Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Using the Freedom of Information Act to get details of Consumer Claims brought - and their results


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5082 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

It would be interesting to use the Freedom of Information Act to get details from the Ministry of Justice around the number of claims raised by a certain DCA and then the number of those claims that were withdrawn before being heard.

 

I suspect the figures wouldn't read well, in that most of them probably result in CCJ's against folk with lesser knowledge!

 

Viva la CAG!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

could that be done? maybe we should gather various court stats so caggers know what they are facing?

 

some may seem discouraging e.g. number of cases that go to CCJ or are lost by debtors but in another light it could be seen to be encouraging as it simply confirms that creditors play a numbers game whereby they intimidate through action and legal process most debtors who don't want to see things through at court and as such creditors are often bluffing when they take action..so every reason to fight to the end in many cases.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would be interesting to use the Freedom of Information Act to get details from the Ministry of Justice around the number of claims raised by a certain DCA and then the number of those claims that were withdrawn before being heard.

 

I suspect the figures wouldn't read well, in that most of them probably result in CCJ's against folk with lesser knowledge!

 

Viva la CAG!

 

I have no doubt that the MoJ will just say they do not collect or collate that metric. I doubt they even keep a track of how many cases are discontinued.

 

Could be worth a punt tho ;-)

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, if my court had to call ME to find out how many claims I was dealing with, I'm not sure there's much hope for accurate statistics coming out of HMCS.

 

On the other hand....... Heather Brooke lit the fuse on the MP expenses scandal by pursuing the Freedom of Information Act.....

 

As CAR has said VIVA LA CAG!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would be interesting to use the Freedom of Information Act to get details from the Ministry of Justice around the number of claims raised by a certain DCA and then the number of those claims that were withdrawn before being heard.

 

I suspect the figures wouldn't read well, in that most of them probably result in CCJ's against folk with lesser knowledge!

 

Viva la CAG!

 

Perhaps now is the time to start asking them, maybe get a letter template done and encourage every CAG member to write to the Ministry of Justice, can you still go onto the No. 10 website and start a signature campaign.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps now is the time to start asking them, maybe get a letter template done and encourage every CAG member to write to the Ministry of Justice, can you still go onto the No. 10 website and start a signature campaign.

 

With the greatest of respect to your intentions, I don't think this should be the case. FOI requests should only be used in certain circumstances, and submitting lots of requests from different members could mean they argue that the effort in getting the data together isn't in balance with the interests of the Act. What is needed is one person (doesn't have to be me ;)) to submit a request for this data and then for that to be shared with CAGgers.

 

No 10 petitions are available online, yes, but what is your petition? :confused:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

With the greatest of respect to your intentions, I don't think this should be the case. FOI requests should only be used in certain circumstances, and submitting lots of requests from different members could mean they argue that the effort in getting the data together isn't in balance with the interests of the Act. What is needed is one person (doesn't have to be me ;)) to submit a request for this data and then for that to be shared with CAGgers.

 

No 10 petitions are available online, yes, but what is your petition? :confused:

 

 

Your probably right:

 

The Freedom of Information Act gives you the right to obtain information held by public authorities unless there are good reasons to keep it confidential.

 

I can think of a large number of banks/DCAs/solicitors who would come up with any number of good reasons.

 

Could CAG, as an organisation, not request it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Freedom of Information Act gives you the right to obtain information held by public authorities unless there are good reasons to keep it confidential.

 

I can think of a large number of banks/DCAs/solicitors who would come up with any number of good reasons.

 

And that would be? :lol:

 

Could CAG, as an organisation, not request it?

 

Anyone can make a FOI request ;)

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

And that would be? :lol:

 

Where would one start.

 

Anyone can make a FOI request ;)

 

Rather than, as you said "submitting lots of requests from different members could mean they argue that the effort in getting the data together isn't in balance with the interests of the Act".

 

Would a single request from CAG be morely likely to get a result.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Where would one start.

 

 

 

Rather than, as you said "submitting lots of requests from different members could mean they argue that the effort in getting the data together isn't in balance with the interests of the Act".

 

Would a single request from CAG be morely likely to get a result.

 

Nope, as an individual would get the same response ;)

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2007/08 - Total claims issue in England & Wales

893,860

 

of which 267,217 were housing & recovery of land

 

leaving 626,643

 

allocated to small claims 91,767

allocated to fast track 50,228

allocated to multi track 25,947

 

Settlements after allocation

Fast track 39,041

Multi track 22,698

 

Cases heard

Small claims 51,896

Fast track 11,700

Multi track 4,177

 

Attachments of earnings granted 76,890

 

Appeals from District Judges 2,939

Link to post
Share on other sites

Total UK personal debt

UK banks and building societies wrote off £9.6bn of loans to individuals in the last 12 months to end Q1 2010. In Q1 2010 they wrote off £2.13bn (£1.25bn of that was credit card debt). This amounts to a write-off of £23.35m a day.

 

Total UK personal debt at the end of May 2010 stood at £1,460bn. The twelve-month growth increased to 0.9%. Individuals owe more than what the whole country produces in a year.

Total lending in May 2010 rose by £1.5bn; secured lending increased by £1.2bn in the month; consumer credit lending increased by £0.3bn (total lending in Jan 2008 grew by £8.4bn).

Total secured lending on dwellings at the end of May 2010 stood at £1,241bn. The twelve-month growth rate rose to 1.1%.

Total consumer credit lending to individuals at the end of May 2010 was £220bn. The annual growth rate of consumer credit rose by 0.1% to 0.0%.

Average household debt in the UK is ~ £8,716 (excluding mortgages). This figure increases to £18,159 if the average is based on the number of households who actually have some form of unsecured loan.

Average household debt in the UK is ~ £57,944 (including mortgages).

If you add to this the March 2010 budget report figure for public sector net debt (PSND) expected in 2015-16 (excluding financial interventions) then this figure rises to £110,166 per household.

Average owed by every UK adult is ~ £30,000 (including mortgages). This is 126% of average earnings.

Average outstanding mortgage for the 11.4m households who currently have mortgages now stands at ~ £108,972.

Britain's interest repayments on personal debt were £67.5bn in the last 12months. The average interest paid by each household on their total debt is approximately £2,679 each year. According to PwC the average household will need to spend approximately 15% of net income purely to service the interest payments arising from this debt.

Average consumer borrowing via credit cards, motor and retail finance deals, overdrafts and unsecured personal loans has risen to £4,513 per average UK adult at the end of May 2010.

Statistical Sources - Unless otherwise indicated statistics in the “Total UK personal debt” section are calculated by Credit Action - primarily using the Bank of England's debt figures.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2007/08 - Total claims issue in England & Wales

893,860

 

of which 267,217 were housing & recovery of land

 

leaving 626,643

 

allocated to small claims 91,767

allocated to fast track 50,228

allocated to multi track 25,947

 

Settlements after allocation

Fast track 39,041

Multi track 22,698

 

Cases heard

Small claims 51,896

Fast track 11,700

Multi track 4,177

 

Attachments of earnings granted 76,890

 

Appeals from District Judges 2,939

 

Hi MD,

 

All amazing stats. Do you mind if I make a tiny but polite observation?

 

This information (and Blondie, Car, Martin, Nodefuallts and Rhia's posts) is way too valuable to get buried on this thread, it desreves to be more accessible. What do you think about starting a new thread on this topic? Bet it would be v effective (i.e., provocative and mobilising!).....

 

Martel

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Martel, can't add anything to your threads but following with interest and support.

Keep fighting!

 

Cym! Always great to hear from you!! Your support is much appreciated! Hoping all is well with you.....MX

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bing!

 

New thread ;)

 

Doh!! Well, I DID say it would be a good idea!!

 

Honestly, I must get out more. Or get around CAG more.

 

Will watch this one.....

 

Good for you!

 

MXX

Edited by Martel
misspelling
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi MD,

 

All amazing stats. Do you mind if I make a tiny but polite observation?

 

This information (and Blondie, Car, Martin, Nodefuallts and Rhia's posts) is way too valuable to get buried on this thread, it desreves to be more accessible. What do you think about starting a new thread on this topic? Bet it would be v effective (i.e., provocative and mobilising!).....

 

Martel

 

Excellent idea, and thank you car2403 (stops someone's thread being hijacked).

 

Wonder when 2008/09 figures will be available - bet they don't make pretty reading.

 

B40

Link to post
Share on other sites

IMHO, I feel it would be best to enquire of the courts concerned which cases went to the claimant or the defendant.

You can then determine maybe which Judge is biased one way or tother.

 

The FOI request, is useful ( Ive used it in the US ), because it puts the officials to task.).

But it should be used sparingly and carefully worded to winkle pick exactly what information you want, so be specific if you ever use it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How about using these stats in a letter to our mp's.

 

All the talk is about austerity measures so surely it would save a fortune in legal aid/help bills and maybe the odd judge redundancy if it were made compulsory to include a verified copy of the agreement where a claim is base upon an agreement.

After all this is what cpr already states it just isn't enforced sternly enough.

Simples me thinks?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...