Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files 2024-01-15 DBCLegal SAR.pdf
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
    • Hi,   I am not sure if I posted this already here but I don't think I did. I attach a judgement that raises very interesting points IMO. Essentially EVRi did their usual non attendance that we normally see, however the judge (for the first time I've seen in these threads) dismissed the notice and awarded me judgement by default because their notice misses the "confirmation of compliance" paragraph. in and out in 3 minutes (aside from the chat at the end with the judge about his problems with evri) Redacted - evri CPR loss.pdf
    • Just to update this. I did apply to strikeout and they did not attend the hearing. I won by defualt and the hearing lasted 5 minutes (court only allocated 15). The judge simply explained that the only matter he was really considering is if the Defendant could have any oral evidence to defend the claim. However he said he had decided that based on their defence, and their misunderstanding of law, and their non attendence he did not think they had any reasonsable chance so he awarded me SJ + Costs on the claim form + the strikeout fee. Luckily when I sent the defendant the order I woke up the next day to a wire trasnfer for the full sum of the judgement
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Only a few days to get my complex defence in- Cabot


maddiemay
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4661 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 130
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

They didn't supply anything until the court ordered them to in Feb, POC pretty basic stuff, I do owe the amount they are claiming is just arrears, but I know it is in actual fact the entire total debt, I am happy to pay them this amount, dont feel I should because they have been a tad deceitful, but I really dont think I can do this for much longer, its so draining!

If I admit defeat and agree to pay them the amount claimed, they'll only come after me at a later date for the non existing 'balance'

so I have to give it a go really

Link to post
Share on other sites

What exactly do you have to submit tomorrow and have you got the POC handy? I will have to look again tomorrow but if you can provide a brief summary of where this is at?

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have a look at the 'split claim' thread, you will see that if you pay the first claim or they win it, they will be breaking the regulations if they come back at you for the balance. You could really hammer them for doing this

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yea, I had a lok through the split claim link you kindly posted last night, but I dont think it is relevant to my case. The claimant claims I owe them £2,***, which is solely arrears, hence why they say they in their witness statement, they didnt have to serve a default notice on me prior to the issue of proceedings, because the account hasnt been terminated, nor are they claiming the full balance.

 

The problem is that I know it is not just arrears but in fact the entire total outstanding balance, and yesterday, I did actually find the default notice received from the original creditor 3 years ago. I cant see anywhere on the claim form relating to the fact that they may claim the 'remaining balance' at a later date, so dont think a split claim is what thery're up to here.

 

I believe (well I know) that they have not sent me a default notice (nor do they know the OC sent one) and when ordered to produce a copy of it by the court, they couldnt, so instead invented the fact that that amount claimed was just arrears and therefore dont have to.

I hope that makes sense, and please feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, thats the only way I'll learn

 

Maddie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I went to the court this morning to file my amended defence, I asked the clerk if she could try and get the paperwork attached to the file before it goes before the judge today, to decide if the extention of time should be granted to the other side, as luck would have it, the judge was just about to look at the case and said, since I was there I just as well go in, as is my right to be present. Thats all I can say at this stage, but it did seem to go well. The extention was granted in order for the claimant to provide documents I know full well they will never be able to do no matter how long they are given. Judge seemed to know only too well, how this bunch work! Lets hope I get him at the next hearing.

I'll keep you posted

 

Maddie

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Urgent help Please.

 

Im so very sorry I have had to call on you guys for help again, I have spent the last 2 days constantly at the computer trying to put together a witness statement which should have been submitted last friday along with all the documents I wish to rely on at the hearing just over a week away, Im hoping due to my illness the court will be a bit more lenient on me and accept the docs in person tomorrow!

What I need to know tonight if possible please, is The credit card account in question was taken out in 2004, what should the consumer credit agreement contain to make it enforceable in court next week and where can I find it, that would be acceptable to quote from.

I'll break for a headache pill now I think and hope someone gets back to me soon. As a matter of interest Cabot are referring to a 'Reply Card' as the consumer credit agreement Thanks again M

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ive tried to get the picture from photobucket, but failed, cant see what it is im doing wrong! There isnt a great deal to see to be honest, just a rectangular box headed Acceptance reply card, 1) my name and address, telephone number and date of birth 2) is missing 3) is a box headed declaration, credit agreement regulated blah blah in tiny tiny writing, my signiture the date and a 'Your right to cancel' Thats it really, not sure if thats any help. Im still hoping to find out what the prescribed terms of an enforceable agreement would be, Please

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 threads merged.please keep to ONE thread per debt.

 

if you need to post docs etc use:

 

scan the required letters/agreements/sheets

as a picture file

remove all pers info inc barcodes etc using paint

but leave all figures and dates.

goto one of the many free online pdf converter websites

convert the image to pdf format.

or ir you have PDF as an installed printer drive use that

open a new msg box here

hit go advanced below the msg box

hit manage attachments below that box

hit the add files button on the top right

hit select files, navigate to your file on your pc

hit upload files

NB:you can set where it goes in the post by hitting insert inline.

the hit reply button

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have limited legal knowledge.........however.......

 

have you checked your CRA to see if this debt exists and what it says?

 

i would not rely on any 'paperwork' errors to get you off this debt if it is yours

 

if a clear financial link exists between you and vanquish, and with what you already have in terms of docs from the OC/DCA/Solicitor ,

 

then i fear the worst here.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just completed my witness statement and prepared my court bundle @ 04.17, probably too late to submit anyway, should have been in last Friday, if I dont win this one, it will be the last time I ever try to fight, its just too stressfull.

Have given it my very best shot, will let you know the outcome regardless

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I know you are feeling down and stressed but don't right everything off, you become more competent with the battles!

 

I have failed on my own account, but different DJ who knew the law .....threw out a case against my OH! If anything my case was stronger but the lottery won!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had probably one of the coldest women DJ'S ever! combined with the sweatiest and greasiest Cabot representitive, who in all honesty I should have been able to wipe the floor with he was so pathetic! I was intimadated by the judge and my mind just went blank!

 

I will be well into my 90's before the judgement amount is paid, they didnt get the £3,000 in costs though, so that a bit of a victory for me and Im so glad its all over and done with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Forthwith or installments Maddie?

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did say to the DJ, they'll want a CO, she said as long as I maintain payments they cant, but like you say they will anyway, probably wont bother to defend, tried that in the past with my husbands creditors to no avail!

 

The judgement payments work at at around £90 a year, would there be any reason why I couldnt pay the whole years payments in one go, then forget about it till the next payment is due? Any advice on that would be helpful

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...