Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • is the home in joint names but this is solely your debt? need far more history to be able to comment if it's paid off and was not just written of by one partly on their books and sold to anther, thus the cra file says £0. dx
    • So, Sunak has managed to get someone to 'volunteer to go to Rwanda hasn't he? .. for just £3000 payment to the person plus 5 years free board and lodging isnt it? - cost to UK taxpayer over £300M+ (300 million quid+) isnt it? - Bargain says Rwanda, especially with all the profit we made privately selling those luxury chalets Bravermann advertised for us   I wonder how many brits would jump at that offer? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Lets see, up to 5 years free board and lodging and £3k in my pocket .. I'd go - and like that person - just come back if/when I get bored. First job - off to Botswana for a week to see the elephants.   Of course the paid volunteers going to Botswana are meaningless - Rwanda have REPEATEDLY said they wont take any forcibly trafficked people in breach of international law eh? Have the poops actually got any civil servants to agree to go yet - probably end up as more massive payments to VIPal contractors to go and sit there doing nowt shortly eh?    
    • Hi Wondered if I could get a little advise please. I entered into a commercial lease (3 years) and within a few months I had to leave as the business I was trading with collapsed. I returned the keys to the landlord and explained the situation and no money, also likely to go on benefits but the landlord stuck to their guns. They have now instructed solicitors to send letter before action claiming just over £4000. The lease was mine and so the debt. I know this. I have emailed the solicitors twice to explain I am out of work and that with help from family I could offer a full and final settlement figure of £1500 or £10pw. This was countered by them with an offer to reduce the debt by £400, or pay off the amount over 12 months. I went back with an improved full and final offer of £2500 or £20pw. This has been rejected with the comment 'papers ready to go to court'. I have no hope of paying the £4000 and so it will have to go to court. Pity as I have no debts otherwise but not working is a killer. I wondered if they take me to court, could I ask for mediation? I also think that taking me to court will result in a pretty much nothing per week payment from my benefits. Are companies just pushing ahead with action even if a better offer is on the table? Thanks for your help.
    • Hi all, Many thanks for the advice! Unfortunately, the reply to the email was as expected…   Starbucks UK Customer Care <[email protected]> Hi xxxxxx, We are sorry to read you received a parking charge after using our Stansted Airport - A120 DT store. Unfortunately, the car park here is managed by MET parking. Both Starbucks and EuroGarages who own and operate this site are not able to help and have no authority to overturn any parking charges received. If you have followed the below terms then you would need to send all correspondence to [email protected], who will be able to assist you further. Several signs around the car park clarify the below terms and conditions: • Maximum stay 60 minutes, whilst the store is open. If the store is closed, pay to park applies. • The car park is for Starbucks customers only who make a purchase in our store, a charge will be issued if you left the site. • If you had made a purchase and required additional time, you must have inputted your registration number into the in store iPad which would have extended your stay up to 3 hours • To park in a disabled bay, you must have displayed a valid disabled badge. • If Starbucks was closed, you must have paid for parking as charges still apply, following signage located on site. • If you didn’t use the store, you must have paid for parking, following signage located on site Please ensure all further correspondence is directed to MET parking at the above email address, and accept our apologies that we cannot help you further on this matter.  Kind Regards,  Lora K  Customer Care Team Leader Starbucks Coffee Company, Building 4 Chiswick Park, London, W4 5YE
    • Thanks HB edited and re-uploaded. Thanks for the heads up 👍
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot - Changed my D/D in July!! up'ed my payments without aking me!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4810 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I've just had a nose round Cabot's site, and checked my payment history and noticed in July my payments increased from £80 to £88, I have received nothing from Cabot. I'm sure they can't do this, can anyone offer me any advice? i first agreed to pay £70 a month for a Monument Credit Card, way back in 2008 (01/09/2008 - first payment) then about three months after that, they phoned me and kept on and on, pushing me to up my payments which i did, then in July 2010 they up'ed it again this time with no call or anything....and certainly without my permission.

 

What's my next move, to whom should i report them to? is it worth contacting them? i've got to do something as i recently lost my job (i found other employment quickly but have had to take a drastic pay cut) Any advice gratefully received.

Link to post
Share on other sites

against the DD guarantee

complain to your bank.

 

also

have you cca'ed these jokes?

 

99% of monument agreements are pants & bals are typically all unlawful charges or mis-sold PPI!!!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah of course, the Direct Debit Gurantee!? i'll get in touch with the bank.

 

On the CCA note, i haven't, and now i'm thinking that perhaps i should, i recently used an outside firm to recover credit card charges from Monument (Barclaycard) with whom the debt is from, and got about £600 back, dealt directly with Barclaycard, i think i will CCA them and see what they've got, if anything!

Thanks DX

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cancell you DD straight away and set up a Standing Order, that way you are in control of what you pay and when. And the previous person is right the DD guarantee anables you to call back the payment, you dont even have to give the bank a reason why.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Always makes me chuckle how these jokers get far too greedy for their own good, I fully condone cancelling the DD with the bank and setting up a S/O, except what you also should do, is set it up to pay them the 'token' payment of £1 a month, and yes it is tit for tat, tough luck for them, if they cannot behave legally and above board then they will lose out, get that CCA off in the post ASAP, and lodge a formal complaint about their unlawful tactics to the OFT&TS via http://www.consumerdirect.gov.uk/contact

AND to their industry regulator http://www.csa-uk.com/page/codes-and-standards as they have fallen way short of any acceptable standards that the CSA likes to make us believe they have!

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you caggers.....i thought i found their bank details off an old letter i uncovered, but apparently the sort code is wrong, can someone furnish me with some details? or how would i go about finding out?

i'll put in a complaint, and also lodge a complaint with the bank and get some money back on a claim. i'll keep you posted with regards to the CCA.

 

xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well, i sorted out an indemnity claim with the bank today, just waiting for it to be confirmed. I've also sent the CCA off today as well. And, i'm going to complain using the links so kindly given to me by Bazooka.

 

I'll keep you posted on the CCA, no doubt, the next step will be putting the account in dispute, although the DD for £88 has just been cancelled (but not by me, hadn't got round to it.) which leads me to believe there about to try increasing my payments again! i'll keep you posted, and as soon as i see it set up i'll cancel it and put in another claim!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm a little confused? Under the DD guarantee, you are entitled to a full and immediate refund, has the bank done this?

As for the DD, cancel it immediately and tell the bank that under no circumstances is this clown outfit to have any access to your account using a DD as they cannot be trusted.

Demand cr@pbots bank details, and until they supply them they won't get paid.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

right i'll try again, i think i was speaking to a phone monkey, as he kept putting me on hold, and then he couldn't transfer me to someone who deals with indemnity's when i do get a call back, i'll get this sorted, it has been cancelled, but i will keep a careful eye on my account. i've let them know about these shisters and their antics.

Link to post
Share on other sites

£616.00 into my account this morning, then the phone rang this afternoon!! got 'em on the run! and i bet they can't find a DD signed by me to prove to the bank!! now just got to wait for the response to the CCA then i can put the whole thing to bed! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

just as a side note

how long have they had some of this money?

 

you might well be entitled to stat int @8%

 

also if this money being missing from your a/c caused you bank charges or charges from other creditors because they did not get paid, you need to look at redress there too

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

Seasoned Caggers know already NEVER EVER to use DIRECT DEBITS FOR ANYTHING especially to miserable vermin like DCA's. The problem with DD's is that they can be changed by the person receiving the money at will.

 

If you want to transfer money regularly use STANDING ORDERS INSTEAD. These are FIXED AMOUNTS THAT ONLY YOU CAN CHANGE.

 

I know people like British Gas etc prefer people to pay with Direct debits for obvious reasons but if you insist that they will only change the amount on a DD AFTER CONSULTING YOU then it might be OK to pay these types of people -- Council Tax, Utilities etc.

 

BUT NEVER EVER EVER EVER EVER USE A DIRECT DEBIT FOR PAYING A DCA.

 

Cheers

jimbo

Link to post
Share on other sites

just as a side note

how long have they had some of this money?

 

you might well be entitled to stat int @8%

 

Damn good point! That should teach them to take what's not theirs....

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for responses! and a good point dx about the 8%, i'll look into that, also jimbo, i'm attempting to get bank details of cr@pbot, in order to set up a s/o, actually what i'm waiting on is them to mess up on the CCA i've asked them for, but at least Natwest are chasing them about the indemnity! and no phone calls from them!! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks, i can't remember the last time i got a statement and i also received a letter from them today, stating that they have approached the original lender for the documents and they have returned my p/o. so i'm waiting for Monument to come up empty or come up with a toilet rolls worth of a credit agreement!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

well,

 

i've received a reply from cabot with a badly photocopied 'reply card' that i don't remember filling in, but it's my handwriting and signature on there (it also says my salary at the time was £32,000!! trust me, if i was earning that i wouldn't have needed monument!!) and they also sent me the loo roll of all the T & C's from Monument, in fact they sent me the T&C's for the platinum card as well as the 'classic' and also two pages of printout (it looks like payment made by me to cabot not Monument) what do you want me to post up first? all of it or just bits that are important? you can also see on the printout that they sat on the debt from 2005 until 2008 (when i still lived at the address they had) and they've lumped on £1222.64 in PENIN interest transaction

Link to post
Share on other sites

like i said

 

99% of all monument debts are unlawful charges and their 'spoof' PPI

it went under another and they still to this day say it is NOT PPI, so cannot be claimed under mis-selling rules.

 

WRONG done it twice now!

 

go get reclaiming.

 

pdf up any statements but remove ALL ID'

 

scan the required letters/agreements/sheets

remove all pers info inc barcodes etc but leave all figures and dates.

goto one of the many free online pdf converter websites

convert the image to pdf format.

open a new msg box here

hit go advanced below the msg box

hit manage attachments below that box

hit the add files button on the top right

hit select files, navigate to your file on your pc

hit upload files

NB:you can set where it goes in the post by hitting insert inline.

the hit reply button

dx

 

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right I have had to take a very close look at that just to attempt to read it properly it is so poor, so you 'could' argue it on that point, and that you want a clearer legible copy of those T&C's, and secondly trying to put the scans in order, is that all they sent you?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well TBH you wont get very far by arguing that its now not you debt sadly, various court cases by silly individuals and rip-off claims companies have put the deathnell on paperwork errors.

 

my next move now would be to SAR the OC

 

i bet there are heaps of unlawful fees and that OPBP [PPI in sheeps clothing] that will have been charged you to reclaim

 

i bet you can kill this debt stone dead with a few pounds to your pocket if you get reclaiming

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...