Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • no need to use it. it doubles the size of the thread and makes it very diff to find replies on small screens too. just like @username it - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread already inc you ...gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.
    • Hello all,   I ordered a laptop online about 16 months ago. The laptop was faulty and I was supposed to send it back within guarantee but didn't for various reasons. I contacted the company a few months later and they said they will still fix it for me free of charge but I'd have to pay to send it to them and they will pay to send it back to me. The parcel arrived there fine. Company had fixed it and they sent it via dpd. I was working in the office so I asked my neighbours who would be in, as there's been a history of parcel thefts on our street. I had 2 neighbours who offered but when I went to update delivery instructions, their door number wasn't on the drop down despite sharing the same post code.  I then selected a neighbour who I thought would likely be in and also selected other in the safe place selection and put the number of the neighbour who I knew would definitely be in and they left my parcel outside and the parcel was stolen. DPD didn't want to deal with me and said I need to speak to the retailer. The retailer said DPD have special instructions from them not to leave a parcel outside unless specified by a customer. The retailer then said they could see my instructions said leave in a safe space but I have no porch. My front door just opens onto the road and the driver made no attempt to conceal it.  Anyway, I would like to know if I have rights here because the delivery wasn't for an item that I just bought. It was initially delivered but stopped working within the warranty period and they agreed to fix it for free.  Appreciate your help 🙏🏼   Thanks!
    • As the electric carmaker sees sales fall and cuts jobs, we take a closer look at its problems.View the full article
    • Care to briefly tell someone who isn't tech savvy - i.e. me! - how you did this? Every day is a school day.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Laptop Screen - Would appreciate help


Dman88
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4557 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Everyone

 

I would really appreciate your help with this as I am really unsure how to proceed.

 

I bought myself an acer laptop from Dixons online in May of this year. The laptop was £810 after an onlline discount, I know I was crazy for spending so much on a laptop but I had experienced a long period of unemployment previously, I had no plans to go on holiday and I wanted something that would have the power of a full desktop system.

 

I also purchased whatever happens coverage with this and this continues to come out of my bank account. This coverage was advertised to me as doing exactly what it says on the tin, I was even given an example of how I could drop it from an upstairs window and it would be replaced with no questions asked.

 

Within 3 months of owning the product I noticed that there had a scratch like blemish on the screen. However this was curious as it was not as if the screen had been hit with something and there had no damage to the outer screen covering. It was as if something was under the screen cover itself or between the layers of the LCD. If it had been a £200 laptop I would have thought little more of it as I would have expected the quality to have been less. However given its value I was glad that I had purchased the coverage and contacted them soon after. List of events are as follows:

 

- Taken the laptop into a Currys store to be told my staff members that they did not think the issue was bad enough and if I wanted something done about it I should damage it by 'accident' and bring it back. I argued back on this point stating that I did not want to do it and they eventually sent it off to be investigated.

 

- Chased KnowHow via telephone as I had not received a response within their timescale and was told that the issue was being classified as being cosmetic damage and hence was excluded from the whatever happens policy.

 

- I contacted them via email to express my disappointment of this and quoted the SOGA on the policy of the product not being fit for purpose. I was later contacted by telephone informing me that they would look again at the issue.

 

- I received another phone call from KnowHow which became quite heated when they told me that their engineer's had inspected my laptop again and it had now been reclassified as neglectful damage, and hence was not covered by Whatever Happens or SOGA.

 

- I spoke to a member of my local consumer council and they informed me that Knowhow could not prove neglectful damage and hence I should write back assuring them that it was not neglect and if something had happened to my laptop it was without my knowledge and most certainly accidental.

 

- Following this I noticed one evening that the blemish had moved further down the laptop screen and where it had been previously was now perfect.

 

- KnowHow informs me that they will be unable to do anything without me taking the laptop to a independent qualified engineer and seeking his opinion. I take the laptop to a local computer repair store as I assume to operate such a business they must be qualified. They confirmed to me verbally that it did not appear to be screen damage and most likely a trapped hair under the screen bezel as they felt the design did not appear sufficient to keep such debris out. However I did not want to bother them for this in writing and they were unwilling to open the laptop as they feared they could invalidate the manufacturers warranty.

 

- I informed KnowHow of this and asked them to inspect my laptop again, they were unhelpful and stated that if they were indeed qualified they can open the laptop and there would be no issue with warranty. Fearful that KnowHow could use this as their next escape clause I sent them another email asking them to provide me with a list of approved engineers in my area and explained that as I am working a full time job and doing a part time masters that I did not have the time or money to chase this issue up with third parties. I also asked them what type of inspection was conducted on my laptop that enabled them to confirm that it was neglectful damage. Considering that I told them that it was under the screen I naturally expected them to look under the screen.

 

- I got another email back informing me that they were unable to provide such as list but encouraged me to take the laptop to another engineer. He also confirmed that the inspection was made visually with no opening of the laptop screen. I sent an email back requesting that they take it back and give it a proper inspection given the fact that the blemish has since moved.

 

- I finally received an email back from them stating that they would not do this without me first taking it to a third party and that they would not reply to any further email from me without this report.

 

I would be really grateful if someone could advise on this. Some friends have told me to try small claims but I know nothing of that process and most of all I feel so stupid for spending so much money on a purchase in the first place. Due to my workload I have difficulty doing much of anything at the moment, never mind being able to track down a possibly acer approved engineer. The only way I could see that happening would be for me to take time off work but this will either result in me loosing money or using up holiday entitlement.

 

Thanks in advance for any advice provided

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could try Consumer Direct, They were very good when i had problems with PC World over a laptop that i bought then it went wrong and they didnt want to know.

I contacted Consumer Direct and they took up my case and they ended up replacing it.

If you google them you will then find your nearest one to contact they were very good.

 

Pecky1

Link to post
Share on other sites

im going to make some assumptions here

 

if they are saying its a hair trapped under the bezel then im assuming its a laptop where the bezel is actually a sheet of plastic over the entire screen

 

if it is please contact pcworld and remind them that screens of this design are not ussually opened, and are ussually replaced as a full screen pack.

 

the idea of negligence is laughable, did you get a letter in with the laptop refering you to gary perriment? if not challenge the call center and get it booked again as it hasnt been offically classed as neglect just someones sayso

Please note:

 

  • I am employed in the IT sector of a high street retail chain but am not posting in any official capacity,so therefore any comments,suggestions or opinions are expressly personal ones and should not be viewed as an endorsement or with agreement of any company.
  • i am not legal trained in any form.
  • I have many experiences in life and do often use these in my posts

if ive been helpful kick my scales, if ive been unhelpful kick the scales of the person more helpful :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...