Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I think his point is renewing his season ticket shows it wont happen again. using contactles doesnt.
    • Thanks dx for your guide. Yes, I will use their services, but not often. I usually spend around 80 per month, but the season ticket price is 160. I plan to renew it as long it could help me to show that I will not do it again.
    • if you are going to be using its services yes if not no. STOP PANICKING........ yours is not the next move. dx  
    • You could try this and include a copy to the SRA who are being particularly tolerant to this bunch of jackapes. This also shows that you are not to be messed with and are capable of stirring up trouble for them when they step out of line. Dear DCBL, I am in receipt of your letter of 18th April 2024 regarding CPR1.1 After studying the whole section I cannot see anywhere that I am required to furnish you  with my mail address or my phone number. Perhaps you would be kind enough to provide me with a reference to it. I suspect that your subterfuge is designed to allow you to bombard uninformed litigants with last minute information on the day of their Court case which appears to occur at times with your company. I notice that you are asking for proportionality at the same time as you are demanding  an unlawful £160 when you are aware that under PoFA the maximum that can be demanded  is only £100. You will note  that I have included the Solicitor's Regulation Authority into our conversation in order to ensure your reply. And your old excuse of "admin. error" is surely wearing a bit thin even with the SRA. so I look forward to an apology for your error and a declaration that you will desist from trying to hoodwink other motorists in future.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Urgent Advice for Car Accident thats been settled by a court without my knowledge


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4998 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

You need to look to get the CCJ set aside.

 

Here is a link to the insolvency helplines guide on this.

 

Removal of CCJ's - Step by step guide to the process

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Something doesn't sit right here, why have you got a CCJif you notified your insuerers about the accident?

 

Without getting into the semantics of the accident or discussing liability, if the other party issued proceedings against you and you had notified your insurers they should have offered you indemnity.

 

If it went to Court your insurers would have either defended it or paid in prior to the hearing, and if you lost they should have paid in at that time.

 

There is no way you should have a CCJ showing as unsatisfied against you, and I cannot understand why the other party has not pressed for enforcement of the judgement.

 

Can you please clarify

 

Mossy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Glad someone else thinks it doesnt sound right, nothing seemed right from the off, and now it continues.

 

problem is, i dont know any more. I dont know why it went to court, it was a minor accident at most, and i dont understand why i know nothing about it until i read it on my credit report.

 

I found it strange back in 2006 why a solicitor contacted me in the first place and why i was accused twice of not been insured.

 

I find it very strange and dont know what to do next as this CCJ has turned my world over, stopped me getting a new car and house, but i also lost my income (main) as my trading account was suspended due to a change in my financial circumstances, and i cant get another one. not only that, no one will hire me as a trader or broker with a ccj, or none i have found so far.

 

I am lost what to do first, and worried i will make it worse, i need that CCJ eliminated and it all sorted.

 

thanks

Edited by MasterMess
Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree with Mossy, this is bizarre.

 

By the sounds of it, the 3rd parties Insurers got nowhere with your Insurers, so took action against you directly. Now to get a CCJ they would have to have followed a process of trying to make sure you were informed of court action, by contacting you at your last known address. They appear to have failed to do this, so you should be able to get a set aside. By applying for this, you should be able to get to the bottom of what has happened and ask the court to set aside the judgement.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do what the wise womble says and get the CCJ set aside, that's your main priority now because it is having an adverse affect on your credit rating and ability to get credit.

 

Don't worry about phrases like 'if you have no insurance, or if you are uninsured' some solicitors incorporate those phrases to scare third parties into action.

 

If you passed on all the paperwork and details of your insurers to the third party and passed all third party correspondence on to your insurers then I cannot understand why thet didn't communicate directly with each other, but that's not your main concern here, getting the CCJ set aside is.

 

Mossy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, to me they didnt do much to find me. They had my parents address, as they wrote to me there several times in 2006. And 8 months before the CCJ was issued i had moved house and was soon the electoral roll. The address they used was an address i was at only 6mths, and find it strange why they didnt contact me at my parents, been that they had that address.

 

I did a quick google of set aside, but only found financial related items, form i found was:

 

http://www.insolvencyhelpline.co.uk/downloads/pdf-files/n245_form.pdf

 

seems more for a debt related CCJ? or do i still fill it in? as i can afford to pay it outright if i had to, so i dont see the purpose of them knowing my finances.

 

Thanks for all the help Mossy and Womble, its invaluable

Link to post
Share on other sites

To the court it is a debt like any other. So just follow the set aside process by completing the relevant form and submitting to the court. The clerk of court can be very helpful, if you are having any difficulties with the process.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, i have all the forms now to send.

 

One last question before i go away and sort this out, at this point, should i contact:

 

1) My insurance company (old) and ask them what went on with the cliam?

 

2) A solicitor

 

I also checked my credit file, and the address the CCJ has been registered to is an address thats no linked on my credit file, and is an address never registered on the electoral roll. So i am puzzled how they got that address, it was a term time student address thats got no links anywhere.

 

Thanks

Edited by MasterMess
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes you could speak to the old Insurance company and see what happened, as the court may ask about this.

 

You could speak to a solicitor about this, but at £150 per hour plus any costs, it might be a good idea to do as much of this yourself as possible. If you have grounds for a set aside, which it appears you do, it is simply a case of making the case to the court. The 3rd party Insurers will have a chance to defend if they choose to do so. Often if they have made mistakes with the CCJ, they won't even bother to turn up to court.

 

If you have any questions the insolvency helpline are helpful, as are clerks of court. Also you could add post to the legal forum on this site and there are a number of experts who can comment further on the set aside process.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Before you try and set the judgment aside or anything else, you need to find out why your insurance company hasn't either dealt with the claim or paid the sums due in the judgment given. Call them immediately to find out what has gone on.

 

Trying to set aside a judgment 4 years after it was handed down is going to be nigh on impossible, although it may be possible, but only if you apply to set it aside immediately as in order to set aside a judgment, you have to have good grounds to set it aside and also to have acted swiftly once the judgment has been enterred or your knowledge of the judgment.

 

You also need to get details of the case against you as you will need the pleadings in order to have any idea how to defend against the Claimants action against you.

 

Also you have to remember that in order to satisfy the Judgment you will also have 4 years worth of interest at 2% (PI Claim) or 8% from the date of the Judgment to pay.

Edited by Endymion
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...
Just an update, was in Court on Friday just gone, and have won hands down, so thanks for all the help!

 

Well done. It has taken some time to sort out !!!!

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...