Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Sorry, I may have forgot to get back on this. Please monitor for a reply tomorrow
    • Yes, now its just about getting the WS / Court bundle finalised to send to the court / Evri. I've attached the most recent version of the WS / Court bundle to save having to scroll back up to the previous post (#204) where it was also shared. If you, @BankFodder or anyone else has any feedback on this, i'd be grateful for your thoughts. In my previous post #204, i'd also attached an invoice from Packlink which shows that I was charged by Packlink for these services: "drop-off at Her mes - Next day delivery" and "Proof of Delivery". It also has the payer's address and there are "Origin" and "Destination" fields which have the postcode of the sender [origin] and the recipient [destination] - I have redacted personal details in the attached invoice.  I am already including this in my evidence bundle (without the redaction) but wanted to share this redacted version so that other people can consider this as example in their bundle of Packlink and Evri's contract being instigated by the sender of the parcel who has paid for the service, and further shows that there is information in the invoice to identify that a third party beneficiary (the sender / recipient) is involved in this transaction. I have also attached this redacted invoice in this post to save having to scroll back up. Happy to get any thoughts and if this invoice is no good, then please let me know.   Draft - Witness Statement and Court Bundle redacted.pdf Packlink invoice - REDACTED.pdf
    • Does anyone know if I would be allowed to record conversations with health professionals for my own use on my phone without them knowing. I know that we are allowed to record phone calls. I do record some of my phone calls for my own use due to my disability and if anything is said then I am covered. I would only record audio in private area's of myself and the professional dealing with me. I know I could not get and other persons audio in it and I don't intend to. my only other option is to buy a body cam but I am not sure the rules regarding this.I never thought i would have to but things are getting worse Thanks for any guidance 
    • Thanks for that. I will give them till Tuesday. Thanks for your help, very much appreciated. 
    • Ok thanks for that, well spotted and all duly noted. Yes they did eventually submit those docs to me after a second letter advising them I was contacting the ICO to make a formal complaint for failing to comply with an earlier SAR that they brushed off as an "administrative error" or something. When I sent the letter telling them I was in contact with the information commissioner to lodge the complaint, the original PCN etc quickly followed along with their excuse!
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Adams Oh V Barclaycard


joload
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6302 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...

Received a partial offer of £105....so off to court we go I think.

 

Its worryiying though as I can't see many claims that have gone to court most get full offer at :BA stage don't they??? they mustn't like me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Yep They will take it the full mile. But you can write and say thankyou for your offer, I'll accept it as part payment but will pursue you through the courts to recover the full amount.;)

 

Al.

-------------------------

CAPITAL ONE * SETTLED*31st Oct 06

HBOS *SETTLED* 8th Oct 06

WOOLWICH *SETTLED*12thJan2007

Monument (Barclays) *SETTLED*10thMar2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a note if you only have statements back to 2004 because of their microfiche arguement state on you letter as partpayment towards your claim

**/**/2004 .... 16/10/2006 Just in case you wanna claim for before 2004

-------------------------

CAPITAL ONE * SETTLED*31st Oct 06

HBOS *SETTLED* 8th Oct 06

WOOLWICH *SETTLED*12thJan2007

Monument (Barclays) *SETTLED*10thMar2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Well I heard nothing for a while about this one they paid the £105 in to the account and then reduced the credit limit from £2600 to £260 THANKS a bunch - we had just paid a load off hoping to do a balance transfer too!!

 

Anyway got an allocation questionaire in the post this morning so think they are truely taking it all the way - Am getting quite scared now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

in completing the allocation questionaire what do i put in other infor and do i need to putthat they have already given up a partial settlement although we didnot accept this as full and final?

 

Try this guide

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/11644-allocation-questionnaires-guide-completion.html

 

as for the partial settlement mention that in the AQ in the other info too otherwise they will moan about deceit to the DJ, also as a courtesey you could send a copy to B/C.

HTH

Al.;)

-------------------------

CAPITAL ONE * SETTLED*31st Oct 06

HBOS *SETTLED* 8th Oct 06

WOOLWICH *SETTLED*12thJan2007

Monument (Barclays) *SETTLED*10thMar2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

HI, Happy New Year

Try not to worry if you could post their defence on here (you'll probably have to type it) but we can have at look to see if its similar to the ones weve recieved if that will help:) . But really in all probability it wont get into court have a read of a few threads on hear and the woolwich forum they have never set foot in the court yet;) . And your the claimant not

the defendant. If want a copy you can call the court but i would not have thought there would be anything of interest the AQ in your case was there to allocate a track ie:small claims which i assume they have done

AL:D

-------------------------

CAPITAL ONE * SETTLED*31st Oct 06

HBOS *SETTLED* 8th Oct 06

WOOLWICH *SETTLED*12thJan2007

Monument (Barclays) *SETTLED*10thMar2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK this is what it says

Dated 20 December 2006

 

the papers in this claim were considered by disrtict judge DD who allocated the claim to the small claims track to be heard 14/03/2006 (i assume they mean 2007)

 

The followng directions apply to this claim

 

1) the claimant salll within28 days of service of this order send to the defendant and to the court

 

a) a shedule setting out each charge repayment of which is sought, showing date ammount and reason for the charge being made

 

b) copies of any statement or other document replied apon in court showing each and every charge been made

 

c) a statement of evidence of all matters relied apon as tending to show that the charges are irrecoverable as penalties or otherwise

 

d) copies of decided cases and other legal materials to be relied apon

 

2) the defendat shall within 28 days thereafter file and sweve a response to the claimants schedule , stating in respect of each item claimed

 

a) pursuant to what contractual provision such charge was made producing a copy of the contractual document replied upon

 

b) whether such charge is accepted to be a penalty if not why not

 

C) If such charge is alleged ro be a pre estimate of the defendants loss incurres by the claiments actions (whether or not such action is to be treated as a breach of contract between the parties)

d) any witness statemenst

 

e) copiesof decided cases and other legal materials o be relied upon

 

3) The original documents shall be brought to the hearing

 

4) The court must be informed immediately if the case is settled by agreement before the hearing date.

 

 

 

So this is what Ihave receibved from the court - I thought it was defence from barclaycard but after reading it it seems pretty standard - can someone explain what I need tocopy and send off along with my schedule of charges please,

 

 

Manythanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I heard nothing for a while about this one they paid the £105 in to the account and then reduced the credit limit from £2600 to £260 THANKS a bunch - we had just paid a load off hoping to do a balance transfer too!!

 

Barclaycard did this to me as well, I paid off quite a bit and they reduced my limit, but they also changed my conditions of use. I dont know why... but I just want it paid off and closed..

 

good luck with your claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Right just about to send the bundles off and am indexing the pages - I can't dind where the UCTA 1977 ends and soga begins or the oft summary begins?? Sorry I am confussed

 

edit - found the soga bit now just looking for the OFT summary -

 

WHOA this is soooo daunting

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't worry you'll be fine, I'm just a little behind you in the process.... just trying to sort out the court bundle but don't actually have a clue as to what I'm supposed to use out of the court bundle?!! If you have any advice it would be much appreciated.

As for court I reakon they may fold the day before haven't actually found any threads of people going to court so try not to worry too much. Also found an article in the paper saying that experts estimate that the true cost of processing a bounced cheque is just £4.50 while dealing with an unauthorised overdraft or bounce direct debit is said to cost banks £2.50!!!

Campaigning MP's say penalty charges are not only inconvenient and unfair but illegal in many cases.

Liberal Democrat front bencher Matthew Taylor, who secured a debate on the practice in Parliament last week said "It is the biggest bank robbery in history and it involves the banks robbing their own customers, especially the poorest customers. The disproportionate and punitive nature of these charges means they have always been illegal. If a consumer breaks a contract, the other party cannot impose a charge greater than a reasonable estimate of loss. And the banks know this. I have helped constituents regain thousands by threatening to take it to court.

 

So as you can see if they all know its illegal we can't loose.

Nationwide

1st Letter Requesting Charges Sent - 31st July 2006

LBA Sent - 16th August 2006:rolleyes:

Money Claim Filed - 1st Sept 2006:evil:

Money Claim Acknowledge - 5th Sept 2006:-|

Part Refund of £79.02 - 13th Sept 2006:oops:

Settled in full.. short by £1.32 but not going to argue with that!! (541.02)- 14th Sept 2006

 

Halifax

Requested Bank Statments - 8th Sept 2006

Statements Recieved - 20th Sept 2006

Letter Requesting Charges Back Sent - 23rd Sept 2006

Letter Sent Refusing offer of £85.00 - 7th Oct 2006

Letter Received Offering Full Settlement (£170.00) - 12th Oct 2006

Barclaycard

S.A.R Sent - 19th Sept 2006

Statements Recieved - 23rd Sept 2006

Letter Requesting Charges Back Sent - 23rd Sept 2006

Part Refund of £152.00 recieved - 29th Sept 2006 :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that

 

I have put in the pack my letters prelim and lba then my statemenst showing the charges then my charges spreadsheet then the bundle and now am just number ing the pages to make my contents page.

 

think thats it I hope

 

make 3 copies send one to court with your court number on front - one to barclay and keep one for yourself

 

good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...