Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

zenith windows/paragon personal finance


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5096 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I'm after a bit of advice on behalf of my grandmother involving an alleged debt going back to 1998.

 

My grandparents were going to have a couple of windows put in by Zenith Windows in 1998 and this was going to be financed by a Company called Paragon Personal Finance.

Some time later for some reason they never ever got the windows but this finance company insisted they still owed for them- some kind of contract clause perhaps protecting their interests if the windows sale fell through? I'm not sure. My nan has not kept any contracts or bills of sale as it was so long ago.

To be honest my grandad had terminal cancer at the time and he was normally the person that would deal with things like this, so matters were let slip.

 

My grandad before he died was made insolvent with some business partners of his so he took this debt and passed it onto the firm dealing with the insolvency for it to be wiped off.

However, the company soon found out my nan was not insolvent only my grandad and so they wiped his name off the debt and started chasing her.

 

Sadly my grandad died in 1999 and ever since then this company hounded my nan and she has been making payments to them ever since up until now. So we are talking 11 years and it is still not paid!

 

My mum accidently opened some of her mail today when I was there and we found it was a threatening letter from this Company tleling her that her so called 'account' was in arrears and they added £80.00 onto the balance in telephone call charges.

 

Firstly, what law in this country says a peron has to pay for goods or services they never actually recieved?

Secondly the debt is several years old and in actual fact, is it REALLY a debt?

How can my nan be in debt for windows that were supposed to be fitted 11 years ago and weren't fitted?

Also my nan is an elderly widow on a pension and she has obviously been a bit naive and has poor understanding of the whole thing.

I think it's disgusting!

 

So I have written a long letter and posted it by recorded delivery telling them the account is now in dispute and that the debt itself is questionable and I shall be sekeing legal advice etc.

I have also got my nan to sign to say that I am now her representative and she is not to be harrassed or caused any more distress.

I also said no further payments would be made, challenged their ridiculous charges for telephone calls and told them it was my intention to have my nan reimbursed for all her payments made so far possibly with interest on top if it is found this debt is not valid.

I also told them I would be contacting trading standards/OFT.

I insisted that she is not called by telephone and a note made on their system of this, that all contact is to be kept in writing and any letters found to be threatening will be kept to build a case of harrassment.

I also requested to see a copy of the signed contract or any bill of sale.

 

So what do you think of this so called debt? Does it sound valid and is there any legal clause in the UK for goods/services like this that says they still need to be paid for even though never recieved?

 

Additionally I would be so grateful if anybody could point me in the right direction with regards to what my next course of action should be.

Am I dealing with this correctly?

 

Many thanks in advance :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

totally ignore

statute barred by along shot.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The law does not say that you have to pay for goods not received. Stop any direct debits/standing orders etc; and go through everything in your grandparents paperwork to see if you can find any sort of contract etc:

 

I believe Paragon are not a finance company but an introduction company so they take money off you for doing absolutely nothing. I might be wrong but someone else will know.

 

As payments have continued, it won't be statute barred unless I have read you post wrong, so can you confirm that payments are still being made?

Link to post
Share on other sites

are yes sorry it does say making payments

 

missed that bit.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and thanks.

Yes unfortunately she has been paying them- for 11 years and still allegedly owes a lot more, in the thousands range.

Thats a pretty expensive set of windows made from thin air right?

I did think myself if communication and payment was being made the debt cannot be statue barred.

 

It is so annoying to think she has stood for this and paid them all these years for absolutely nothing.

I am hoping there may be some way in which she can get these payments refunded as she was effectively bullied into paying.

 

Sadly she has not kept anything back from zenith windows or any bills of sale contracts etc so I have written asking this company for a copy.

 

I just wish I knew about this sooner!

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

spotted the telling bone fees though.

i wonder what others stuff they have charged for.

 

looks like they have been fleecing her for years, nasty buggers. praying on the old.

 

i really do hope you are successful in getting all the payments back.

 

i think the elderly pensioner fleecing part might well be the only pressure [nasty publicity] that you have to getting anywhere.

 

i dont know where, but i've seen it, there is a link to 'ask dom' the guy that is on the one show about consumer issues and the dodgy builders.

 

i know he will be VERY interested in this case.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i'd SAR them too

force their arm on every scrap of info they have

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i'd SAR them too

force their arm on every scrap of info they have

 

dx

 

That was going to be my suggestion as well. With a sar there is no getting out of a reply and sending you what is required. Will cost you £10 but the best £10 you will ever spend.

 

You need to get the thinking caps on and work out exactly how much has been paid so you are prepared when the time comes to claim it all back.

 

If you don't receive anything from them, then the account is in dispute and you can stop paying.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys.

 

I'm going to print out a SAR this evening and get it sent off tomorrow.

Do I take it that when a SAR is requested they have to provide sttaments of account including any payments made/statements?

I don't really think my nan is totally 'with it'- she doesn't have a clue how much she's paid because it's been so long and I think after her husband died she gave up caring.

She has been paying by debit/credit card over the phone- I'm wondering whether we should now report her cards as lost/stolen in case they try to charge her card now they know I'll not be allowing any further payment.

 

Thanks for the advice, I will keep you updated as to what happens after the SAR and I'll take it from there.

 

dx100uk- I will certainly try to locate and bring thios to the attention of Dom, thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

and don't forget to add 8% to EVERY payment from the date it was made to the date of your claim.

that would be what a court would allow.

 

i really think you can go places with this.

 

please keep us informed.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys,

On looking at some paperwork today I discovered Paragon Personal finance seem to be handling this so called 'debt' on behalf of an original creditor named Universal Credit LTD.

I have done the SAR addressed to paragon, also my letter yesterday.

Do you think this will suffice or will I need to send these also to Universal credit- never heard of these and not sure where to obtain an address.

I would ahve thought the broker, Paragon, would ahve all the info on my Nan and the account seeing as they are the ones providing statements and asking for payment.

Thanks :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi Guys,

I'm back with an update but the situation has changed completely!

 

Basically I sent a SAR and have today recieved all the documentation.

 

It looks like my nan has got herself mixed up with a few key things but at the same time I question the debt's validity as it is extremely old.

 

From my findings from the SAR it would appear this was a personal loan for £5000,00 and it was actually taken out in July 1990, 20 years ago!

So it would appear this was a loan for something else- not for the windows which is something entirely different.

My poor nan's memory is failing her a bit I guess. But who can blame her with it being a 20 year old debt!

 

Anyway I have a photocopy of the agreement signed by both my grandparents. The details as follows:

 

Protected payment premium: £487.50

AMount of Loan: £5000

Total Loan; £5487.50

Monthly repayment: £163.33

Rate of interest per annum variable: 25.7%

Annual percentage rate of charge variable: 28.9%

Number of monthly repayments variable: 60

 

signed and dated 16/07/90

 

As you know my grandad died in 1999. This debt was to be put into an IVA he had before he died and was going to go ahead until they discovered my nan wasn't part of the IVA and challenged her solely for the debt!

After he died my nan tried to get the payment protection insurance/life cover they had on the loan to write off the rest of the balance but apparently the loan term had over-run due to them having fell into financial difficulty and were making reduced payments and so they refused to write it off and have pursued my nan ever since.

They know she is only on a state pension and my grandad's small private pension and as I udnerstand she was up until recently paying £15 per month but between them my grandad and her paid a hell of a lot over the years- the exact amount I am going to have to calculate manually.

 

I have a list of all the payments credited to the account and as soon as a payment is made the amount rockets with interest (which i don't understand) so that the balance never really reduces.

I have papers of about 5inches thick showing payments made yet her balance is still just under 2k for a 5k loan 20 years ago!

 

Ok so what I need to know guys is:

 

is this debt legit?

Should my nan keep paying or not?

Do we have any loopholes to get this debt written off?

 

Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

She should STOP paying and you should get somebody from CAB and Trading Standards involved in this, if your grandad had it as part of the IVA it should have stopped on his death, there is NO way they should be chasing your Grandma.

 

Why not try Tony Heatherington at the Daily Mail, I bet he would jump all over Paragon for this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

wow

i suspected they had been fleeced but not to that extent.

thats downright greed.

 

i'd give them one change

total up all the payments she has made and when

then add 8% to each from day of paying to day of claim.

 

and post off a letter demanding that lot baCk or you are off to the press with it.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep - calculate how much has been paid and if equals or exceeds £5,000 then stop paying. They haven't lost anything, well maybe their ego a bit.

 

She would definately come out on top anyway if they decided to take it further.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys.

 

Sillygirl1:My grandad wanted to put this debt in with his IVA and it was going to go ahead until they realised at the last minute that my nan was not named in the IVA and it was his alone.

They then refused to allow the debt to be put in with the IVA and pursued my nan alone for it, so it never went into the IVA.

They also refused to write it off after grandad died because the loan term and life insurance/ppi had long expired.

 

As I say, the original agreement was 60 payments of £163.33 which would make the total amount owing under the agreement £9799.80

 

I have just sat and trawled through the payments and she has paid £8645.44.

So as the original amount owed was £9799.80 it would suggest she owes another £1154.36 under the original agreement.

So she hasn't overpaid on the agreement.

 

They claim she still owes them a further £1527.73- the extra £373.37 is charges for telephone calls, letters and returned payments.

 

She was (until i stepped in) paying them £28.00 per month but was struggling to maintain it.

In their latest letter with the SAR they have offered to accept payments of £15.00 per month.

This would mean she's have around 101.8 payments to make- if she lives another 8 years!

 

So it seems I can't claim she has overpaid because she's not yet paid the full contractual amount owing.

 

Is there any other loophole I can use to get the debt written off?

It's ridiculous. She will most probably pass away before she pays it off and it's already 20 years old.

If she carried on with £15.00 payments it'd take it to 28 years old!

 

Really it should have been placed into the IVA my grandad had. He was the one working with the income- it doesn't seem right they can still legally pursue his wife even if it was joint, she had no income.

He was the breadwinner.

Can I use this arguement?

If I could, I could then calculate interest on the payments she made after his death and threaten court/press action if they don't write the balance off?

 

What kind of outcome should I be pushing for here?

 

Many Thanks again :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would personally stop paying. She can't be worried about any bad marks on her credit reference now, so let them take her to court. She will then be able to show with the help of a budget sheet that she can only afford £1 per month and it would probably be agreed.

 

I have seen payments ordered for this amount.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you can claim back the PPI and ALL those unlawful charges [the extra £373.37 is charges for telephone callslink3.gif, letters and returned payments.]

 

that will easily clear the bal & give her some money back.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...