Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • just to be clear here..... the DVLA do not send letters if a drivers licence address differs from any car's V5C that shows the same driver as it's registered keeper.
    • sorry she is a private individual, the cars are parking on her land. she can clamp the cars. only firms were outlawed from doing it bazza. thats what the victims of people dumping cars on their drives near airports did and they didn't not get prosecuted.    
    • The DVLA keeps two records of you. One as a driver and one for your car. If they differ you might find out in around a month when they will send you a reminder as well as to your other half for their car. If you receive nothing then you can be fairly sure that you were tailgating though wouldn't explain why they didn't pick up your car on one of drive past their cameras. However even if you do get a PCN later then your situation will not change. The current PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 which is the main law that covers private parking. It doesn't comply for two reasons. 1. Section 9 [2][a] states  (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The PCN states 47 minutes which are the arrival and departure times not the time you were actually parked. if you subtract the time you took to drive from the entrance. look for a parking place  park in it perhaps having to manoeuvre a couple of times to fit within the lines and unload the children reloading the children getting seat belts on  driving to the exit stopping for cars pedestrians on the way you may well find that the actual time you were parked was quite likely to be around ten minutes over the required time.  Motorists are allowed a MINIMUM of ten minutes Grace period [something that the rogues in the parking industry conveniently forget-the word minimum] . So it could be that you did not overstay. 2] Sectio9 [2][f]  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN does not include the words in brackets and in 2a the Act included the word "must". Another fail. What those failures mean is that MET cannot transfer the liability to pay the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable which is why we recommend our members not to appeal. It is so easy to reveal who was driving by saying "when I parked the car" than "when the driver parked the car".  As long as they don't know who was driving they have little chance of winning in court. This is partly because Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. And because anyone with a valid motor insurance policy is able to drive your cars. It is a shame that you are too far away to get photos of the car park signage. It is often poor and quite often the parking rogues lose in Court on their poor signage alone. I hope hat you can now relax and not panic about the PCN. You will receive many letters from Met, their unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors threatening you with ever higher amounts of money. The poor dears have never read the Act which states quite clearly that the maximum sum that can be charged is the amount on the signs. The Act has only been in force for 12 years so it may take a  few more years for the penny to drop.  You can safely ignore everything they send you unless or until they send you a Letter of Claim. Just come back to us if they do send one of those love letters to you and we will advise on a snotty letter to send them. In the meantime go on and enjoy your life. Continue reading other threads and if you do get any worrying letters let us know. 
    • Hopefully the ANPR cameras didn't pick up the two vehicles, but I don't think you're out of the woods just yet. MET's "work" consists of sending out hundreds of these invoices every week so yours might be a few days behind your partner's. There is also the matter of Royal Mail.  I once sold two second-hand books to someone on eBay.  Weirdly the cost of sending them separately was less than the cost of sending them in one parcel.  So to save a few bob I sent them seperately.  One turned up the next day.  One arrived after four days.  They were  sent from the same post office at the same time! But let's hope I'm being too pessimistic. Please update us of any developments.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Wrongly Issued Fare - What can I do?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4374 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I'm really distressed and in need of help. On my birthday I travelled from Worthing to London on a advance ticket purchased online. The ticket was only valid with a railcard. When I got on at Worthing station I had my railcard. Somewhere between getting on tot the platform and getting on to the train I misplaced my railcard. (Later it was retrieved by a guard at Worthing and given back to me)....

 

On te train up I didn't realise my railcard was gone... Only at Victoria did I notice my absnet railcard. My ticket was ripped up by the guard at Victoria and I had to purchase a new one.. I was also given a £55 fine which I appealed but this appeal was unsuccessful even after I produced my railcard and explained my extenuating circumstances.

 

They are now refusing to reply to furhter correspondence.. What should I do? I refuse to pay a fine I feel is totally unjust.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and welcome to CAG.

 

I'm not an industry expert and hope they will be able to get here soon, but maybe I could start things off?

 

It could be me misunderstanding, but why did the guard at Victoria rip up your ticket please? I could be wrong, but I didn't think you needed to show your railcard when you exited the train, or was this on the way back?

 

When you say you got a fine of £55, do you mean a Penalty Fare? Only a court can issue a fine.

 

You say they're refusing to answer further correspondence. How many letters have there been and where do things stand at the moment?

 

Finally, it may or may not help, but are you willing to tell us which rail company it is please?

 

I hope the guys will be able to tell you what to say, but from the limited knowledge I have from visiting this forum, refusal to pay a penalty fare without convincing the rail company that you didn't deserve it could end in something more serious for you.

 

As I said, I'm not an industry insider, so please wait for the experts.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Assuming you were issued a Penalty Fare for no supporting document then unfortunately the Pen Fare will stand as you did not show a valid railcard when requested. Unfortunately it is one of those things, if it isn't paid then the Penalty Fare would be cancelled and the matter reported for prosecution. Best thing you can do is pay the Pen Fare and put it down to experience. However, once you have paid it is certainly worth writing to the Train Operators customer services department and explaining your case providing the relevent proof and see what they say. I know it is easy for me to say "put it down to experience" from the outside but if it isn't dealt with it will just esculate and end up a lot worse. Unfortunately there are occasions when genuine cases like this (based on what you have told us) crop up but it is just unlucky, sorry I cant be the bearer of better news but the customer services avenue is worth exploring.

Views expressed in this forum by me are my own personal opinion and you take it on face value! I make any comments to the best of my knowledge but you take my advice at your own risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your replies guys..

 

Sorry I did mean penalty fare not fine.. When entering Victoria you have to provide your railcard with your ticket (at least I had to) and when I realised I'd left my railcard at Worthing Station my guard ripped up my ticket and made me buy a new one (£30) and issued me with a £55 penalty fare.

 

I think you're probably right and I will just have to pay it, i just find it so unfair that I had my ticket when I got on to the platform at Worthing and I bought a full price ticket at Victoria when it was apparent my railcard was not with me but I still got issued with a huge penalty fare!

 

I sent an initial appeal which was rejected, so I tried to write to them again and enclosed a complaints letter too but they just ignored my response (well that was 10 days ago and nothing back) and they won';t speak to me on the phone and it's near approaching 3 weeks since the fine was issued.

 

I just feel the whole thing is unjust because I went through the gates at Worthing WITH a railcard and it was a genuine mistake and the guy at Victoria was SO rude to me it had me in tears on my birthday (never nice!) and on the train up my ticket was checked and not my railkcard and if it had been at this earlier stage then maybe I wouldn't have had such a huge penalty fare!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again.

 

I agree, it does sound rather heavy-handed the way you tell it.

 

The problem could be that lots of people who have deliberately tried to circumvent the rules try to get out of it by blaming the member of staff, so they will have seen what you wrote many times, as I understand it from the guys here.

 

I would try what RPI suggests. Old CodJA is good at suggesting what to write, hopefully he will look in.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you travel with a railcard discounted ticket, you must have the railcard available at the time of travelling.

 

If you don't, then you are liable for a "No Supporting Document" Penalty Fare (if applicable), Byelaw 17/18 prosecution, or in some instances, a Regulation of Railways Act 1889 prosecution.

 

Unfourtunately, the appeal has been correctly rejected. It may be of some comfort to know that it could have been a lot worse for you if you had been reported for prosecution.

 

There is no need for any malice or "intent" to be shown.

 

Just put it down to experience, and be more careful next time.

 

(The attitute of the Revenue Protection Asst/Inspector is unfourtunately immaterial to your appeal)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just think for someone who HAD the railcard on the platform to be charged such a hefty fine and then be treated as some kind of criminal is utterly unfair and bullying. I understand lots of people travel without railcards knowingly and that's why the rules are there, but I think that paying an extra £30 for a new ticket (rightly so) and then a £55 for a genuine mistake is rather unfair.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again.

 

I agree, it does sound rather heavy-handed the way you tell it.

 

The problem could be that lots of people who have deliberately tried to circumvent the rules try to get out of it by blaming the member of staff, so they will have seen what you wrote many times, as I understand it from the guys here.

 

I would try what RPI suggests. Old CodJA is good at suggesting what to write, hopefully he will look in.

 

My best, HB

 

I have paid the fine now and will be doing this, thanks HB

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just think for someone who HAD the railcard on the platform to be charged such a hefty fine and then be treated as some kind of criminal is utterly unfair and bullying. I understand lots of people travel without railcards knowingly and that's why the rules are there, but I think that paying an extra £30 for a new ticket (rightly so) and then a £55 for a genuine mistake is rather unfair.

I can see why you will think it is unfair and ultimately it is unlucky however there are people out there who buy discounted tickets for their mates etc which is why the rules are so black and white, it's a fact of modern society that so many are dishonest that everybody gets tarred with the same brush. If you put a complaint letter in with your appeal then it won't have got to the TOC's customer service department as the appeals are dealt with independantly.

Views expressed in this forum by me are my own personal opinion and you take it on face value! I make any comments to the best of my knowledge but you take my advice at your own risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As others have said, unfortunately this charge can be justified under the rules however, we understand that will not help you from feeling hard done by. I can almost always find reasons to justify the staff action when the rules are followed, but I do have some sympathy in a situation like this.

 

'Fail to show' is the transgression in this instance, but I wouldn't lose all hope of getting some satisfaction in this case. If I were you, having paid the Penalty Fare, I would write to the Independent Penalty Fares Appeals Service and the Rail Company Customer Relations department along the following lines:

 

"Dear Sirs,

 

Reference Penalty Fare Notice Number XXXXXXXX

 

Whilst I accept that the penalty notice might be justified in a pure 'rules is rules' interpretation of the circumstances that occurred on (date), I ask that you consider that it might be deemed immoral to demand the penalty by completely ignoring the indisputable fact that anyone can make a purely human error. This is not an example of a traveller attempting to claim a discount to which they are not entitled, which is what rule 6 of the Conditions of issue & use of the Railcard seems designed to prevent.

 

I was not in breach of any rule at the start of my journey, I held and showed a valid rail ticket and valid rail card, but by human error, dropped the railcard somewhere en-route thereafter. Indeed, it can be said that the only reason that I was unable to physically show my railcard at Victoria was because it was already in the possession of the rail company representative on the train on which I travelled. This is evidenced by the fact that my valid Railcard was subsequently returned to me by the Rail Company.

 

I strongly urge that you return my penalty fare payment in full and whilst I accept that by strict interpretation of the rules, I was liable to pay for a new ticket and did do so, I might also be justified in requesting that you consider a refund of all or part of that sum too.

 

I am copying this letter to the Customer Relations department of the Rail Company and to Passenger Focus for their consideration. Please respond in writing as soon as practicable.

 

Yours faithfully

 

Etc..”

 

Contact details for Passenger Focus are: Email: [email protected]

 

The Passenger Focus helpline is open 8am – 8pm Monday – Friday and 8am – 4pm weekends.

 

Telephone: 0300 123 2350

 

Or you can write to:

Passenger Focus

FREEPOST (RRRE-ETTC-LEET)

PO BOX 4257

Manchester

M60 3AR

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Brownfra, I can only commiserate with you and hope that Passenger Focus can help you with this. I know from personal experience that it can feel like you've been mugged, with the added insult that the justice system is on their side. I've had my mobile stolen with threats and a penalty fare extracted with threats, the latter was worse. The rail penalty fares system, in the attempt to dissuade the intentional fare dodgers, causes misery to many ordinary law abiding people who fully accept that the train company deserve to be paid for the service they provide. I know someone who on one occasion did not buy a ticket because she was unable to for very good reasons, but in the end it was her word against theirs and she received a criminal conviction. I've twice fallen victim, genuinely believing that I had a valid ticket for the journey and in circustances which made it pretty transparent that I did not intend to avoid paying. It's not about justice, it's about the rules which are firmly written in favour of the train operators. Write to your MP, questions have been asked in parliament and the Lords about the system, one day it may change. Until then, take the car.

 

Would anyone care to disagree? I'd be genuinely interested to hear a defence of the system as it works. I've tried to get this from a number of train operator customer service people, but without success.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you were travelling on a small branch line and you had made a genuine mistake it may well be that the staff would of been more sympathetic and helpful, unfortunatley the staff in lonmdon (both TOC's and TfL) are so used to fare evasion that they become like robots and act accordingly, i believe there was even an incident involving Ken Livingstone when he was major and therefore head of TfL when there was some problem with his ticket and he had a moan at how the staff dealt with it.

 

Maybe the situation would be differenet if people didnt accept the penalty fare and choose to fight it out in court ?

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...