Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You need a back up plan. If you believe that redundancy is very likely, start looking at other employment options.  Don't leave it until you have been made redundant before looking for new employment. I regularly speak to people who have been made redundant and about mental health. Those who have a positive plan, get into employment quickly following redundancy and manage to maintain their finances. Those who don't have a plan, decide to accept redundancy and a period of unemployment. They end up in a downward spiral, with redundancy money spent, debts accumulated, mental health decline and difficulty finding new employment.  
    • Interested observer here as I'm in a similar situation. People become conditioned into seeking and maintaining a perfect credit score/file, but if your situation is that you're unlikely to obtain further credit for the foreseeable future anyway due to your other outstanding debts, then tanking your credit file now won't make a difference other than you've took back control of your finances.
    • Firstly, I would like to thank everyone for their help in this matter. Since my last post I have received a reply from Plymouth Council Insurance Team concerning my wife’s accident (please see enclosed letter and photo of the offending Badminton post) which they deny any responsibility for the said accident. I feel that the Council is in breach of their statutory duties under the following acts: The Leisure Centre was negligent in its duty of care and therefore, in breach of the statutory duty owed under section 2 of the Occupiers’ Liability Act 1957. Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 (the Act) to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all their employees, and others who might be affected by its undertaking, e.g. members of the public visiting the Leisure Centre to use the facilities. The Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 that requires employers to assess risks (including slip and trip risks) and, where necessary, take action to address them. The Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations (PUWER) require the risk to people’s health and safety from equipment that is used at a Leisure Centre be prevented or controlled. I would like some advice to see if my assumptions are correct and my approach to obtaining satisfactory outcome to this matter are accurate. Many thanks   PLM23000150 - Copy Correspondence.pdf post docx.docx
    • Talking to them does not reset the time limit, although they will probably tell you it does, they'd be lying. Dumbdales are the in-house sols for Lowlife, just the next desk along. If Lowlifes were corresponding with you at your current address then Dumbdales know your address. However, knowing that they are lower than a snake's belly, you would be well advised to send them a letter, informing them of your current address and nothing else. Get 'proof of posting' which is free from the PO counter, don't sign it, simply type your name. That way then they have absolutely no excuse for attempting a back door CCJ.   P.S. Best course of action, IGNORE them, until or unless you get a claim form......you won't.
    • A 'signed for' Letter of Claim has been sent today so they have 14 days from tomorrow... Lets wait and see what happens but i suspect judging by their attitude they wont reply 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cap1 & CCA return


tamadus
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4972 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Guy's,

 

Can't be long as I'm in a bit of a rush!

 

However, I have sent the following letter to ARC, another one of eggs DCA's

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/show-post/post-931982.html

 

I phoned consumer direct yesterday and made a complaint about egg and their chosen DCA's, who threaten (me) consumers, using Harassment and coercion...in my case 2 DCA's at the same time pursuing an account in dispute. Together with the fact, that Egg has been unable to comply fully with my S78 CCA request.

 

Consumer Direct passed my complaint to my local TS, who are now about to investigate my concerns along side TS in Derby, which is Egg's local TS.

 

I will be sending ALL the relevant correspondence to my local fair trading officer tomorrow.

 

Note, please guy's do not be put off by Consumer Direct, just persevere and insist that you wish your local TS to look into your complaint, after all that is one of the reasons why you pay council tax!

 

More tomorrow.

 

Love AC

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 17.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Yes Car Credit or rather their owners are being sued by every man & his dog for mis-selling PPI.

 

They are already paying back thousands in compensation Check the web

 

What are the factors that would make it mis-sold though?

Abbey - *SETTLED IN FULL!* ;)

-£445 refunded after one phonecall

HERE

 

Lloyds - Reclaiming Charges ***WON!***

-09/05/07 - Prelim delivered

-22/05/07 - LBA sent - no response

-11/07/07 - Filed at court

- 26/07/07 - Full settlement offer!!!! Donation made ;)

HERE

 

Next - Trying to Sue us with no agreement! :lol:

-29/06/07 - Defence filed

-16/08/07 - AQ filed

-19/09/07 - Claim struck out!! :p

HERE and continued HERE

 

PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES IF I'VE HELPED!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry, I don't understand.

 

I would have thought that whatever docs they sent you first are the only relevant ones as one of the secs states that any statement made by a creditor under sec 78 is binding - so if they have changed the docs they sent you then just disregard them - that is only MY opinion and it has not been discussed as yet!!

 

Thanks for responding. I think they are saying they are complying because Reg 7 says:

 

every copy of the executed agreement shall include either an easily legible copy of the latest notice of variation given in accordance with Sect 82(1) of the Act relating to each discrete term of the agreement which has been varied

or

an easily legible statement of the terms of the agreement as varied in accordance with sect 82(1) of the Act.

 

So what Im trying to get straight in my head is, are they saying every variation done should be sent as well as the original or can they get away with sending the variation providing it shows the parts that have varied...(if that makes sense...it does in my head lol)

 

The terms and conditions have to be those pertaining at the time you signed the agreement

 

Well the ones they have sent have no dates on so I have no idea when they are from but the CCA must be recent as the charges are £12.00.

 

Do you know what part of the regs say the T&C's must be from the original agreement please as I need to make sure I word this letter correctly.

Thanks

Morgan Stanley

**Won 31.01.07 with CCI**

Capital One

**Won 19.04.07 with CCI**

Halifax current & Joint

Verbal S.A.R 11.01.07, stats recd 18.01.07

Halifax Visa prelim sent 26.01.07. Reply 31.01.07 Filed N1 on 20.03.07 - Judgement granted, sent in the bailiffs

GE Capital

Frazercard Prelim sent with CCI 27.01.07

Burtons Prelim sent with CCI 22.01.07

 

RBOS Visa S.A.R sent 12.01.07

Partners JJB card (Creation) *Won* with part interest - 15.02.07

 

 

Partners LLOYDS Account S.A.R 13.12.06 - stats recd 30.01.07. Prelim sent with CCI 01.02.07

 

Partners BOS Mastercard Offered all charges except £12. Refused. N1 filed 20.03.07 - Judgement granted, sent in the bailiffs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Ian, I understand that. Is that what the reg I quoted is saying? I dont think it makes that clear.

Morgan Stanley

**Won 31.01.07 with CCI**

Capital One

**Won 19.04.07 with CCI**

Halifax current & Joint

Verbal S.A.R 11.01.07, stats recd 18.01.07

Halifax Visa prelim sent 26.01.07. Reply 31.01.07 Filed N1 on 20.03.07 - Judgement granted, sent in the bailiffs

GE Capital

Frazercard Prelim sent with CCI 27.01.07

Burtons Prelim sent with CCI 22.01.07

 

RBOS Visa S.A.R sent 12.01.07

Partners JJB card (Creation) *Won* with part interest - 15.02.07

 

 

Partners LLOYDS Account S.A.R 13.12.06 - stats recd 30.01.07. Prelim sent with CCI 01.02.07

 

Partners BOS Mastercard Offered all charges except £12. Refused. N1 filed 20.03.07 - Judgement granted, sent in the bailiffs

Link to post
Share on other sites

What are the factors that would make it mis-sold though?

 

Hi Monopoly

 

The answers to your question re: PPI are in the OFT Consumer Credit (Agreements) Regulations 1983 as amended by the 2004 Amendment Regulations

 

9.1 onwards

 

Hope this helps!

 

minkyxx

 

ps. I can send you a copy if you haven't got the regs already, let me know?

It is in PDF format, if you have Adobe Acrobat!

Link to post
Share on other sites

No I dont have it! Do you have a link please?

Abbey - *SETTLED IN FULL!* ;)

-£445 refunded after one phonecall

HERE

 

Lloyds - Reclaiming Charges ***WON!***

-09/05/07 - Prelim delivered

-22/05/07 - LBA sent - no response

-11/07/07 - Filed at court

- 26/07/07 - Full settlement offer!!!! Donation made ;)

HERE

 

Next - Trying to Sue us with no agreement! :lol:

-29/06/07 - Defence filed

-16/08/07 - AQ filed

-19/09/07 - Claim struck out!! :p

HERE and continued HERE

 

PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES IF I'VE HELPED!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

 

Without demeaning the previous posts, there appears to be a lot of caggers being sent application forms instead of ca without prescribed terms on this thread and others.

 

Maybe we need to follow Peter's advice and sent in a mass compliant to the OFT regarding this. If enough of us do this they will have to listen.

 

But if we don't do it, things will never change. We are all questioning and questioning and getting nowhere!!!!!!!!!!!!! apart from individual complaints

 

Lets make a stand:D

 

Uniboy where are you

 

We do really need to do something like this!! Somebody has to listen to us if we do it in a group?

 

I have a CAP1 hearing in September and they have only sent me an application form (cut & re arranged) as the CCA (5 times I have been sent the same Document by them) they still say it's the CCA.

 

I have seen in their defence they have written to court on 3 different occasions that they have settled the monetry side of my claim (hog wash) they have told the judge there is no reason for me to continue my claim wasting court time. (Mmm - but I am not lying in my statements to court am I?)

 

I have written numerous times asking them to sort the matters out and they just ignore it or answer with more Hog Wash. I even wrote to some of the Directors and board members in there on more than one occasion and asked them if they were condoning the behaviour from their Legal Dept - to find the people at the top won't reply.

 

BUT DOESN'T THE SILENCE FROM THE TOP OF THIS ORGANISATION MAKE A DEAFENING RESPONSE? :D

 

I do think there may be a way forward with a group complaint - seems individually these companies are just taking the mickey?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's ok, but cease and desist mean the same thinng mate!! ;)

 

 

Hi all,

 

just wondering, is there a standard letter to send to the CRA people to inform them that an account is in dispute, as I cant see CBS Transcom/Arrow Global informing them about the fact that they are in default of my CCA request.

 

patch666......................

Link to post
Share on other sites

Abbey - *SETTLED IN FULL!* ;)

-£445 refunded after one phonecall

HERE

 

Lloyds - Reclaiming Charges ***WON!***

-09/05/07 - Prelim delivered

-22/05/07 - LBA sent - no response

-11/07/07 - Filed at court

- 26/07/07 - Full settlement offer!!!! Donation made ;)

HERE

 

Next - Trying to Sue us with no agreement! :lol:

-29/06/07 - Defence filed

-16/08/07 - AQ filed

-19/09/07 - Claim struck out!! :p

HERE and continued HERE

 

PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES IF I'VE HELPED!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Uni- this claim will be dismissed based on the bank charges that are within the actual amount that is written into the particulars of claim- however your letter is good based on the dodgy CCA that the DCA / EGG provided!! I will adjust it slightly and click your scales!!

 

Hiya mate, thanks. Let me know if you need help amending it.

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

 

Without demeaning the previous posts, there appears to be a lot of caggers being sent application forms instead of ca without prescribed terms on this thread and others.

 

Maybe we need to follow Peter's advice and sent in a mass compliant to the OFT regarding this. If enough of us do this they will have to listen.

 

But if we don't do it, things will never change. We are all questioning and questioning and getting nowhere!!!!!!!!!!!!! apart from individual complaints

 

Lets make a stand:D

 

Uniboy where are you

 

 

Hehe, here I am - sounds good, let's do it!!

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

Uni- my reply regarding copying your earlier letter has been removed????

 

 

Hmmm, PM me your email address mate.

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Aahhh, thanks - I looked up the meanings in the dictionary.....lol, but your link makes sense!!

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

No I dont have it! Do you have a link please?

 

Hi Monopoly

 

Sorry but the link I gave you was wrong. I can only find the PDF link sorry!

 

I have copied the regs you are after into Word but there are 11 pages and the only way I can think of to get them to you is by email unless anyone else has any ideas??

 

Sorry for the wrong link :( ..

 

minky xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

No it works fine. I have it in pdf its ok. Thaks again! :)

Abbey - *SETTLED IN FULL!* ;)

-£445 refunded after one phonecall

HERE

 

Lloyds - Reclaiming Charges ***WON!***

-09/05/07 - Prelim delivered

-22/05/07 - LBA sent - no response

-11/07/07 - Filed at court

- 26/07/07 - Full settlement offer!!!! Donation made ;)

HERE

 

Next - Trying to Sue us with no agreement! :lol:

-29/06/07 - Defence filed

-16/08/07 - AQ filed

-19/09/07 - Claim struck out!! :p

HERE and continued HERE

 

PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES IF I'VE HELPED!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello all again, after a bit more help with this ermm agreement Egg sent me.

Im questioning my agreement to the PPI and they are charging me interest 2 months after defaulting me, so wondering where i stand regarding the interest, threads here.

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt/97844-default-still-charging-interest.html

 

Sent me this as proof of me requesting PPi, doesnt prove i requested, proves to me "plus ppi" is added to all loans, more than i requested it.

 

http://i197.photobucket.com/albums/aa198/Wednesday1867/EggLoanPic2.jpg

 

http://i197.photobucket.com/albums/aa198/Wednesday1867/EggLoanPIc1.jpg

 

And they call this my agreement, is it worth sending a proper cca request? Or apart from missing signature would this stand up as properly executed?

 

Thanks again for the info :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have started reading this thread with great interest and wish to congratulate you on all the hard work.

 

I wonder if I might impose on you to clarify whether a document I recieved follwing a CCA request, can be claimed to be the executed agreement or merely an application.

 

The document is headed ' your priority application for the marbles card'

Directly below it begins 'Credit agreement regulated by the CCA1974.

This agreement between 'them' and 'me'.

Do you want ppi?

do want 2nd card holder?

then data protection blurb

right to cancel

signed by bothe parties, them 5days after me

 

but no reference to any prescribed terms or any separate t&c's.

 

Am I right in thinking that for this to be an executed agreement it should include the terms or at least refer to me abiding to separate sheet t&c's?

 

Its just that s78 refers to 'any other document referred to in it' (agreement) and this document doesn't refer to anything other than it being regulated by CCA

 

No t&c's came with the document, so even if this document is the main body of the agreement, is the bank in default of CCA for not supplying t&c's with it?

 

Clarification would be greatly apreciated.

 

Peri

 

78 Duty to give information to debtor under running-account credit agreement

 

(1) The creditor under a regulated agreement for running-account credit, within the prescribed period after receiving a request in writing to that effect from the debtor and payment of a fee of £1, shall give the debtor a copy of the executed agreement (if any) and of any other document referred to in it, together with a statement signed by or on behalf of the creditor showing, according to the information to which it is practicable for him to refer,—

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have started reading this thread with great interest and wish to congratulate you on all the hard work.

 

I wonder if I might impose on you to clarify whether a document I recieved follwing a CCA request, can be claimed to be the executed agreement or merely an application.

 

The document is headed ' your priority application for the marbles card'

Directly below it begins 'Credit agreement regulated by the CCA1974.

This agreement between 'them' and 'me'.

Do you want ppi?

do want 2nd card holder?

then data protection blurb

right to cancel

signed by bothe parties, them 5days after me

 

but no reference to any prescribed terms or any separate t&c's.

 

Am I right in thinking that for this to be an executed agreement it should include the terms or at least refer to me abiding to separate sheet t&c's?

 

Its just that s78 refers to 'any other document referred to in it' (agreement) and this document doesn't refer to anything other than it being regulated by CCA

 

No t&c's came with the document, so even if this document is the main body of the agreement, is the bank in default of CCA for not supplying t&c's with it?

 

Clarification would be greatly apreciated.

 

Peri

 

78 Duty to give information to debtor under running-account credit agreement

 

(1) The creditor under a regulated agreement for running-account credit, within the prescribed period after receiving a request in writing to that effect from the debtor and payment of a fee of £1, shall give the debtor a copy of the executed agreement (if any) and of any other document referred to in it, together with a statement signed by or on behalf of the creditor showing, according to the information to which it is practicable for him to refer,—

 

 

It's headed application so it's an application form. It has no prescribed terms so it is completely unenforcbale - even by a Judge. I would write and tell them this. Oh, and stop paying!!

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks un1boy

 

Can I also ask you if i stop paying and then they do supply the agreement, they have to go to court to enforce it i understand, but do any payments missed and the interest accrue during that and must be paid once enforced.

 

Also, what is my course of action if they don't fulfill my request before 12+1 month has expired.

 

Thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4972 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...