Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If that was the reason then that is good news. The whole reason that being able to charge £100 for breaching private car park rules is because the law Lords decided in a celebrated case that the rogues had a legitimate interest in keeping their car park spaces available for all motorists . {parking Eye v Beavis]. However when the business is closed then there is no legitimate interest in keeping spaces free so to charge £100 is a penalty. As such any Court would automatically throw out the case when the penalty charge is accepted.
    • gives them a feeling of grandeur. dx  
    • yep they can be a bit like the TV licencing lot. for 4yrs ive been getting a series of about 8-10 diff letters that just go round a loop. currently upto 61
    • thread tidied. new thread for the court claim is here  
    • new thread created for this claimform please post here now for anything to do with it now . pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’. Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time. You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID. You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .. get a CCA Request running to the claimant . https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332502-cca-request-consumer-credit-act-1974-updated-january-2015/ .. Leave the £1 PO unsigned and uncrossed . get a CPR  31:14  request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant] ... https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ . .use our other CPR letter if the claim is for an OD or Telecom Debt or Util debt]  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ on BOTH type your name ONLY Do Not sign anything .do not ever use or give an email . you DO NOT await the return of ANY paperwork  you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count] ..............  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Fictitious amount on claim form


palemm
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4558 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Rang the court they said fairfax have tried to get a default judgement and I need to get my defence in and there is no stay on the case.

 

So Fairfax are lying to me.

 

I f my defence is due next week can I send the court a copy of the letter that Fairfax sent me for more time, or do I do a negative defence with copies of all letters as evidence or can I file a N244 even though my defence is due ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having read the pt.legal compilation pdf I think N244 is the way forward and I quote.

 

"

1) an order compelling the Claimant to disclose the requested documents

2) an extension of time not less than 28 days from the date of the order for filing your defence.

3) costs occasioned by the Claimants failings to disclose pursuant to CPR 31.14 and 31.15.

 

Looks to be the right thing.

 

Any help with wording appriciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, posts crossed. Yup, that’s the bit.

 

One thing I wanted to check, which wasn’t answered at the start of the thread: did you ever actually get a default notice from Lloyds, or a Notice of Assignment (either from Lloyds or Arrow)?

 

You can only answer the claim as stated. If you have never held any account with Lloyds under a credit agreement, that would be a defence.

 

Anyway, back to N244. What you need to do is write a simple statement of what has happened. Something like this, but with detail:

 

1. I received a claim form from Arrow on XX XXX 2011.

2. I acknowledged the claim and requested a further 14 days to defend all.

3. I issued a CPR 31 request to the claimant’s solicitor on XX XXX 2011, giving them seven days to provide the documents mentioned in the particulars of claim (see attached letter).

4. I received a response from the claimant’s solicitor on XX XXX 2011 stating that no documents would be provided before I entered a defence (see attached letter).

5. I wrote back to the claimant’s solicitor on XX XXX 2011 making clear that I expected them to comply with my valid CPR request (see attached letter).

6. The claimant’s solicitor replied on XX XXX 2011, stating that they required several weeks to locate the documents and that they would delay the court case (see attached letter). I found this unacceptable.

7. I called the court for advice on 9 November 2011 and was told the claimant’s solicitor had already applied for, and had been refused, default judgment.

8. Without said documents as mentioned in the PoC, I am unable to enter a defence. I further deny ever having any kind of credit agreement with Lloyds TSB Bank, as stated in the particulars of claim, and without any evidence of the alleged debt, I am embarrassed.

9. Accordingly, I seek an order of the court compelling the claimant to comply with my valid CPR 31 request within seven days, failing which the case shall be struck out and costs awarded to the defendant.

 

Then add the draft order as above.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Should I hand write the statement in the evidence box or will it be ok to print it and say "Please see statement" in the evidence box.

 

I want to get it right, plus I have a broken hand and it hurts to right.:sad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

This kind of puts a spanner in the works due to lack of funds, any other options ?

 

Oh well looks like a negative defence is the only way mentioning the fact that I requested the documents under CPR 31.14 and they refused

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do I have to send payment to the court to file the N244 ?

 

And if so how do I pay ?

 

 

Usually payment is made by cheque but I think some Courts take card payments over the phone.

 

The cost is £45 without a hearing or £80 with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is my defence........

 

I am unable to plead as the claimant has failed to comply with my request for documents mentioned in the claim.

 

I issued a CPR 31 request to the claimant’s solicitor on 29/10/2011, giving them seven days to provide the documents mentioned in the particulars of claim (see attached letter).

I then received a response from the claimant’s solicitor on 02/112011 stating that no documents would be provided before I entered a defence (see attached letter).

I wrote back to the claimant’s solicitor on 05/11/2011 making clear that I expected them to comply with my valid CPR request (see attached letter) and stating I would contact them by telephone on the 07/11/2011.

I rang them on the morning of the 07/11/2011 I told them I was seeking an extension of time under CPR 15.5 to allow them to comply with my CPR 31.14 and CPR 31.15 request and for me to inspect the documents and form my defence and was told that the case would be put on hold until they could get copies of all the documents that they're claim is based on.

The claimant’s solicitor replied on 07/11/2011 with what can only be described as a vague letter. (see attached letter). I find this unacceptable.

I ask that the court order disclosure of the documents that this claim is based on so I can know what I'm defending myself against or strike out the claim

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...