Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files 2024-01-15 DBCLegal SAR.pdf
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
    • Hi,   I am not sure if I posted this already here but I don't think I did. I attach a judgement that raises very interesting points IMO. Essentially EVRi did their usual non attendance that we normally see, however the judge (for the first time I've seen in these threads) dismissed the notice and awarded me judgement by default because their notice misses the "confirmation of compliance" paragraph. in and out in 3 minutes (aside from the chat at the end with the judge about his problems with evri) Redacted - evri CPR loss.pdf
    • Just to update this. I did apply to strikeout and they did not attend the hearing. I won by defualt and the hearing lasted 5 minutes (court only allocated 15). The judge simply explained that the only matter he was really considering is if the Defendant could have any oral evidence to defend the claim. However he said he had decided that based on their defence, and their misunderstanding of law, and their non attendence he did not think they had any reasonsable chance so he awarded me SJ + Costs on the claim form + the strikeout fee. Luckily when I sent the defendant the order I woke up the next day to a wire trasnfer for the full sum of the judgement
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5038 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Sorry if this is a long winded introduction from a newbie but I am a very scared newbie and would appreviate any help or advice please.

I received a parking ticket nearly two years ago. As the ticket was exactly 1 minute over its limit I disputed it. I had to fill out a form and send a letter. I did this and the last email contact with Northampton County Court is November 2009. I rang them to check what was going on and they assured me all was fine and the ticket had been squashed. As a mum to 3 children, 2 of which are severely autistic, I am constantly on the go and I completely forgot about it. Until this morning. Just before 8am this morning the bailiffs banged hell out of my door with a warrant to seize from Northampton County Court. I explained what had happened nearly a year ago and he says it wasnt on his system so it wasnt his problem. He gave me half an hour to get dressed and find the money! The kids were terrified as he was adamant he was taking everything of value. I was so scared. I borrowed the money from my neighbours - I have never so much as borrowed sugar from them before. He came back, walked straight into my house and took the cash. I asked for a receipt which he gave me and then he started trying to take the serial numbers from the tv? I refused to allow him to do this. I said I have just paid you even though I dont owe you, you cannot seize goods! He said it was a formality and he could levy a charge on anything in my house wether I paid him or not. I did argue that as I had paid him in full he could not and I did not allow him near the tv BUT he still left me a form 7 which is a notice of seizure and inventory of goods. On it he has wrote our tv. He also said he has levied a charge on our car even though its not our car - Its a motability car? I told him this and he said he could not seize it but he can levy a charge on it. So I now have a receipt for £342.26 which is app the full amount. It was originally £80 or £40 if paid within 14 days. He says the charges are for visits but I can assure you they have never visited. They visited once last year and I contacted them and the courts immediately. I can honestly say I heard nothing since November last year and now I am terrified plus my youngest is really in meltdown over this. What do I do? I really do not kno what to do? Thank you for reading this and I am very grateful for any help or advice offered x

Link to post
Share on other sites

amount does suggest he/they have visited before, and legally they have to send a letter out before visiting at a cost of 11.20 +vat (13.16) knowing equita they dont do 1st and 2nd calls choosing to illegally send letters including charges on them.

crucially unlike council tax, bailiffs can charge an enforcement fee/van fee for parking fines regardless of whether a levy has taken place or not so why he felt the need to write one out anyway is a pointless exercise

None of the beliefs held by "Freemen on the land" have ever been supported by any judgments or verdicts in any criminal or civil court cases.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did he leave you a comprehensive breakdow of charges if not send them this by both email & post by Signed For - adapt as you see fit:

 

"From:

My Name

My Address

 

To:

Acme Bailiff Co

Bailiff House

 

Ref: Account No: 123456

 

Dear Sir

 

With reference to the above account. Can you please provide me with a breakdown of the charges.

 

This includes:

a - the time & date of any Bailiff action that incurred a Fee.

b - the reason for the fee.

c - the name(s) of the Bailiff(s) that attended on each occasion a Fee was charged.

d - the name(s) of the Court(s) the Bailiff(s) was/were Certificated at.

e - the date of the Certification.

 

This is not a Subject Access Request under the Data Protection Act S7 1998 so does not incur a fee of £10. You are obliged to provide this information.

 

I require this information within 14 days.

 

Yours faithfully

 

Ripped off customer"

 

Also have you checked to make sure the Bailiff who attended has a current Certificate.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you ploddertom x On the receipt it says the original fine was £80 and then the rest is their fees. But they have only ever been to my house once before and they left a letter. They never knocked until yesterday morning. He was so intimidating though. He said it wasnt his problem that I have no family to borrow from I either get the money in half an hour or he was coming in and taking everything. He was saying it so loudly as well all the neighbours heard. Thankfully they know me well enough to know I am not a dishonest person. I am so scared to go to work now and my daughter was terrified going food shopping today. She really thought that the tv would be gone when we got back and to be quite honest I feel the same. I now have to try and pay everyone back but I am so angry at Northampton Court who advised there was no fine to pay and that they would pull offthe bailiffs. What can I do about the levy on my tv? Are they allowed to do this? Will they come back again for more? I am not a wealthy person and we work so hard to provide for our children but I have never felt so scared or threatened by anybody before and thats saying something seeing as how I have a barring order against my ex husband for violence and intimidation!!! I have every intention of sending this letter - Thank you for that. But who else can I complain to and how do I go about it? Thank you again x

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suggest you now write a formal complaint to the Chief executive of the issuing council, this bailiffs actions was inexcusable and you must make a complaint.

He had no reason at all to make a levy after you had paid, But I can guess why he done this so that he could add a charge for it. He obviously wasnt expecting you to pay so already had added this charge before he came to see you. He certainly cannot levy against a mobility vehicle, so that would make the levy invalid any way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...