Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • sorry she is a private individual, the cars are parking on her land. she can clamp the cars. only firms were outlawed from doing it bazza. thats what the victims of people dumping cars on their drives near airports did and they didn't not get prosecuted.    
    • The DVLA keeps two records of you. One as a driver and one for your car. If they differ you might find out in around a month when they will send you a reminder as well as to your other half for their car. If you receive nothing then you can be fairly sure that you were tailgating though wouldn't explain why they didn't pick up your car on one of drive past their cameras. However even if you do get a PCN later then your situation will not change. The current PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 which is the main law that covers private parking. It doesn't comply for two reasons. 1. Section 9 [2][a] states  (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The PCN states 47 minutes which are the arrival and departure times not the time you were actually parked. if you subtract the time you took to drive from the entrance. look for a parking place  park in it perhaps having to manoeuvre a couple of times to fit within the lines and unload the children reloading the children getting seat belts on  driving to the exit stopping for cars pedestrians on the way you may well find that the actual time you were parked was quite likely to be around ten minutes over the required time.  Motorists are allowed a MINIMUM of ten minutes Grace period [something that the rogues in the parking industry conveniently forget-the word minimum] . So it could be that you did not overstay. 2] Sectio9 [2][f]  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN does not include the words in brackets and in 2a the Act included the word "must". Another fail. What those failures mean is that MET cannot transfer the liability to pay the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable which is why we recommend our members not to appeal. It is so easy to reveal who was driving by saying "when I parked the car" than "when the driver parked the car".  As long as they don't know who was driving they have little chance of winning in court. This is partly because Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. And because anyone with a valid motor insurance policy is able to drive your cars. It is a shame that you are too far away to get photos of the car park signage. It is often poor and quite often the parking rogues lose in Court on their poor signage alone. I hope hat you can now relax and not panic about the PCN. You will receive many letters from Met, their unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors threatening you with ever higher amounts of money. The poor dears have never read the Act which states quite clearly that the maximum sum that can be charged is the amount on the signs. The Act has only been in force for 12 years so it may take a  few more years for the penny to drop.  You can safely ignore everything they send you unless or until they send you a Letter of Claim. Just come back to us if they do send one of those love letters to you and we will advise on a snotty letter to send them. In the meantime go on and enjoy your life. Continue reading other threads and if you do get any worrying letters let us know. 
    • Hopefully the ANPR cameras didn't pick up the two vehicles, but I don't think you're out of the woods just yet. MET's "work" consists of sending out hundreds of these invoices every week so yours might be a few days behind your partner's. There is also the matter of Royal Mail.  I once sold two second-hand books to someone on eBay.  Weirdly the cost of sending them separately was less than the cost of sending them in one parcel.  So to save a few bob I sent them seperately.  One turned up the next day.  One arrived after four days.  They were  sent from the same post office at the same time! But let's hope I'm being too pessimistic. Please update us of any developments.
    • New version after LFI's superb analysis of the contract. Sorry, but you need to redo the numbering of the paras and of the exhibits in the right order after all the damage I've caused! Defendant's WS - version 4.pdf
    • Hi  no nothing yet. Hope it stays that way 😬
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

An Umbrella company, called Legal-e... Is it legal?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4347 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi People,

 

A quick question.

 

I work for an recruitment company which is based in Bradford. They are my employer and pay my wages and obviously take a cut of my wages each week. I live in Leeds and have a round trip of 32 miles to "Morrison's" in a Village called Flaxby ,where I work as a Fork lift truck driver.

 

I am currently paying a £40 minimum in petrol a week, and have kept petrol receipts for the last 4 months.

 

My question is, Can I reclaim expenses from the agency ( my employer ) or the government? Sorry if this question has been asked before, as I am new around these parts.

 

Many Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I doubt it but I don't have sufficient knowledge in umbrella companies to say for definate. I'm sure any payment would have had to have been agreed in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have worked on jobs where fellow colleagues have worked for umbrella companies and they manged to claim petrol expenses back through said companies. So I am assuming you must be able to claim back tax etc...

Link to post
Share on other sites

A round trip of 32 miles? Hate to sound harsh but I am doing a round trip of +70 miles per day during the week. Being pushed pass £50 per week for fuel. The best I have got from the agency is a rate of 10p per hour from the rate they were offering for a normal worker. I would love to have a forklift license tbh be on a ever higher rate. 8-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can only reclaim mileage if the agency send you to separate places of work on a regular basis, so if you were working at several sites then you would be able to reclaim mileage between sites, but not for the mileage to your normal place of work. If you are on a long term placement then the location of the site would be classed as the 'normal' or 'permanent' place of work and you cannot claim expenses.

 

Some Umbrella companies will claim that you are permitted relief for the journey to and from the place of employment, but this is only valid for multi-site or short term placements in between periods of regular work, and HMRC will inevitably catch up with, and charge back cases where this happens with long-term placements.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yeah,the agencies can arrange to pay you through an umbrella company,the umbrella company i use is called fairgate construction,they handle wages for a lot of agencies,they deduct 18 pounds a week from your wage and you get tax relief on that,you fill form in for petrol help also you get 5pounds a day food allowance if its less than 10 hours,10 pounds a day if more than 10 hours they also arrange 3pounds a day laundry its all legal but ya need an umbrella company to do the paperwork,I get 10 pounds an hour as well so it aint too bad

Link to post
Share on other sites

Be very careful. This is all only relevant if you would normally be self-employed and would be able to file these expenses as essential in the course of your business. Meals can only be claimed as a necessary business expense, not claimed automatically, and the amount claimed HAS to be spent on a meal - therefore it A) must be an allowable expense, and B) the claim must be for the exact amount spent. Similarly, and mileage claimed must be allowable, ie only claimed for trips over and above those made to the normal workplace.

 

Many umbrella companies have previously been able to use a 'dispensation' from HMRC in claiming such expenses as 'allowable', however due to abuses of the type that are being discussed here (reclaiming mileage for what would be 'commuting' for everybody else, and claiming relief for meals which the worker would have eaten or had to pay for in any case ), HMRC have already announced that they intend to revoke the special dispensation afforded to Umbrella Companies and in future, such claims will require receipted evidence and will be subject to the same scrutiny as for other tax affairs. The consequences for Umbrella Companies are likely to be severe, and particular where the revocation could be made retrospective, there will be some hefty tax bills involved.

 

For most people travel to work is a necessary and expensive affair, and commuting to a normal place of work has never been tax-deductable - people instead have to consider either moving or changing jobs if the cost is not affordable. Mileage required over and above the 'norm' is subject to tax relief, but only in certain circumstances. Similarly, most people either buy lunch and have to pay for it, or take a packed lunch, but again it is reasonable that if you are required to work over and above what is normal, or have to entertain clients, that relief can be given in certain circumstances.

 

What is being discussed here is bordering on tax evasion....

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry I disagree,

 

I have never avoided paying tax and never would. Just trying to find out what I can / cannot claim back in which ever manner. Seems like I have the answers I was looking for.

 

Any tips on Working Tax credits sidewinder. I.e At what threshold of annual wage can you stop claiming?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry - I was not intending to point the finger at anybody and I certainly wasn't labelling you as a tax dodger! Believe you me, if I could find a way to reclaim tax on my private mileage I would have done so like a shot! Umbrella Companies crop up from time to time on the forum for various reasons, and whilst some people think they are the bees knees, there are an equal number of horror stories.

 

WTC is way too complicated to explain in simple terms - the best thing you can do is to use the Calculator which can be found here http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/MoneyTaxAndBenefits/TaxCredits/Paymentsandentitlement/entitlement/DG_181270

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

personally I think you are better being selfemployed these days,you could cut the agency out by approaching potential employers yourself,agencies obviously charge a few quid more than they pay the workers,thats how they make their money,if you were selfemployed you could probably get a pound or more an hour and claim your fuel receipts as tax deductable also any other costs,overalls,gloves,boots etc that you could justify

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sidewinder,

 

No problems my fellow forum poster.

 

Did not think you was pointing any fingers, I did say several posts earlier that I had my answer.

 

Working Tax credits is complicated I know, and have fillled the relevant forms. Was just asking broadly, for any possible advice.

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi,

 

I have just started work for a new agency in Leeds and there payroll department is paying me through an umbrella company.

 

I had to fill out an expenses form, which included my daily petrol and food costs. This totaled £87.19....

 

I will cut and paste the explanation of how their system works, and show you my payslip.... could someone please explain why I am paying so little tax, NI etc. And if it is Legal?

 

Here is there explanation :-

 

 

First of all, we are an umbrella company and we pay temporary workers on behalf of their recruitment agencies.

As an umbrella company we are able to claim expenses on behalf of temporary workers and offset these against their gross pay in order to reduce their tax and NI payments. Please note that the expenses part on your payslip becomes a non-taxable part of your gross and these are not directly reimbursed to the temporary worker. Only tax saving made on this part of wage being protected from being taxed will get added to the net pay to increase it .These expenses include travel to and from work, a food allowance and other expenses incurred due to the nature of temporary work.* Your meal allowances are based on your hours worked each week.* Any other additional expense incurred by you to carry out your role may be taken into consideration, however, please check with the Customer Service team at Legal-e who will advise you accordingly as you will be required to keep receipts for these.

 

The purpose of an umbrella company is to allow the worker to come home with a higher weekly wage than the standard PAYE system. From the savings made in the tax and NI payments Legal-E put some of this money back into the workers pay to make them better off.

 

 

* Only temporary workers can take advantage of this scheme as permanent employees are not allowed to receive additional tax free allowance in the form of expenses. This means that through Legal-E you are not taxed on your whole gross salary, instead you are taxed on only your taxable income and because of this we must lay out your pay slip in a particular way. To calculate your net pay you will need to look at your taxable amount only deduct NI and tax, then add your expenses equals your net pay.

 

 

 

You can easily check how much better off you are each week from questioned dates by using

Just enter your weekly gross, insert in Gross Income Every 52 weeks, and tick 1 week in Wage Breakdown, enter your correct tax code and calculate.

 

It is not PAYE system so the rules of this system do not apply here.

When it comes to the final figure on the P60 –it sums up all the taxable earnings and not a gross figure as the gross has still got expenses un-deducted from it as they are tax free.

 

 

Here is the payslip break down :-

 

 

Hours = 40.25

Rate = 6.50

Amount = 261.63

 

DEDUCTIONS

 

Tax = 0.25

Employee's Ni = 0.72

 

 

BREAKDOWN

 

Gross pay = 261.62

salary Gross = 261.62

Taxable = 145.00

 

Less

 

Tax = 0.25

NI = 0.72

 

add EXPENSES = 87.19

 

NON-Taxable = 116.61

less

Holiday Accrual = 29.42

 

 

NET PAY = 231.22

 

Hope the payslip details make sense, I could not cut and paste the PDF document, but have typed all relevant details...

 

Hope you can shed some light on this.. I am better off, but need to know if I will owe the tax man?

 

Many Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there. This does sound odd if you don't understand umbrella companies, which I don't either.

 

You might want to post on the Employment forum here as well, because in the past we've heard from people who understand all this.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...