Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • is the home in joint names but this is solely your debt? need far more history to be able to comment if it's paid off and was not just written of by one partly on their books and sold to anther, thus the cra file says £0. dx
    • So, Sunak has managed to get someone to 'volunteer to go to Rwanda hasn't he? .. for just £3000 payment to the person plus 5 years free board and lodging isnt it? - cost to UK taxpayer over £300M+ (300 million quid+) isnt it? - Bargain says Rwanda, especially with all the profit we made privately selling those luxury chalets Bravermann advertised for us   I wonder how many brits would jump at that offer? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Lets see, up to 5 years free board and lodging and £3k in my pocket .. I'd go - and like that person - just come back if/when I get bored. First job - off to Botswana for a week to see the elephants.   Of course the paid volunteers going to Botswana are meaningless - Rwanda have REPEATEDLY said they wont take any forcibly trafficked people in breach of international law eh? Have the poops actually got any civil servants to agree to go yet - probably end up as more massive payments to VIPal contractors to go and sit there doing nowt shortly eh?    
    • Hi Wondered if I could get a little advise please. I entered into a commercial lease (3 years) and within a few months I had to leave as the business I was trading with collapsed. I returned the keys to the landlord and explained the situation and no money, also likely to go on benefits but the landlord stuck to their guns. They have now instructed solicitors to send letter before action claiming just over £4000. The lease was mine and so the debt. I know this. I have emailed the solicitors twice to explain I am out of work and that with help from family I could offer a full and final settlement figure of £1500 or £10pw. This was countered by them with an offer to reduce the debt by £400, or pay off the amount over 12 months. I went back with an improved full and final offer of £2500 or £20pw. This has been rejected with the comment 'papers ready to go to court'. I have no hope of paying the £4000 and so it will have to go to court. Pity as I have no debts otherwise but not working is a killer. I wondered if they take me to court, could I ask for mediation? I also think that taking me to court will result in a pretty much nothing per week payment from my benefits. Are companies just pushing ahead with action even if a better offer is on the table? Thanks for your help.
    • Hi all, Many thanks for the advice! Unfortunately, the reply to the email was as expected…   Starbucks UK Customer Care <[email protected]> Hi xxxxxx, We are sorry to read you received a parking charge after using our Stansted Airport - A120 DT store. Unfortunately, the car park here is managed by MET parking. Both Starbucks and EuroGarages who own and operate this site are not able to help and have no authority to overturn any parking charges received. If you have followed the below terms then you would need to send all correspondence to [email protected], who will be able to assist you further. Several signs around the car park clarify the below terms and conditions: • Maximum stay 60 minutes, whilst the store is open. If the store is closed, pay to park applies. • The car park is for Starbucks customers only who make a purchase in our store, a charge will be issued if you left the site. • If you had made a purchase and required additional time, you must have inputted your registration number into the in store iPad which would have extended your stay up to 3 hours • To park in a disabled bay, you must have displayed a valid disabled badge. • If Starbucks was closed, you must have paid for parking as charges still apply, following signage located on site. • If you didn’t use the store, you must have paid for parking, following signage located on site Please ensure all further correspondence is directed to MET parking at the above email address, and accept our apologies that we cannot help you further on this matter.  Kind Regards,  Lora K  Customer Care Team Leader Starbucks Coffee Company, Building 4 Chiswick Park, London, W4 5YE
    • Thanks HB edited and re-uploaded. Thanks for the heads up 👍
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4357 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Help and advice needed please. My daughter's partner was pulled over by the police in January for not wearing a seat belt, instead of paying the fine he attended a Road Safety Educational Presentation - as such his Fixed Penalty Notice was cancelled. He has written evidence from Essex Police to confirm this as indeed in this letter they quote "As such, I can confirm that no further action will be taken against you in relation to this offence".

 

A letter from Marstons was received on 2nd May asking for £215 for non payment of this offence, stating that they had a Magistrates Court Order and if payment not met in full they would attend 7 days later. The police advised to send copy of letter from Essex Police to Marstons, which was done via e-mail and was told if they called again in the meantime to show them a copy of this letter.

 

Now, today they have called again asking for just under £400 and have left another letter to this effect. Will obviously ring Police again but need to know if there is anything else to do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Marstons do have a problem as most of their Bailiffs failed English and they have not yet learned joined up writing. I suggest you try the Magistrates Court where this originated and find out what has happened.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, i thought if you had the option to attend a course, they would waive the 3 points on the license and you had to pay the fine all the same. Im not 100% sure but when my old man got done for speeding he did the awareness course had the points waived but had to pay the fine which was the fee for the course itself

None of the beliefs held by "Freemen on the land" have ever been supported by any judgments or verdicts in any criminal or civil court cases.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, will do this on Monday. My daughter did phone him and he said he was going to come back tomorrow and that in his opinion the Court would make him pay and that it would probably be better if they paid Marston and then claim it back. Obviously we said noooooooooo, her partner is working away at the moment and will not be back for another month, she has a 15 month baby and is 4 months pregnant, I call this harrassment. He added, he did understand and because he is a nice guy and understands (of course he does) he will wait till next week.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would suggest that not only do you send a copy of the letter to Marstons but a letter with a copy to the magistrates court, addressed to the Court Manager.

Meanwhile as long as Marstons do not get entry to your home or be able to perform a levy on goods outside your home (car/s) they are toothless. there is no law that says you must speak or deal with a baillif, they cannot break into your home, employ locksmiths, arrest you take your kids into care or auction your grannies false teeth.

 

WD

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, no court papers have been issued, simply that if payment is not made then he will be liable for substantial costs. Marstons had a copy of Police letter on 8th May.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to add on the bailiffs paperwork in written pen added by the bailiff it says "client - Southend Magistrates Court" but no court papers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, will do this on Monday. My daughter did phone him and he said he was going to come back tomorrow and that in his opinion the Court would make him pay and that it would probably be better if they paid Marston and then claim it back. Obviously we said noooooooooo, her partner is working away at the moment and will not be back for another month, she has a 15 month baby and is 4 months pregnant, I call this harrassment. He added, he did understand and because he is a nice guy and understands (of course he does) he will wait till next week.

 

In this condition in my view she would be classed as vulnerable and all enforcement agencies have signed up to abide by the National Standards for Enforcement Agents. To claim this however proof of the vulnerability should be sent to the Bailiffs. I would suggest write a letter and send by email outlining she is a mother of a young child with another on the way, proof may be obtained from her midwife which may be sent ASAP afterwards. http://www.justice.gov.uk/downloads/courts/bailiffs-enforcement-officers/national-standards-enforcement-agents.pdf Page 9 applies

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just something to bear in mind, if she attended a course there would likely be a fee to be paid, not as high as a fine, but if this wasn't paid, then they might have set the dogs from marstons on her for this fee. Just looking at a possibilities. once the clowns at marstons have it they will ramp up fees ad infinitum. Agree ploddertom, OP must indicate to magistrates that she is likely vulnerable, and why are the dogs loose when she attended a course to avoid the fine.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

if she attended a course there would likely be a fee to be paid,

 

I attended a speed awareness course last year, this avoided the 3 points but the fee was higher than the fine by about £20. Also it had to be paid in advance before the course.

So if the course was taken, it's paid.

Illegitimi non carborundum

Link to post
Share on other sites

The course was run by Essex County Council - as far as I am aware there was no fine imposed - the letter states that by attending course and submitting fixed penalty notice it has disposed the offence.

 

The thing that alarms me is that the Bailiff was quoting Southend County Court - when there are no court papers. Also, he has asked her to ring him on Monday to let him know if she is paying or not and that he could not take a part payment - payment had to be made in full.:mad2:

Link to post
Share on other sites

The course was run by Essex County Council - as far as I am aware there was no fine imposed - the letter states that by attending course and submitting fixed penalty notice it has disposed the offence.

 

The thing that alarms me is that the Bailiff was quoting Southend County Court - when there are no court papers. Also, he has asked her to ring him on Monday to let him know if she is paying or not and that he could not take a part payment - payment had to be made in full.:mad2:

 

Perhaps Essex CC charged a fee for the course which was overlooked, or you weren't informed or given a bill, hasn't been paid, so went for a CCJ, and sent the bailiff.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is always the case that the magistrate court MUST send your partner a Further Steps Notice BEFORE they issue a Distress Warrant. All enquiries concerning this matter should be referred to the Court and NOT Marston Group. Unless they are instructed otherwise, they have to enforce the warrant.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...