Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Post #415 you said you were unable to sell it yourself. Earlier I believe you said there had been expressions of interest, but only if the buyer could acquire the freehold title. I wonder if the situation with the existing freeholders is such that the property is really unattractive, in ways possibly not obvious to someone who also has an interest in and acts for the freeholders.
    • i dont think the reason why the defendant lost the case means anything at all in that case. it was a classic judge lottery example.
    • Hello, I will try to outline everything clearly. I am a British citizen and I live in Luxembourg (I think this may be relevant for potential claims). I hired a car from Heathrow in March for a 3-day visit to family in the UK. I was "upgraded" to an EV (Polestar 2). I had a 250-mile journey to my family's address. Upon attempting to charge the vehicle, there was a red error message on the dashboard, saying "Charging error". I attempted to charge at roughly 10 different locations and got the same error message. Sometimes there was also an error message on the charging station screen. The Hertz 0800 assistance/breakdown number provided on the set of keys did not work with non-UK mobiles. I googled and found a bunch of other numbers, none of which were normal geographical ones, and none of which worked from my Luxembourg mobile. It was getting late and I was very short on charge. Also, there was no USB socket in the car, so my phone ran out of battery, so I was unable to look for further help online. It became clear that I would not reach my destination (rural Devon), so I had no choice but to find a roadside hotel in Exeter and then go to the nearest Hertz branch the following day on my remaining 10 miles of charge. Of course, as soon as the Hertz employee in Exeter plugged it into their own charger, the charging worked immediately. I have driven EVs before, I know how to charge them, and it definitely did not work at about 10 different chargers between London and Exeter. I took photos on each occasion. Luckily they had another vehicle available and transferred me onto it. It was an identical Polestar 2 to the original car. 2 minutes down the road, to test it, I went to a charger and it worked immediately. I also charged with zero issues at 2 other chargers before returning the vehicle. I think this shows that it was a charging fault with the first car and not my inability to do it properly. I wrote to Hertz, sending the hotel, dinner, breakfast and hotel parking receipt and asking for a refund of these expenses caused by the charging failure in the original car. They replied saying they "could not issue a refund" and they issued me with a voucher for 50 US dollars to use within the next year. Obviously I have no real proof that the charging didn't work. My guess is they will say that the photos don't prove that I was charging correctly, just that it shows an error message and a picture of a charger plugged into a car, without being able to see the detail. Could you advise whether I have a case to go further? I am not after a refund or compensation, I just want my £200 back that I had to spend on expenses. I think I have two possibilities (or maybe one - see below). It looks like the UK is still part of the European Consumer Centre scheme:  File a complaint with ECC Luxembourg | ECC-Net digital forms ECCWEBFORMS.EU   Would this be a good point to start from? Alternatively, the gov.uk money claims service. But the big caveat is you need a "postal address in the UK". In practice, do I have to have my primary residence in the UK, or can I use e.g. a family member's address, presumably just as an address for service, where they can forward me any relevant mail? Do they check that the claimant genuinely lives in the UK? "Postal address" is not the same as "Residence" - anyone can get a postal address in the UK without living there. But I don't want to cheat the system or have a claim denied because of it. TIA for any help!  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Baliff Bristow and Sutor Unreasonable attendance fees and administration errors


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5099 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi.

XXX Council sent my parking fine to B&S on 26.05.09 I believe. I have paid 783 to B and S, (car park charge was £330 initially). the last payment made on 14.04.10. for 150.00. They demanded another £70.00 to be paid by 19.04.10. I said I couldn't and it would have to be 1st May 2010 when I got paid again.

I received message on ansaphone (out of country of business from 29.04.10 until 03.05.10) left on 30.04.10 at 10.16 a.m. and then again on 30.04.10 at 15.37 asking me to contact the baliff because he was going to remove my vehicle.

I returned home on Sunday 3rd May to find my vehicle removed.

He left the following documents:

1. date: 30.04.10 time: 10.10: Notice of removal expenses totalling 223.25 plus an URGENT ACTION required for a debt of £931.83.

2. date: 30.04.10 time: 16.00: Notice of removal expenses totalling 487.63 and a notice of seizure which outlines the follloing:

 

XXXP-6036: 110.00 (car park charge)

attendance to levy fees: 478.93

Costs incurred in attendance to remove goods: 867.25

Costs uncured in the removal of goods: 282.63

contracters fees incurred in removal of goods 205:63

Card transaction fee: 6.00

sub total: 2169.81

Less payments received: 578.

Sub total 1591.81

Storage and pre sale costs to be added: TBC.

 

1. In the space of six hours the debt went from 931.83 to 1591.81

2. the Payments I had made totalled 783 not 578

3. the charges to attend etc. seem extortionate?

4. He attended twice on the same day

5. the first attendnace he has put time down as 2 hours. what was he doing?

 

I phoned him on my return on 02.05.10 andhe said I had to talk to the office on Tuesday 05.05.10. I did. At 9.30 they said that they did not have the file back from the baliff and could not help. I should phone in the afternoon.

I phoned in the afternoon and they said the debt recovery officers were very busy and I would have to call back or they would call me. I called again.

 

Their response was

1. he made an error in the amount I had paid.

2. The fees weren't extortionate

3. He had every right to attend twice and charge the fees.

4. My car would be auctioned within five days if i did not pay.

5. If it sold for less than the outstanding debt of 1431 + storage charge, then I would be liable for the amount.

6. There were no more options to pay.

7. I had to attend the office and pay in cash or bankers' draft.

 

I stressed the following:

1. my car was essential for work (25+ miles from home and long hours)

2. the car was worth more than the outstanding balance.

3. I was not disupting I owed the council but disputing the additional fees.

 

I had to pay. It's taken my entire month's salary which means my priority payments mortgage and secured loan will fall behind.

I want to make the strongest possible complaints in an effort to make them respond, and maybe gain some recompense but I know that it is unlikely.

Please advise on any templates, legalities I could quote in correspondance.

Thank you!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Happy Contrails

If they have taken your car, then pay the bailiff with a CREDIT card to recover your car, then recover the money for breach of contract using a chargeback. The fee for collecting a parking ticket is 28% of the fine, max three visits. The bailiff is having you on with all those fees.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Happy Contrails.

Thanks for a quick response!

They said they would only accept cash or a banker's draft. Feel rather violated by the whole thing I have to say.

Have requested just used a template to request breakdown of costs and cc:d to the concil as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi.

XXX Council sent my parking fine to B&S on 26.05.09 I believe. I have paid 783 to B and S, (car park charge was £330 initially). the last payment made on 14.04.10. for 150.00. They demanded another £70.00 to be paid by 19.04.10. I said I couldn't and it would have to be 1st May 2010 when I got paid again.

I received message on ansaphone (out of country of business from 29.04.10 until 03.05.10) left on 30.04.10 at 10.16 a.m. and then again on 30.04.10 at 15.37 asking me to contact the baliff because he was going to remove my vehicle.

I returned home on Sunday 3rd May to find my vehicle removed.

He left the following documents:

1. date: 30.04.10 time: 10.10: Notice of removal expenses totalling 223.25 plus an URGENT ACTION required for a debt of £931.83.

2. date: 30.04.10 time: 16.00: Notice of removal expenses totalling 487.63 and a notice of seizure which outlines the follloing:

 

XXXP-6036: 110.00 (car park charge)

attendance to levy fees: 478.93

Costs incurred in attendance to remove goods: 867.25

Costs uncured in the removal of goods: 282.63

contracters fees incurred in removal of goods 205:63

Card transaction fee: 6.00

sub total: 2169.81

Less payments received: 578.

Sub total 1591.81

Storage and pre sale costs to be added: TBC.

 

1. In the space of six hours the debt went from 931.83 to 1591.81

2. the Payments I had made totalled 783 not 578

3. the charges to attend etc. seem extortionate?

4. He attended twice on the same day

5. the first attendnace he has put time down as 2 hours. what was he doing?

 

I phoned him on my return on 02.05.10 andhe said I had to talk to the office on Tuesday 05.05.10. I did. At 9.30 they said that they did not have the file back from the baliff and could not help. I should phone in the afternoon.

I phoned in the afternoon and they said the debt recovery officers were very busy and I would have to call back or they would call me. I called again.

 

Their response was

1. he made an error in the amount I had paid.

2. The fees weren't extortionate

3. He had every right to attend twice and charge the fees.

4. My car would be auctioned within five days if i did not pay.

5. If it sold for less than the outstanding debt of 1431 + storage charge, then I would be liable for the amount.

6. There were no more options to pay.

7. I had to attend the office and pay in cash or bankers' draft.

 

I stressed the following:

1. my car was essential for work (25+ miles from home and long hours)

2. the car was worth more than the outstanding balance.

3. I was not disupting I owed the council but disputing the additional fees.

 

I had to pay. It's taken my entire month's salary which means my priority payments mortgage and secured loan will fall behind.

I want to make the strongest possible complaints in an effort to make them respond, and maybe gain some recompense but I know that it is unlikely.

Please advise on any templates, legalities I could quote in correspondance.

Thank you!

 

 

I am really sorry, but I am finding it a little difficult to understand precisely what you have paid. In the first sentence you have said that you had paid £783 and then further payments were also made. Can you explain this further.

 

Also you say that they have had the debt since May 2009. That is nearly a year ago. Is this correct?

 

When you set up a payment plan was this following a visit?

 

Had you received the original PCN/Notice to Owner and Order for Recovery?

 

How old was the car and was it on finance?

 

When you made the payment arrangement, was this over the telephone and was it confirmed in writing?

 

You also state that the bailiff has apparently made an error in the amount charged Can you explain.

 

From what you have said, this must surely be the most excessive charge that I have ever seen and I have a commercial business advising the public with bailiff enquiries !!

 

The fees are NOT CORRECT in any way at all and frankly, this case really should be brought to the attention of the Chief Executive of the local authority immediately as they are wholly responsible for the charges. The Ministry of Justice would also be very interested !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

Sorry for the confusion.

I have paid £783 in instalments until April 14th 2010 and then gave them a bankers draft for 1466.48 to get my car back on May 5th 2010.

 

Yes, they have had the debt scine May 2009.

 

A payment plan was set up following a visit.

 

Yes, I received the parking charge notice but not the order for recovery.

 

The car is a puma and is 8 years old. It's not on finance.

The payment arrangement was over the telephone but not confirmed in writing.

 

The baliff claimed that I had paid 578 when the total was 783.

 

Hope this clears things up and would be very grateful for any further steps I can take.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send them something similar to this, use and adapt to your own needs - send by email and Signed For letter ASAP:

 

"From:

My Name

My Address

 

To:

Acme Bailiff Co

Bailiff House

 

Ref: Account No: 123456

 

Dear Sir

 

With reference to the above account. Can you please provide me with a breakdown of the charges including Computer Screenshot.

 

This includes:

a - the time & date of any Bailiff action that incurred a Fee.

b - the reason for the fee.

c - the name(s) of the Bailiff(s) that attended on each occasion a Fee was charged.

d - the name(s) of the Court(s) the Bailiff(s) was/were Certificated at.

e - the date of the Certification.

 

This is not a Subject Access Request under the Data Protection Act S7 1998 so does not incur a fee of £10. You are obliged to provide this information.

 

I require this information within 14 days.

 

Yours faithfully

 

Ripped off customer"

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Thanks for this ploddertom!

I'll also cc: the relevant council as well.

Will update once I get a reply.

Thanks again. It's good to to do something active!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

Sorry for the confusion.

I have paid £783 in instalments until April 14th 2010 and then gave them a bankers draft for 1466.48 to get my car back on May 5th 2010.

 

Yes, they have had the debt scine May 2009.

 

A payment plan was set up following a visit.

 

Yes, I received the parking charge notice but not the order for recovery.

 

The car is a puma and is 8 years old. It's not on finance.

The payment arrangement was over the telephone but not confirmed in writing.

 

The baliff claimed that I had paid 578 when the total was 783.

 

Hope this clears things up and would be very grateful for any further steps I can take.

 

Can you find out the precise date of the Warrant of Execution. If the bailiff company refuse to provide this then you will need to ring the local authority.

 

PS: You really must request a copy of the SCREEN SHOT of your account. These fees are simply incredible and are excessive in the extreme.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Tomtubby.

I'l find out the precise date of the warrant of execution.

I've requested a copyh of the screen shot of my account and have copied the local authority. They have acknowledged receipt of the letter sent but nothing as yet from Bristow and Sutor.

 

Many thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...