Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Paint is a free programme on any Windows PC. But don't worry, the choice here is not either perfection or nothing. As you say, use your scanner, save the file ... and then use the "choose files" option when you post to CAG to add the file. We can do all the redacting and converting to the correct file type at this end.  The important thing is just to get the info to us. Why not do an experiment this afternoon and see if the above works?  
    • I see they're trying to round up asylum seekers and lock them up for about three months so they can be put on planes to Rwanda. I'm a bit surprised that this is legal.  
    • thought for the day "Prime ministers need a big strategy that tells you where you’re going, you need a bunch of tactics that get you there, and you need the ability to take everybody else with you."   Now I know you are all thinking 'why is the  UKs destination Rwanda ???
    • Asset Link filed for a default CCJ against me, in relation to an old Barclaycard debt which I apparently signed an agreement for back in 2000.   I did not own a Barclaycard in 2000 so I know this is not true.  The CCJ notice was sent to an old address so I did not receive it.  Years later when I found out about the CCJ when I applied for credit, I put an application in to have the CCJ set aside.   As part of the set aside case, I was asked by the judge to provide a draft defence, should the CCJ be set aside.   The defence I provided was that I did not admit to the debt as I had not been provided with any evidence of an original loan agreement.   I won the case and the CCJ was set aside.   Link then filed to court again to make me pay the debt.   We both filed directions questionnaires and the judge allocated the claim to the small claims track.   As part of the directions, additional directions given were as follows ' Additional Directions in a claim for an Assigned Debt - Because the claim is in respect of an assigned debt the Court makes the following directions for the management of claim.  The claim shall be automatically struck out at 4pm on 3 April 2024 unless, before that time, the Claimant delivers to the Court and to the Defendant the following documents'  It then listed various documents such as an original agreement, deed of assignment, notice of default, statement of account setting out how the alleged debt accrued under that agreement etc.     The Claimant failed to provide these documents within the deadline provided and instead I received a copy of a bundle of documents provided by them in preparation for the court date, this was received weeks after the deadline.    I have called the Court to ask if it has been automatically struck out and they advised that it is not automatic and that I should still send my witness statement by the deadline provided, which is Wednesday.  This does not give me much time to prepare my witness statement.   I have never done anything like this before and I am unclear what my witness statement should include.  My thoughts were that I should keep it simple and stick to the facts, like the fact thy have not provided evidence of the original agreement, or the deed of assignment of the debt.   They have provided a copy of a default notice from Baclaycard dated 2015, this states a figure of £550 but the debt they say I owe is £10k.   I am not sure what makes a valid default notice?   I have previously requested proof of the debt from Barclaycard directly and have evidence of emails between us where they have been unable to provide me with the agreement or any documents at all relating to the debt.   Should I include these as an appendix?  Are there any other documents I should include in my bundle?    I have also tried to mediate with the claimants, to save the court costs and time, on a without prejudice basis, but the claimants solicitors refused to mediate.   Should i state this in my witness statement too to show the judge that I have been reasonable and they haven't? Many thanks   Louise
    • Right that's exactly why so many drivers got caught, it had been that way for many years then suddenly changes with no warning
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4362 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I hope somebody can help me out.

 

A few years back I developed clinical depression with a side order of anxiety and after losing my job I stupidly ignored bills including rent and council tax. I am in a strange position in that my Housing Benefit is provided by Portsmouth City Council, and my Council Tax Benefit is through Havant Borough Council.

 

 

PCC were really good and came to an arrangement for the arrears which I am sticking to and are nearly clear. HBC, however refused my offers of payment and took me to court in my absence, obtaining an order which garnished my benefits.

 

 

The slightly complicated part is that the arrears owed were over two financial years, and they could only take payments on one arrears account at a time. It seems that now the first amount is paid off they are pursuing me separately for the second arrears, amounting to £165.11.

 

This is conjecture on my part, as the first I heard of this was when an arrears notice was posted through my door yesterday with an added first visit charge of £24.50 from the good people at Ross and Roberts.

 

 

After receiving this, I did some research about bailiff powers online and have the following concerns and queries.

 

 

Can a bailiff attend my property without first sending me a demand for the arrears? - Unfortunately previous paperwork from the original debt has been lost, though there was bailiff correspondence at the time, would this be grounds for springing the visit on me with no warning four or five years after the original trouble which was settled when the garnishing of my benefits was ordered?

 

 

Do they have to give notice of a visit? - They gave no notice. Also I believe they used a well known [problem] of posting the letter without knocking in order to generate a second visit and extra fees.

 

I have no wish to deal with this company. I phoned their bailiff, a charmer by the name of A. Russell-Smith telling him that I had cause to believe that the arrears were being garnished from my benefits and that I was disputing their action, to which he replied that I owed the money, pay up. I then told him that as far as I was aware, he had no right to visit without first giving me notice of an enforcement visit.

 

He said that was not the case, and he could come any time he wished. I replied that I had read the advice on the YouGov site, and this was not the case. He said it was. I then told him that I was on ESA for anxiety and depression, and that I wished to be treated as a vulnerable debtor, to which he just snorted.

 

Unfortunately, I then lost my temper and told him to p**s off and put the phone down. He then rang me back and I refused the call, but he persisted. Ao I answered, saying that he was harassing me and that I would be complaining, told him to p**s off again and blocked his phone number.

 

So that's the situation, and I need advice. I should state that I freely admit liability of the debt and wish to repay it, but to the council, so is there any way I can get this debt back to them to make repayments without them making crippling demands.

 

Sorry if it's a bit complicated and long-winded, but I really need some advice. I am sitting in dread waiting for them to come back and harass me, and just want this nightmare over. Thanks.

Edited by citizenB
formatted for easier reading
Link to post
Share on other sites

Contact Havant Borough Council about this and ask for their help. Explain about any health issues that make you vulnerable.

 

Sounds like HBC have obtained a liability order on a mass list. The councils are basically issuing these on behalf of magistrates courts and just getting the list rubber stamped. Often people on the list, have no idea that they have been taken to court.

 

If you don't get the help you need from HBC, book an urgent appointment at your nearest Citizens Advice bureau.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi thanks for replying.

 

HBC finally got back to me after I rang and complained. They originally said that they had sent me a letter to say that the payments from the DWP had stopped, that they had then sent me a letter which I had ignored so they had instructed the bailiffs to commence action.

 

I disputed this, I have received nothing from them so they dug a little deeper and said that actually the payments had been made as usual, and they didn't know why I had been contacted.

 

Naturally I'm delighted that this is the case, and that they have instructed these parasites to desist. However I'm utterly peed off to be treated like this and after complaining strongly, I received a half hearted apology which I told them they could stick where the sun doesn't shine. So they are now sending me a letter saying that I am not behind on these payments and that they have called the account back from the bailiffs.

 

And these morons claim to govern us? :mad2:

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is indeed a classic example for the CEO of the Council to be sent a Formal Complaint..I would further that by sending a copy to your MP along with the letter that says 'oops made a mistake' There must be thousands of people receiving the same treatment as you have experienced and it begs the question how many of these poor souls have simply paid up to bailiffs without question? Here is your chance to make HBC aware they do not run a proficient ship and never will do with Capita/aka Equita /aka Ross and Robbers at the helm.

 

WD

Link to post
Share on other sites

I shall certainly make an appointment to see my local councillor, not so much to try and gain compensation, but so that they can revise their working practices.

I am still fuming mad as my girlfriend sometimes feeds my cat and there's no way I want her to come into my flat and find a letter from a bailiff that wasn't even in an envelope. Or even worse, to let one of these people into my flat, because once they're in they can come in anytime, and though I was safe on this occasion from this experience of their working practices the thought fills me with outrage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is definitely a cause to complain, yet again another mistake from a council, again putting a person under undue stress. Take your complaint as high as it will go. we can help advise as and when.

keep us informed. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...