Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • An update! I emailed both Andrzej.Tuleja and James_Goldsmith at Whirlpool dot com. I got a phone call from their executive team a couple of days later, and a replacement part dropped on the mat a week after. She was quite apologetic, however, also reiterated the "90 day warranty" period on customer fitted parts, and did not comment when I mentioned that the CRA also applies as I was a consumer buying from them directly. So I now have a spare door switch if the machine decides to eat another in the future! Cheers all!   Note dx100 that the "Hotpoint CEO" you linked to is not related to the hotpoint appliances, but some kind of marketing app.
    • yep, throw that morality card out the window....9/10 you never owe a DCA ANYTHING!! they are NOT BAILIFFS!!
    • (See the link to DVLA’s INF188/6 document I posted above, page 4 as cited) “I have a new medical condition that I have told the DVLA about on my recent application. Can I drive? As soon as the DVLA receives your correct and complete application for a new licence and as long as you meet all the Section 88 criteria, you may drive. It is important that you are satisfied that the medical condition you have declared on your application does not stop you from driving. If you are unsure, check with your doctor or healthcare professional before you make a decision. You can also look up your condition in the ‘Assessing fitness to drive’ guide, which you can find at www.gov.uk/dvla/fitnesstodrive to see whether you meet the medical standards for driving. As this guide is intended for healthcare professionals, it can be complicated. Your doctor or healthcare professional should be able to help you if necessary." It seems that DVLA think that S.88 does apply for applications disclosing a new medical condition after all. Why might this be so, and what of “qualifying application" and "relevant disability"? S. 92(1) imposes on the driver a requirement to disclose a relevant disability. S.92(3) requires the Secretary of State to refuse such an application disclosing a relevant disability ….. EXCEPT S.92(4) requires the Secretary of State to grant such an application if the relevant disability is “adequately controlled”. Hence my belief S.88 can apply for medical conditions (if the driver meets the medical standard of fitness to drive) as the application remains a qualifying application IF the driver meets the medical standard of fitness to drive, until DVLA (on behalf of the Secretary of State) say it doesn’t, provided the driver believes they meet the (medical) standard. Additionally, at (or before) June 2013 (as noted in my previous post) the medical standard for fitness to drive for conditions involving excessive daytime sleepiness was changed from “completely controlled” to "adequately controlled".  
    • CFO Bill Guan allegedly led a team at the news outlet that was behind a global money laundering scheme.View the full article
    • Anyway, I've asked my Booking.com flat-rent-out-bloke what needs to be done on the Booking.com portal to cancel a reservation. I got a late message "I'll let you know tomorrow".
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Compromise Agreement? Urgent


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5003 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 73
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

You are right, I am so lucky!! I will count my blessing in church on Sunday.

 

Its about protecting myself and my family, in the hight of a recession. Are you kidding me! I didnt see the solicitors offering to pay my bills or put food on the table. Its about survival and using the system to my advantage. I do think I am right, all payments made under "ex gracia" are tax free upto 35K apart from the obvious statutory payments laid down by the Goverment, I think its 1 weeks salary for every year worked. This is taxable and cannot be avoided. But leave, notice pay and exceptional payments can be thrown in.

 

I consider myself a savvy person and used the system to my advantage rather than having to claim from it.

 

Like I mentioned, check it out and speak to a solicitor, wouldnt want you to break the law now.

 

Joncris - Where do you get 14yrs from?? People kill each other and get less than that. Get real

I need to change my avatar..But cant find a good replacement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

For all your bluster you have still not explained why the solicitor was concerned & NO lawyer worth his salt will take part in a clients deceit if that deceit is illegal

 

AS for money laundering 14 years IS the maximum sentence

Link to post
Share on other sites

I never called anyone names. Just pointing out the obvious God complex of another.

 

Anyhow, hope you get everything you can from your ex-employer and my bit of advice may be of help.

 

Stewie

I need to change my avatar..But cant find a good replacement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suppose it boils down to, on the one hand, how strong you feel you case is (and remembering your policy of 'If it ain't wriiten down it didn't happen' it's probably pretty solid).

 

Or, on the other hand, whether you'd like to avoid the drawn out hassle of a Tribunal case.

 

If the latter you could maybe ask whether the earlier offer is still on the table.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suppose it boils down to, on the one hand, how strong you feel you case is (and remembering your policy of 'If it ain't wriiten down it didn't happen' it's probably pretty solid).

 

Or, on the other hand, whether you'd like to avoid the drawn out hassle of a Tribunal case.

 

If the latter you could maybe ask whether the earlier offer is still on the table.

I want to avoid the ET route if at all possible. I think it's a strong case, but discrimination cases are never easy. Probably have to resign and claim CD too.

AH! hang on, he's just emailed me again, I'll be back....

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, received another email from the director. He's now accepting the amount I requested, which he initially rejected.

I'd stated that I wouldn't move out of the staff accomodation I'm occupying until I had received the settlement. He's insisting that I won't get the money until I move out. So that's the only sticking point. What does everyone think?

I'm sure that if we finalise the agreement and then they don't pay up, that I could soon pursue them for the money, but do you think I should insist that I get the money before I go anywhere?

The only other point, that I've asked for him to clarify, is will it be deemed that I've resigned, or that I was made redundant?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Been reading these boards with interest, so I thought I would sign up and chip in :)

 

I did a compromise agreement with my employer, although it was ten years ago now.

 

I went to the lawyers office, met my ex director there, and we signed the paperwork together and handed over the cheque at that point. Although accommodation wasnt the issue in my case, so I couldnt be certain, I would think this would be the point you hand your accomodation keys back? Would make sense, that way you can draw a line under it.

 

I did negotiate quite well I think, and they did agree to note it as a voluntary redundancy...(I wanted out, it was not a pleasant environment, to say the least, although I had worked there for many years, including internationally)

 

Good luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Redundancy is infinitely better than resignation or worse and should provoke few questions, although I think Elpulpo said he has another job to go to. Pulpo, it's worth bearing in mind a reference if you haven't already mentioned this. Sorry, long day, long lunch.

 

HB x

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your average CA [or equivalent] would include what would be said on any future reference wouldn't it, if I've read the forum right since I've been here? I have to say, your people have a unique way of negotiating and I admire how you're dealing with it.

 

HB x

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Something else to think about, Pulpo.

 

Also, OH says if you really don't trust them with a cheque, would they do a bank transfer? I realise that could be asking too much, just a thought.

 

HB x

Edited by honeybee13
Clarity.

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

As you've got another job lined up I don't suppose that it matters too much whether your CV says resignation or redundancy.

If you can get the other matters sorted I'd bite his hand off and not stop chewing until you reach the elbow.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, the director has just emailed me and confirmed the net money I will receive, that the EDT can be tomorrow and that they can state that I was made redundant. He suggested that I write a reference for myself, which he would then accept or amend. No mention of the next step, my seeking independant legal advice etc.

I've emailed him back accepting, with a proposed reference. (glowing)

I've never been in this situation before, and it just doesn't feel right - like I'm walking into a trap somehow. I just keep having to assure myself that if they're being underhand then it will backfire on them.

Still got until early October to file an ET1 if it goes pear shaped.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...