Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • HI DX Yes check it every month , after I reinstated the second DD I was checking every week. Also checked my bank statements and each payment has cleared. When responding to the court claim does it need to be in spefic terms ? Or laid out in a certain format? Or is it just a case of putting down in writing how I have expained it on CAG?
    • Come and engage with homelessness   Museum of Homelessness MUSEUMOFHOMELESSNESS.ORG The award-winning Museum of Homelessness (MoH) was founded in 2015 and is run by people with direct experience of homelessness. A very different approach. If you're in London you should go and see them
    • You have of course checked the car is now taxed and the £68 is stated against  the same reg?  If the tax for the same car did over lap, then I can't see you having an issue pleading not guilty Dx
    • The boundary wiill not be the yellow line.  Dx  
    • Afternoon all Looking for advice before I defend claim for car tax payment that the DVLA claim I owe £68 from an idemity claimback from my bank and unpaid tax  brief outline. Purchased car Jan 30th ,garage paid the tax for me after I gave them my card details  first payment £68 out in Feb 24  followed by payment of £31 from March due to end Jan 24 Checked one of my vehicle apps and about 7-10 days later car showing as untaxed? No reason why but it looks like DVLA cancelled it , this could be because I did not have the V5 and the gargae paid on my behalf but not sure did not receive a letter to say car was untaxed.  Fair enough I set up the tax again staight away in Feb 24  and first payment out Mar 31st , and each payment since has come out each month for £31 , this will end Feb/Mar 2025, slightly longer than the original tax set up, all good. I then claimed the £68 back from my bank as an indemity refund as obviously I had paid but DVLA had cancelled therefore it was a payment for nothing?  Last week recieved a SJP form dated 29th May stating that DVLA were claiming for unpaid tax and a false indemity claimback which of course is the £68. It also stated that I had received two previous letters offering me the oppotunity to pay that £68 but as I had not responded it was now a court claim that I must admit guilt for or defend. My post is held for weeks at a time from Royal Mail ( keepsafe) due to me receiving hospital tretament at weeks at a time that said I did not receive any previous letters from DVLA. I am happy to defend this and go to court but wondering what CAG members think? In summary I paid an initial amount of £68 and then a DD of £31 , tax cancelled  I set up a new DD at £31 a month all in the month of Feb 2024, I claimed the £68 back from my bank. DD has been coming out each month without issue and I have paperwork to show the breakdown for both DD setup's plus bank statements showing the payments coming out . The second DD set up has extended payments up to Feb/Mar 2025. DVLA claiming the £68 was ilegally claimed back despite the fact they cancelled the original DD for reasons unknown. Is this defendable ? I will post up documents including the original DD conformations 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Received a letter from Fredrickson International Limited


leehuk1982
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5015 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

Out of the blue today, I received a letter from a DCA called Fredrickson International Limited, and all it says is the following:-

 

"Dear X

 

We have been instructed to collect the outstanding balance on the above account.

 

We have made tracing enquiries for confirmation of your current place of residence and information has been received confirming that your address details have changed to this address.

 

Please contact us immediately on 0845 0349711 quoting the above reference."

 

It seems a bit strange to have received this, it DOESN'T mention who the debt is owed to, and the reference number on the letter has no relevance whatsoever! I'm not going to call them as I don't want to open a can of worms!

 

I do owe Barclays a sum of money for a loan which a PREVIOUS debt collector tried to collect about 2 years ago, but they couldn't supply me with a copy of my signed credit agreement, so they wrote back saying they had closed the case.

 

I also owed Smile a sum of money for a credit card, but haven't paid that for about 4 years or so nor have I ever heard from anyone chasing any payments!

 

So what advice do you guys offer? Shall I just ignore it and see where it goes?

 

Regards,

Lee

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ignore and wait for the next letter. The next letter should tell you who the original creditor is and then you can decide what to do next.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

leehuk1982................Hi.............Uncle advise fine,next letter should produce OC,if you are feeling Fredrickson are a Pain in Ars...............send them a letter along the lines of their 1st two paragraphs ( I have been instructed to collect the outstanding balance on the above account) it usually stops them in their tracks,might even send you a cheque.................................FS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Keep a diary of events, and file everything including the envelopes they send their rubbish in, as it is Freds you should expect to receive some irrelevant nonsense from their side kick Bryan 'bloody' Carter.

 

If they can't be bothered to tell you what the debt actually relates to, then firmly ignore the fools, you should also make a complaint to the OFT/TS via http://www.consumerdirect.gov.uk/contact for once again, failing miserably, to inform you of the reason for contacting you.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

 

I've received a 2nd letter from Fredrickson International Ltd, this time it actually has details of who the debt is owed to! Here's what it says:-

 

"Re Brand/Product: Additions Direct

Balance: £800 (just over!)

Our Client: Phoenix Recoveries (UK) Ltd S.a.r.l

 

Dear Mr X,

 

DO NOT IGNORE - IMMEDIATE PAYMENT REQUIRED

 

We are instructed by Phoenix Recoveries (UK) Ltd S.a.r.l to collect the above debt which is now seriously overdue.

 

You have failed to pay the balance of £800 (just over!) which remains outstanding despite previous repeated requests for payment. Our client now requires payment in full to avoid further action.

 

YOU MUST CONTACT US IMMEDIATELY ON 0845 0349701 to discuss the matter further.

 

Payment should be made to Fredrickson International Ltd quoting our full reference number. For your convenience, payment can be accepted by Maesto, Delta, Credit Card or Cheque.

 

This is a serious matter and you may wish to seek independent legal advice."

 

 

Now.....I do recall owing Additions Direct Catalogue a sum of money, but can't remember how much! It's been a good 3 or 4 years since I made any payment! What steps should I take next? I can afford to pay it (on my hubby's credit card!!), but of course I'd rather tell them to politely F Off if I can!! What should I respond with?

 

Thanks for your help!

 

Lee

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send them the prove it letter from the templates, it sounds like their standard pishing exercise.... Fredricksons are one of the firms which specialise in nearly statute barred debts.

 

You need to head the letters "I do not acknowledge any alleged debt to you or your agents or clients...."

 

Which letter in the templates section should I use?

 

Thanks,

Lee

Link to post
Share on other sites

I got one of them letters from Fredricksons yesterday, re Additions catalogue. The must be starting at the begining of the alphabet, either that or they can't get past "a". I would like to be a fly on the wall in the morning when they receive the "account in serious dispute" letter. Moorcroft could not provide a CCA in 2008, so I doubt if they will be able to now!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You will find Phoenix Recoveries SARL UK Ltd are the subject of huge threads on this site,they are based in Luxembourg and use companies like Fredrickson to do the dirty work, Sillygirl and Bazooka are right,tell Fredrickson to prove it,head your letter I do not acknowledge any debt to Phoenix Recoveries I have never heard of this company there has been no communication between us and I only have your word that you represent them,which you will understand as there are so many [problem] letters and emails in existence I need absolute proof of the existence of this debt and the company you claim to represent....................FS

Link to post
Share on other sites

You will find Phoenix Recoveries SARL UK Ltd are the subject of huge threads on this site,they are based in Luxembourg and use companies like Fredrickson to do the dirty work, Sillygirl and Bazooka are right,tell Fredrickson to prove it,head your letter I do not acknowledge any debt to Phoenix Recoveries I have never heard of this company there has been no communication between us and I only have your word that you represent them,which you will understand as there are so many [problem] letters and emails in existence I need absolute proof of the existence of this debt and the company you claim to represent....................FS

 

Thanks for the info - but is there a letter within the template section that I should state the above on? Or should I literally just knock something basic up?

 

Regards,

Lee

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this the one I should send?

 

Regards,

Lee

 

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

You have contacted me/us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself/ourselves.

 

I/we would point out that I/we have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to (insert company name).

 

I am/we are familiar with the Office of Fair Trading debt collectionGuidance which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

 

I/we would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

 

Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment.

 

I/we would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my/our liability for the debt in question.

 

I/we await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed. Otherwise I will have no option but to make a complaint to the trading standards department and consider informing the OFT of your actions.

 

I/we look forward to your reply.

 

Yours faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

that is the one to send. Don't forget-Recorded Delivery

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Last question before I send this off tomorrow...

 

The address at the top of the letter from Fredrickson is a PO Box address - I can't send a recorded delivery letter to a PO Box address can I?? There is a registered address at the bottom of the letter which is in London (whereas the PO Box address is in Surrey) - so should I send it to the registered office address instead?

 

Thank you all so far for your help!

 

Regards,

Lee

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have sent plenty of letters to PO boxes so don't worry about it. The post office will do it by the post code anyway.

 

I'm sending them a letter tomorrow too so they'll both land on the table at the same time.:-)

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...