Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi on the notice of disqualification it lists the 2 speed offences and marks offence withdrawn? This is for both offences and then the other 2 is the MS90s which I’m fined for and the additional costs. R
    • Hi,    It has taken a while, but I have received an email from Auxillis -  hello, we are not dealing with this claim all we do is log accident for you isnurance - the claim has been passed to your underwriter markerstudy 0344 873 8183 as they are deal with fault cliams ion behalf of adrian flux. thankyou auxillis   I have made repeated attempts to phone Markerstudy in between working from home, struggling for energy and trying to find a cheap car so that I can keep my job (community support worker). Thankfully I have a supportive team and I am being given phone calls to make but it cant last too long. I had a severe migraine over the weekend and also have quite bad whiplash in my neck and back.    I found this in my insurance policy booklet -    Protection and Recovery If the insured vehicle cannot be driven following an incident leading to a valid claim under this section, we will pay: • the cost of its protection and removal to the nearest approved repairer, competent repairer or nearest place of safety; and • the cost of re-delivery after repairs to your home address; and • the cost of storage of the insured vehicle incurred with our written consent. If the insured vehicle is damaged beyond economical repair we will arrange for it to be stored safely at premises of our choosing. You should remove your personal belongings from the insured vehicle before it is collected from you. In the event of a claim being made under the policy we have the right to remove the insured vehicle to an alternative repairer, place of safety or make our own arrangments for re-delivery at any time in order to keep the cost of the claim to a minimum     I do about 20-25000 miles a year with the work I do, I have been getting quotes and putting that I have now have one accident and no no claims bonus and the cheap quotes from similar companies to markerstudy are more than double what i paid last year at 8-900 and aviva is offering 2600 which is simply out of my price range and more than the car i am looking at.  I am starting to wonder if it is even worth going ahead with the claim as i have no one to claim from. I have had no information from any of the enquiries I have made.  I have a full tank of vpower diesel in the car in the impound, i can strip it for parts and probably make what I will be offered by the insurance payout and get the money quicker.  As I have made contact and started the process can I back out, still keep my NCB and a claim free history? Also what happens with my injuries? I don't think there is any permanent damage but my dr refused to see me and just gave me a boat load of naproxen and codeine. What happens in the future if things don't get better and I cancelled this claim? Can you claim injuries off your own insurance because the other guy ran and you cant find him? I have tried to ask these questions off markerstudy but they keep me waiting for nearly an hour then end the call.     
    • Thanks for the response. Am I able to send you the documents I’ve received or can you message via instant message and I’ll send these? Reece
    • Regretfully it does. Have you actually seen any papers which show what you were charged with (rather than what you were convicted of)? It is unusual not to be “dual charged” but if you were not charged with both, you are where you are. If you had been charged with both offences and providing you were the driver at the time, you could, after performing your SD, have asked the prosecutor to drop the “Fail to Provide” (FtP) charges in exchange for a guilty plea to the speeding charges (you cannot be convicted of speeding unless you plead guilty as they have no evidence you were driving). You will have difficulty defending the FtP charges. In fact, it’s worse than that – you have no chance of successfully defending them at all because the reason you did not respond to the requests is because you did not receive them and that’s entirely your fault. No it’s not correct. Six months from 18/11/23 was 18/5/24 so, unless they were originally charged, the speeding offences are now “timed out.” There is one avenue left open to you. If you perform your SD you must serve it on the court which convicted you. You will then receive a date for a hearing to have the matters heard again. Your only chance of having the matters revert to speeding (and this is only providing you were the driver at the time of those offences) is to plead Not Guilty, attend court. When you get there you can ask the prosecutor (very nicely, explaining what a pillock you know you were for failing to update your  V5C) if (s)he is prepared to raise “out of time” speeding charges, to which you will offer to plead guilty if the FtP charges are dropped.   This is strictly speaking not lawful. Charges have to be raised within six months. Some prosecutors are willing to do it, others are not. But frankly it’s the only avenue open to you. There is a risk with this. I imagine you have been fined £660 (plus surcharge and costs) for each offence. The offence attracts a fine of 1.5 week’s net income and where the court has no information about the defendant’s means a default figure of £440pw is used.  If the prosecutor is not prepared to play ball you can revise your pleas to guilty. A sympathetic court should give you the full discount (one third) for your guilty pleas in these circumstances but they may reduce the discount somewhat. The prosecution may also ask for increased costs (£90 or thereabouts is the figure for a guilty plea). So it may cost you more if you have a decent income (I’ll let you do the sums). But MS90 is an endorsement code which gives insurers a fit of the vapours. One such endorsement will see your premiums double. Two of them will see many insurers refuse to quote you at all meaning you will have to approach "specialist" (aka extortionate) brokers. So you really want to exhaust every possibility of avoiding MS90s if you can. One warning: do not pay solicitors silly money to defend you. Making an SD before a solicitor should attract just a nominal sum (perhaps a tenner). That’s all you should pay for. You have no viable defence against the FtP charges and any solicitor suggesting you have is telling you porkies. The offer to do the deal is easily done by yourself and you can save the solicitor’s fees to put towards a few taxis and increased insurance premiums if you are unsuccessful. In the happy event you find out you were "dual charged", let me know and I'll tell you how to proceed. (Seems a bit odd hoping you were charged with four driving offences rather than two, but it's a funny old world!).    
    • Just the sort of people you despise eh Jugg  You would be much happier among your mates in that room with Rayner begging for votes 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Access to bank accounts by JCP and/or local council


jared
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4647 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there

 

My first post so please forgive me if this subject has already been covered

 

Does anyone know whether JCP and/or local councils have the right to access all your bank account when you try to claim JSA and/or council tax rebates?

 

A friend of mine claims she supplied them with a statement from one of her bank accounts and they came back to her with an alternative figure which matched her combined savings from her 2 bank accounts (the total figure was under the threshold anyway, so she was entitled to full JSA and council tax rebate anyway, but was stunned that they could access her 2nd bank account)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and Welcome,

 

I've moved this thread to the appropriate Forum.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Nystagmite

 

Thanks for quick response; no, as far as she led me to believe she only handed over a recent 3-month statement of one of her bank accounts, as requested, and give no authorisation for any further access

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi jojopo000

 

Thanks for your response; I still can't believe they can legally access a bank account for which they have been given absolutely no details of in terms of bank, account number, sort code etc. Surely they can't ask every bank if a specific person holds an account with them

 

However, I recently heard from one source who claimed that, if you give them details of one bank account, they can search 10 years back into this account and look for payments to/from another account(s); they can then access the other account(s) this way.

 

Not sure if this is the case for my friend, I'll need to ask her

Edited by jared
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I take it both accounts were with the same bank ?

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi maroondevo52,

 

No, both accounts were with totally different banks, one was RBS and the other ING

 

That surprises me, though I must admit I don't know much about how JCP and Local Councils operate.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Obviously I know this is nothing to do with fraud BUT I watched an episode of the BBC series "Saints and Scroungers" a couple of months back and on there the councils fraud department were accessing details of bank accounts etc and that is how they caught a lot of people out. I presume if one department has access to them others would too? Just a thought.

Link to post
Share on other sites

maroondevo52, backofbeyond and caledfwlch

 

thanks for your responses; while I have no objection to public bodies taking all reasonable steps to prevent fraud, I just cannot understand what possible legal mechanism could be employed to allow any organisation to access details in a bank account with the only information available being a name and address and with no prior knowledge of Bank, branch, sort code etc; surely, even checking credit files won't flag up any useful info?

Link to post
Share on other sites

maroondevo52, backofbeyond and caledfwlch

 

thanks for your responses; while I have no objection to public bodies taking all reasonable steps to prevent fraud, I just cannot understand what possible legal mechanism could be employed to allow any organisation to access details in a bank account with the only information available being a name and address and with no prior knowledge of Bank, branch, sort code etc; surely, even checking credit files won't flag up any useful info?

 

The same way any debt collector, or finance institution does. They check your credit file, which will show up any accounts you hold.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is puzzling. It's been well over a year since I worked for the DWP, but in general the staff cannot directly access your bank account. Obviously they need to know the acct number and sort code in order to make any payments, and they can ask to see statements if the rules require it. But they can't just call up and ask for Joe Bloggs's bank balance on a whim.

 

Now I understand that there is talk of using credit reference agencies for fraud prevention and so on, so maybe it's changed. And of course, fraud investigators have extra powers, as we'd expect, but those guys aren't involved in the routine processing of claims.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nowadays all claimants are credit checked by outside agencies as routine, and so they have a complete overall view of all your bank accounts, savings accounts and debts and linking addresses etc. Since the current government seems obsessed with benefit fraud (despite the largest amount of money wasted goes in clerical error rather then actual fraud) they've been farming out claimants info to private companies to do this before any payments are made.

 

It seems these days that If you want any help from the government ie benefits, single persons council tax reduction, working tax credits, then you sign away your privacy and you must expect to be credit checked.

 

Pity they don't treat politicians this way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nowadays all claimants are credit checked by outside agencies as routine, and so they have a complete overall view of all your bank accounts, savings accounts and debts and linking addresses etc. Since the current government seems obsessed with benefit fraud (despite the largest amount of money wasted goes in clerical error rather then actual fraud) they've been farming out claimants info to private companies to do this before any payments are made.

 

It seems these days that If you want any help from the government ie benefits, single persons council tax reduction, working tax credits, then you sign away your privacy and you must expect to be credit checked.

 

Pity they don't treat politicians this way.

 

Interesting to know, thanks. I knew there was talk of this.

 

Wonder if they do check MPs. There would be a legitimate purpose to do so - you can't be an MP if you're bankrupt.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They're not worried about bankruptcy they're only worried about nosing into benefit claimants money It seems. MP's have been getting away with murder for years now, and despite some of them being recently taken to task over claiming false expenses, reports have come out saying many have reverted to their 'old ways' so to speak. Not surprising really considering who's running the country now.

 

'Great Britain, run by the rich for the rich'....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your friend would have had to declare all bank accounts held for her (and a partner if she has one) and give details of the balances of all accounts under each catagory (they separate bank and building society accounts) even if they are not in a positive balance - if she had one account with £300 in credit and another account with an overdraft of £200 then her combined balance would be £100 but they would ask for proof of both accounts - at least that's how I read the forms when I filled them in a few months ago!!

 

Feebee_71

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks to everyone for the feedback: have just discovered a link which would indeed suggest almost draconian powers to investigate JSA/council tax rebate claims: haven't done 10 posts yet so not allowed to post link but its dwp.gov.uk/docs/cop-ssfa.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can DWP/Councils access people's bank accounts when they claim benefit?

 

The basic answer is normally "no".

 

The powers available under the SSFA can only be used by authorised officers who are senior investigations staff. They are only permitted to use such powers where there is a reasonable ground to do so and there is not really an alternative avenue to obtain information, e.g. benefit fraud cases.

 

When a person claims benefit, they will normally be asked for details of their bank accounts and the balances in the accounts.

 

If a person declares that they have 2 bank accounts, but only provides statements for one account, the DWP/Council may decide to either request statements for the second account he claimant or they may choose to accept the balances provided by the claimant. The latter sounds like what has happened in this case.

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi id6052

 

Thanks for response but she only told them about one bank account

 

Hi sadone

 

I can't accept that they can simply request a credit check and bingo! obtain the balance and details of every account; since I have no knowledge of credit checks, I simply assumed they only existed to record payment defaults and the like from finance companies!

Edited by jared
mi
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well the government has given the DWP full powers to check everyone who claims benefits via private credit agencies in a push to stop fraud. This proposal (like in the article above) was all over the net and is old news now.

 

Thats why those who have working tax credit have been waiting far longer then normal for their renewals to be processed as all this extra checking is slowly processing claims down to an incredible amount.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...