Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • TECHZONE BUXTON LTD overview - Find and update company information - GOV.UK FIND-AND-UPDATE.COMPANY-INFORMATION.SERVICE.GOV.UK TECHZONE BUXTON LTD - Free company information from Companies House including registered office address, filing history, accounts, annual... thread title updated. dx
    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files 2024-01-15 DBCLegal SAR.pdf
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
    • Hi,   I am not sure if I posted this already here but I don't think I did. I attach a judgement that raises very interesting points IMO. Essentially EVRi did their usual non attendance that we normally see, however the judge (for the first time I've seen in these threads) dismissed the notice and awarded me judgement by default because their notice misses the "confirmation of compliance" paragraph. in and out in 3 minutes (aside from the chat at the end with the judge about his problems with evri) Redacted - evri CPR loss.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Flight not as described, forced to cancel - any help?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5091 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This is a bit complicated and I will be very grateful if anyone has a clue as to where I stand....

 

I booked a flight online with STA travel, everything seemed fine until I tried to check in online the morning of departure. The flight had a transfer and I noticed that the arrival transfer airport had a different name to the departure transfer airport. I called the airline to find out the story and was told that the two airports are on different sides of the country, so I would need to collect my baggage, get a bus/taxi to the other airport and then check in again! As I only had a 4 hour gap between flights, the airline said this wouldn't be possible so I should ring my travel agent.

 

Then followed 3 hours of phone calls and being put on hold while travel agent and airline argued and tried in the end to tell me this is a viable flight. From what I have seen/heard, there is not a hope in hell that I would arrive at the other airport in time to catch the second flight, even if traffic on the day was perfect.

 

At the end of my patience and not being offered a refund or alternative, I had to cancel, meaning I have lost my money. Hopefully the travel agent will give me back the taxes but that's all. This is so bizarre to me - how can you be expected to change airports and collect your luggage, then cross a country and check in again as part of a normal flight? Have never heard of anything like this and there was nothing on the itinerary or receipt to indicate I would need to do a land transfer. If I hadn't noticed this when I tried to check in, I would probably still be standing in the first airport not having a clue what was going on!

 

Can anyone help with how I can try to get my money back? I have written a complaint to the travel agent but they haven't even acknowledged it yet. I have had to pay for another new flight (probably now also to be cancelled due to this volcanic ash nightmare!) and my schedule has been messed up, plus all the hassle of having to redo airport transfers, phone calls, etc. Please help!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that is you don't get satisfaction in a reply then you should let a judge decide if it is reasonable or not.

 

Collect all available paperwork to show exactly what was expected of you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Update on this - after several emails and a long (2 month) wait, finally this week I got a refund for the tax portion minus a generous 'admin charge'. This means I am still down on most of what I paid for the useless flight...and they are still selling the same flight on the their website with no mention of the overland transfer. Have put in a complaint with ABTA so we'll see what happens next. The most annoying thing about all this is that I was told is was essentially my fault for not checking out all the details properly. HELLO!? YOU'RE THE TRAVEL AGENT, IT'S YOUR JOB TO DO THIS! Would seriously advise not to book with STA Travel at least for flight only, their prices are more than booking direct with the airline and apparently you're not actually paying for the cost of a knowledgeable travel agent but just funding their office parties.

Link to post
Share on other sites

To Dubai, with Turkish Airlines. The airports were Istanbul and SAW (can't remember the full name). I just had a message from Consumer Direct saying I had no case for redress as I should have checked the details before booking - so basically STA can sell any old flights that don't actually work without explaining the transfer situation and if you make the mistake of booking then it's your fault. So much for consumer rights. :-x!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

To Dubai, with Turkish Airlines. The airports were Istanbul and SAW (can't remember the full name). I just had a message from Consumer Direct saying I had no case for redress as I should have checked the details before booking - so basically STA can sell any old flights that don't actually work without explaining the transfer situation and if you make the mistake of booking then it's your fault. So much for consumer rights. :-x!!

 

If the itinerary and schedule is published, surely it's up to you to check it like any other thing purchased.

 

There are strict rules and guidlines laid down, so have a good read. Airlines seem to be a club all of their own. Perhaps it's something to do with the fact they travel worldwide and all the nations can't agree on legislation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The airport codes weren't shown when I booked online, or on the receipt. They were shown on the itinerary I was emailed a few days later. From what I can make out, even if I had questioned it once I received the itinerary it would have been too late as I'd already booked it and it was non-refundable. It honestly never occurred to me that a flight like this would be sold and I've been travelling for years - it wasn't even a bargain price! Saying it's my fault surely allows them to sell any old rubbish online and blame the customer when they realise it's not going to work - and what's the point of even using a travel agent if they aren't checking what they sell first?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...