Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Esa / jsa


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4335 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

Came across this forum while trying to find info. Some great info/links here, thank you. I am still a little uncertain about steps in the process, so hope you don't mind my asking?

 

I have been on long term IB (depression/anxiety) and had the interview with ATOS for ESA at the beginning of the week. As they did not actually ask any questions about my illness, I can only presume I will be yet another classed as work_shy and need to get a job.

 

I have read about the appeal process, but need a little more clarity.

If I receive no points (or not enough points) and ESA claim rejected by letter, will I also receive (with that letter) the forms for the appeal at the same time? Would I first need to ask the reasons for the rejection? Would I need to get a medical sick_note from the date of the ESA rejection letter?

 

If I was to decide to go and sign on for JSA, I believe there is a waiting time period before claim can be made, what is that time period now? If the letter concerning the failed ESA was, for example, received by me 5 days after date on letter, would I also lose that time period for any benefit?

 

Sorry if this as been covered some where, I have looked, but am getting more confused the more I read.

 

Thanks for any help,

 

Regards,

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi,

Speaking from experience when I have recieved the news that I have not been awarded enough points for ESA they have not included the relevant form, I have phoned them and requested a form and a copy of the the assessment report and yes I would get a fit note from your GP.

 

Hope this helps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Thanks for the reply.

 

A "fit note", is that what they call them now? I do not have much confidence in doctors these days and currently avoid them when possible.

 

I did find a link in another thread showing the descriptors for ESA. If ATOS entered the info correctly, then I should be placed in a support group, but I think, going from what I have seen posted, I doubt ATOS put down what was said.

 

I will wait and see, while climbing the walls and panicking about anything and nothing, as I usually do these days.

 

Regards,

 

d'n'o

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you go from ESA to JSA you don't get paid for the first 3 days of your claim. They said it counts as a new claim. When i changed from ESA to JSA they deducted the first two weeks payment and the signing on day became the day i would have received ESA payment, so now my payment day is three days later than what it was. I rang them to complain about the lost first two weeks payment but they said all payments were correct.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you appeal ESA you can stay on ESA. You just need to tell the processing centre that you plan to appeal.

 

If you choose to claim JSA then there is no period to wait. A backdated claim should be made when there is a gap between the end of the ESA claim and the actual letter which is sent to confirm it. These are good grounds for a backdated claim to be allowed.

 

When you transfer from ESA to JSA you do not have the three waiting days. This is only for completely new claims.

 

Astro1,

 

When i changed from ESA to JSA they deducted the first two weeks payment and the signing on day became the day i would have received ESA payment, so now my payment day is three days later than what it was.

 

This looks at first glance like you have lost money but the change of day makes it look like you have lost out. I don't have your records in front of me, of course, but if they say that all payments are correct that usually means that the payments have been right from the claim date up to date. If you don't understand what they say or want confirmation then contact them again or write to them requesting clarification.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Thanks for the reply,

 

Don't presume. If you have not received a letter then contact them to check your IB claim has been closed.
But my IB will already be closed won't it? I am waiting to see if I get ESA

 

 

This can slow down JSA claim processing
Having to go on JSA is certainly a probability. If so, I think I would prefer to wait a few weeks before I find out. As you mentioned earlier in the thread, I will be able to get it back-dated.

 

Regards,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your IB isn't automatically closed if you make a new claim for another benefit. You may need to put this in writing or confirm it over the phone.

 

You should understand that waiting a few weeks after you know about the stop of IB is not the same as what I said earlier where you are given, for want of a better word, grace, because you were unable to claim earlier because you literally did not know of the decision. Also, no back-dated claim is a given and I would urge you to make the claim ASAP if that is what you intend to do..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your IB isn't automatically closed if you make a new claim for another benefit. You may need to put this in writing or confirm it over the phone.

I have just been searching. I will receive my current benefit until my claim is reassessed (source DWP website)

 

You should understand that waiting a few weeks after you know about the stop of IB is not the same as what I said earlier where you are given, for want of a better word, grace, because you were unable to claim earlier because you literally did not know of the decision. Also, no back-dated claim is a given and I would urge you to make the claim ASAP if that is what you intend to do..
I will not know the decision until they have made it. So why would I make a claim for JSA without written confirmation that that is something I need to do? Are you putting forward it is my responsibility to find out myself if I failed ESA? You stated earlier:-
the end of the ESA claim and the actual letter which is sent to confirm it
Which puts forward receiving a letter, not my phoning for verbal confirmation.

 

.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you will stay on IB untill they have decided the result of the medical.

they will write and notifiy you, that you have passed or failed.

 

Your IB will cease, If passed the day after IB ceases you will transfer over to ESA, whatever group.

 

If failed then you can apppeal if you disagree, or claim JSA, if you agree with the decision.

There should be no gaps in your benefit.

 

I think you may have taken Insyders answers out of context....

good luck with your result :)

Edited by MIKEY DABODEE
Link to post
Share on other sites

you will stay on IB untill they have decided the result of the medical.

they will write and notifiy you, that you have passed or failed.

 

Your IB will cease, If passed the day after IB ceases you will transfer over to ESA, whatever group.

 

If failed then you can apppeal if you disagree, or claim JSA, if you agree with the decision.

There should be no gaps in your benefit.

 

 

Thanks for the reply.

 

Sorry for my delay in reply, have not been too good.

 

I will wait for either IB to stop going into bank, or until I get confirmation of change, whatever the result may be. I just need to stop worrying, as I am in hospital next week for another check up, so a little concerned with that. The last time I went, they kept me in for a week due to dangerously low blood oxygen level.

 

Take care,

 

Regards,

Link to post
Share on other sites

so sorry to hear you have not been to good.

You will get notification from ESA about the transfer and whether you have passed your medical, fingers crossed you will,.

You could always ring your BDC Monday, ask for a calll back of IB to confirm the date your IB will cease.

This will then give you the heads up to when your ESA will start.

Its always the next working day.

maybe if you ring Monday then you will know before hospital,

save you stressing,

Good Luck at the hospital...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mikey,

 

Sorry, I should of updated my thread.

 

maybe if you ring Monday then you will know before hospital, save you stressing,

I do not really like to ring them, as I do not have a means to record. I prefer the paper trail. However, I did receive a phone call earlier in the week, which stated I am now in the WRAG. I am now awaiting the letter for confirmation of what was put forward.

Good Luck at the hospital...
Thanks. I am hoping all is well, or should I say, not worse than before.

 

Regards,

Edited by down'n'out
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mikey,

 

I could appeal, but I would really like to get back into work. Unfortunately I do not believe that the WRAG is set up to actually help those with health issues, but only to try and force those into some form of WP.

I am finding conflicting info concerning the rights(or lack of rights) of those on WRAG. As what I am seeing (possibly having to take unpaid work) is going against the regulations 2011 with no sign (that I can currently find) of change in those regulations since then concerning the WRAG and WP.

 

I have no doubt I will be finding out personally over the coming months, all of which I will be documenting.

At least I am not just feeling ill now, I am also feeling quite angry.

 

What joy to have such a caring government.

 

 

Regards,

Edited by down'n'out
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mikey,

 

I have been going through the letter confirming my transfer from IB to ESA(wrag). But I am not on ESA(wrag) until next month. I am still on IB until then.

I have read the letter a few times. One point that jumps out at me:-

You are required to attend and take part in work-focused interviews as a condition of continuing to receive benefit. If you do not attend or participate in a work-focused interview your benefit may be reduced.

However work-focused interviews may be deferred if there are good reasons as to why it is not appropriate or of no assistance at that time

I believe it will be of no assistance at any time. So no work-focused interviews. :roll:
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Thought an update.

I sent off for the "reasons for decision". Those arrived a week later.

The report from ATOS, it is quite accurate from what I remember. There are some additions, such as me walking 20 meters in the examination room, transferring between seats, which never happened.

When I phoned asking to be sent the report, I asked how long I was on WRAG, I was told there would be a review, with another WCA in 6 months. On the Medical report (medical report from ATOS, lol), it states that I am unlikely to return to work in the longer term and advises that a return to work is unlikely for at least 2 years. So not sure why another WCA in 6 months.

Oh well,......

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

 

If I asked for help to, or just started to look for work (while on WRAG), would I need to change to JSA?

If I did find work but then found I could not continue, would I be able to go back on ESA(wrag), or would I be on JSA, or possibly sanctioned if I lost job due to missing days/being late(due to illness)? or just could not manage and had to leave?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

 

If I asked for help to, or just started to look for work (while on WRAG), would I need to change to JSA?

If I did find work but then found I could not continue, would I be able to go back on ESA(wrag), or would I be on JSA, or possibly sanctioned if I lost job due to missing days/being late(due to illness)? or just could not manage and had to leave?

 

No, you are encouraged to look for whatever work (if any) you can do while you are in the WRAG, so you would stay on ESA. If you find work but aren't sure if you can do it, you could consider the Permitted Work scheme. This allows you to work and claim ESA at the same time. You keep your wages and your benefits, and there's no penalty if it doesn't work out and you have to stop.

 

The short version of the rules: you can, for 1 year, work up to 16 hours per week and earn up to £95 or so; or you can work up to 5 hours per week for as long as you want, earning up to, I think, about £25. In either case you would need to earn NMW, submit payslips and obtain permission in advance. This is available to any ESA claimant - assessment phase, WRAG or Support Group.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...