Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Last month was confirmed to be the hottest-ever May on record, in terms of global average temperatures, completing an entire calendar year of month-by-month records.  The average temperature last month was 1.52C above the pre-industrial average, according to the Copernicus Climate Change Service, known as C3S. The average global temperature for the 12-month period to the end of May was 1.63C (2.9F) above the pre-industrial average
    • This time you do need to reply to them with a snotty letter to show you'd be big trouble for them if they did try court. We will help this evening.  
    • Hi, I just wanted to update the post and ask some further advice  I sent the CCA and CPR request on the 14th May, to date I have had no reply to the CCA but I received a load of paperwork from the CPR request a few days ago. I need to file the defence today and from the information I have read the following seems to be what is required.  I would be grateful if some one could confirm suitability. Many thanks   Claim The claim is for the sum of £255.69 due by the Defendant under an agreement regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974 for a PayPal account with an account reference of xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)  The Defendant failed to maintain contractual payments required by the agreement and a Default Notice was served under s.87(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 which has not been complied with. The debt was legally assigned to the claimant on 15-09-21, notice of which has been given to the defendant. The claim includes statutory interest under S.69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue of these proceedings in the sum of £0.00. The Claimant claims the sum of £255.69   Defence  The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 1. Paragraph 1 is noted. I have had financial dealings with PayPal  in the past but cannot recollect the account number referred to by the Claimant. 2. Paragraph 2 is denied. I am not aware of service of a Default Notice by the original creditor the Claimant refers to within its particulars of claim.  3. Paragraph 3 is noted. On the 17/5/2024 I requested information related to this claim by way of a Section 77 request, which was received and signed for by the claimant on 20/5/2024. As of today, the Claimant has failed to respond to this request, and therefore remains in default of the section 77 request and therefore unable to enforce any alleged agreement until its compliance. 4. Therefore it is denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, and the Claimant is put to strict proof to: (a) Show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement and: (b) Show the nature of the breach and evidence by way of a Default Notice Pursuant to s.87(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. 5. Paypal (Europe) S.A.R.L is out of the juristriction of English Courts. 6. As per Civil Procedure 16.5 it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. 7. By reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed, or any relief.
    • Thanks @dx100ukI followed the advice given on here... then it went very quiet!  The company was creditfix I think then transferred to Knightsbridge (or the other way around) The scammer independent advisor was Roger Wallis-having checked his LinkedIn profile just this morning, it does look like he's still scamming vulnerable people... I know I was stupid for taking his advice, but i do wonder how many others he has done this to over a longer period of time (it came as a  massive shock to him when our IVA suddenly failed). Lowell have our current address (and phone numbers if the rejected calls over the past couple of days is anything to go by!) No point trying the SB because of the correspondence in 2019? Thanks
    • I have received the following letter from BW Legal today.  Also includes form if I admit the debt and wanting my income details.  Do I reply to this LETTER OF CLAIM please?  Looks like they are ready for court now??  Thank You BW Legal - Letter of Claim.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HFO services / Barclycard


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4645 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

If not the letter is in the library @ http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?436-Failure-to-provide-a-copy-of-the-agreement-within-the-prescribed-timescale. Once you have sent this recorded delivery they cant take you to court unless they have fully provided the CCA request

My advice is given through personal experience and is given without prejudice

 

 

If I Have helped please feel free to click the star

:smile:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 186
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Then, your pretty much playing the waiting game. They are allowed to send the agreement months later if they so wish, but they can't try to enforce the debt until they comply. Not much you can do now until you get your SAR results. I sent a SAR to BC a bit before you and have got half the results back, I know there is more to come (did the same for my relative earlier this year.

Send a reminder to BC that they haven't complied

My advice is given through personal experience and is given without prejudice

 

 

If I Have helped please feel free to click the star

:smile:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all planning to send this on Friday (giving post office a chance to catch up) if there is nothing back from BC.

 

Is there anything more that I should be asking for and should I give them more time other than the 7 days?

 

SAR Follow up to BC 2.doc

 

Also just wondering are DCA's allowed to do an unrecorded inquiry on your credit file.

:-) Just Keep Smiling.

as Some days your the Dog and Other days your the Lampost :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with Coledog, CRA's are buggers and hide behind some fuzzy laws which they interpret for themselves. The DCA probably has done an account management search on you (I Have two from HFO) on mine. They are probably looking to see what credit you have available to you or if you have applied for some.

 

You question CRA's you get answers like "This is something that the credit industry has agreed upon between them and hasn't been questioned by the information officer". Well maybe so , but this isn't common law and doesn't mean it isn't questionable, but they never answer me when I reply with that. Sorry, gone onto an anti CRA rant now, god i hate them.

I think we should all join forces to challenge them, they think and act like they are a government agency. European Court etc. Im still going on aren't I

My advice is given through personal experience and is given without prejudice

 

 

If I Have helped please feel free to click the star

:smile:

Link to post
Share on other sites

And you were right CD, I noticed some people from money saving expert with the same user name on here. Their threads on MSE didn't amount to much but got a lot more interest on here

My advice is given through personal experience and is given without prejudice

 

 

If I Have helped please feel free to click the star

:smile:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes - there are 2 at least, one of them has said that he did receive some advice from another site before coming to CAG but must have seen sense - glad to see that there is a slightly doctored poster name now giving advice, may now register myself as cooldog. Dread to think who Chipshop is!! Get a Kebab mate!

Edited by coledog

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think my name change was due more to it being the day after new years eve. Didn't really want to get involved over there , but some of the advice was making me shout at my screen. Going to try and get as many of them to repost over here without alerting the MSE site team

My advice is given through personal experience and is given without prejudice

 

 

If I Have helped please feel free to click the star

:smile:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all postman has just been with this from BC.

 

http://i423.photobucket.com/albums/pp316/dogtrainer05/hfo0017-1.jpg

 

http://i423.photobucket.com/albums/pp316/dogtrainer05/hfo0016.jpg

 

she says that mercers are collecting it.

 

O what a tangled web they are weaving .

:-) Just Keep Smiling.

as Some days your the Dog and Other days your the Lampost :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I still think this is a Barclaycard cock-up, but it proves their records cannot possibly show the account has even been sold, so there is total doubt about who owns it. If I were a judge, I would believe Barclaycard over HFO!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I still think this is a Barclaycard cock-up, but it proves their records cannot possibly show the account has even been sold, so there is total doubt about who owns it..

 

but the print out I have got shows it was sold

 

Donkey is there anything I should do now apart from sitting and waiting

:-) Just Keep Smiling.

as Some days your the Dog and Other days your the Lampost :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all was think of sending this to BC what do you think.

The highlighted part I copied from a SAR letter written by Man42 I found when looking through the library.

SAR Follow up to BC 2b.doc

Edited by dogtrainer
link not working

:-) Just Keep Smiling.

as Some days your the Dog and Other days your the Lampost :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...