Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I used to post regularly in order to provide factual information (rather than advice) but got fed up with banging my head against a brick wall in so many cases when posters insisted black was white and I was writing rubbish. I have never posted anything which was untrue or indeed biased in any way.  I have never given 'advice' but have sought to correct erroneous statements which were unhelpful. The only username I have ever used is blf1uk. I have never gone under any other username and have no connection to 'bailiff advice'.  I am not a High Court Enforcement Officer but obtained my first 'bailiff' certificate in 1982. I'm not sure what records you have accessed but I was certainly not born in 1977 - at that time I was serving in the Armed Forces in Hereford, Germany (4th Division HQ) and my wife gave birth to our eldest.   Going back to the original point, the fact is that employees of an Approved Enforcement Agency contracted by the Ministry of Justice can and do execute warrants of arrest (with and without bail), warrants of detention and warrants of commitment. In many cases, the employee is also an enforcement agent [but not acting as one]. Here is a fact.  I recently submitted an FOI request to HMCTS and they advised me (for example) that in 2022/23 Jacobs (the AEA for Wales) was issued with 4,750 financial arrest warrants (without bail) and 473 'breach' warrants.  A breach warrant is a community penalty breach warrant (CPBW) whereby the defendant has breached the terms of either their release from prison or the terms of an order [such as community service].  While the defendant may pay the sum [fine] due to avoid arrest on a financial arrest warrant, a breach warrant always results in their transportation to either a police station [for holding] or directly to the magistrates' court to go before the bench as is the case on financial arrest warrants without bail when they don't pay.  Wales has the lowest number of arrest warrants issued of the seven regions with South East exceeding 50,000.  Overall, the figure for arrest warrants issued to the three AEAs exceeds 200,000.  Many of these were previously dealt with directly by HMCTS using their employed Civilian Enforcement Officers but they were subject to TUPE in 2019 and either left the service or transferred to the three AEAs. In England, a local authority may take committal proceedings against an individual who has not paid their council tax and the court will issue a committal summons.  If the person does not attend the committal hearing, the court will issue a warrant of arrest usually with bail but occasionally without bail (certainly without bail if when bailed on their own recognizance the defendant still fails to appear).   A warrant of arrest to bring the debtor before the court is issued under regulation 48(5) of The Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992 and can be executed by "any person to whom it is directed or by any constable....." (Reg 48(6).  These, although much [much] lower in number compared to HMCTS, are also dealt with by the enforcement agencies contracted by the local authorities. Feel free to do your own research using FOI enquiries!  
    • 3rd one seems the best option, let 'em default, don't pay a penny, nothing will happen, forget about all of this. As for Payplan don't touch them with a bargepole, nothing they can do that you can't, and they will pocket fees. A do it yourself DMP is pointless as it will just string out the statute barred date to infinity.
    • Because that’s what the email said. Anyway it’s done now. Posted and image emailed.    im doing some reading in preparation for defence but I will need my hand holding quite tightly by you good people.  I’m a little bit clueless
    • why do you need adobe...use a pdf online website. all for now...no get reading up and do not miss your defence filing date no matter what. post it up in good time no!!    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Debt collection demands for incorrect amoun of debt! Need help-fast!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5071 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I have recently been sent a letter from "TNC collections" about an outstanding university tuition debt.

 

They phoned me several days before the letter arrived and I quite clearly stated that I wasnt interested in discussing it on the phone and that paying the outstanding amount (£2622.50) within a week or 2 was completely unfeasible, and that the amount of the debt was wrong (more about that later).

 

In 2007/2008 I was enrolled on a PgD/MSc computer course. At christmas I became quite ill (some viral thing according to the doctor) that knocked me for a few months. Because of this I did not hand 2 pieces of coursework in for the first semester (2 seperate modules) and did not complete semester 2.

 

In 2008/2009 I reenrolled on the course. At the time there was confusion with what I had to complete. However all the lecturers and the head of the course told me that I should submit the 2 pieces of coursework for the end of the first semester then sit all the modules in the second semester.

 

The year went well and I eventually passed everything and could go on to the third semester (MSc component). When I went to reenrol for that I was classed as a debtor and not allowed to reenrol.

 

no problem, off to the fees office to setout a payment plan. Now I find out that I am being charged for 2 full semesters in the resit year.

 

Now I spend the next 4-6 months running back and forth between the shool office, fees office, head of course, until i finally get (via email) passed up the chain to the "only person who can help me" who states that i was enrolled for a full year and have to pay for it according to the records, and to change it I have to go back to the school office etc. Despite me pointing out that in the resit year I only sat examinations and classes for the 2nd semester and the only 1st semester thing i did was submit my coursework from the year before.

 

"F*ck this" say I and give up. Hear nothing from the university until this month when I get a letter from the university (pay or go to a debt collection). I point out to them, again, that I believe the debt amount to be wrong and a week later I get the debt collection agency phoning me to say "Pay all now or go to court!". Then a letter from them stating "Pay within 7 days or go court and pay fees, interest and damage to credit record".

 

Any suggestions on how I should respond from now on would be greatfully appreciated. Oh, thanks for bearing with the long story above!.

 

Oh, and should this be put in the students thread.

Edited by Cuchulainn2010
Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly, send the DCA the prove it letter, to make sure they have the right to collect;

 

Dear Sir or Madam

 

You have contacted me/us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself/ourselves.

 

I/we would point out that I/we have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to (insert company name).

 

I am/we are familiar with the CPUTR 2008 and the Office of Fair Trading's Guidance on debt collectionlink3.gif, which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

 

I/we would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. AND in not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

 

I/we would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my/our liability for the debt in question.

 

I/we await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed. Otherwise I will have no option but to make a complaint to Trading Standards and also inform the Office Of Fair Trading of your actions.

 

I/we look forward to your reply.

 

Yours faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

In regard to the tuition fees that they are trying to charge you, what evidence does the University have that you received the tuition. What forms did you complete to contract you to be liable for these?

 

In addition to sending the letter in Harassed seniors post, you should write to the most senior person at the University, asking them to look into this. Explain the position, as you have done in your post. Send the Debt company a copy of the letter you send to the University.

 

While the debt is in dispute, the debt company has to suspend their collection activity to comply with the OFT's rules.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for both replies.

 

The problem with the tuition fee is that it I am being charged for 4 additional semesters. The university had previously said that I was to repeat the second semester, then they said the full year, but when I enrolled for the resit year, I was told that I passed everything in the first semester (except 2 pieces of coursework for 2 of the first semester modules).

 

N.B. I am paying 1 years full tuition for the first year (even though I became ill) and being asked to pay for a second full years tuition, though I believe it should only be one semester (plus the cost of 2 pieces of coursework).

 

Therefore I was charged for a repeat year, instead of a repeat semester, plus 2 pieces of coursework.

 

The problem I encountered was that I had a academic record saying that I was due to repeat "part/or all" of the year and doesnt specify which.

 

The university records of this decision have me as having to repeat the entire year (I have not been shown these records, just told about them!) and yet my academic record clearly shows that I did 1 semester one year, then was ill, then finished the second semester the next year.

 

My exam results and all the coursework (bar the 2 pieces mentioned) where carried over to the next year, I even have a certificate for one of the modules of the first semester, first year.

 

In essence then, i am being told to pay for something that I did not do, nor had to do. At the time I said I would be happy to pay for the 2 extra modules, as long as I got to continue on with the MSc.

 

The university said that I must settle all the debts before enrolling on the MSc component. Therefore, I did not get to complete the MSc component, after putting in all the effort to pass the PgD after being ill.

 

Should/can I ask for all the universitys information on me under the Freedom of Information act.

 

Also, I contacted the university (via email) and restated my position that the amount of the debt was wrong before their deadline to go to a collection agency had passed. Then the debt collection agency phoned me to try to get all the money. I informed them that the amount was wrong and that I was in communication with the university about that fact. The debt collection agency then stated that I would have to pay at least half of the debt then to stop further action, even if the debt is in dispute. I guess that this is not the correct way then from reading the posts on this forum? ;-)

 

Should I contact the university and/or debt collection agency in a formal manner to state that the debt is in dispute if/when I receive a reply to the above letter in Harrassed Seniors post? Should I contact them to state that now? Or just wait for a reply from the debt collection agency?

 

Finally, should I cease all phone and email communication with both parties, relying on just the mail, or can I continue via email also?

 

Thanks again for the help.

Edited by Cuchulainn2010
Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly, send the DCA the prove it letter, to make sure they have the right to collect;

 

Dear Sir or Madam

 

You have contacted me/us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself/ourselves.

 

I/we would point out that I/we have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to (insert company name).

 

I am/we are familiar with the CPUTR 2008 and the Office of Fair Trading's Guidance on debt collectionlink3.gif, which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

 

I/we would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. AND in not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

 

I/we would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my/our liability for the debt in question.

 

I/we await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed. Otherwise I will have no option but to make a complaint to Trading Standards and also inform the Office Of Fair Trading of your actions.

 

I/we look forward to your reply.

 

Yours faithfully

 

Sorry to be a pain, but in this letter I am stating that I know of no such debt to the university, is this ok for me to say as ive stated that I dont believe the debt to be correct, therefore I am aware of the debt. Sorry, I am a bit dense when it comes to legalese sometimes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stop complicating matters. If you keep this simple then it will make things easier to follow.

 

Your argument is with the University about what tuition they provided. They need to provide evidence of tuition you received and a contract to prove you are liable to pay for any tuition received.

 

1) Send the Universities most senior person a letter by recorded delivery stating the facts as you know them and question why they have made an allegation that you owe them a debt, which they have passed for debt collection. Ask them for full details of their complaints process and details of how you may obtain a full copy of any records held in your name. I don't think Universities are covered under FOI as they are not a public body as such. They may be covered under Data Prorection.

 

2) Send the Debt company the letter in Harassed seniors post by recorded delivery. You are not aware of the debt, because you have not been provided with 100% acccurate information to prove you are liable for these tuition fees. Enclose a copy of the letter sent to the University.

 

Follow this advice for now and see what comes of it. The University should just aknowledge that they will look into this, before investigating and replying fully. The debt company should stop their collection activity, while the matter is in dispute.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stop complicating matters. If you keep this simple then it will make things easier to follow.

 

Your argument is with the University about what tuition they provided. They need to provide evidence of tuition you received and a contract to prove you are liable to pay for any tuition received.

 

1) Send the Universities most senior person a letter by recorded delivery stating the facts as you know them and question why they have made an allegation that you owe them a debt, which they have passed for debt collection. Ask them for full details of their complaints process and details of how you may obtain a full copy of any records held in your name. I don't think Universities are covered under FOI as they are not a public body as such. They may be covered under Data Prorection.

 

2) Send the Debt company the letter in Harassed seniors post by recorded delivery. You are not aware of the debt, because you have not been provided with 100% acccurate information to prove you are liable for these tuition fees. Enclose a copy of the letter sent to the University.

 

Follow this advice for now and see what comes of it. The University should just aknowledge that they will look into this, before investigating and replying fully. The debt company should stop their collection activity, while the matter is in dispute.

 

Thanks, I have replied to the university and to the DCA as you advised. Thanks for your help!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well, I have sent off the "prove it" letter to the debt collection agency.

 

Saturday, I received a letter from the DCA, showing a couple of emails I sent to the university asking for them to explain the letter they had sent me asking for payment of unpaid fees of £2600 (the emails show that i was disputing the amount of debt and one of the universities reply emails had me addressed by a name that isnt mine!) and a copy of my exam and coursework marks for the modules I studied (isnt that private information?). In addition a letter was enclosed from TNC stating that if I did not initiate payment proceedings then they would initiate court proceedings and they would claim interest plus court costs.

 

Today I received a very threatening phone call from TNC collections stating

- They had given me all the chances they would

- They had been helpful

- They had given me all the information I needed

- They would only deal over the phone because mail was too slow (They sent out the last letter 2nd class then told me it was first, despite me looking at the 2nd stamp on the envelope as they said it)

- If I didnt pay now or have a payment plan within 24 hours then they would be taking court action

- They would be registering a debt and court action against my parents (where i live) address?

 

What do i do now? As far as I was concerned the University was charging me £3800, and I had contacted them too say it was wrong. 2 years go past and I suddenly have the correct amount being billed to me and 2 weeks to pay? Am I the only one who thins this is unreasonable?

Edited by Cuchulainn2010
Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you done as suggested in my previous post. Started a complaint with the University ?

 

If you are in the middle of a dispute with the University the DCA should not be taking any collection activity as it is against OFT debt collection guidelines. If they tried to go to Court, you would just show the court that you were in the process of a complaint with the University about tuition fees that you believe are not due. The Court would tell the DCA to go away until the dispute with the University is resolved.

 

If you have started the complaint with the University, phone Consumer Direct and ask them to refer this the relevant Trading Standards. The Trading Standards office local to the DCA, should then contact the DCA on your behalf.

 

It is up to you now. If you don't make a stand with the University to prove that the tuition fees are not due, you will end up with a CCJ against your name, with added interest and fees.

 

The DCA cannot insist on telephone only contact. If you phone Consumer Direct with details of what they said, then Trading Standards can take this up with the DCA.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you done as suggested in my previous post. Started a complaint with the University ?

 

If you are in the middle of a dispute with the University the DCA should not be taking any collection activity as it is against OFT debt collection guidelines. If they tried to go to Court, you would just show the court that you were in the process of a complaint with the University about tuition fees that you believe are not due. The Court would tell the DCA to go away until the dispute with the University is resolved.

 

If you have started the complaint with the University, phone Consumer Direct and ask them to refer this the relevant Trading Standards. The Trading Standards office local to the DCA, should then contact the DCA on your behalf.

 

It is up to you now. If you don't make a stand with the University to prove that the tuition fees are not due, you will end up with a CCJ against your name, with added interest and fees.

 

The DCA cannot insist on telephone only contact. If you phone Consumer Direct with details of what they said, then Trading Standards can take this up with the DCA.

 

Thank you.

 

Firstly, about 3 years ago, I had originally been arguing with the university about the amount they were charging me, but after 6 months of being sent back and forth between the same people I stopped pestering them.

 

However, as soon as I received the letter from the university about the debts (last month), I contacted them by email and stated that I had been in communication previously with them about the debts being incorrect. The new amount they quoted was correct, however they stated that it had to be paid in full or a payment plan set up with the debt collection agency.

 

Now, after 1 year (according to their records) they agreed with me over the amount, but did not contact me to tell me this. Then another year later I get a letter stating that I have to pay within 14 days or it goes to a DCA. To me, I was still disputing the amount with them.

 

Also, their reply by email adressed me by a first name that isnt my first name.

 

Now, the debt collection agency is literally threatening me, as I stated above, with court, debts, marks against my parents, etc.

 

I asked them for evidence that the debt is mine and all they could provide is a copy of my university exam and coursework marks (isnt this in breach of the Data Protection Act?) and the emails that I sent to the university over the past month. Including their reply adressed to someone with a different firstname!

 

Now, my problem is, I am in no position to pay any of the debt as I am currently unemployed and the DCA says that I must pay at least 10% of the debt per month.

 

They phoned today and stated that they would give me until 4pm tomorrow to come up with a payment plan or it goes to court and they slap me with fees and interest.

 

The way I see it is -

1. I was disputing the amount with the university

2. The university did not contact me to inform me that they agreed with my calculation of the fees and had lowered the amount by £1500 after 1.5 years

3. The university has sent me emails about this within the month and got my name wrong

4. I have lost out on completeing the MSc component of the course because of this

5. The DCA has provided nothing which proves I have agreed a debt to the university as evidence and I believe what they have should not have been given to the DCA

6. The debt collection agency has made threatening phone calls

7. The debt collection agency has set payment limits that I have no ability to pay

 

What I need advice on is how to fight back at this point. If the debt had been calculated correctly in the first place, I would have paid it. If I had been contacted after they had decided to change the amount to the correct amount, I would have paid it. Now 3 years later, I have had 1 month to sort this out, when I am not in a position to pay. Can they really act in this manner?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like the University and DCA have not handled this at all well. The University should certainly not have passed on any information to the DCA that was not relevant to them.

 

You need to think about this abit more clearly. Yes you may have been in contact with the University about this before, but you are where you are. You are in a position now, where the DCA will probably apply to the court within the next few weeks, using information from the University to prove you incurred the tuition fees. The court will probably pass judgement in the DCA's favour, unless you have proof the tuition fees are not due. But you will only have to pay back what you could afford. The court would assess your ability to pay and set the amount of repayment per week/month. So in some ways it could be better to let this go to court, apart from you having a CCJ on record.

 

If you wanted to fight the DCA/University, you need to submit a new complaint to the University and send a copy to the DCA. Advise them it is against the OFT's collection guidelines to continue requesting payment, while a dispute with the creditor is in progress. The University will probably have a complaints resolution process, so when you make a complaint, ask for a copy.

 

You should focus your attention on the University. They are the ones that have caused the problem and are the ones that can provide a solution. They have passed on some information to the DCA which is totally wrong of them to do so, which will help you apply some leverage. The information should only have been related to the tuition fees and related proof.

 

These are the OFT debt collection guidelines. Read them and have a copy by the phone when the DCA next phone. Tell them they are in breach of the guidelines and if they continue, you will report them to Trading Standards.

 

http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/business_leaflets/consumer_credit/oft664.pdf

 

In regard to University tuition fees, I am not totally sure how these are affected by the limitation act 1980. Do they become statute barred after 6 years, so cannot be collected? Do you know the date that the alleged debt went into a default position ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...