Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I've just noted that in Section 4 of the ebay powered by packlink T&Cs, there is a link to a list of webpages for each Transport Agency including Evri. When clicking on this, it redirects to Evri's send terms and conditions, which says: Our contract with you When you send a parcel with us, you enter into a contract with Evri. These terms and conditions set out your responsibilities and our service commitments to you, along with some legal bits about our liability and how you will be compensated in the unlikely event that things go wrong. Link to Evri send T&Cs: https://www.evri.com/terms-and-conditions the extract highlighted in bold above is pertinent as in Evri's own T&Cs, by sending a parcel with Evri, the sender and Evri have entered into a contract. Screenshot of the above extract attached. Screenshot_20240524_030834_Chrome.pdf
    • Hi, Evri provided a copy of the Ebay powered by Packlink T&Cs in their WS/Court bundle - this is already uploaded in post #246 yesterday. I copy and pasted the actual wording of clauses 3b and 3c from there into my post #246. see points 3b and 3c in Section 3 (General) through this link to the T&Cs:  https://support-ebay.packlink.com/hc/en-gb/articles/360004768420-eBay-Delivery-Powered-by-Packlink-Terms-and-Conditions#h_01HFXQJBTB441YZGPB7CQP9KFV Screenshot attached below. I cant answer why its not been picked up before. In my opinion, this is called Ebay powered by packlink T&Cs so it could be intepreted to mean Ebay and Packlink's T&Cs rather than Packlink and the delivery couriers T&Cs. In regards to seeing Evri/Packlink's entire contract in original form, in my WS, Evri has been invited to provide this. They have not provided the contract in their WS/court bundle. Screenshot_20240524_024259_Chrome.pdf
    • yes, and he has since emailed them to say he wants it done with a hearing
    • Do I take it that you had already informed the court that you wanted the case settled on the papers rather than by way of a hearing before you came here and told us?
    • This is a very important find. I don't understand why nobody has picked up on this before. It's a shame that you have only just found it but please will you get a screenshot and also give us a link to the page which contains this and if possible a link to the actual passage. This makes a huge difference because if this is right that the third party actually has a direct contract with the courier company then they can rely on their consumer rights rather than commercial rights. Also as you seem to have pointed out, even if  their commercial contract does exclude third-party rights, the clause that you have found on the eBay site directly contradicts that And this should be pointed out to the judge.  Please will you screenshot the passage. Give us a link and then stand by for a response later on today. We will have to send this additional piece of information to the court and don't worry we will manage to do it before the 4:00 pm deadline. And in any event, you will certainly want to see the entire contract in original form and receive clarification as to when their third-party exclusion close was included in it.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HFO and Barclaycard


Kitty_el
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4641 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I wondering if anyone could advise me, I recieved a letter today from HFO services stating that I had 3 days to pay £1627 (original debt £500) otherwise my account will be escalated to legal desk etc. They also attached a copy of an equifaxcredit report, however the debt was not even on there, just a list of previous tenants, very odd.

Do you think they are just trying to scare me or would they actually manage to get a CCJ?

Also I took out the Barclay Card back in 2003 and defaulted straightaway (I was a very poor student) and as far as I can remember there has been no contact on the account since then, so I am right to think SB may apply?

 

Any help would be appreciated.

 

Thank you Ellie

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Hi

I'd do the standard response to this one.

 

One - WHAT is the debt they are trying to collect. Standard "Prove it " letter.

 

Two challenge their right to collect it -- do they OWN the debt or are they just the Lapdogs collecting on behalf of the OC. If they are just the Lapdogs just ignore and deal with the OC.

 

Three -- challenge and "abnormal" / or "excessive" charges too.

 

If you even THINK this is a debt from 2003 DO NOT ACKNOWLEGE it in anyway.

 

Send 1 GBP Postal order for CCA agreement to Sharkleycard.

 

Also after this verify date of last activity on this account via the SAR (10 GBP) also send to Sharkleycard.

 

If last date is 6 years or more (5 in Scotland) DEBT IS SB'D and you can tell HFO with great pleasure to Foxtrot Oscar.

 

Cheers

jimbo

Edited by jimbo45
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Jimbo, I know 100% this debt is from 2003, I remember taking it out in my second year at Uni.

So the CCA is the one asking for the original credit agreement? - I send this to HFO

and what is the SAR? - Do i send this to HFO or Barclaycard?

 

Thanks again

Ellie

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should also complain to the OFT with regard to what they sent, the person to write to is-

 

James Waldron, OFT, Fleet Bank House, 2-6 Salisbury Square, London, EC4 8JX.

US President Barack Obama referred to Ugland House as the biggest building in the world or the biggest tax SCA* in the world.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Send a CCA request to HFO, details below. SAR to Barclaycard and a very strong complaint to the OFT (see below) You need to get all the details of this account before claiming that it is Statute Barred and HFO need kicking for their behaviour

CCA Request

CCA letter to send with a £1 postal order by recorded delivery, do not sign. They have 12 plus 2 working days to reply. If nothing valid is received you can send a letter to put the account in dispute and this should stop them contacting you.

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?414-CCA-request-letter

 

SAR Request

Subject access request letter send with £10 postal order - send recorded delivery and sign over the dotted area at the bottom. They have 40 days to reply. Adapt the last paragraph to give any previous addresses that the OC may have and attach a copy of a utility bill or they will write back and ask for one

OFT

OFT http://www.oft.gov.uk/

You can complain online and send copies of all correspondence for attention of James Waldron

OFT Guidance link

This helps when drafting a letter to OFT

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?416-The-OFT-Debt-collection-guidance

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your replies :)

and yes this is the first letter I have had of HFO - they said in the letter that they have tried to contact me several times (which is a lie)

I have no idea what a Notice of Assignment is so I am guessing that they have didnt send me one.

 

Ellie

 

Also I will most definitely be making a complaint to the OFT tomorrow morning!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no idea what a Notice of Assignment is so I am guessing that they have didnt send me one

 

136 Legal assignments of things in action.(1)Any absolute assignment by writing under the hand of the assignor (not purporting to be by way of charge only) of any debt or other legal thing in action, of which express notice in writing has been given to the debtor, trustee or other person from whom the assignor would have been entitled to claim such debt or thing in action, is effectual in law (subject to equities having priority over the right of the assignee) to pass and transfer from the date of such notice.

 

This is the Notice of Assignment.

US President Barack Obama referred to Ugland House as the biggest building in the world or the biggest tax SCA* in the world.

Link to post
Share on other sites

136 Legal assignments of things in action.(1)Any absolute assignment by writing under the hand of the assignor (not purporting to be by way of charge only) of any debt or other legal thing in action, of which express notice in writing has been given to the debtor, trustee or other person from whom the assignor would have been entitled to claim such debt or thing in action, is effectual in law (subject to equities having priority over the right of the assignee) to pass and transfer from the date of such notice.

 

This is the Notice of Assignment.

 

 

Hi there

Whilst to most people the meaning of this document is probably as clear as mud I accept the fact that you are answering the previous Posters question but this issue actually obfuscates the whole question of whether the debt is STATUTE BARRED or NOT.

 

So just to re-iterate

 

It doesn't matter WHEN / IF / HOW these slimebags ASSIGNED the debt -- if it's 6 years without a payment on the account or acknowledgement of the debt BY YOU then its STATUTE BARRED --END OF.

 

100% defence in Court -- there is no actual law against them from TRYING to collect although you are under 100% no obligation to pay it -- and of course the usual complaints about Harrassment etc can (and should) be made if they keep pestering you. Once they KNOW that YOU know the debt is SB'd then even their tiny pea brains will realize its pointless continuing to attempt to collect.

 

They will then move on to a more unfortunate victim who has never heard of CAG.

 

(SB is 5 Years in Scotland just in case).

 

Cheers

jimbo

Edited by jimbo45
Added confirming SB is 100% defence in court
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

As of this morning I have made a complaint to Equifax, in regards the copy of a credit report sent to me. I have the paper work downloaded to send the complaint to ICO and I will be sending a complaint to the OFT shortly. Before I do I have a couple of questions if anyone can help?

1) What exactly am I complaining about, the fact that they sent me a credit report, the fact I believe debt to be SB and that they didn't send me a NOA, also I read somewhere that HFO is not a UK company?

2) I have been on the OFT website and am unable to find the link to make the complaint, I am sure it is just my eyes but I have spent the last 45 mins trawling the website, lol

 

Thank you again

 

Ellie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Contact details for OFT

 

http://www.oft.gov.uk/contactus#named3

For all enquiries, guidance on the work of OFT and to report anti-competitive or other behaviour by a trader or traders, please email [email protected]. Please be aware that the OFT cannot provide advice or assistance to individual consumers or traders.

Your complaint is

You have been contacted by HFO regarding a debt that they have not previously informed you about and have not offered any proof that you owe to them by way of a Notice of Assignment. The only contact you have had with the alleged original creditor was over x years ago.

You are in the process of challenging this claim to monies and its origin

You wish to complain in the strongest possible terms about the content of the letter sent to you by HFO, which is threatening you with legal action. In addition HFO have accessed your personal data by obtaining a credit report from etc etc and then attached this to the letter with no explanation as to the purpose of this.

The letter and content was not sent by secure post and could have been accessed by anyone.

You are extremely distressed by the receipt of this correspondence

I am sure you can adapt to suit

 

 

 

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

Whilst to most people the meaning of this document is probably as clear as mud I accept the fact that you are answering the previous Posters question but this issue actually obfuscates the whole question of whether the debt is STATUTE BARRED or NOT.

 

So just to re-iterate

 

It doesn't matter WHEN / IF / HOW these slimebags ASSIGNED the debt -- if it's 6 years without a payment on the account or acknowledgement of the debt BY YOU then its STATUTE BARRED --END OF.

 

100% defence in Court -- there is no actual law against them from TRYING to collect although you are under 100% no obligation to pay it -- and of course the usual complaints about Harrassment etc can (and should) be made if they keep pestering you. Once they KNOW that YOU know the debt is SB'd then even their tiny pea brains will realize its pointless continuing to attempt to collect.

 

They will then move on to a more unfortunate victim who has never heard of CAG.

 

(SB is 5 Years in Scotland just in case).

 

Cheers

jimbo

 

Correct I was answering the previous question, at this time there is no cogent evidence that the debt is statute barred.

US President Barack Obama referred to Ugland House as the biggest building in the world or the biggest tax SCA* in the world.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for all your replies and help :)

I have just finished sending my letter of complaint to the OFT and I have attached a copy of the letter that HFO sent to me.

I think I am going to wait a few days to see if HFO send me anything else before requesting the CCA.

I cant believe how many complaints etc have been raised about this company and nothing has been done to stop them!!

 

Ellie x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Coledog

I am a bit dubious about sending the SAR to Barclaycard as from what I have read this can constitute acknowledging the debt, and the CCA gives pretty much the same info???

 

Thanks

 

You have been misinformed, it is your legal right to a SAR, this is the only way to find out whether the debt is SB or not.

US President Barack Obama referred to Ugland House as the biggest building in the world or the biggest tax SCA* in the world.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The SAR will not acknowledge the debt at all or the right of HFO to claim that you owe them money. It is a request under the data protection act for data held on you. You do not deny having an account once with BC but do deny that there is a legitimate debt owed. Add the phrase ' I acknowledge no debt to your company' to the letter if you are concerned, add to any letter you send.

 

The SAR should produce statements of account and manual record print outs telling you when there was activity so is invaluable. IT may be that BC have not kept any records as it was a long time ago if so, they have to inform you of this and there is no case.

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sending a letter saying that this is Stat Barred, MAY be taken as an acknowledgement, only if it is not SB, that is why you need to establish this before you send it

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Make sure you confirm the date of default with Barclaycard as HFO have been known to make there own default dates up. This is very important when dealing with SB debts.!

You can only be defaulted on any account once and that is the original creditors date, not some random date which appears as if by magic by HFO.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...