Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • statute barring in Scotland is 5yrs from last payment/use date or date of default Notice + 14 days, whichever is the later. dont confuse that with the 6yrs debts show on credit files (DN's 6th bday regardless to payment or not). they'd never get a claim raised by august in 99% of cases . as long all these debts were taken out whilst resident in scotland and you have not moved since taking them out but failed to inform the original creditor before the debt sale....... then stay radio silent until sb date is reached. then if you wish send our scottish sb letter. just remember unlike E&W in scotland debts are extinguished, dead , gone , parrot. once SB'd dx  
    • Hi all, Love this site and it's no nonsense advice, have dipped in and out of the consumer forums over the years, mostly to assure myself that what I was doing was the right thing when dealing with various businesses (almost 100% success rate, thanks in part to reading and more reading here.). Anyway, the time is almost approaching where I might need to ask for some specific help and I have a couple of queries that I can't see definitively answered. Due to financial mismanagement and severe anxiety issues I stopped paying all unsecured debt in December 2018 (one slipped to the first week in Jan 2019 when the last payment was made having rechecked my bank statement from that period - all my unsecured debt direct debits were cancelled in early Jan 2019). This has left half a dozen debts;  a couple of credit cards, a bank loan, Shop Direct and some Hitachi Finance stuff having been sold on and passing the rounds through the usual suspects, Lowells, Link, PRA Group, others related to them, and then back to them again. I have somehow successfully managed to maintain radio silence and avoided anything more worrying than their begging letters.  I have blocked their phone calls and texts, bumped all emails to the spambox and had a chuckle at their desperate letters.  I've never had anybody at the door.  I have been at the same address since before I defaulted and all correspondence comes to my current home address.  I have NEVER contacted them or admitted any debt. In anticipation of them perhaps ramping up action at the last minute I've had a look at my credit report on Credit Karma (rec'd from this very place) and I see that the default dates on these range from May 2019 to November 2019. Also in preperation I've been reading, reading and reading lots here as advised. Obviously being in Scotland there are a lot fewer posts relating to these matters and it's always quite annoying when OP's do not follow up with any outcome on their cases - how rude! This has also left me a bit confused of when I am able to finally breathe easy (although cancelling all the direct debits in Jan 2019 was the biggest sigh of relief as I knew it was all going to be unmanageable and, well, default one, default all.). I've been reading that defaults should be filed 3-6 months after the missed payment but one of my larger debts was defaulted on 27th August 2019 when the last payment I made was 10th December 2018, meaning the first missed payment was 10th Jan 2019.   My query for now is - when should I infer that these debts are prescribed?  From when the payment was missed, or taking the default date plus 5 years from the credit report? The three I have with the May date are moot anyway as either way they are gone  - some letters from Lowell offering me 90% off to settle is what got me thinking these must have been near SB status, however I have one big 10k+ with a July date and another 10k+ at the end of August I am feeling a bit anxious again, even though I know there is nothing to worry about with the begging letters.  Reading the various forums I am not sure why the OC's didn't take action against me when I read time and again the surprise that other posters haven't already been taken to court for lesser amounts - I'm also surprised I've avoided any action this long as there are plenty in this forum and sub forum who are whisked off to the court by the beggers minions after only a year or so after defaulting.  There are no CCJ/decrees listed on my credit report and I have not received any such judgements against me.  I still just regularly receive the begging emails to the spambox, the blocked phone calls and the letters from the they. I'm also reading that there is no need in Scotland to send an LBC so what should I be looking out for to know that the time has come to engage with CCA requests etc? I'm afraid in a fit I threw a lot of the paperwork out but I have a box of stuff I'm going to go through which may have the original letters from the OC's. Thanks in advance for any advice.  
    • I'm at work now but promise to look in later. Can you confirm how you paid the first invoice?  It wasn't your fault if the signal was so poor and there was no alternative way to pay.  There must be a chance of reversing the charge with your bank.  There are no guarantees but Kev  https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/09766749/officers  has never had the backbone to do court so far.  Not even in one case,  
    • OK  so you may not have outed yourself if you said "we". No matter either way you paid. Snotty letter I am surprised that they were so quick off the mark threatening Court. They usually take months to go that far. No doubt that as you paid the first one they decided to strike quickly and scare you into paying. Dear Chuckleheads  aka Alliance,  I am replying to your LOCs You may have caught me the first time but that is  the end. What a nasty organisation you are. You do realise that you now have now no reason to continue to pursue me after reading my appeal since you know that my car was not cloned. Any further pursuit will end up with a complaint to the ICO that you are breaching my GDPR.  Please confirm that you have removed my details from your records. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I haven't gone for a snotty letter this time as they know that you paid for your car in another car park. So using a shot across their bows .  If it doesn't deter them and they send in the debt collectors or the Court you will then be able to get more money back from them for  breachi.ng your data protection than they will get should they win in Court-and they have no chance of that as you have paid. So go in with guns blazing and they might see sense.  Although never underestimate how stupid they are. Or greedy.
    • Thank you. Such a good point. They did issue all 3 before I paid though. I only paid one because I didn’t have proof of parking that time, only for two others.    Unfortunately no proof of my appeal as it was just submitted through a form on their website and no copy was sent to me. I only have the reply. I believe I just put something like “we made the honest mistake of using the incorrect parking area on the app” and that’s it. Thanks again for your help. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Like
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Welcome Finance PPI and Mr Z ** SUCCESSFUL OUTCOME **


citizenB
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3495 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

So my claim has been stayed for 6 weeks to enable the parties to attempt a settlement.

Edited by MrZ

Please overlook my typos and spelling mistakes, sometimes my fingers arent in sync with my brain :)

I am just a consumer and have no legal training. My posts are opinion only, based on my own limited experience. If in doubt you should seek legal advice from a qualified practitioner.

 

Activ Kapital - Disputed £4,000.00 - 04/04/2011 Settled! WON!

HSBC Current Account - Defaulted for £200.00 Charges. - 19/05/2011 Charges Refunded Default Removed! WON!

HSBC Loan Account - £16,000.00 Unsecured Loan - 05/07/2011 Disputed No Further Contact WON! (for Now)

Barclaycard Account - Disputed account and £1500.00 Charges. - 18/07/2011 Charges Refunded! WON!

London Scottisht - Disputed account and Charges. £25,000.00 - 06/2011 Balance reduced by 95% WON!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 613
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

This says to me that maybe they don't want it to go to court as they know they will loose?

 

I think its just a stalling tactic. Them using every bit of time they are allowed to use.

 

Sadly my draft directions were not ordered. In fact no other directions other than to stay the claim and telling me that I must notify the court by x date whther settlement has been reach or request a stay or the stay be lifted.

Please overlook my typos and spelling mistakes, sometimes my fingers arent in sync with my brain :)

I am just a consumer and have no legal training. My posts are opinion only, based on my own limited experience. If in doubt you should seek legal advice from a qualified practitioner.

 

Activ Kapital - Disputed £4,000.00 - 04/04/2011 Settled! WON!

HSBC Current Account - Defaulted for £200.00 Charges. - 19/05/2011 Charges Refunded Default Removed! WON!

HSBC Loan Account - £16,000.00 Unsecured Loan - 05/07/2011 Disputed No Further Contact WON! (for Now)

Barclaycard Account - Disputed account and £1500.00 Charges. - 18/07/2011 Charges Refunded! WON!

London Scottisht - Disputed account and Charges. £25,000.00 - 06/2011 Balance reduced by 95% WON!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been doing some further research and brainstorming. I would like to get some opinions on the following.

 

1. Kleinwort has been frequently suggested as the cas elaw which supports that my PPI claim can be brought beyond the 6 years since the loan was taken out. The basic argument is that I paid PPI as a result of a mistake. Hvaing read the Kleinwort case, my understanding is that the mistake is one of a mistake of law and not a mistake of fact. In other words if a court made a ruling on the grounds of a law, but later that ruling was clarified and held to be a mistake (by application, or intepretation, etc) then that is a mistake of law...basically the court got it wrong and therefore a claim can be brough after the 6 year limit because of that mistake. It does not relate to a mistake of fact. The argument that PPI was paid by mistake because it was believed to be a requirement to pay, is an example were the mistake is one of fact. In my understanding, the mistake at issue in Kleinwort was on of a mitsake of law. Can any comment here?

 

2. Under section 32 of the Limitations Act, there is an exception for concealment. Now it the recent past it has come to light that Welcome, among others were found to have widespread cases of mis-selling of PPI. In 2008, due to this and other internal failures, WFS was ruled to be in default. WFS had to provide or set aside money to cover the claims that were likely to be made as result of this. WFS had to undertake an internal review of their loans and estimate how much money to set aside for these claims. This means WFS knew they had mis-sold the PPI and would ultimately be held liable in the claims. WFS did not notify me of this or advise that I could bring a claim. Had I been notified of this in 2008 or 2009 I would have been able to make my claim within the 6 year limit. Can this be argued as a concelament under section 32?

 

3. Can anyone clarify whether exception under section 20 of the Limitations Act allows a debtor to bring a claim against the lender with the same application of the 12 year limit or is does this section apply strictly to the lender?

 

4. Lastly, section 14A applies to damages as a result of negligence. What is the burden here for the negligence? Can anyone give an example of how the mis-sale was a rsult of negligence in a way that would satisfy therequirement of this section?

 

I may submit an application to strike out their defence. I am happy I have everything covered with the exception of their defence that the entire claim is time barred. Before I submit an application to strike out, I need to be able to reasonably and successfully argue the claim is not time barred.

 

As always I appreciate any comments/feedback.

Please overlook my typos and spelling mistakes, sometimes my fingers arent in sync with my brain :)

I am just a consumer and have no legal training. My posts are opinion only, based on my own limited experience. If in doubt you should seek legal advice from a qualified practitioner.

 

Activ Kapital - Disputed £4,000.00 - 04/04/2011 Settled! WON!

HSBC Current Account - Defaulted for £200.00 Charges. - 19/05/2011 Charges Refunded Default Removed! WON!

HSBC Loan Account - £16,000.00 Unsecured Loan - 05/07/2011 Disputed No Further Contact WON! (for Now)

Barclaycard Account - Disputed account and £1500.00 Charges. - 18/07/2011 Charges Refunded! WON!

London Scottisht - Disputed account and Charges. £25,000.00 - 06/2011 Balance reduced by 95% WON!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have flagged the questions for you :)

 

Point 2 could be worth pursuing IMHO

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have flagged the questions for you :)

 

Point 2 could be worth pursuing IMHO

 

I really hope I can use it, as at the moment it seems to be the only legally valid way I have around the time limit issues....still researching.

Please overlook my typos and spelling mistakes, sometimes my fingers arent in sync with my brain :)

I am just a consumer and have no legal training. My posts are opinion only, based on my own limited experience. If in doubt you should seek legal advice from a qualified practitioner.

 

Activ Kapital - Disputed £4,000.00 - 04/04/2011 Settled! WON!

HSBC Current Account - Defaulted for £200.00 Charges. - 19/05/2011 Charges Refunded Default Removed! WON!

HSBC Loan Account - £16,000.00 Unsecured Loan - 05/07/2011 Disputed No Further Contact WON! (for Now)

Barclaycard Account - Disputed account and £1500.00 Charges. - 18/07/2011 Charges Refunded! WON!

London Scottisht - Disputed account and Charges. £25,000.00 - 06/2011 Balance reduced by 95% WON!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Prior to my claim being stayed allowing the parties oppertunity to attempt settlement, I sent a Part 18 request for information. I gave 14 days for the response. The time is up today(yesterday was a bank holiday). Does anyone know if the stay of the claim also stays the clock on my Part 18 request, or can I go ahead and apply to the court for an order for my Part 18 request?

Please overlook my typos and spelling mistakes, sometimes my fingers arent in sync with my brain :)

I am just a consumer and have no legal training. My posts are opinion only, based on my own limited experience. If in doubt you should seek legal advice from a qualified practitioner.

 

Activ Kapital - Disputed £4,000.00 - 04/04/2011 Settled! WON!

HSBC Current Account - Defaulted for £200.00 Charges. - 19/05/2011 Charges Refunded Default Removed! WON!

HSBC Loan Account - £16,000.00 Unsecured Loan - 05/07/2011 Disputed No Further Contact WON! (for Now)

Barclaycard Account - Disputed account and £1500.00 Charges. - 18/07/2011 Charges Refunded! WON!

London Scottisht - Disputed account and Charges. £25,000.00 - 06/2011 Balance reduced by 95% WON!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The stay should not effect your part 18 request.Have you read Holyoak –v- Lloyds TSB Bank Plc? It was in Sunderland CC and might be relevant, although only a CC decision and not really any authority. I foulnd it on Lovells LLP website.

 

The matter went before District Judge Loomba. He agreed with Lloyds and held that both claims in relation to the 2004 PPI policy were time-barred, because:1. The documentation provided to Mr Holyoak made it clear that the PPI was optional; and2. Mr Holyoak had the right to cancel the PPI and this was set out in the policy documentation. The Judge found that if Mr Holyoak had read the policy documentation, he would have uncovered the alleged wrongdoing and could have cancelled the PPI and/or pursued his cause of action then.As a result of the above, neither of sections 14A or 32(1)© saved his claims in relation to the 2004 policy and such claims were time-barred. Worth a look.

 

Yes, Holyoak is one of the case I mentioned earlier in the thread. Its one of the cases that has me concerned. Its a county court case so its not binding, but it is an indication of how some judges are looking at certain types of claims. Each case is different, and I can only hope the facts of my case are such that the limitation doesnt apply.

Please overlook my typos and spelling mistakes, sometimes my fingers arent in sync with my brain :)

I am just a consumer and have no legal training. My posts are opinion only, based on my own limited experience. If in doubt you should seek legal advice from a qualified practitioner.

 

Activ Kapital - Disputed £4,000.00 - 04/04/2011 Settled! WON!

HSBC Current Account - Defaulted for £200.00 Charges. - 19/05/2011 Charges Refunded Default Removed! WON!

HSBC Loan Account - £16,000.00 Unsecured Loan - 05/07/2011 Disputed No Further Contact WON! (for Now)

Barclaycard Account - Disputed account and £1500.00 Charges. - 18/07/2011 Charges Refunded! WON!

London Scottisht - Disputed account and Charges. £25,000.00 - 06/2011 Balance reduced by 95% WON!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have flagged the questions for you :)

 

Point 2 could be worth pursuing IMHO

 

Wanted to share some more info that might be helpful.

 

The argument for concealment is a non starter. In order to plead concealment, the defendant (Welcome) will have to be proven to have deliberately concealed or hidden facts. As it would be virtually impossible to prove that they deliberately hid or concealed the mis-sale, this argument is doomed to fail.

 

Hopefully this will be of use to anyone following or reading the thread.

Please overlook my typos and spelling mistakes, sometimes my fingers arent in sync with my brain :)

I am just a consumer and have no legal training. My posts are opinion only, based on my own limited experience. If in doubt you should seek legal advice from a qualified practitioner.

 

Activ Kapital - Disputed £4,000.00 - 04/04/2011 Settled! WON!

HSBC Current Account - Defaulted for £200.00 Charges. - 19/05/2011 Charges Refunded Default Removed! WON!

HSBC Loan Account - £16,000.00 Unsecured Loan - 05/07/2011 Disputed No Further Contact WON! (for Now)

Barclaycard Account - Disputed account and £1500.00 Charges. - 18/07/2011 Charges Refunded! WON!

London Scottisht - Disputed account and Charges. £25,000.00 - 06/2011 Balance reduced by 95% WON!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Wow what along thread. I have started a court claim for PPI,Time barring with mine and the POC is the same old scenarion. :(.

 

Have you an further news? Wish you good luck :)

Edited by millymollymoo

CAPITAL ONE (O/H!): Won £1864.63 including contractual :D

GE MONEY: WON £266.00

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Hi all,

 

A brief update. I still have Welcome in court. The tried really really hard with the "lets wear him down" strategy... you know letter ping pong, frivolous court applications, pointless hearings, threats of mounting costs against me because I don't have a case, blah blah blah.

 

I knew from the jump that my case was sound, but I didn't know how to play the legal game...and yes it really is a game. I hired a team of solicitors and a top consumer credit barrister who all agreed my case was sound. Long story short, every time they try it on, I come right back at them with statute, case law, indisputable facts...all guns blazing.

 

I am like a dog with a bone now. They will not win, they can not win. They are now making more offers of settlement (still WAY undervalued), the interest keeps adding up. I am happy to string this out until the global economy collapses. They don't have a leg to stand on, they know it and they are stalling.

 

They are avoiding court at every cost, my opinion is, and my barrister strongly agrees, they are not afraid of the pay out, but the legal precedent that will follow and open flood gates.

 

Can anyone say damage control?

 

More updates when I have something I can disclose.

Please overlook my typos and spelling mistakes, sometimes my fingers arent in sync with my brain :)

I am just a consumer and have no legal training. My posts are opinion only, based on my own limited experience. If in doubt you should seek legal advice from a qualified practitioner.

 

Activ Kapital - Disputed £4,000.00 - 04/04/2011 Settled! WON!

HSBC Current Account - Defaulted for £200.00 Charges. - 19/05/2011 Charges Refunded Default Removed! WON!

HSBC Loan Account - £16,000.00 Unsecured Loan - 05/07/2011 Disputed No Further Contact WON! (for Now)

Barclaycard Account - Disputed account and £1500.00 Charges. - 18/07/2011 Charges Refunded! WON!

London Scottisht - Disputed account and Charges. £25,000.00 - 06/2011 Balance reduced by 95% WON!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Mr Z, thank you for the update :)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your update has thoroughly made my day :-D Good for you, I'm so glad you decided not to give in!!

What stage of the process are you at now? Did you amend your POC? Have you got a trial date yet?

Sorry for all the questions, it just makes me so happy to hear they are in this situation :madgrin:

 

It's so interesting that your barrister thinks they are fearful of the repercussions, if they are that worried perhaps they shouldn't have done it in the first place eh??

 

I'll be at the final trial with them in little over 2 weeks time and we get to talk all about secret commission and who paid what to whom :razz:

How exciting! :lol:

Unfortunately for them, the options to avoid court on this issue have been thoroughly and entirely exhausted. There's no way out for them now.....:!:

 

I think the only difference between us is that I went with the Unfair Relationships provisions, it is a fantastic umbrella which covers a multitude of sins - the debtor alleges the relationship is unfair, the creditor then has to PROVE otherwise. My UR claim encompassed all manner of things they did, just because they might get one point doesn't mean all the others don't still count :wink:

 

Best of luck to you and I look forward to your updates!

Congratulations on learning how to play the game :razz:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Mr Z, thank you for the update :)

You're welcome. I am away, but still around.

Please overlook my typos and spelling mistakes, sometimes my fingers arent in sync with my brain :)

I am just a consumer and have no legal training. My posts are opinion only, based on my own limited experience. If in doubt you should seek legal advice from a qualified practitioner.

 

Activ Kapital - Disputed £4,000.00 - 04/04/2011 Settled! WON!

HSBC Current Account - Defaulted for £200.00 Charges. - 19/05/2011 Charges Refunded Default Removed! WON!

HSBC Loan Account - £16,000.00 Unsecured Loan - 05/07/2011 Disputed No Further Contact WON! (for Now)

Barclaycard Account - Disputed account and £1500.00 Charges. - 18/07/2011 Charges Refunded! WON!

London Scottisht - Disputed account and Charges. £25,000.00 - 06/2011 Balance reduced by 95% WON!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your update has thoroughly made my day :-D Good for you, I'm so glad you decided not to give in!!

What stage of the process are you at now? Did you amend your POC? Have you got a trial date yet?

Sorry for all the questions, it just makes me so happy to hear they are in this situation :madgrin:

 

It's so interesting that your barrister thinks they are fearful of the repercussions, if they are that worried perhaps they shouldn't have done it in the first place eh??

 

I'll be at the final trial with them in little over 2 weeks time and we get to talk all about secret commission and who paid what to whom :razz:

How exciting! :lol:

Unfortunately for them, the options to avoid court on this issue have been thoroughly and entirely exhausted. There's no way out for them now.....:!:

 

I think the only difference between us is that I went with the Unfair Relationships provisions, it is a fantastic umbrella which covers a multitude of sins - the debtor alleges the relationship is unfair, the creditor then has to PROVE otherwise. My UR claim encompassed all manner of things they did, just because they might get one point doesn't mean all the others don't still count :wink:

 

Best of luck to you and I look forward to your updates!

Congratulations on learning how to play the game :razz:

 

Believe it or not we are still back and forth at the AQ stage. I am happy for it to be sent to fast track and get on with it. They are trying any and all tactics to try to get me to drop or settle before a trial. Not going to happen :)

 

Yes the POC's were re-written by my barrister...at a VERY hefty price I might add. It was necessary to remove some issues that may have been the difference between success or failure. The least of which was the claim being time barred. The idea that one can claim (PPI) even after the 6 years is not true. Its 6 years from the time of SIGNING or entering the contract NOT when you become aware. The info that was (is?) going around that you can is simply untrue.

 

I too am attacking on the grounds of UR in addition to others, misrepresentation is key here too, and of course the hidden/secret commissions, and violations of the DPA.

 

I will update as much as I can but because its an ongoing case I was advised to keep a lot of the specifics under my hat for the moment.

Please overlook my typos and spelling mistakes, sometimes my fingers arent in sync with my brain :)

I am just a consumer and have no legal training. My posts are opinion only, based on my own limited experience. If in doubt you should seek legal advice from a qualified practitioner.

 

Activ Kapital - Disputed £4,000.00 - 04/04/2011 Settled! WON!

HSBC Current Account - Defaulted for £200.00 Charges. - 19/05/2011 Charges Refunded Default Removed! WON!

HSBC Loan Account - £16,000.00 Unsecured Loan - 05/07/2011 Disputed No Further Contact WON! (for Now)

Barclaycard Account - Disputed account and £1500.00 Charges. - 18/07/2011 Charges Refunded! WON!

London Scottisht - Disputed account and Charges. £25,000.00 - 06/2011 Balance reduced by 95% WON!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Believe it or not we are still back and forth at the AQ stage. I am happy for it to be sent to fast track and get on with it. They are trying any and all tactics to try to get me to drop or settle before a trial. Not going to happen :)

 

Yes the POC's were re-written by my barrister...at a VERY hefty price I might add. It was necessary to remove some issues that may have been the difference between success or failure. The least of which was the claim being time barred. The idea that one can claim (PPI) even after the 6 years is not true. Its 6 years from the time of SIGNING or entering the contract NOT when you become aware. The info that was (is?) going around that you can is simply untrue.

I too am attacking on the grounds of UR in addition to others, misrepresentation is key here too, and of course the hidden/secret commissions, and violations of the DPA.

 

I will update as much as I can but because its an ongoing case I was advised to keep a lot of the specifics under my hat for the moment.

 

Mr Z, I dont think this can be right at all. The claim below is from 1998 and MBNA shelled out £64,000. If what you say is true, MBNA would never have paid out !!

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?354001-Mbna-awaiting-offer-letter-£64-000-WIN!!

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wanted to share some more info that might be helpful.

 

The argument for concealment is a non starter. In order to plead concealment, the defendant (Welcome) will have to be proven to have deliberately concealed or hidden facts. As it would be virtually impossible to prove that they deliberately hid or concealed the mis-sale, this argument is doomed to fail.

 

Hopefully this will be of use to anyone following or reading the thread.

 

 

CAN YOU PLEASE ELABORATE ON THIS READING THE POST

 

surly the six year limitation period starts from when the credit agreement contaning any insurance such as ppi ended, not from conception of the agreement at point of sale

 

i cant see how welcome can get out of concealment either ref the misselling of these insurance product, welcome cannot sell you the insurance products with the agreement and then benefit by the sale by giving itself commission payments on the sale of those insurance products

 

 

did welcome inform you it was paying itself commission on the over priced insurance products it sold you

 

that is breach of fiduciary duty

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mr Z, and well done for sticking this out and with style!!!!! Me too really happy to read your update. BTW mbna paid out (partially) to me last year re PPI from around 1998/2000. Now in court for the remainder. Keep strong. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I couldn't agree more about keeping things under your hat. I can see you've already had one of the welcome spies on your thread :mad2:

There's much I'd like to share and also ask opinions on but regrettably I can't due to unwelcome eyes :sad:

 

The only thing I will say is to take extra care with the breach of fiduciary duty argument, it's not quite as straightforward as it may seem....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

Providing another update.

 

This case is still in the Court. A trial has been scheduled for later this spring. Meanwhile, Welcome were required to give disclosure (which they failed to do), and witness statements were to be exchanged at a specified date given by the court (they failed to do this as well).

 

I have complied with the Court's directions. Welcome have not. As a result I have made application to have their defence stricken out. A hearing on this has been scheduled and is to be heard in a few days.

 

Will update more when appropriate.

Edited by MrZ

Please overlook my typos and spelling mistakes, sometimes my fingers arent in sync with my brain :)

I am just a consumer and have no legal training. My posts are opinion only, based on my own limited experience. If in doubt you should seek legal advice from a qualified practitioner.

 

Activ Kapital - Disputed £4,000.00 - 04/04/2011 Settled! WON!

HSBC Current Account - Defaulted for £200.00 Charges. - 19/05/2011 Charges Refunded Default Removed! WON!

HSBC Loan Account - £16,000.00 Unsecured Loan - 05/07/2011 Disputed No Further Contact WON! (for Now)

Barclaycard Account - Disputed account and £1500.00 Charges. - 18/07/2011 Charges Refunded! WON!

London Scottisht - Disputed account and Charges. £25,000.00 - 06/2011 Balance reduced by 95% WON!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the update, MrZ

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Providing another update.

 

This case is still in the Court. A trial has been scheduled for later this spring. Meanwhile, Welcome were required to give disclosure (which they failed to do), and witness statements were to be exchanged at a specified date given by the court (they failed to do this as well).

 

I have complied with the Court's directions. Welcome have not. As a result I have made application to have their defence stricken out. A hearing on this has been scheduled and is to be heard in a few days.

 

Will update more when appropriate.

 

Cant go into a lot of detail but, good result for me at the hearing. They have managed to buy a bit of time, but it wont save them.

 

More updates to come when/as appropriate.

Please overlook my typos and spelling mistakes, sometimes my fingers arent in sync with my brain :)

I am just a consumer and have no legal training. My posts are opinion only, based on my own limited experience. If in doubt you should seek legal advice from a qualified practitioner.

 

Activ Kapital - Disputed £4,000.00 - 04/04/2011 Settled! WON!

HSBC Current Account - Defaulted for £200.00 Charges. - 19/05/2011 Charges Refunded Default Removed! WON!

HSBC Loan Account - £16,000.00 Unsecured Loan - 05/07/2011 Disputed No Further Contact WON! (for Now)

Barclaycard Account - Disputed account and £1500.00 Charges. - 18/07/2011 Charges Refunded! WON!

London Scottisht - Disputed account and Charges. £25,000.00 - 06/2011 Balance reduced by 95% WON!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...