fine.

 

Although I think this is a little harsh considering my circumstances, I am happy it isn't going to court.

 

Thank you so much everyone for your helpful input in my case xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again.

 

I'm pleased you've managed to resolve this, even though it's not your ideal outcome. Thank you for letting us know, this could help future caggers who find themselves in the same position you were.

 

I'll change your thread title. :)

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...