Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
    • Hi,   I am not sure if I posted this already here but I don't think I did. I attach a judgement that raises very interesting points IMO. Essentially EVRi did their usual non attendance that we normally see, however the judge (for the first time I've seen in these threads) dismissed the notice and awarded me judgement by default because their notice misses the "confirmation of compliance" paragraph. in and out in 3 minutes (aside from the chat at the end with the judge about his problems with evri) Redacted - evri CPR loss.pdf
    • Just to update this. I did apply to strikeout and they did not attend the hearing. I won by defualt and the hearing lasted 5 minutes (court only allocated 15). The judge simply explained that the only matter he was really considering is if the Defendant could have any oral evidence to defend the claim. However he said he had decided that based on their defence, and their misunderstanding of law, and their non attendence he did not think they had any reasonsable chance so he awarded me SJ + Costs on the claim form + the strikeout fee. Luckily when I sent the defendant the order I woke up the next day to a wire trasnfer for the full sum of the judgement
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HMRC signs up 10 DCAs following mega-tender - 26/05/2011


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4746 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Absotivly Posolutly!! bunch of bandits :jaw::!:

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I owe money to HMRC, wonder how long it will be before the DCA's start sending me even more love letters than they do already :oops:

Have £20k+ in debt, seriously want to be debt free, currently in temporary accomodation and having business problems.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I like the bit

"an offer to pay by installment that we are able to accept"

Whats the betting they will not be able to accept what ever amount is offered

 

I am waiting to see how long before members are posting on here about demands for non-existent debts to HMRC

Link to post
Share on other sites

The amount is around 1.5 K and I was informed that installments could last no longer than 3 months, so even if my sister paid all of her state pension and pension credit over to them every week it would still not clear the 'debt' in 3 months, so she is 'doomed'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

pity it is not credit solutions that sent the threat-o-gram

 

Three of the four DCAs used in a previous HMRC debt collection pilot project have been retained - iQor, Fairfax and CCS Collect. It is believed the fourth, Credit Solutions, was not retained.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

Just read this on Credit Today...Haven't Apex been selected by HMRC!

Just goes to show what an industry this is.....****!!

OFT warning to debt management firms - 27/05/2011

 

The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) has warned debt management firms that their licenses will be revoked if they do not operate within guidelines and withhold cash from creditors.

 

The comments come following a BBC investigation that alleged some firms held on to clients' cash rather than paying it to creditors in a bid to secure lower settlements.

 

David Fisher, OFT director of consumer credit, said businesses that operated a full final settlement model had a responsibility to tell consumers what they were doing with their money.

 

"We would be very concerned should a business mislead consumers," he said. "This would call into question its fitness to operate.

 

"We have warned the industry that it needs to improve its business practices and in June 2011 we will publish further guidance setting out the standards we expect of businesses that we license."

 

The BBC alleges that in one case Bolton-based Global Debt Solutions offered to arrange a repayment plan for £40,000 of credit card debt and loans but did not pass the money paid over to creditors.

 

As a result the creditors took the couple who had used the firm’s services to court, resulting in County Court Judgements against them.

 

Global Debt Solutions, which became 3 Step Finance, has since been shut down by the Insolvency Service.

 

Another company, Apex Debt Counselling & Management, is also named in the investigation as having withheld money from creditors.

 

Industry guidelines state that any money taken from debtors should be passed on to creditors within five working days.

 

Lisa Colclough, national money advice policy and development manager at Citizens Advice (CA) that offers free debt advice to consumers, said that some firms offered a useful service that people were prepared to pay for but a lack of regulation provided a fertile breeding ground for rogue operators.

 

"We continue to see far too many people whose debt problems have been made much worse by the high fees and poor service of some debt management companies - including cases where money is not passed on to creditors," she said.

 

The CA is calling for the Consumer Credit Act and data protection legislation to be updated to tackle these problems and has made a super complaint to the OFT calling for a ban on cold calls and upfront fees. A response is expected from the OFT next week.

Edited by twoman
DELETE PICKIE
Link to post
Share on other sites

My sister had another letter this morning for CCS saying they were now chasing a second amount!!! I assume there can only be one amalgamated debt to HRMC? The first claim amount covers all the period since she became 60 up to date so who knows now where this second claim is coming from. Sadly she is now in a very distressed state and we do not know who to turn to next. It has been confirmed by a voluntary company helping 'older' people with tax affairs, that all her assessment are wrong and she owes much, much less than they are claim, the charity has written to them with her new calculations which HMRC are just ignoring. She is too ill and disabled to ever deal with this herself or appear in Court.

 

How did she get in debt - well originally when she was first eligible for State Pension they sent the gross amount to Pension Credit who topped her allowances up to the basic minimum. Apparantly this is wrong as they should have sent the net figure after taking into account what her liability to tax on her state pension would be. This has happened over 5 years, hence she now owes the tax from the minimum guaranteed pension income, which should have included an amount to cover this tax. So, basically the State Pension Office owe this money to HMRC but my sister is the piggy in the middle, we have proof of this, and have sent reams of paperwork to all concerned with copies of everything. No one has bothered to come back to her even though they were all sent Recorded. I think we either have to see our MP or write and send the lot to David Cameron to sort out!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't want to alarm anybody but are friends at CABOT are involved in this,

 

AnaCap buys Cabot Financial from Citi - 08/04/2011

 

AnaCap Financial Partners (“AnaCap”), the European private equity firm that specialises in the financial services sector, acquires Cabot Financial, the consumer debt purchasing firm, from Citi.

 

The purchase will create the UK’s biggest debt purchasing and collection business as AnaCap will integrate Cabot Financial with Apex Credit Management, another market leading debt purchasing and collections agency that is already owned by AnaCap’s funds.

 

Cabot Financial purchases consumer debt from financial institutions and other credit providers that no longer wish to manage that debt internally.

 

Apex manages debt on a contingent basis and also purchases debt from credit providers no longer wanting to manage it internally.

Dispatch, “We have a 911, Armed Robbery in progress, see Surplus Store corner of Peebles Drive and West 24th Street”

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your right a DCA has no formal power, however HMRC does, so they will use this to chase and harrass under the guise of working for the HMRC, what is needed is people to collect evidence on abuse in this process

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi PGH, As you may have seen I have had dealings with the DCA's for nearly two years and have been told

that in collecting for government depts. they must conform to they codes of practice in place for all debt collection,

anything further has to be handed back to the dept. concerned.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Up date my MPs' office has acknowledged my communication on the use of DCA'S for DWP

debt/over payment.

Will post up results.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Couple of very large smelly ones HS:madgrin:

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have received a reply from my MP with regard to the regulating of DCA's and CRA's employed

by the government to collect benefit over payments etc.

He has referred the matter to Lord Freud,Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Welfare Reform)

He been asked to clarify exactly the manner in which the companies are regulated.

Edited by BRIGADIER2JCS

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...