Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for your reply, I have another 3 weeks before the notice ends. I'm also concerned because the property has detoriated since I've been here due to mould, damp and rusting (which I've never seen in a property before) rusty hinges and other damage to the front door caused by damp and mould, I'm concerned they could try and charge me for damages? There was no inventory when I moved in, I also didn't have to pay a deposit. I've also been told that if I leave before a possession order is given I would be deemed intentionally homeless, is this true? My daughter doesn't live with me, I'd likely have medical priority as I have health issues and I'm on pip etc.      
    • extension? you mean enforcement. after 6yrs its very rare for a judge to allow enforcement. it wont have been sold on, just passed around the various differing trading names the claimant uses.    
    • You believe you have cast iron evidence. However, all they’d have to do to oppose a request for summary judgment is to say “we will be putting forward our own evidence and the evidence from both parties needs to be heard and assessed by a judge” : the bar for summary judgment is set quite high! You believe they don't have evidence but that on its own doesn't mean they wouldn't try! so, its a high risk strategy that leaves you on the hook for their costs if it doesn't work. Let the usual process play out.
    • Ok, I don't necessarily want to re-open my old thread but I've seen a number of such threads with regards to CCJ's and want to ask a fairly general consensus on the subject. My original CCJ is 7 years old now and has had 2/3 owners for the debt over the years since with varying level of contact.  Up to last summer they had attempted a charging order on a shared mortgage I'm named on which I defended that action and tried to negotiate with them to the point they withdrew the charging order application pending negotiations which we never came to an agreement over.  However, after a number of communication I heard nothing back since last Autumn barring an annual generic statement early this year despite multiple messages to them since at the time.  at a loss as to why the sudden loss of response from them. Then something came through from this site at random yesterday whilst out that I can't find now with regards to CCJ's to read over again.  Now here is the thing, I get how CCJ's don't expire as such, but I've been reading through threads and Google since this morning and a little confused.  CCJ's don't expire but can be effectively statute barred after 6 years (when in my case was just before I last heard of the creditor) if they are neither enforced in that time or they apply to the court within the 6 years of issue to extend the CCJ and that after 6 years they can't really without great difficulty or explanation apply for a CCJ extension after of the original CCJ?.  Is this actually correct as I've read various sources on Google and threads that suggest there is something to this?.
    • whats the court claimform for? return of goods order? please complete this:  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

mackenzie hal/capquest/eggl overdue account


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4407 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi I am new to forum and hoping someone here will be able to help.

 

I received a letter today from Mackenzie Hall a "notice of overdue account" who mark capquest as pursurers for egg banking plc and an ammount of outstanding debt.

 

"This letter is to inform you of our clients intended action, even if you do not acknowledge this"

 

but does not actually state any intended action

 

I can not work out where to go from here I have no recollection of this debt or ever having an account with Egg. I rang them (Mackenzie Hall) to try and find out more and they quoted a previous address of mine and said the debt was taken out in 2003 while at previous address. They were going to offer a settlement figure but I said I had no intention of paying as wasn't aware of the debt or its origins the advisor then told me to ring the police and call them back with a incident number so they could take it further.

I am wondering if this is necessary I am considering sending a SAR letter but who should I send this to Mackenzie Hall, Capquest or Egg and do you think it would be any benefit to me. I also had a look at my equifax report and could find no reference to any of the above at all.

 

Thanks hopefully someone can help because I am very confused at the moment as where to go from here

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Welcome to CAG.

A SAR would go to Egg, but a CCA request goes to MH,

this may well be a statute barred debt.

Do the CCA request to MH first.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

"This letter is to inform you of our clients intended action, even if you do not acknowledge this"

 

Ha ha, that must be a new turn of phrase they have put into their threatomatic, a bit like "Valid even if not read by you" I think Muck hall, you can safely say that this is yet again an "EPIC FAIL" Morons!!!

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had the same letter myself last week. Mackenzie Hall acting on behalf of Crapquest chasing a debt from someone I've never dealt with. I'd CCA's Crapquest back in July 2009 and have yet to have the relevant documents sent. Now Mackie Hall are chasing the alleged debt. Given that I've had no credit for over 7 years then they're on a hiding to nothing.

 

I'd agree with the Brigadier. CCA Mack Hall and watch them be unable to find any original agreement...

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the accounts from 2003 then its more than likely statute barred. save yourself a quid and send them the prove it letter. The onus is on MHall and Egg Banking (perhaps a misprint there) to prove the debt exists and that you're liable for it and that they have the right to collect. Challenging MuckHall to send you anything other than threatograms is often futile as they don't ever seem to have much in the way of paperwork. When they fail to comply with your letter hit them with a complaint. They'll have eight weeks to resolve it and if they don't you ramp it up to the Financial Ombudsman Service.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree with the others, send the prove it letter from the CAG library linked at the top of each screen.

 

Please stay off the phone unless you are able to record the conversation :)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi thanks for all your guidance this may be me just getting a little confused with wordings and abbreviations but when you say prove it letter do you mean the request for copy of Consumer Credit Agreement? As I can find no other reference to a "prove it" letter sorry this is all new to me. Just confused as NailPost said "save yourself a quid and send them the prove it letter" but just noticed as I went to send it that the CCA letter still states enclosed £1 postal giro. Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

just heard back from prove it letter they have sent " further to your recent correspondence we require to speak to you urgently please call us on" etc. etc.

 

any reccomendations ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't phone them. You have made them a proper request for them to prove to you the debt exists and they have the documents to satisfy anyone of that. Their pathetic response probably proves they don't have the paperwork but they would rather like to bully and harrass you into paying anyway. Few weeks ago I may have suggested a gentle reminder telling to put up or shut up but bearing in mind the sudden hike in postage I'd just go straight down the complaint route. Write to their compliance manager pointing out you have asked for proof of the debt they are claiming and they simplyjust want to talk about it - You have told them you will only deal inn writing haven't you? - and that you are disatisfied with their response. Tell him the statement is an official complaint and you await his reply.If that doesn't come along within eight weeks you can ramp it upto the next level.

Link to post
Share on other sites

" further to your recent correspondence we require to speak to you urgently please call us on" etc.

 

Oh well, the correspondence stops their then doesn't it! The price increase on postage is also a plus on our side too, as these fools might just stop sending out their mickey mouse comic strip letters and think long and hard about the content of their fake letters.

Ignore them, you have absolutely NO legal responsibility to do anything they say, least of all something that is printed in a letter.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...