Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

bristow and sutor notice of intended seizure of your goods


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4603 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello, I am new to this site and have been told about it by a freind, I really appreciate it if you can help here please.

 

I have come home today to find a letter from bristow & sutor, they want over £300 from me including a £56 charge for their visit.

 

It is from the city of worcester and as i pay my council tax to dudley and after reading this site I dont think that it can be todo with council tax as I havent lived in worcestershire since council tax was poll tax! but i have seen on google that it may be parking fine.

 

My wife was out and the letter was half sticking out of the postbox in the front door, but our neighbor says that this strange man in a mondeo was trying to break in to the back gate and side door so its really creepy.

 

Does anyone know what I should do? I dont really have £300 spare (does anyone) but I really dont want my wife getting scared at home when Im out or anything like that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi hope this helps Bailiffs are well aware of their limited powers and may use a variety of different means to gain entry peaceably. They may attempt to walk in as soon as a door is opened. They may ask if they can use your telephone to check if an arrangement is satisfactory with their office. They may simply ask you if you would prefer to discuss matters inside. You do not have to go along with any of these methods.Most bailiffs do not have the right to force their way into your home to seize your goods. The only exception is that bailiffs from the Collector of Taxes (Inland Revenue) can get a warrant to force entry, but this is very rare.All other bailiffs have a right of peaceful entry only. This means that they cannot use force to enter your home, for example, by breaking a window or a door. However, they can enter your property through an open door or window (front and back) and can climb over fences and gates, but cannot break them down.

I take it that this has been to court and they have got a judgement against you ?Regards GH

:) HFO fan club member :) HFO V GLORYHUNTER ( WON ) :)

0 - 1

Link to post
Share on other sites

Moved into Bailiffs forum

 

:wink:

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes you are right, dont leave windows open which isnt hard with the british summer hehe

 

how do i find out if they have a judgement?

 

I was going to phone them but it is a premium rate number and i only have a top up mobile. I was going to send a letter but I dont know what to put as Im not really sure what I owe and why?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you want to call them which isn't always recommended unless you can record the call, I think their landline number was 01527 504030 when I used to supply them.

Any advice or opinion given is done so in the spirit of goodwill and assistance, but please note I'm not legally trained or qualified, only hoping to help. My advice or opinion is based on experience in my life, and research from forums such as this and other useful sites.

 

Please seek professional legal advice if you are in any doubt about what to do next with your personal case.

 

There are many threads on this forum to help you and I do recommend searching around to see what steps others have taken. You're in good hands with CAG-

buy a ConsumerActionGroup.co.uk email address, and help to keep this forum going!

 

If you like what I say, feel free to give those scales a tickle :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the number.

 

i know its not always recommended to speak but at the end of the day, they are just doing their jobs like any of us.

 

should i call to confirm what the debt is for and then ask for them to cease action and put it into writing as i think anyone could go around asking for money and they should have some way to prove there is a judegment?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Avoid speaking to them. They are only interested in getting money from you.

 

Keep everything in writing.

 

You need to find out what the alleged debt relates to and who it was owed to.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the number.

 

i know its not always recommended to speak but at the end of the day, they are just doing their jobs like any of us.

 

should i call to confirm what the debt is for and then ask for them to cease action and put it into writing as i think anyone could go around asking for money and they should have some way to prove there is a judegment?

 

If you do phone the bailiff, make sure you can record the call, as they suffer from severe memory loss when asked to recall what they said.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I spoke to someone who was helpful at first and told me that it is in fact a parking fine but couldnt tell me where or when etc.

As soon as i said thta this wasnt right and i at least wanted some proof before i hand over money, they got nasty and said that the police would come along with a locksmith and take my things. Basically they wanted me to setup a direct debit.

 

So I have sent a bout 3 or 4 emails this week and finally received a reply this morning...

 

We note that you feel that you do not owe the Penalty Notice that is the subject of the Warrant of Execution we seek to enforce.

 

The Council will not normally withdraw a Warrant of Execution unless a valid Witness Statement is sworn but this will only normally be accepted if sworn within 21 days of the service of the County Court Order. It should be sworn at the County Court at which the Order was made. They have not informed us that such a Witness Statement has been accepted therefore we must continue.

 

Even if you are within the time limit, there are only four grounds on which a Witness Statement can be validly accepted . They are :-

 

1) You did not receive the Notice to owner.

 

2) You made representations to the local authority about the penalty charge within 28 days of service of the Notice to Owner and did not receive a rejection notice.

 

3) You appealed to a traffic adjudicator against the local authority’s decision to reject your representations but received no response to that appeal.

 

4) The Penalty Charge Notice has been paid in full.

 

Please note that unless the Council tell us not to proceed, we will continue with our recovery action.

 

 

 

There is a lot of timelimits on there and a lot of information that I think should be taken with a pinch of salt.

 

At this moment, I can honestly say that I have no idea if the county court order was three days or three months ago.

 

What is the next step? Write to the council?

 

Is there a way to put these people on hold as they seem to think burglary is legal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it is for Parking and you are not aware of the ticket you should apply for an Out of Time to the Traffic Enforcement Centre on the basis you never received the Notice originally. Have you moved recently, is your vehicle registered at another address?

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well they can't break in for a council pcn, so are bluffing, I think others will be able to advise further, but if you have no knowledge an Out Of Time application to the Northanpton bulk clearing kangaroo court centre , the TEC may well be in order to put the proceedings on hold, cancel the bailiff and his fees, and put the case back to the pre court stage

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

tom, brassneck and all. thanks for your help.

 

I sent a couple of emails which came back with cleverly worded replys about how I need to pay sooner rather than later and the usual stuff you would expect from a slightly dubious company. I sent a recorded post letter explaning that I have no knowledge of the ticket and requesting details, this was sent on the 10th. I had no reply, but have had another visit with an even bigger bill for £500+ which I have no idea how it could be so much!

 

At this point in time, I have no idea what car or where or anything really and dont even know about the court details.

 

Is it worth speaking to the council as I dont think bristow will go out of their way to help?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...