Jump to content


UKCPS and Leaving site


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4189 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

my wife recently received a parking charge for being "Observed leaving site" when parking at a Shopping Centre. She did leave the site to visit the next door university library (Where she is a student) before coming back on site to shop. I informed the company of this before i read any advice to ignore correspondence from them but they declined the appeal. However, we can prove that she returned to do shopping as she has receipts. I have since ignored correspondence but IF they decided to take this to court would they be required to prove that she left site or would we be required to prove her innocence? (Surely they need to prove that she left and didnt return?) Does this mean that they photographed her? She strongly values her privacy and would be quite upset by this!

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

ignore its a speculative invoice

 

do some reading in this forum

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

IF it went to court (and it won't) then leaving site is not really an issue. The issue will boil down to how much money the landowner incurred in damages as a result of this happening. Which is nowt. Relax, and ignore everything. It won't go to court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

but IF they decided to take this to court would they be required to prove that she left site or would we be required to prove her innocence? (Surely they need to prove that she left and didnt return?)

Relax, just ignore them, you are taking this far too seriously.

 

 

Does this mean that they photographed her?

Unlikely, but so what.

 

She strongly values her privacy and would be quite upset by this!

It's not unlawful to take photos in a public place and doing so is not an invasion of privacy. If she feels that strongly/insecure the only solution is not to go out in public!!!
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 8 months later...

hi, we are in a very similar situation, and have now had a letter from 'court proceedings ltd' that give us 7 days to pay. have tried to PM you to find out how you got on but I only just joined so was unable to. If you can PM back I would appreciate it. Obviously dont want to put too much info on here incase their trolls are reading the forums.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sri please keep on thread

 

courts proceeding are just a lowlife dca

with a clever name to intimidate you

 

they can do nothing

 

ignore

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sri please keep on thread

 

courts proceeding are just a lowlife dca

with a clever name to intimidate you

 

they can do nothing

 

ignore

 

dx

 

Thanks, that what I thought b

 

ut have just watched youtube and it seems the law changed in October making it easier for thesepeople to take us to court. Know anthing about that at all?

Link to post
Share on other sites

tes its cover in this forum several threads

 

nothing has changed by that at all.

just willy waving

 

its still the landowner that must suffer a loss not the PPC.

 

so safe to ignore

 

dx

  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...