Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks @lolerzthat's an extremely helpful post. There is no mention of a permit scheme in the lease and likewise, no variation was made to bring this system in. I recall seeing something like a quiet enjoyment clause, but will need to re-read it and confirm. VERY interesting point on the 1987 Act. There hasn't been an AGM in years and I've tried to get one to start to no avail. However, I'll aim to find out more about how the PPC was brought in and revert. Can I test with you and others on the logic of not parking for a few months? I'm ready to fight OPS, so if they go nuclear on me then surely it doesn't matter? I assume that I will keep getting PCNs as long as I live here, so it doesn't make sense for me to change the way that I park?  Unless... You are suggesting that having 5 or so outstanding PCNs, will negatively affect any court case e.g. through bad optics? Or are we trying to force their hand to go to court with only 2 outstanding PCNs?
    • That is so very tempting.   They are doing my annual review as we speak and I'm waiting for their response once I have it I will consider my next steps.    The debt camel website mentioned above is amzing and helping to. Education me alot    
    • Sending you a big hug. I’m sorry your going through this. The letters they send sound aweful, and the waiting game for them to stop. But these guys seem so knowledgable and these letters should stop. Hang in there, and keep in touch. Don’t feel alone 
    • In my time I've never seen a payout/commission from a PPC to a landlord/MA. Normally the installation of all the cameras/payment of warden patrols etc is free but PPCs keep 100% of the ticket revenue. Not saying it doesn't happen mind. I've done some more digging on this: Remember, what your lease doesn't say is just as important as what it does say. If your lease doesn't mention a parking scheme/employment of a PPC/Paying PCNs etc you're under no legal obligation to play along to the PPC's or the MA's "Terms and conditions". I highly doubt your lease had a variation in place to bring in this permit system. Your lease will likely have a "quiet enjoyment" clause for your demised space and the common areas and having to fight a PPC/MA just to park would breach that. Your lease has supremacy of contract, but I do agree it's worth keeping cool and not parking there (and hence getting PCNs) for a couple months just so that the PPC doesn't get blinded by greed and go nuclear on you if you have 4 or 5 PCNs outstanding. At your next AGM, bring it up that the parking controls need to be removed and mention the legal reasons why. One reason is that under S37(5b) Landlord and Tenant Act 1987,  more than 75% of leaseholders and/or the landlord would have needed to agree, and less than 10% opposed, for the variation to take place. I highly doubt a ballot even happened before the PPC was bought in so OPS even being there is unlawful, breaching the terms of your lease. In this legal sense,  the communal vote of the "directors" of the freehold company would have counted for ONE vote of however many flats there are (leases/tenants) + 1 (landlord). It's going to be interesting to see where this goes.  
    • @Whyisitthisthank you very much for asking. I am still feeling anxious, especially when someone rings the doorbell, or when I receive a letter I feel a it paranoid. I stopped going to the shops unless I really have to. I shop online now. When I see security I feel paralised. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

*Capquest and Limitation Act bluff?*


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5041 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Your right,

 

The first letter i sent was just normal post (Limitation Act Letter) they did reply within 7 days this time as it's getting a bit more heavy i better send recorded. thanks

 

I wonder if BOS, ever issued a default notice? If they didn't for whatever reason, perhaps this is why the debt in not shown on the credit record.

 

CapQuest will be requesting this information from BOS in due course I would think, if they are thinking about taking this near a court. If Capquest had all the information already, I would have thought they would have done this by now.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 77
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

You won't know what BOS has by the way of recorded payments unless you send them the SAR. Also, banks don't keep copies of Default Notices - they do them on templates - but they should have recorded on the history sheet whether a DN was sent or not - again you would get that with an SAR. If they didn't send one and sold the debt to CQ or CQ has demanded the full balance without prior issue of a DN, then that is repudiation of contract and they would only be able to ask for the arrears. Worth keeping up your sleeve in case they do go to court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How can i drag this out? any advice on this appreciated...''

 

It's been done before. For just over 3 months concentrating on the CCA, then asking for a copy of the default notice, then copy of the notice of assignment, then a formal complaint about a number of things, each one taking several weeks to reply to.

 

Just keep them busy with anything that doesn't mention it's close to being SB. Keep it indispute, and pester them for copies of things, but one at a time, and don't be in a hurry to reply to them. 3 months will soon pass, and you'll have fun doing it.

 

Here's the link to the thread which show step by step how it's done... http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/187616-almost-statute-barred.html

These are video links to show how I deal with Debt Collectors.

 

Fly fishing for C.A.R.S

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=zPtzK8FqE6k&feature=related

 

Frederickson International don't accept my card type

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=eiZBULlWW6Q&feature=related

Link to post
Share on other sites

Longest I have kept a DCA busy one one account is 4 months. Hillesdens :D Still keeping them dangling just for the sheer hell of it to this day. As from last week I now invoice them £25 for having to deal with each letter they send me. :D They owe me £50 so far.

These are video links to show how I deal with Debt Collectors.

 

Fly fishing for C.A.R.S

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=zPtzK8FqE6k&feature=related

 

Frederickson International don't accept my card type

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=eiZBULlWW6Q&feature=related

Link to post
Share on other sites

You won't know what BOS has by the way of recorded payments unless you send them the SAR. Also, banks don't keep copies of Default Notices - they do them on templates - but they should have recorded on the history sheet whether a DN was sent or not - again you would get that with an SAR. If they didn't send one and sold the debt to CQ or CQ has demanded the full balance without prior issue of a DN, then that is repudiation of contract and they would only be able to ask for the arrears. Worth keeping up your sleeve in case they do go to court.

 

 

Here's the default notice? why is it not on his credit file???

 

dated 07/06/2005 asking for arrears payments of about three months i can work out from his re-payments so he defaulted with a last payment March/April 05

Erin copy0001.jpg

Edited by kathleenbilly
Link to post
Share on other sites

Because they don't keep copies of them - they use the same templates over and over and change the details to suit the customer. They should have a note on the file history that one was sent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it's very strange he did say this loan,

 

 

and i presume it must of been the default was on his Equifax a few years back but gone completely??

 

Should be on them both i thought.

 

So it looks like i have to drag this out for him fro a good few months

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is exciting news i'm reading his default notice and credit agreement,

 

The credit agreement was signed on 25th October 2004

 

He does not need to make or start payments until two months after the signed agreement so his first payment was due on the 25th December 2004,

 

The default notice states from the Bank of Scotland we may register at the credit reference agency to which we subscribe, well it looks like they didn't because it's not there,

 

So the only date that seems to carry any weight is the original 25th October 2004 Credit agreement which is now just a couple of months from being statue barred.....''

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the letter i'm sending out to them in the next day or two then we will start to see how this pans out....

 

I do not acknowledge any debt to your company.

For your information, all communications regarding this matter must be in writing for Court use. Personal callers will neither be admitted nor spoken to. Telephone calls will not be answered or acknowledged. If your telephone calls continue,they will be taken as HARRASSMENT under PROTECTION FROM HARASSMENT ACT 1997. This is a CRIMINAL Act which can lead to 6 months imprisonment and/or a level 5 fine. I shall therefore report you personally to the police.

You are required to supply the following before I will enter into any further correspondence with you.

1. You must supply me with a copy of the agreement you refer to. This is my right under your obligation to supply a copy of the agreement which is s.78 (1) CCA 1974 (s.77 (1) for fixed sum credit) - your obligation extends to providing a statement of account. I enclose a £1 postal order in payment of the statutory fee.

2. You are also obliged to supply a copy of the deed of assignment of the above referenced agreement.

3. You are notified that you are obliged to supply these documents, whether you are the original creditor or not.

Failure to comply with my request will result in a report being submitted to the relevant statutory authority.

I await your response in writing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Capquest relied saying the account was opened on the 25/10/04 there letter was brief.

 

so not statute barred, in simple terms i could just sit it out for a few months and then it will be statute barred according to there own information to me.

 

I still think there are bluffing they are well know for buying debts older than 6 years.

 

The fact the debt is not shown on Experian is a good sign if not on Equifax which i will see in the next fews days then clearly it's passed the 6 year date,

 

Thats my guess could have this rapped up by next week. It's for them to prove the debt is owing or not statue barred as they say by providing me the information to prove it ie: the credit agreement i don't see why i need to do anymore at this stage until i see what they have first, (maybe nothing) :cool:

 

When was the last payment made?

 

The clock for a debt to be statute barred only starts ticking from the date of the last payment, from what you have said if account opened 25/10/04 the only way it can be SB is if no payments made at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hopefully as you say there is no CCJ, this would have fallen off the credit files after 6 years, but would still be valid.

 

If you want to check up on that you can do so online and it costs, I believe £8:

 

CCJs, court orders & fines - Search yourself and others - Trust Online

 

Creditors can have a CCJ registered again if NOT paid up in full after 6 years.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes your correct,

 

the person claims he made two payments which would of started from around 25th December 2004,

 

So the default or last payment by him was maybe in February 2005

 

But no default has been recorded or registered on his credit file.

 

these payments were made via direct debit from a bank account.

 

Capquest speak only of the original agreement date as clearly they at this stage have no clue of when payment if any were made given the search of his file gave them no information of the debt in any way,

 

All they have is an account number and a date that's it.

 

Now i will be pushing them for the original agreement which they may not be-able to come with we will see.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no CCJ the guy picked up a fantastic morgage deal and has a credit score of 780

 

i just can't get my head around how this has slipped through the credit file net.

 

Back in 2004/2005 creditors were a lot more free and easy with their money and probably had a lost less staff working in their collections departments, could have very easily slipped through the net.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had already sent a limitation act letter to them to which they have informed me it is not as i did not have any information. They are correct it is not statue barred at the moment.

 

But they still have alot of work to do themselves starting with providing me with proof of an actually credit agreement for starters

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would proceed with caution, some banks when they give you a CUSTOMER COPY of an agreement do not have customer signature and/or bank signature boxes on them.

 

However the CUSTOMER COPY should have all the required prescribed terms.

Have you checked this out?

 

Does the DN issued comply as well?

The image you have posted is too small too tell.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still not clear, although that's probably good because the agreement number is on.

 

What is the date by which the arrears need to be paid?

 

Could make out Ms Edwards signature, she has got around a lot.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...