Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

2 backdoor CCJ's for split claims from Bryan Carter


nigrob
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5092 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi , i am currently paying a judgement from the court which is dealt with by Bryan Carter.

Should i send a CCA request to both parties incase they decide to claim more money.

So far on this warrant £150 has been paid with £122 outstanding , the last letter form Bryan Carter now says outstanding balance is £599 .

 

Does this mean they have their sums wrong or could the balance be rising even after Judgement.

 

Please advise...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did he split the claim in the original case, ie. claimed in court only for a part of the debt? Carter often does this - you ONLY have to pay the amount in the judgment, not a penny more.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi thanks for the info....

 

With the last letter saying that the balance is £599 i am just concerned that when this warrant has been paid off Carter is going to pursue more money from me.

 

Should i CCA to ensure that the original balance has been paid???

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hi , how can Bryan Carter Solicitors be stopped from obtaining a court judgment forcing payment of a disputed debt?

We have had to pay two judgments now that we were unaware of until we received the court judgment which is too late to contest the ammount claimed.

It usually gets to the baliff knocking on the door for payment.

We have not received any court forms to defend these before and wondered if this is how it works or should we receive something .

This company seems to be able to just make a claim for money to the court and then be awarded the claim without any problems.

We have just received another letter from them but again we are unaware of what the claim is from .

Also it must be a very old debt or something as it is in my wifes maiden name & we have been married for 10 years now.

 

Please help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi , how can Bryan Carter Solicitors be stopped from obtaining a court judgment forcing payment of a disputed debt?

We have had to pay two judgments now that we were unaware of until we received the court judgment which is too late to contest the ammount claimed.

It usually gets to the baliff knocking on the door for payment.

We have not received any court forms to defend these before and wondered if this is how it works or should we receive something .

This company seems to be able to just make a claim for money to the court and then be awarded the claim without any problems.

We have just received another letter from them but again we are unaware of what the claim is from .

Also it must be a very old debt or something as it is in my wifes maiden name & we have been married for 10 years now.

 

Please help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you moved at all ? Have you had problems with your post recently ? is the house next door empty ? I have heard judges in court say...'if I had a pound for every person who said they didn't receive any paperwork...so and so etc'....you should make a complaint to the post office too. It sounds like the debts are statute barred....however I think Bryan Carters issue court proceedings through the Northampton Bulk Courts...can you scan up what they have sent you ? And if you do have a court claim for a statute barred debt then read this - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/162456-help-statute-barred-debt.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

42man and Twofoot are absolutely right. Carter is an appalling representative of solicitors !! He will issue court papers to a previous address knowing full well that you won't get them - however as soon as he gets judgement by default, hey presto - he "remembers" your current address to send the bailiffs to.

 

Regarding the previous two CCJ's, contact the court and ask what address the original papers were issued to - and then ask for them to send you a copy. This will prove very useful in defence of any further court claim by Carter. Sending court papers to the wrong address once could be classed as a mistake, but twice or three times is an abuse and the court won't be amused!

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

carters can be stopped by defending the claim...the moment you defend carter runs for the hills...if he has obtained these ccj by default.. apply to have them set aside on the grounds that you knew nothing of original case and if you had you would have defended

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI , how do i get them set aside , do i go to the court to do this.

 

Also , can the money he has already been paid for the previous judgements be claimed back .

These could also be either disputed credit debts or statute barred which he should not have been awarded judgement for.

Should i receive the County Court papers before the judgement is given like i have before from the likes of Welcome finance.

If i remember these are usually blue coloured but i cant recall the name of them.

 

Thanks for the advice so far..

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes you have to get the forms fill them in. i believe it cost 75 quid to apply to set aside unless you are on benefits in which case it is free....dont think you will get the money back you have already paid in..you should have recieved the papers before the judgement was given...if you didnt you have a good case for set aside...

Link to post
Share on other sites

If Carter discontinues before the set aside hearing I think there is every chance of you getting your money back either by asking the court to so order or to start your own claim against the cretin.

 

Another one of Carter's alleged tricks is to go for part of the amount first, usually just his fees. Then once these have been paid to start CCJ'ng you for the remainder in instalments. If this is the case you should report him to both the court and the Solicitors Regulatory Authority as this little [problem] is very illegal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The little weasil should be reported to the SRA anyway, quite how this man is still allowed to practice as a Sol. is beyond me!

Solicitors Regulation Authority - For solicitors

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all , how many more times on this site must I read of Bryan Carters tricks . Surely if we all report him (to courts , solicitors authority , local MPs , etc ) something may be done. Maybe a thread devoted to complain to the powers to be about Bryan Carter so that anyone doing a search can see how to and who to complain to.

sleepingdog

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you go for a set aside claim ,you must also ask the judge to strike it out,and you must put a claim in for your costs.

carter will not defend it /or turn up,he never does,

last time i had dealings with the little SH*T he paid for my holiday!

SO BRYAN, SUMMERS HERE CAN I HAVE ANOTHER ONE PLEASE !

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to 2 backdoor CCJ's for split claims from Bryan Carter
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...