Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
    • Developing computer games can be wildly expensive so some hope that AI can cut the cost.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Urgent help required-ccj claim received while the claimant already made claim to my insurance company


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4655 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi thr I had a minor accident in August 2010 which was mainly other dirver's fault. But she made claim against me which was being dealt by Swiftcover. Because of this Swiftcover reduced my no claim bonus.

 

However today I received a CCJ claim form out of blue from the claimant in my home address. I thought it should be dealt by Swiftcover. I was even told by Swiftcover team so. I do not why this person send me a CCJ claim form. She even did not give me any warning or any notice for this. It was issued by a solicitor firm of Kent.

 

Can she do that and what should I do now. Can someone send CCJ claim form when I am insured and she made claim to my insurance company already...

 

The POC says as follows:

 

The claimant claims damages due to the defendants negligent driving. Failed to take avoiding action, steering, swerving or otherwise, so as to avoid the said collission. on 00-08-10 at (road name) a collission occured betweeen vehicle driven by claimant regd n0.... and vehicle driven by defendant regd no....... The defendant reversed into claimant's stationery vehicle causing damage and the claimant claims:

1. The sum of £1xxx.05

2. Statutory interest pursuant to section 69 of Country Court Act 1984 at a rate of 8.00 % per annum from 07.09.10 to 19.07.11, £129.95 and thereafter at a daily rate of 0.41 untill judgment or sooner payment

Repairs xxxx.67

Excess xxx.00

Avica's Hire xxx.xx

The truth is I was stationery and she hit my backside, Also her car had minor damage, Cause she hit my backside I had no damage. there were no witness for none of us. Today I checked the status of the claim in Swiftcover which says 'OPEN'

Please advice what shall I do.. I will lose my career if I get CCJ…

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi JM

 

Pass it on to Swiftcover, send it Recorded, get the address right, it's bizzare but a similar thing happened to my relative.

Keep a copy, just incase they lose it.

 

Thread moved.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would also recommend ringing Swiftcover to inform them you have received this claim form.

 

It sounds as if her insurers have refused to pay out (perchance her cover was only third party?) and as if Swiftcover are taking their time to close claim either way - or they may have declined her claim but haven't finished with the file hence it still showing as open!

 

Feebee_71

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not abnormal, so no need to worry there. the claim is against you, with your insurer being paid by you, to cover you for it, but in the eyes of the law the action is against you.

For whatever reason the third party is now suing you for their damages, as advised above, send it in recorded delivery and get the insurer to deal.

They should have had an idea this was about to happen (95% of the time they know this, it leads up to this), so they should have sent you a letter or similar to advise you what to do if you get a summons.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys thank you for your support. Today I had email contact with Swiftcover and they guy from SWiftcover told me to email him the CCJ claim form which I did and he said he will deal with the matter accordingly. However end of today I have not got any confirmation on what he has done yet. I guess I should leave with him for 2 days and then chase him again.

 

By the by swiftcover never told me in advance that this will happen.. I was told by Swiftcover that the third party have not contacted them after initial contact...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi thr I was told by Swiftcover they have settled the case and issued the cheque to the third party solicitors. However I was told by the third party solicitor they will not stop the court action untill the cheques is recievd and cleared. Now I have not acknowledge the CCJ claim form which last date is this friday as I had sent the CCJ claim form to Swiftcover. However it does not seem that SWiftcover had acknowledge the claim form either.

 

Now if the claim form is not acknowledged while the case are being settled with the thrid party solicior, will I get judgment automatically against me. What should I do now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would not worry about it. Even if they get a judgement, the courts allow 30 days for settlement before the judgment is registered. By then it would have all been dealt with.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for prompt reply Uncle. U mean there is no risk of CCJ registered in my name and I do not need to acknowledge it at all...

 

Yes I don't think it will happen if Swiftcover have issued the settlement cheque to the third parties solicitor.

 

I think you should make a complaint to Swiftcover for putting you through this. There are many other similar posts online, so they must be having problems.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jason - responding to your PM.

 

I think you'd be wise to protect your interests here. I agree with what UncleB says but I think you'd be unwise to assume Swiftcover have responded to the court claim.

 

I suggest you respond to the Claim using the Acknowledgement form which you should send back to the court before the deadline.

 

You need only say something like:-

 

This is an vehicle insurance-related matter that I believe has been settled by my insurer, Swiftcover, on my behalf. Accordingly, I deny all of the claim on the basis that it has been handled, and settled, by my insurers.

 

I understand that the Claimant has now been paid in full thus enabling them to Discontinue this court claim against me.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Slick thank you for your reply. Thought you are on holiday.

 

However I should tell you that I emailed MCOL team of the Northampton County Court with the email that I recievd from the claimant solicitor where the claimant solicitor suggested that I do not need to acknowledge the form as the claimant solicitor received comfirmation from Swiftcover that a cheque being issued.

 

MCOL (Money Claim Onlien team) of Court replied me back saying they have updated the system but they will need confirmation from the claimant that the payment has been made.

 

Do you think I will still need to acknowledge it. Can I write all those you suggested if I acknowledge online?

 

Thanks.

Edited by jason_mnm
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to be safe, acknowledge the claim in the manner I suggested above.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...