Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Welcome & HFO Services


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4437 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

So in point 15

 

i can put in a request (d) for this assignment details

 

do you care to write out a few sentance for me to put in on that point for disclosure

 

They may claim that they have already issued me with an NOA - which is true.

 

The question seems to be if it is a valid copy of the original.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 297
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I don't think the issues I've raised add to the defence until any related documents are requested or received.

 

The key things still needed are:

 

1. Info from Welcome regarding the actual sale date and who it was sold to. I note they wrote the account off in August 2007, but apparently did not sell in on until Feb 08. Most odd.

 

2. Copy of the original Default Notice. Although it isn't mentioned in the PoC, CPR 18 should be used to request it. It is central to their claim, as you point out in the defence. Their own DN is irrelevant, and is frankly laughable.

 

3. Sight of the Deed of Assignment/Sale Agreement between HFO and Welcome. This should have been requested under CPR 31 as it was referred to in the PoC. If this hasn't been requested, do it now!

 

Apologies to VJ and BA - they suggested getting these docs earlier in the thread.

 

I think you have worded the section about interest very well. It's clear from their PoC that they have taken the 12% figure from their own T&Cs, which were stated in their own default notice. Again, unless there is reference in the original enforceable contract to 12% interest being claimed by anyone after termination, they can whistle. It's just nonsense, but you have to refute their claim and put them to strict proof af any entitlement to 12% interest.

 

What may be worth doing is getting the request in to HFO for sight of the deed under CPR 31, and adding to the defence the fact that this has been requested but not supplied. I doubt they will want us to see it, but it is dadofholly's right to view it within 7 days of a request.

 

Dadofholly, have you tried calling Welcome to ask for details of when and to whom the account was sold? Experience tells us that the claimant has a poor history in respect of accuracy regarding assignment, so this is worth pursuing by any means possible.

Edited by DonkeyB
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Donkey

 

Thanks for your input.

 

I am as we speak awaiting a response from certain parties regarding the original sale of the debt, and any associated NOA's.

 

Unfortunatley this may take a bit more time yet. I think it may be best to issue defence as is - and add other info - such as issues that may arise with the NOA and with evidence of breaches of the DPA - at a later date, if needed.

 

Any further evidence will be used for complaints - and possible action, even if we win the case hands down. I am in total agreement with you in regards to further exposing their actions.

 

The NoA issue is a weak one. DCAs and debt buyers are allowed to send out NoAs on behalf of the original lender, but they MUST be accurate. Inaccuracy is fatal!

 

Did they actually send you an NoA when it was supposedly issued, in 2008, or simply make it up to suit their case when they finally got round to pestering you this year? Usually they swear blind they sent it when they bought the debt, but that simply is not true. They buy the accounts in tranches and often take years to get round to doing anything about them, then they simply backdate the letters they supposedly sent.

 

A good trick is to see if the logo they used for Welcome was actually the one in use in 2008. VJohn stuffed HFO and Barclaycard over this kind of, er, 'reconstruction'.

 

But please make sure you DO follow through on the complaints!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok then guys

 

So are we agreed that the final draft looks ok?

 

I am going to start getting it prepared ready for sending early next week. So any comments and last minute alterations need to be picked up over the weekend latest.

 

Thanks for all your inputs - and to post for putting the defence together - lets see what they make of it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did they actually send you an NoA when it was supposedly issued, in 2008, or simply make it up to suit their case when they finally got round to pestering you this year?

 

What do you think? I bet you already knew the answer to that one :-)

 

A good trick is to see if the logo they used for Welcome was actually the one in use in 2008.

 

It was the logo that first made me smell a rat - that and the fact it was signed cattles and not welcome.

 

Welecome have always signed everything i have ever received from them as Welcome not Cattles. If that NOA turns out to be genuine i am going to buy one of them Rolex watches for 10 euros next time im on holiday.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What do you think? I bet you already knew the answer to that one :-)

 

 

 

It was the logo that first made me smell a rat - that and the fact it was signed cattles and not welcome.

 

Welecome have always signed everything i have ever received from them as Welcome not Cattles. If that NOA turns out to be genuine i am going to buy one of them Rolex watches for 10 euros next time im on holiday.

 

wrong thread sorry...

Edited by geee
Link to post
Share on other sites

Stop worrying, even though you have got what might be the original documentation the request merely asks for the same, will prove then if they 'reconstituted' the stuff sent to you to substantiate their legality over the claim.

 

Thanks

 

Have just had info saying much the same thing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...