Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • you mean you did aos on mcol yes? pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’.  Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time.  You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID.  You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.<<**IMPORTANT**  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim type your name ONLY no need to sign anything .you DO NOT await the return of paperwork. you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.   dx  
    • The Letter of Claim information is not absolutely essential, but it would be useful for two reasons. Firstly, judges take a dim view of companies or individuals who rush to court without giving the other party notice and a chance to settle - the Letter of Claim.  If they didn't send it we could include this point in your defence and it would be detrimental to them. Secondly, we know Countrywide.  They are a very small cowboy company.  The are reluctant to do court, simply becasue they are very bad  at it.  Their record of beating Caggers in front of a judge is exactly 0%.  They have lost every time.  They send the Letter of Claim also to look for people who don't reply, thinking that the person might not reply to a claim form either, giving them an easy default win.  Conclusion - always best to reply to a Letter of Claim and ridicule the PPC's case.
    • Any update here? I ask as we have someone in a similar situation.
    • It's possible.   I suffer from ADHD and also anxiety and depression currently and struggle with paperwork.  I'll have a search around to see if i can find anything.  If they did send something I haven't replied.   I thought there's no way that they will pursue this because I know for a fact i didn't park in a private space and the evidence they have sent is so ridiculous.   What impact does this other paperwork have? Thanks!   I already sent the acknowledgement as i panicked and thought today was the last day to respond.   Then i remembered this wonderful forum.  I'll follow the steps in the sticky next.
    • The particulars of claim doesn’t mention statement of accounts.  Should I include that in the cpr letter?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CapQuest chasing 1999 abbey Overdraft - Court Claim Received


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 377 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

They get away with it because nobody bothers to report it as it is very hard to prove.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...
  • Replies 258
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

It has been a while since last writing in this thread but

 

today I have received a letter from a company called Past Due Credit Solutions saying they have been appointed by CapQuest to recover the outstanding amount.

 

Seems to be a fairly standard looking letter which gives me options on how to pay the amount.

 

I remember somewhere in this thread someone said that by November of this year the debt will be statue barred or something?

 

Any advice on what to do regarding this latest letter would be greatly appreciated.

 

I haven't heard a thing from CapQuest in months then all of a sudden this letter appears today.

 

x

Link to post
Share on other sites

PDC can safely be ignored.

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hi everyone, I had hoped this situation had died given that I have had no correspondence (save for a few phone calls which I have not answered) from CapQuest since my last post in August last year. But today I received the following letter:

 

Dear XXXXXXX

 

We need to discuss your account.

 

Account Purchased from: XXXXXXXX

Account No: XXXXXXXX

How much you owe: £XXXX.XX

 

We’ve written to you in the past to talk about your outstanding balance. Unfortunately you’ve not resolved your account. Our next step is to send your account to a specialist collection partner for further action.

 

How to stop this action:

 

To avoid this action you need to contact us by 16th September. We can work with you to reach a repayment plan that you can afford. We’ll only take further action if we can’t reach a solution with you. To explore your options:

 

Call us on 0333 999 7201. Your operator standard charges appy.

Email us on [email protected]

Write to us at Templer, Templer Avenue etc

Visit our website

If you want to seek free independent advice, you can find further details overleaf.

 

We look forward to hearing from you. We’re here to help.

 

Your sincerely,

 

Collections Department

 

What should I do?

This has been going on for so long now I cannot even remember when it all started :(

 

Should I just contact them and make arrangements to pay or should I take another course of action?

 

It seems that they are not giving up and just when I finally feel like I'm regaining some kind of financial control over my life,

 

the above letter arrives and I feel like I'm back at square one :(

 

Any help and advice would be very much appreciated.

 

x

Link to post
Share on other sites

simple willy waving

 

 

IGNORE THEM

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hahaha "willy waving" that made me laugh :) Thank you dx.

 

 

What I am worried most about it them sending people round to the house,

that would just stress me out too much and stress is not good for my current health state x

Link to post
Share on other sites

forget not the golden rule

 

a DCA IS NOT A BAILLIFF

 

and has

NO SUCH LEGAL POWERS.

 

doorsteppers Dca are the same

 

go away or i'll call the police

 

end of!

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Theyll always try to catch a mug out

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

going from the start of this thread a few years yet

because the OP was blindly paying them...

 

it was an abbey current account with overdraft

which is 99% charges

 

I think the main thing is

sadly

the op was encouraged over 3yrs to keep stupid letter tennis going.

so they think a mug still awaits fleecing.

 

time to ignore them

until/unless they issue a claimform

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Hi again :( I have today received the following letter from Drydensfairfax Solicitors:

 

"Dear Madam,

 

We are instructed by out client, CapQuest, to commence legal proceedings against you in the county court if you do not provide proposals for repayment of this debt within 14 days of the date of this letter (29th Feb).

 

It is not too late to stop the claim being issues. Please call us and we'll discuss an affordable arrangement with you, we won't ask you to pay more than you can afford. Alternatiely you can email collections or wtite to us at the address below. If we do not receive clear proposals to pay this debt by 14th March a claim will be issued.

 

We are required by court rules to provide you with certain information prior to issuing proceedings:

 

The claimant will be CapQuest who own the account.

We will tell the court that you made a credit agreement with Santander Group bt failed to repay it. We will explain that your account was then sold to CapQuest.

The claim will be for the outstanding balance on your account £xxxx.xx.

If you disput the claim, we are willing to try to resolve that dispute without going to court and we will be happy to discuss this with you or your representative.

We think it is reasonable to ask you to respond to this letter by 14th March. If you need longer please let us know.

If you don't comply with the Practice Direction which will be provided by the court to you, the court can impost sanctions against you and this may increase your liability costs.

You can make payments in a variety of eans that are show on the back of this letter.

If you need advice about this letter you should seek independent legal advice.

 

Please do not hesitate to contact us if you would like to discuss this matter."

 

I have only just returned to work (last week) after suffering a second brain haemorrhage in October last year. I am on reduced hours and am being monitored by the neuro hospital for life. My health is not too good and I am trying to not get stressed out about this, but I really don't know what to do about this now.

 

Any advice would, as always, be extremely appreciated, I feel like this is a weight around my neck :( x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wait for the claim form...and we will take it from there.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

how can they do that?

its not even been to court

and you've not lost

and refused to pay.

 

 

a DCA is NOT A BAILIFF

and never can be

 

 

that's a std threat-o-gram

read it properly

doesn't say will anything

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

we'll be old and grey first

and pigs cant fly me thinks

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

Thread moved to the Financial Legal Issues.

 

If you could read the following link LilMissM and then copy and paste your responses back here

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?419198-You-have-received-a-Claim-What-you-need-to-do.-**UPDATED-December-2014**

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

did you ever get that sar sent to Santander

and get ALL the statements.

I now suspect that this debt was already statute barred when you started paying

the DCA all those years ago

before that, when was your last payment to abbey was.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Name of the Claimant ? Capquest Investments Limited

 

Date of issue - 25 March 2016

 

 

Date to file defence = 26th April

 

What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim?

 

1. The claim is for the sum of £1,283.20 in respect of monies owing by the defendant on a credit agreement held by the defendant with Santander Group under account number XXXXXXXX upon which the defendant failed to maintain payments.

 

2. A default notice was served upon the defendant and has not been complied with.

 

3. By virtue of a sale agreement between Santander Group and the claimant, the claim vested in the claimant who has a genuine commercial interest. The defendant has been notified of the assignment by letter.

What is the value of the claim? £1283.20

 

Is the claim for a current account (Overdraft) or credit/loan account or mobile phone account? Overdraft I think

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? No idea

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Debt purchaser I think.

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? I have no such document.

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Not that I can remember.

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? No

 

Why did you cease payments? I cannot remember.

 

What was the date of your last payment? I cannot remember. I think sometime in 2012 maybe.

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? I think so.

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor

and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No debt management plan that I can remember.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a letter from Capquest dated 8th March 2011 thanking me for setting up a direct debit

and the date of the first collection was 27th March 2011.

 

I also have a copy of a letter from Abbey dated 14th July 2009

saying that on 3rd July 2009 my account was sold (by way of assignment) to Capquest

(the copy letter was given to me by Capquest.)

 

Their letter dated 12th July 2012 states

 

"We can confirm that we have requested statements for the above account

and these will be forwarded to you when received."

But I never received them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

post 59 says:

 

 

I have today received a letter from CapQuest as follows:

 

"Further to your recent correspondence and in order to process your communication further, we would request you provide the following information by 19th August to assist us in resolving this matter: Details of residence at time this account was opened: 30/04/1999. Your assistance would be greatly appreciated. Please note that this is not a demand but a request."

 

Surely they would already have this information? x

 

I am wondering if you paid anything off this debt in the 6yrs preceding 27th March 2011

cause if you didn't the debt was statute barred before you started paying CQ then

and ofcourse will still be SB 'd now, regardless to your payments from 27th March 2011

 

on the offchance

id got ring Santander tomorrow and ask.

cause if they have no data

then bottom dollar CQ wont be able to prove its NOT sb'd

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...