Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
    • hi all just got the reminder letter, I have attached it and also the 2nd side of the original 1st pcn (i just saw the edit above) Look forward to your advice Thanks   PCN final reminder.pdf pcn original side 2.pdf
    • The airline said it was offering to pay $10,000 to those who sustained minor injuries.View the full article
    • The Senate Finance Committee wants answers from BMW over its use of banned Chinese components by 21 June.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4459 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 134
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Have recieved the paperwork from b and s

And they have put the actual balance as £4821.99

And not £6395! As written in a previous letter from council!

The following items are what is on the levy:

Dvd's approx 60(these are mostly kids belonging to my daughter). Lap top,up lamp (£4! From,

Argos!).sky box, hitachi tv, 2x2 seater sofas, sanyo microwave,toaster, and step ladder( belongs to my fil for his business) cant read last bit but think it says cooker??

Anyway the charges they have listed are:levy fee:£126.00

First visit;£24.50 walking possesion fee:£12.00,redemtion of goods:£24.50,C/tax and court costs £6659.49. So far we have paid at total of £2052.00 .

So firstly i understand the levy may not be valid?

What can i do about this and how?

2nd am i safe to just pay the council now? What i can afford?

I take it the bailiff can not force entry and i do not have to let him in regardless of wether he has gained peacefull entry before?

Thankyou so much for help!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The levy is invalid imho, as it contains children's property, and unless the Hitachi TV is a monster 60" plasma is woefully short of what he needs to levy, to cover a debt of 4k he would need to levy around £40k worth of goods. the head h redemption fee is likely invalid ans he has not actually taken the goods away, and you haven't discharged the total debt.

 

A Formal Complaint to CEO, Council leader, councillor and MP imho, you could threaten them with a Regulation 46 complaint in the magistrates court with themselves as defendant, you being aggrieved by the levy of their agent the bailiff for whom they are wholly liable.

 

others will no doubt be able to advise further or alternative actions.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou. Yes the tv is old style 32inch infact it wasnt even ours it was borrowed and we no longer have it!

I just need to know where to start now.

Im not disputing paying its just that i cant afford £200 a month anymore! Debating wether to pay £100 online direct to council. Whilst this is being sorted..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou. Yes the tv is old style 32inch infact it wasnt even ours it was borrowed and we no longer have it!

I just need to know where to start now.

Im not disputing paying its just that i cant afford £200 a month anymore! Debating wether to pay £100 online direct to council. Whilst this is being sorted..

 

It would do no harm, as it shows you are willing to pay, and would be another nail in the bailiffs coffin, you will have to allow for legitimate fees though, pay them what you know you can afford to pay regularly without fail until the debt is discharged.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You will need to do more letter writing, just because 1 item on a levy is incorrect does not necessarily make the levy invalid as the rets of the items could be seized. Your levy does appear to cover goods belonging to a child which are exempt from seizure, if he has included a cooker then this is exempt also or the microwave - he can have one or the other but not both. The numbskull has levied on the TV but not the remote control - they are 2 different items. Following the seizure of 2 sofas would this leave enough seating in the home for each member of the household, do the sofas stillhave their safety labels on them.

 

It doesn't really leave much else and there appears to be goods which are owned by 3rd Party's. In my view you have a good argument to state the Bailiff has only made a levy in order to gain a financial advantage for himself & his Company. You can also argue the case that you are aggrieved by the levy and could file a Regulation 46 Complaint in the Magistrates Court where you would name the Council as Defendant.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou i was under the impression that the whole levy becomes invalid :( so really he could break in to take the valid items only? There is only the 2 sofas but 2 adults and a child so we need both sofas as one is only a two seater the other one he levied got damaged and is so longer here we have replaced it with a 3 seater.. He also listed a coffee table and this is only table we have.

Also what about the value? The goods are nowhere near the value of the debt?

And lastly where do i start! im going to pay council £100 through website this week but bristow are expecting there usual payment of £200 by tmrw.. I just want to get out of this awful mess! :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

You must get out of the idea he can "break in". To gain entry again he needs to be either let in or would have to go back to Court for an Order allowing him to force entry - these are very rarely given.

 

About your seating - you say you had to dispose of 1 sofa because it was damaged, did you advise the Bailiff of this as it is not legally yours to dispose of - only a minor matter. Did you have any dining chairs also?

 

As for payment then I would actually pay as arranged tomorrow as it then gives you a whole month afterwards to formulate what to do in the future.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Again the sofa was not ours anyway but he didnt even ask at the time.No dining chairs at the time he levied.

Also the microwave he levied blew up so he wasnt informed of this! I didnt realise i had to..Only after joining this site i have started to learn what they are entitled to!

Whe he came to do the levy i wouldnt let him in so he threatnd me with police and locksmiths etc i didnt know then so let him as i was scared!

When you say pay as usual do you mean to council or bailiffs? Its just that i cant afford the £200 this month only £100.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks will do 1st thing! Im just very worried as to what the outcome will be :( They will prob clamp my car even though its under finance! ( its not as if they will ask if i own it etc 1st!). Should i wait for them to respond and them inform

Them i have paid the council?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just tried paying council online but wont allow me!

Will they have to accept if i pay by phone?

Also should i ask them about the conflicting amount due?

Letter from council says total amount due;£6394.00 recieved 27th Jan and after asking for breakdown from bailiff the amount due is :£4257.00! Recieved today.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should have the following information from your CT accounts:

1 - Property Ref No - never changes

2 - Account No - never changes

3 - Ref No - should change on a yearly basis as this should the details the Council need to allocate to the correct year owing.

You may need a combination of the above. Alternatively you can pay in cash at the Council, if refused then you require the name & position of the person refusing the payment as it will form the basis of a complaint of the Council refusing payment when tendered.

 

Difference in totals may be due to payments made? benefits granted?

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok I am paying the council today :0. Im so paranoid about bristow threatining me!

I know i have asked a million times but can he deffinatly NOT force entry? Even though he has gained peacefull entry previously and levied goods?

How can i tell him this? As no doubt he will tell me he is going force his way in and has the right!

Thankyou all so much for your help!

Wish i had discoverd this forum before ! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok I am paying the council today :0. Im so paranoid about bristow threatining me!

I know i have asked a million times but can he deffinatly NOT force entry? Even though he has gained peacefull entry previously and levied goods?

How can i tell him this? As no doubt he will tell me he is going force his way in and has the right!

Thankyou all so much for your help!

Wish i had discoverd this forum before ! :)

 

If he tried to force entry he would be committing the criminal offence of breaking and entering, he has not followed the correct procedure, to allow him to force his way in, and he knows this, he is relying on fear and intimidation to get his way

 

keep the door locked and film him even with a mobile phone to capture his threats.

 

Above all don;t worry Caggers are here to help and support you

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to all of the regulars on here but I should have remembered the provision within the National Standards for Enforcment Agents relating to the levying upon goods where the goods are of limited value:

 

Under the heading of Goods: The NSEA states as follows;

 

“Enforcement agents should take all reasonable steps to satisfy themselves that the value of the goods impounded in satisfaction of the judgement is proportional to the value of the debt and charges owed.”

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?203289

p5 Forcing re-entry

The law upon the rights of bailiffs to force re-entry to premises in order to remove

goods previously seized has recently been clarified. In Khazanchi v Faircharm

Investments; McLeod v Butterwick [1998] 2 All ER 901 the Court of Appeal held that

bailiffs may only force re-entry where they are being deliberately excluded from

premises. It will thus be necessary in most cases for the bailiff to notify the debtor in

advance of the date and time of the visit in order to remove. If the debtor is then

absent from home, or refuses entry, force may be employed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks everyone! Really appreciate your help!

I felt so stuck and stressed with this whole thing.

I have a 4 yr old daughter and we are struggling as it is.

I know it should of been paid in the first place and then i wouldnt be in this mess.

@ hallowitch. So they can write to inform me they are going re-force entry? i know this may not happen as most of the goods on levy are exempt and also not to the value of goods? Im just thinking ahead!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you read TT's post #44 and keep in mind any goods he has levied must cover the debt and fees you will quickly see that in your case, the goods levied do not do that!! You are not refusing to pay the debt simply repay at a realistic amount that is affordable to you, given the bailiff is trying to deny you the right to pay that way I wouldn't rate his chances above -zero to getting any Court in the land to agree a warrant that would allow him to force entry to your property to remove goods of little/ no value in order to sell them at auction to COVER THE DEBT AND RELATED COSTS.....stop worrying and just follow the advice the good folk of Cag have given you.

 

WD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got a letter from b and s today i asked for a breakdown when i made my first post ! Anyway it says:

Please note bailiffs cert lasts two years so therefore dates below are current dates:

17/08/10. 1st visit fee: 24.50

 

15/09/10. £126.00 levy fee

£12.00 walking possession fee

£24.50 redemption fee.

It also lists the bailiff name and current date of certification:

1st bailiff:12/10/10

2nd bailiff:19/09/11

 

And as for the 1st visit dont rmbr anything about it.

So is above correct?

Also is this all i owe the bailiff if i have started paying council direct?

Thankyou.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...