Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Whose fault? Bus lane driver under-taking.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4792 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Had a little scrape and would appreciate some advice.

 

Approaching a (green) traffic light, in the middle of three lanes, nearside lane being a bus lane until just before the lights. Rush hour, so lots of traffic.

 

Indicated to turn left (after the lights) on approaching the end of the bus lane, and, not having passed a bus, taxi or bike for a few hundred yards, begin to pull over when the bus lane ended.

 

At which point, chap behind must have pulled out of the middle lane, as he steamed up beside me on my left, and my nearside bumper took a strip of paint off his rear driver's side door, no dents. I stopped and pulled in completely, just before the lights. He was going fast enough to be through the lights, which include a pedestrian crossing, before stopping.

 

The cars touched just where I began to pull out, which was where the road markings indicated that the bus lane ended. To be where he was, the other driver must have been in the bus lane to start with, and caught me as it ended.

 

Is it likely to be my fault?

 

All advice gratefully received!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure that I fully understand, but it does seem to me from what you say that the person on your left was undertaking and was also travelling quite fast – probably too fast for the conditions. If this is correct, then he would have to be at fault.

 

Make sure you do a complete statement of everything that happened and diagrams. Do it now. Include the details of any conversation which happened and the identities of any witnesses.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suspect a 50/50 will be the outcome for this. Unless you have definate proof of the other driver short cutting the bus lane and not driving in a manner to allow for the road conditions ahead. So make sure your diagrams are good and perhaps get a few photos of the road layout. If you don't make a persuasive case, your Insurers won't make much of an argument on your behalf that the third party driver was at 100% fault for the accident.

 

It is a shame that there appears to be no independment witnesses or CCTV/traffic camera evidence. If these were helpful to you, then you have a chance of proving the other driver at fault. Without these the chances are that a 50/50 would be the outcome.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely there would be CCTV footage of this incident?

 

It is worth checking whether there were any working cameras at the location of the accident and whether any recordings have been kept.

 

Since the cuts started, many of the cameras have been turned off, as local authorities have cut funding. I thought that the cameras were self funding from fines, but apparently local authorities provided funds to the camera operators and many have withdrawn these funds. Time to get the Ferrari out (I wish !)

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks for all the really helpful replies.

 

I don't know whether the driver - who is not the car owner - is going to try to claim or not, but I've managed to get hold of my insurers, and they seem to think I may be in the right.

 

I wasn't going to claim anyway, as the damage to my car is merely a small scrape on top of another old one. But at least I've told them my side, and I have the diagram and account if I need it.

 

Good suggestion re CCTV - I'll have a look and see if there was any, but I'm not that hopeful - cutbacks, as you mentioned. Have you noticed how half the motorway lighting is now turned off?

 

Regards,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Indicated to turn left (after the lights) on approaching the end of the bus lane, and, not having passed a bus, taxi or bike for a few hundred yards, begin to pull over when the bus lane ended.

Did you look in your passenger wing mirror before moving across?

 

i.e. did he pull into the bus lane earlier and you just didn't look because you assumed nothing would be there, or did you look and it was clear but he made a sudden move to undertake at the same time?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did check my mirror - I was taught a while ago and even still indicate if no-one is behind me. I notice when my kids were taught that they don't do that any more, but to me it's just automatic to do the old check list, M-S-M, and in cities especially, the wing mirror for bikes, as I am a cyclist too.

The TP was going fast, as my husband reminded me he had to reverse back towards the lights to get out of the junction.

I assumed he'd shot out from behind me as we approached the junction, and given where the scrape occurred, he must have been in the bus lane before it ended. I wasn't moving very fast as the lights had been green for a while and I thought they might change any second.

 

Thanks for all the input, it's been really helpful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...