Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • In my time I've never seen a payout/commission from a PPC to a landlord/MA. Normally the installation of all the cameras/payment of warden patrols etc is free but PPCs keep 100% of the ticket revenue. Not saying it doesn't happen mind. I've done some more digging on this: Remember, what your lease doesn't say is just as important as what it does say. If your lease doesn't mention a parking scheme/employment of a PPC/Paying PCNs etc you're under no legal obligation to play along to the PPC's or the MA's "Terms and conditions". I highly doubt your lease had a variation in place to bring in this permit system. Your lease will likely have a "quiet enjoyment" clause for your demised space and the common areas and having to fight a PPC/MA just to park would breach that. Your lease has supremacy of contract, but I do agree it's worth keeping cool and not parking there (and hence getting PCNs) for a couple months just so that the PPC doesn't get blinded by greed and go nuclear on you if you have 4 or 5 PCNs outstanding. At your next AGM, bring it up that the parking controls need to be removed and mention the legal reasons why. One reason is that under S37(5b) Landlord and Tenant Act 1987,  more than 75% of leaseholders and/or the landlord would have needed to agree, and less than 10% opposed, for the variation to take place. I highly doubt a ballot even happened before the PPC was bought in so OPS even being there is unlawful, breaching the terms of your lease. In this legal sense,  the communal vote of the "directors" of the freehold company would have counted for ONE vote of however many flats there are (leases/tenants) + 1 (landlord). It's going to be interesting to see where this goes.  
    • @Whyisitthisthank you very much for asking. I am still feeling anxious, especially when someone rings the doorbell, or when I receive a letter I feel a it paranoid. I stopped going to the shops unless I really have to. I shop online now. When I see security I feel paralised. 
    • My expectation was their WS would include the best paperwork, like at least true copies of originals, but these just look wrong somehow, perhaps the font and size of font... Not sending me the DN in CCA request but producing it for evidence I would argue could be a tactic used by them... - Page 11 with ticks - there is no reference to IP addresses - Home addresses are correct for dates in documents   Just looking up example Defendant WS's while awaiting your thoughts on this
    • Hello lovely, just posting to check in to see how you are feeling now? Hopefully your feeling better? 
    • Sorry my redactions made it harder dx. Tick dates are 11/12/2014
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Knocked wing mirror off illegally parked car now owner is being akward


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4700 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

As the title suggests my sister was driving her car on the main road when she accidently knocked the wing mirror off an illegallly parked car. The owner saw this happen and they exchanged details.

 

My sister is trying to find a replacement wing mirror however the owner is now getting akward saying that he will claim on her insurance and this would be ridicilous as my sister has offered to pay for a replacement wing mirror.

 

Point is can he claim more than the wing mirror costs if he decides to be silly and approach my sisters insurer or tries top extort more money from her than it actually costs??

If there are spelling mistakes on my posts, I blame the gremlins tapping my keys. :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

He dosent know who her insurer is they just provided each other with their names and addresses and obviously registration numbers she is getting a few quote for a wing mirror and is going to offer to replace it but is not going to give him the money himself so that he can try and claim more than is needed.

If there are spelling mistakes on my posts, I blame the gremlins tapping my keys. :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

As the title suggests my sister was driving her car on the main road when she accidently knocked the wing mirror off an illegallly parked car. The owner saw this happen and they exchanged details.

 

My sister is trying to find a replacement wing mirror however the owner is now getting akward saying that he will claim on her insurance and this would be ridicilous as my sister has offered to pay for a replacement wing mirror.

 

Point is can he claim more than the wing mirror costs if he decides to be silly and approach my sisters insurer or tries top extort more money from her than it actually costs??

 

Depends on the car, but replacing the whole door mirror including the caseing won't be that cheap.

 

The third party could just find out who the Insurer is, using the reg no. and make a claim to them directly or via their own Insurers. Your sister would then be contacted by her Insurers to find out the details, as to what had happened. There is a condition on her policy that she has to advise them of all such accidents/incidents. Of course if her Insurers get involved, it will cost her in terms of no claims deduction (2 years worth unless protected) and a premium loading.

 

Best thing to do is call the third party if she can get the phone number and to discuss this, hopefully in a calmer way than at the time of the accident. If both can look into the cost of getting the mirror fixed and get agreement that would probably be the best way forward. If they can't, then the Insurers will have to be involved. When you agree to any private settlement, get the third party to sign/date a receipt that they have received £x amount representing full and final settlement for the damage to their cars door mirror.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

my sisters boyfriend has spoken to a solicitor who said that as he was illegally parked he is entitled to nothing as it would invalidate his own insurance as well. so we shall wait and see what happens then!

If there are spelling mistakes on my posts, I blame the gremlins tapping my keys. :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

my sisters boyfriend has spoken to a solicitor who said that as he was illegally parked he is entitled to nothing as it would invalidate his own insurance as well. so we shall wait and see what happens then!

 

This is VERY dangerous advice!

 

Jogs

Link to post
Share on other sites

perhaps you could expand on your comment re dangerous advice as this is only one opinion ive got so far I would be grateful to hear your opinion

If there are spelling mistakes on my posts, I blame the gremlins tapping my keys. :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly, how says the car was parked illegally? Was it ticketed, did the Police say so?

 

Second, the driver is ALWAYS responsible for his/her actions. The driver hit a parked car.

 

I've asked the experts to look in and advise.

 

Jogs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to elaborate on the circumstances of the accident, my sister was in a stationery position at temporary traffic lights with the third party parked on the left on double yellow lines. There was so little space to manouvre as the third parties vehicle was a mercedes 300 which is rather a large car and therefore she caught the wing mirror as she went past.

 

Also, with reference to name and address we only have his first name and mobile number nothing else.

If there are spelling mistakes on my posts, I blame the gremlins tapping my keys. :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

The police did not attend and the vehicle was parked on double yellow lines which is illegal. Should she inform the insurers just to cover herself in case he tries to claim. Also should she be taking pictures of the accident scene and writing down a witness statement should anything untoward happen.

 

The guy is claiming he has a quote for the repair and replacement of the mirror at £380.00 which is ridicolous.

If there are spelling mistakes on my posts, I blame the gremlins tapping my keys. :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

The police did not attend and the vehicle was parked on double yellow lines which is illegal. Should she inform the insurers just to cover herself in case he tries to claim. Also should she be taking pictures of the accident scene and writing down a witness statement should anything untoward happen.

 

The guy is claiming he has a quote for the repair and replacement of the mirror at £380.00 which is ridicolous.

 

I agree the solicitors advice is not correct in my opinion. Yes the third party should not have been parked illegally, not just on yellow lines, but also in a position to potentially block emergency vehicles from getting past. But this would not avoid negligence of someone crashing into or damaging the car. Who is to say that there was not enough room for your sister to pass their car, without damaging the mirror.

 

I would suggest that your sister lets her Insurers deal with the claim. If they can argue against the claim by the third party, they will do so.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

my sister was in a stationery position at temporary traffic lights with the third party parked on the left on double yellow lines. There was so little space to manouvre as the third parties vehicle was a mercedes 300 which is rather a large car and therefore she caught the wing mirror as she went past.

So stationary, saw space was tight, but still managed to go past fast enough to knock a door mirror clean off?

 

The guy is claiming he has a quote for the repair and replacement of the mirror at £380.00 which is ridicolous.

How old was the car? Whilst he may be trying to profit from this, if he got a quote from a Mercedes garage and any electric controls or the casing were damaged or needed replacing, I could imagine with labour it could be more than you think if he's trying to get the whole thing done.

 

Only agree to pay for a provided invoice for work carried out, not hand over cash.

Link to post
Share on other sites

obviously he is entitled for the cost of work to replace the mirror; he is entitled to put back in the position prior to the incident.

£380 for the mirror/fitting and VAT is not unreasonable. if you know the make/model just ring round garages and get quote to check.

It would be cheaper in the long run than putting through your insurance. loos of NCB and premium loading next time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Raydetinu's advice is good, ask for the quotes and check yourself, but realise it's not up to you where he takes it, as long as it's a legit garage, the choice is thiers . £380 sounds ok, not cheap, but ok. depends what make model, (merc 300 you say) controls (electric, or toggle) is it coloured?, that will involve possible blending. The garage could be charging £40-£60 per hour labour(depends where you live), this could be 2 hours, again depending on what is being done.

You could potentially lose out big time if you push them away. If they go to an accident management firm, you could be looking at repairs, engineers fees, hire alone can be over £100.00 per day with a like for like(1 or 2 days) , loss of earnings, inconvenience the £380 can turn into £700.00.

Edited by Mwynci
Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly, how says the car was parked illegally? Was it ticketed, did the Police say so?

 

Second, the driver is ALWAYS responsible for his/her actions. The driver hit a parked car.

 

I've asked the experts to look in and advise.

 

Jogs

 

 

 

Agreed. Parking on double yellow lines does not make him responsible for the accident.

Link to post
Share on other sites

my sisters boyfriend has spoken to a solicitor who said that as he was illegally parked he is entitled to nothing as it would invalidate his own insurance as well. so we shall wait and see what happens then!

 

That is absolute rubbish, no qualified solicitor would ever say or suggest that.

 

It doesn't matter one bit whether the car was illegally parked or not. If your sister hit it and caused damage then she is 100% totally liable for the cost of repairs.

 

As other people have already said, it would be dangerous to listen to that so called solicitor quite simply because if you do ignore it then chances are it will cost you a lot more money in the long run.

 

Mossycat

Link to post
Share on other sites

Illegal parking could well be a relevant factor, but would not eliminate the responsibility of another.

 

The recent precedent of Andrew Howe v Wayne Houlton (1) Marshall Barry Ltd (2) Norwich Union Insurance Ltd (3) found that parking on the zig zag lines of a pedestrian crossing made no material difference to an accident.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...