Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi all!   Thank you in advance for any help you can give me!!    I parked up (at 18:08) in a rush, entered my Reg and paid for an hour of parking. At 18:20 I got a ticket for not paying for parking.    I've just looked at my receipt and noticed why ... I put "22" instead of "21"  when i put in my Reg. yes... what a stupid mistake.    I seem to remember there being a court case or a rule change about entering the wrong reg but the company wasn't at a loss because i had paid for the parking just technically for the wrong car. Am i making that up?    Any advice would be gratefully received, even some key points i have to hit when doing the appeal      
    • You haven't returned to the thread to give us your views, but a couple of other things strike me which you should consider: 1. You say that at no time was your father's licence revoked by the DVLA. It didn't have to be revoked. It expired in September and his "entitlement to drive" (of which the licence provides proof) expired along with it. He could only continue driving whilst his application was being processed by virtue of s88, and it seems clear to me (based on what you have said) that he was not able to take advantage of the benefits provided by that section. 2. The letter he received threatening to revoke his licence was probably a template letter sent when any medical issues are brought to the attention of the DVLA. But it is clear that beyond September until it was eventually renewed, your father had no valid licence to be revoked. I believe a "not guilty" plea in court will fail. The basic facts are that your father's licence expired in September, it was not renewed until February because the DVLA were looking into his medical declaration and he could not take advantage of s88. So in December he had no licence and no entitlement to drive under s88. The facts that he believed he was fit to drive and that his licence was eventually renewed may mitigate the offence but they do not provide a defence. I also asked whether he had received a summons (very unusual these days) or whether he had received a "Single Justice Procedure Notice". The way to proceed from here differs slightly depending on what he has received so if you let me know, I'll advise further.  
    • Well, what I've read from various sources suggest if a CCJ is 6 years old that if becomes pretty much ineffective for enforcement purposes in its original form.  And that if it's about to expire then the claimant needs to apply to the court to extend the original CCJ within the final year.  Even if they do apply for an extension within the 6 years they have to have a very strong argument for doing so such as the person being out of the country or could not be traced, basically show they were actively still perusing the debt I guess. Now if a claimant ever does apply within the 6 years to extend the CCJ, would the person named on if be notified by the court that such an application has been made?.  In my case I've heard nothing from the court so assume no such application has been made.  The original CCJ in my own case is now a year beyond the 6 years of issue so must now make things even less likely again. So whilst the CCJ exists that they have not enforced it in that time must surely make it unlikely they can now take it back to court because as said it would be very rare for a judge to agree to such action now. That said, I guess they now can't use the CCJ to continue with any action for an attachment order to our mortgage either?
    • Donald Trump now banned from countries including Canada and UK as convicted felon WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK There are 37 countries that bar felons from entering, even to visit.  
    • Well, they trashed their last election manifesto pledges, so nothing new really is it? They just find weasel words to try to claim they haven't actually failed if you just look at it just a little squinted and in this particular way  - and are stupid.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Ingeus


Raven1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2494 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

@Aelous That's a crazy situation! i'd be off to the papers :-x

Have you been sanctioned or just been given the cold shoulder for 5 weeks? You should get some good info here but i'd also take a look at @boycottworkfare on twitter or send them a mail info@boycottworkfare they will help, and i know the guy is online now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 6.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

@flumps That sounds like you have to apply even if the job isn't suitable? To me it sounds like they are spamming with a general list taken from who knows where, then forcing you to apply for unsuitable jobs in the hope that you get work unsuitable/or not, so the wp can claim a job outcome payment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven't been sanctioned (I don't think so, I haven't received anything about any doubts being raised.

I think it's more the advisor trying to bully me into jumping through hoops. They don't like it when you stick up for yourself; they seem to expect everyone to just nod and agree with everything they're told to do.

I have been asked to leave more than once before, usually whenever I question them.

 

Edit: Forgot to mention the time 5 week gap.

It sees to vary, sometimes they'll ask me to go in once a week, other times it can be up to a month without any contact (except the emails)

I would say this is probably due to them being busy or the advisor not wanting to deal with me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im glad your not sanctioned, you seem to know how to handle them:-)

I keep all emails, paperwork, anything! and i always take my camera and phone to record (just in case), im not liking these WP and i will make sure they get no more profit off my back!

The spamming with these emails should be reported, Flumps is spot on (again) it is a breach of data protection, im at ingeus/scientium but don't get that type of email.... yet!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, it basically is just a list of random jobs.

I asked one time where they come from and apparently they're "privately posted positions only they have access too" which is funny because I check them all (out of curiosity) and they're all listed on the DirectGov (and other) websites.

Sometimes I even get Spreadsheets with like 40 random jobs all over the Country and they're from the JCP site.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you should be safe if you have your own log, like the job centre one (i just show them that) but i am expected to forward 5 jobs applied via email per week that i apply for, this week iv'e not applied for any jobs via email (so far) so im not sure what they will say at my next appointment, but the job centre seem happy enough as long as im searching.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hehe, WP use the direct gov website and tey use other well known sites such as monster and total jobs, they don't get privately posted positions as the mahority of companies utilise as many free advertising sites as possible.

Link to post
Share on other sites

connexions I believe are joining forces with the national careers service at some point (I'm sure our adviser who comes in to the JCP on behalf of the National Careers Service previously next steps said this when everything changed last month).

Link to post
Share on other sites

These people (WP advisers) are idiots and liars.

I had to go on a course in march about how to fill in an application form. I explained to the lady that I knew how to fill in an application form, there wasn't really much room for error, her response was "well obviously you don't or you wouldn't be here would you?". I went along with it anyway, free trip to the town centre and back paid for by the tax payer.

This course was taught by some young lady who looked about 19. There was one guy on the course who was 54 and was an accountant.

It's completely ridiculous how some 19 year old fresh from college thinks they can lecture a middle aged man on "how to fill in an application form"

Edited by Aelous
Link to post
Share on other sites

Big fiddle going on here somewhere

Im with Ingeus, they send me to Scientium, which have 2 table's in the Next Steps office, in the Connexions building.

Wonder who claims for rent, IT Consumables ect?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am pretty sure they claim the travel expenses back. I do drive but I always take public transport whenever I'm going to the Providers office for appointments/courses, so I can claim the money back. They take photo copies of the bus tickets as proof.

When I take my tickets to the front desk, they have a big pot of coppers and they stand there in front of everyone counting it out, I find it embarrassing.

On several occasions they've "ran out" of money to pay back travel expenses and they've been told to "just keep the ticket and we'll refund it later".

What a shambles.

Link to post
Share on other sites

connexions I believe are joining forces with the national careers service at some point (I'm sure our adviser who comes in to the JCP on behalf of the National Careers Service previously next steps said this when everything changed last month).

 

Quick Question Flumps - Is a current unaltered JSA agreement that someone holds the absolute arbitrator?

 

What I mean is, can one be sanctioned if the "offence" being sanctioned is not in your personalised agreement? As it sounds like the Providers are putting demands and expectations onto claimants, but which are not in any signed agreement?

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

haha i do the same, but i do know that you can claim for petrol costs, just they don't pay for parking. Not sure how much they pay per mile or if that is just when attending a course?

 

 

Hi Booji Boy

if you go in your car you get 20p per mile

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am pretty sure they claim the travel expenses back. I do drive but I always take public transport whenever I'm going to the Providers office for appointments/courses, so I can claim the money back. They take photo copies of the bus tickets as proof.

You can claim 20p per mile, and you can claim car parking. You would need evidence for parking, either a Park & Ride ticket or similar.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Honda+ID, 20p per mile + parking, that's nice to know. Still i think it's better to get a saveaway or day rider, at least it can be used all day and then passed on for someone else to use :-)

 

Thanks osdset, can get some good info and links from that! I see Referrals to the Work Programme from 1stJune 2011 to end of January 2012 is 565 thousand, of those - 519 thousand Attachment fees were paid to Work Providers, that so far is a whopping "215.6million pounds" :jaw:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Honda+ID, 20p per mile + parking, that's nice to know. Still i think it's better to get a saveaway or day rider, at least it can be used all day and then passed on for someone else to use :-)

 

Thanks osdset, can get some good info and links from that! I see Referrals to the Work Programme from 1stJune 2011 to end of January 2012 is 565 thousand, of those - 519 thousand Attachment fees were paid to Work Providers, that so far is a whopping "215.6million pounds" :jaw:

That's an awful lot of old rope.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They say there are 2.65 million Unemployed, That's at the least a potential 1.04 Billion Pounds in attachment fees alone for the first year, and they get the attachment fees for 3 years. No figures yet for Job Outcome fees or Sustainment fees, no wonder Emma H made sooo much!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great links and discussion still continuing here!

 

I'm preparing to send an email to Ingeus about the failure to respond to my last request (now 10 days ago)

 

Does anything need adding to the following:

 

Hi ,

 

I sent an email 10 days ago which read:

 

Hi , as of last Friday my circumstances have changed and am I no longer have a current claim for JSA.

 

As a result i'd like to inquire about the process regarding having Ingeus removing my data from their systems at my request. A second inquiry asking who other than the DWP/JC/HMRC my data has been shared with is also been made. A third inquiry about whether or not I have to pay to acquire copy of the data you have collected and what the process of this is. I would be grateful for these details.

 

Thanks in advance for your help in this matter

 

Yorkylad

 

From my, limited, understanding of the law it was a legal requirement to reply. I do not understand why this has not be done. Though obviously i'm not surprised. It is an action (more accurately a lack of action) to which I have become accustomed to during my time with Ingeus. Brushing peoples concerns, complaints and unwanted inquiries under the proverbial carpet. Then the work programme providers are bemused at the wide-spread mistrust of them.

 

It would fantastic for us all to avoid the impending legal action I intend to pursue should I not be furnished with a reply (as Ingeus are obliged to send me)

 

Again....

 

Thanks in advance (should you choose to) for help in this matter

 

Yorkylad

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...