Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Part time work on JSA


batwoman83750
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4821 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

Im not really sure what to do here.

 

Im currently on JSA and have been for 2 months. However, the temp job I had over xmas has offered me a permanent position. The problem is its only for 9 hours on a saturday. It somewhere I really want to work and they obviously want me as there were over 130 temps they let go at the end of Dec. Also Im thinking once my foot is in the door if any other contracts come up for more hours, I will have first chance to apply before it is advertised externally.

 

I just dont know what happens with JSA. Obviously the money I get will go down, but how does it work? What if I get offered extra hours at work (something that is very possible)? I dont want to turn these down as I want to make a good impression for any other future jobs. Do I declare how many hours I work whenever I sign on or do they look at my average over a certain period of time? Will they stop my payments for so long so they dont overpay me?

 

I have 2 children (age 6 and 3) am I better off on IS? If so, will any benefits stop while they work it out. Ive heard of certain benefits stopping due to a change in circumstances just so they dont over pay. I cant afford to have nothing.

 

Whats the best course of action for me?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

If you have young children you would be better off on income suport than Job seekers?

When on income support you can work, but obviously they will take some away.

Have a look at this site...

 

http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/MoneyTaxAndBenefits/BenefitsTaxCreditsAndOtherSupport/Employedorlookingforwork/DG_10018757

 

And here's a benefit calculator site you can play around on....

 

http://www.turn2us.org.uk/benefits_search.aspx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Income Support is only an option if you are a lone parent with young children (youngest under seven) in this scenario.

 

You can work and claim Jobseekers Allowance as long as your hours are less than 15hrs and 59mins in one benefit week. They disregard a certain amount of your earnings dependant on your personal circumstances, single people its the first £5, couples its the first £10 and for couple and lone parents its£20. After the disregard the earnings are taken into consideration pound for pound.

 

For example if you are a lone parent and you earn 5.93 an hour (national minimum wage) x 9hrs then they would disregard the first £20 therefore your Jobseekers would be reduced by the remainder of any earnings after the disregard.

 

wages= £53.37 (9 x 5.93 per hour)

disregard= £20

remainder=£33.37

Jsa - remainder = £32.08

 

This would mean that you would be paid £53.37 by your employer and £32.08 by JSA.

 

You would still have to sign on every two weeks and look for work but you would get your national insurance credited by JSA.

Edited by MONX
added a bit!

Advice given is my opinion only, I am not a legal or financial expert (far from it).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

We are entitled to IS as my eldest gets DLA and my husband is his full time carer and gets CA. We've had it before. Having said that I might just stay on JSA if I think its better for me (not necessarily financial - we got about the same IS as Im getting JSA)

 

I just want to know if my benefits will stop for a bit while they work it out as I cant afford for that. Im already behind in my rent and now that has finally been sorted Im worried about becoming behind again while everything gets figured out. My Landlord can only be reasonable for so long. Also what happens if I do extra hours one week? Im contracted to work 9 hours a week, but they may ask me to work an extra day here and there. How does that work? Do I just tell them my extra hours or do they need proof etc? Also once I tell them I am working will they stop all my benefits until they have a certain number of wageslips etc?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you work extra hours they will just recalculate it, however if you work more than 15hrs and 59mins in one benefit week then for that week you are considered to be in full time work in that week and not available. You would have to sign off for that week and make a new claim.

 

As it was a short period between the claims and as long as there are no changes in your circumstances it would be a Rapid Reclaim so although you are making a new claim you are just declaring no changes in your circumstances just 16hrs or more work in your previous benefit week.

 

They dont end your claim when you declare a part-time job, they suspend it pending recieving the details, when you declare it you fill in an A15c form and another called a B7, this outlines your employment and hours and earnings already earned. You should provide any wageslips but they do contact your employer to confirm these. Once they have established your hours and earnings they calculate it using the formula i gave in my previous post.

 

I believe they are updating the system so that it averages the earnings over a certain period of time so if you did work over 16hrs in one week but it was a one off, it doesnt close your claim but just amends the amount of averaged hours and hearnings. Not sure when this is happening, it is worth asking at the jobcentre.

Advice given is my opinion only, I am not a legal or financial expert (far from it).

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was affraid it would stop for a bit. It took over a month to sort them out originally. pants pants pants pants. I really cant afford to have them stop for a bit. Am I better not to go for the job I really want then? grrrrr

 

Oh well will see what happens I suppose.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am anti claiming anything whilst working nowdays. The only thing I will be claiming is a bit of tax credits. I think unless you are on IS it's a total nightmare & going back to work & them messing my earnings up at HB, I ended up 1600 in debt. They love their over payments & the way they treat their errors, our errors & fraud are always the same. There is no difference, you're a fraudster in all 3 ways atleast to start with. And that's scarey.

Having gone through the over payment road after trying to do the right thing & go to work even though my youngest was still young enough for me to stay on IS, I would rather live on less money & be sure I wont ever have to be told 'we messed up, but you didn't notice so we want our money back'

Remember, people that claim benefits are vulnerable, they obviously need the/entitled to the money, so they do have a Duty of care.

That is forgotten when it comes to mistakes though.

Only you can decide if the job is worth doing. If I could go back 2 years I would have stayed on IS.

I dont really see any incentive for people to leave the safety net of full benefits, what with tax credit over payments & all those hassles.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you do work over 16 hours in a week and/or 32 hours averaged over two weeks, you have to sign off. You can immediately start a fast reclaim once you are unemployed again. What I dont understand is this: If you do a reclaim (after say a temping agency finds you 3 days work), Does the reclaim attract the first 3 days as unpaid waiting days, in the same way as the original claim has the first 3 days unpaid?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes the system is being updated to allow people who work static hours to no longer have to declare their part time work on form B7 every 2 weeks, when this has been decided at the BDC you will receive a letter to advise you that you no longer need to provide te B7's and will be advised of your buffer zone where you only need to notify the BDV if you earn more or less than the amount on that letter.

Due to the staffing cuts from the fta's being let go the work is starting to pile up so the BDC that covers the JCP where I work is running behind with all work so very few cases have actually been decided for this but it something that is on going.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you do work over 16 hours in a week and/or 32 hours averaged over two weeks, you have to sign off. You can immediately start a fast reclaim once you are unemployed again. What I dont understand is this: If you do a reclaim (after say a temping agency finds you 3 days work), Does the reclaim attract the first 3 days as unpaid waiting days, in the same way as the original claim has the first 3 days unpaid?

 

No, you wouldn't have to serve the three waiting days in those circumstances. Your new claim will link to the old one - in effect it will be treated as a continuation of the previous claim - and the three days you served at the start of your initial claim will be taken into account.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...