Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • just to be clear here..... the DVLA do not send letters if a drivers licence address differs from any car's V5C that shows the same driver as it's registered keeper.
    • sorry she is a private individual, the cars are parking on her land. she can clamp the cars. only firms were outlawed from doing it bazza. thats what the victims of people dumping cars on their drives near airports did and they didn't not get prosecuted.    
    • The DVLA keeps two records of you. One as a driver and one for your car. If they differ you might find out in around a month when they will send you a reminder as well as to your other half for their car. If you receive nothing then you can be fairly sure that you were tailgating though wouldn't explain why they didn't pick up your car on one of drive past their cameras. However even if you do get a PCN later then your situation will not change. The current PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 which is the main law that covers private parking. It doesn't comply for two reasons. 1. Section 9 [2][a] states  (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The PCN states 47 minutes which are the arrival and departure times not the time you were actually parked. if you subtract the time you took to drive from the entrance. look for a parking place  park in it perhaps having to manoeuvre a couple of times to fit within the lines and unload the children reloading the children getting seat belts on  driving to the exit stopping for cars pedestrians on the way you may well find that the actual time you were parked was quite likely to be around ten minutes over the required time.  Motorists are allowed a MINIMUM of ten minutes Grace period [something that the rogues in the parking industry conveniently forget-the word minimum] . So it could be that you did not overstay. 2] Sectio9 [2][f]  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN does not include the words in brackets and in 2a the Act included the word "must". Another fail. What those failures mean is that MET cannot transfer the liability to pay the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable which is why we recommend our members not to appeal. It is so easy to reveal who was driving by saying "when I parked the car" than "when the driver parked the car".  As long as they don't know who was driving they have little chance of winning in court. This is partly because Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. And because anyone with a valid motor insurance policy is able to drive your cars. It is a shame that you are too far away to get photos of the car park signage. It is often poor and quite often the parking rogues lose in Court on their poor signage alone. I hope hat you can now relax and not panic about the PCN. You will receive many letters from Met, their unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors threatening you with ever higher amounts of money. The poor dears have never read the Act which states quite clearly that the maximum sum that can be charged is the amount on the signs. The Act has only been in force for 12 years so it may take a  few more years for the penny to drop.  You can safely ignore everything they send you unless or until they send you a Letter of Claim. Just come back to us if they do send one of those love letters to you and we will advise on a snotty letter to send them. In the meantime go on and enjoy your life. Continue reading other threads and if you do get any worrying letters let us know. 
    • Hopefully the ANPR cameras didn't pick up the two vehicles, but I don't think you're out of the woods just yet. MET's "work" consists of sending out hundreds of these invoices every week so yours might be a few days behind your partner's. There is also the matter of Royal Mail.  I once sold two second-hand books to someone on eBay.  Weirdly the cost of sending them separately was less than the cost of sending them in one parcel.  So to save a few bob I sent them seperately.  One turned up the next day.  One arrived after four days.  They were  sent from the same post office at the same time! But let's hope I'm being too pessimistic. Please update us of any developments.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cant cope with harrassment much more


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4841 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Before he met me my husband lived with a girl and ended up in financial difficulty. To cut a long story short it went to court and he was ordered to pay £80 per month.

 

Fast forward to today and Intrum Justicia ! in the past 6 months alone they have had another income and outcome summary, they refused to take payment without a copy of a court order, i paid for that and sent it. Every month since they have said that they need another income ond outcome, they have asked him to pay more, they say he has never had a court order and want more money a month. Today i rang and they have point blank refused payment ( i pay over phone via card) wont give us an email address, wont let us speak to manager, and wont take any payement until we increase what we pay.

 

Im a student and my hubby earns that little we get free prescriptions and dental THATS how little we have

 

I dont know what to do im fed up of crying, im scared to answer the phone, i live in fear that they will turn up at the house

 

Please help

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and Welcome, first of all try not to be at all concerned, easy for me to say, but I and most others on CAG have all 'been there'.

 

The first thing I will advise is to stop all contact on the telephone, you have already found out what happens when you, 'phone they try and tie you in knots. If they phone telll them in writing only.

 

Now, you say that there is a Court Order in place, so I assume you mean a CCJ, if this is correct, when was this obtained, by whom, (original creditor) and what payments were ordered.

 

Once we have that information we can go further.

 

Another piece of advice, an Income and Expenditure calculation is a personal and private thing, and as such they are not entitled to see it, the only person who can insist is a Judge.

 

There are template letters than we can advise sending once we have more information about the CCJ etc.

 

Do not let these **** take over your life/lives if you are on benefits it is most likely a Judge would order a payment of £1 per month, so, in time we will get you to send an offer letter to that effect, and they can take it or leave it! A judge would not be best pleased with them if they then tried to take it to Court, and would most probably rule it a waste of the Courts time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The date of the Judgement, who was the Claimant, and what was the amount ordered to be repaid, and by what method, ie in a lump sum or installments. Who was he ordered to repay to, and did he make all his repayments to them?

 

Date Feb 2004

claiment - Royal Bank of scotland

amount - £21666.04

method - installments of £80

Made all payments to Bank of scotland -then went to credit management at royal bank and then we received a letter a while back (cant remember when )saying they were taking over - it seems that Intrum Justice bought the loan and didnt know it was a ccj from what we can gather

Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven't read through this entire thread, but I did notice that they are refusing to take payments. Let me tell you that they are not entitled to refuse payments and this is been made clear by the OFT. If they are refusing to take payments then you should make a note of everything and also complain to the OFT.

 

If you have a look at the OFT website you will see somewhere that this rule is clearly stated. I'm sorry I don't have the links at present and I don't have time to find for you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.oft.gov.uk/

 

Have a read as suggested, and then draft a letter to include the relevant parts from the Guidelines. Further, I would inform them that until they can show you a legal assignment from Royal Bank of Scotland allowing payments to be made to them, no payments will be forthcoming.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If this is a CCJ, then an assignment doesn't matter - to whom payments are to be made is ordered by the court, and can only be changed by the court. If RBS want to pass the money on to IJ, that is a matter for them. IJ have no business asking for anything at all unless and until they can produce a variation authorised by the court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He needs to establish if RBS/ CMS have terminated this account & sold it on. It may also be time, to get the statements, see how much is still owed. After 8 years, the CCJ will have dropped off.....might be a good time to establish what has been going on, and use any procedural errors to an advantage, and resolve this.

 

Send a Subject Access Request to RBS

 

Joyce E Tudor

Retail Regulatory Risk

Business House B

PO Box 1000

Edinburgh

EH12 1HQ

 

Enclose your £10.

 

But also, copy CMS on this request ( you don't need to pay again). attach a letter requesting that they comply by providing all data that they hold regarding this account, inparticular a copy of your "Diary Event History". This is an internal log of all internal & external actions regarding this account.

 

The Recovery Manager

Customer Management Services

Kendal Court

Ironmasters Way

Telford TF3 4DT

Link to post
Share on other sites

All good advice, as always.

 

If RBS have not informed the court that they have sold the debt then it is possible that there is no legal requirement to pay Intrum Justicia as it's not a simple matter of assigning the debt, as they can do with old accounts. This is subject to a court order and you say that payments have never been missed, which is totally in your husband's favour. But, as it is a court order, it's not wise to stop paying - just make sure you have a record of payment on bank statements or whatever.

 

RBS should have applied to the court for a variation of the order to change the details of who the payments should be sent to. It would be interesting to find out if they bothered to do that. Intrum Justicia will issue many threats and demands, they are not entitled to demand increased payments or ask for income details. Only the court can do that.

 

As others have said, do not speak to them by phone as you have no record of who said what and when, they could easily put notes on their system that you agreed to treble payment or something on those lines and you will find it difficult to say otherwise if they then send demanding letters with that 'fact'. If everything is in writing then there can be no dispute.

 

It is also possible for your husband to apply to the court for a variation of the order if he is having difficulty in making such high payments. A court judge can be very understanding, but that's where you need proof of income, benefits and outgoings. He/she will look at the facts and make a considered judgement. No matter what the other side say, that is then the amount that would need to be paid - not what some debt collection company demand.

 

It may also be worthwhile making a formal complaint to the OFT, the link is in a message before this. Tell them what Intrum Justicia have been saying to you, and point out that a CCJ exists. The OFT will reply to say they cannot deal with individual cases, but they may take on such clear maladministration of an account and contact Intrum Justicia on your behalf. Consumer Direct is another useful one, as they report back to the OFT and can pass cases on to Trading Standards.

 

As and when the SAR comes back, details just about everything, check carefully to see if any additional costs and/or interest have been added since the CCJ. Debt Collection Agencies love to add bogus fees and extra interest that they are simply not entitled to, but many people simply accept and pay - because they've not found CAG!

 

Unless a variation of order was made, the payments should continue to be made to RBS, not Intrum Justicia. They have no right to a penny without the court saying so. I'm not sure how you would go about asking the court about this, as they would have the correct information. No use asking Intrum Justicia as they'll just keep making demands. I live close to my local court so, if it were me, I would pop in with paperwork to show that it was my case (your husband may need to be there, as it's his order) and ask them if I should perhaps pay through the court until it can be determined what has happened. That prevents any breach of the court order at least.

 

It may be that Intrum Justicia would have to pay back whatever has been paid to them if they were not entitled to it. RBS could do with a good slapping for messing you about on this if they've not handled it properly.

 

Don't be afraid of the court. This matter has already gone past the stage of a court order being made, years ago, and they can be most helpful in sorting out who you need to pay and perhaps assist in making an application for a variation to reduce the payments. If you are on certain benefits you may not have to pay for a court hearing. They can advise you on that as well.

 

I don't think I'm knowledgeable enough to devise a suitable letter to send, but I would be on to Intrum Justicia to inform them, quite clearly, that the matter is in dispute and request that they provide proof, by way of a variation of the court order, that they are entitled to collect on the account. If the court are willing to accept payment through them then you are meeting your obligations under the court order and that's what really matters.

 

What can Intrum Justicia do anyway? Take you to court...? That's when they would really get their wrists slapped. Don't put up with their harassment, never speak to them on the phone, if they do call you simply refuse to answer 'security' questions - the Data Protection Act is to protect your data, it is not a tool for a tool at a DCA to make demands for information. If they get to be a pain, bar their number if you can (BT offer a service where you can do that).

Be good to those who give you advice that helps - click the star to give them your thanks by way of a reputation credit.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Before he met me my husband lived with a girl and ended up in financial difficulty. To cut a long story short it went to court and he was ordered to pay £80 per month.

 

Fast forward to today and Intrum Justicia ! in the past 6 months alone they have had another income and outcome summary, they refused to take payment without a copy of a court order, i paid for that and sent it. Every month since they have said that they need another income ond outcome, they have asked him to pay more, they say he has never had a court order and want more money a month. Today i rang and they have point blank refused payment ( i pay over phone via card) wont give us an email address, wont let us speak to manager, and wont take any payement until we increase what we pay.

 

Im a student and my hubby earns that little we get free prescriptions and dental THATS how little we have

 

I dont know what to do im fed up of crying, im scared to answer the phone, i live in fear that they will turn up at the house

 

Please help

 

A couple of things spring to mind

 

The amount owing isn't low.

As you have stated you can't afford to pay it off.

 

There are other options;

You could continue as you are (£80 pm to RBS)

If you don't own your house (or your house is in negative equity) you could go for a LILA sequestration

This would wipe out ALL your debt and clear you after a year.

 

Please note this is a very serious option. Please seek advice from one of the free debt help lines.

 

Use Consumers Advice, or CCCS, or your local council option

 

Please remember there are options, your family come first and take no crap- they are taking advantage of your lack on knowlege

Link to post
Share on other sites

b4 u do anything

get a sar from rbs

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you could go for a LILA sequestration

Isn't a LILA just for Scotland?

Edited by hillards
quoted wrong bit...tired...

Be good to those who give you advice that helps - click the star to give them your thanks by way of a reputation credit.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Isn't a LILA just for Scotland?

 

It is, I assumed the OP lived in Scotland. Apologies if she does not

 

The BR route is an option, I considered it at the and of 2010, but realised it would make running my joinery business hard

 

the only saving grace is the wholesalers know me locally and have told me that they can override credit decisions based on my previous history

Link to post
Share on other sites

IJ are a pain, they harassed me for years. You must take control of this and never speak to them on the phone, say 'in writing only' and hang up. Change your number if possible. Actually, they should not be speaking to you if it is your husband's debt

 

Write to them and complain about the harassment and that you are refering the matter to OFT. Tell them you will not speak to them on the phone

 

Tell them that all future payments will be made by Standing Order only and ask them to supply their bank details for you to set this up and that payment amounts can only be varied by the County Court. You will not be supplying I and E details.

 

It also strikes me that IJ should be sending you regular statements of everything paid so ask for this and also clarification as to the actual owner of this debt. You should have received a Notice of assignment with details of who actually owns this.

 

send all letters by recorded delivery and keep copies of everything

 

If a CCJ has been bought the court needs to have been informed about this so ask if this has been done.

 

Also IJ cannot add interest to this

 

You can add elements of this letter to yours to cover the harassment

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk...esponse-letter

Edited by coledog

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some useful advice on applying for a variation order through the courts, if your husband is on a low income you may not have to pay to have this heard. I am assuming you are NOT in scotland, if you are there is a different set of legislation and you would need to look at National Debtline for Scotland.

 

If the CCJ was granted in a court not near you, you can ask if this can be transferred to a local one

 

http://www.nationaldebtline.co.uk/england_wales/factsheet.php?page=08_reducing_payments_or_suspending_a_bailiffs_warrant_on_a_county_court_judgment

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Way back in the olden days when the country was run by a lady that made roofs, the RBS got a CCJ against me for several thousend pounds. I was ordered by the court to pay £15 a month. I used to send them a PO every month on apayment book, later on I wrote back to the court and got this reduced to £5 as I was having difficulties. I was working at that time. Later on when I had to stop work due to health reasons I lost the payment book and couldn't remember who to send the money to (they kept giving me different addresses/DCAs to pay). I've not heard anything for many years.

 

I would definatly write to the court and get your payments reduced. If you qualify for free scripts, NHS dental, etc. you can't afford more than a £1 a month, and that would be all the court would order you to pay.

 

Again the greed of a DCA has forced someone to find out their rights and now they'll get a lot less. They never learn do they.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would suggest that you try and get to the bottom of this, find out who actually owns it and what right they have to collect it. Also contact the court about a variation order to get the payments reduced, if you have a low income this should not cost you anything.

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...