Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • "We suffer more in imagination than in reality" - really pleased this all happened. Settled by TO, full amount save as to costs and without interest claimed. I consider this a success but feel free to move this thread to wherever it's appropriate. I say it's a success because when I started this journey I was in a position of looking to pay interest on all these accounts, allowing them to default stopped that and so even though I am paying the full amount, it is without a doubt reduced from my position 3 years ago and I feel knowing this outcome was possible, happy to gotten this far, defended myself in person and left with a loan with terms I could only dream of, written into law as interest free! I will make better decisions in the future on other accounts, knowing key stages of this whole process. We had the opportunity to speak in court, Judge (feels like just before a ruling) was clear in such that he 'had all the relevant paperwork to make a judgement'. He wasn't pleased I hadn't settled before Court.. but then stated due to WS and verbal arguments on why I haven't settled, from my WS conclusion as follows: "11. The Defendant was not given ample evidence to prove the debt and therefore was not required to enter settlement negotiations. Should the debt be proved in the future, the Defendant is willing to enter such negotiations with the Claimant. "  He offered to stand down the case to give us chance to settle and that that was for my benefit specifically - their Sols didn't want to, he asked me whether I wanted to proceed to judgement or be given the opportunity to settle. Naturally, I snapped his hand off and we entered negotiations (took about 45 minutes). He added I should get legal advice for matters such as these. They were unwilling to agree to a TO unless it was full amount claimed, plus costs, plus interest. Which I rejected as I felt that was unfair in light of the circumstances and the judges comments, I then countered with full amount minus all costs and interest over 84 months. They accepted that. I believe the Judge wouldn't have been happy if they didn't accept a payment plan for the full amount, at this late stage. The judge was very impressed by my articulate defence and WS (Thanks CAG!) he respected that I was wiling to engage with the process but commented only I  can know whether this debt is mine, but stated that Civil cases were based on balance of probabilities, not without shadow of a doubt, and all he needs to determine is whether the account existed. Verbal arguments aside; he has enough evidence in paperwork for that. He clarified that a copy of a DN and NOA is sufficient proof based on balance of probabilities that they were served. I still disagree, but hey, I'm just me.. It's definitely not strict proof as basically I have to prove the negative (I didn't receive them/they were not served), which is impossible. Overall, a great result I think! BT  
    • Seeking further advice now. The 33 days in which the defendant has to submit a defence expires at 16:00 tomorrow. The defendant has submitted an acknowledgement of service but looking to get the claim awarded by default in failure to submit the defence. This is MoneyClaim Online and can see an option to request a default judgement but believe that is for failure to acknowledge the claim within 14 days??  So being MoneyClaim Online, how do I request the claim be awarded in my favour?
    • Have to agree with the above Health and safety legislation is specific in that the service provider in so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all his employees and those not in the employ of the business. You claim is like saying you slipped in the swimming pool area while taking a dip. As rightly stated by by the leisure centre, a sports hall has dedicated equipment and you yourself personally have a legal obligation in mitigating danger or injury to yourself by taking account of your immediate surroundings. Where your claim will fail is if it is reasonable and proportionate to impose liability of the Leisure Centre? The answer has to be no.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ajs444 v Cap. one ** WON - They Cave In Just Before The Hearing **


ajs444
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3123 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 174
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Having read moneysavingexpert, I can see what has happened with regard to the T&C's on the statement.

 

On March statement it says:- Crapone is now authorised by the FSA as an Authorised Payment Institution. Your interest rates are now linked to the BOE base rate.

 

This is really quite handy for them as the BOE interest rate is not likely to go any lower, and can only go upwards, so any increase cannot realy be challenged.

 

That is my reading of the situation, anyone got any other line of thought?

Don\'t let the B**tards grind you down

Link to post
Share on other sites

So got reply back from these to**ers and they say that the only way I can get these figures is for them to supply statements at £10 charge, and I go through them to see when and what the rate change was.

Well Crapone, I already have the statements and will be doing my own calculations.

Don\'t let the B**tards grind you down

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Well decided to get the finger out and do something about Crapone, they are charging me a fortune just now in interest (31.9%)

I have asked them how my rate went from 7.7%APR to this eyewatering rate, but as usual the crapone avoid the question letter.

 

I have looked at the court procedures for small claims, anyone know if you just copy and paste the same POC's used in the English court systems?

 

I also understand small claims to be £3000 limit, is this due to be increased?

Don\'t let the B**tards grind you down

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I don't think the limit will be increased in the near future, 2007/2008 they increased it from £750 to £3,000. With a couple of my claims I used Summary Cause actions , where the limit is £5,000.

There is more of a risk going down this route as if you were to lose you'd be liable to pay costs.

 

The procedure for using Summary Cause actions is almost identical to the Small Claims but you have to pay for Sheriff Officers to serve your claim on the Bank, with a small claim the court does it all for you.

 

 

There's a poc in here you could amend to suit.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?94302-Updated-Scottish-Procedure

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not been to East End for a while used to take a short cut through the graveyard !!!

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well got my finger out as their monthly payments are really getting on my goat. Have gone back to March 2010 when I originally contacted them, and then back to March 2004 and it comes up to just under £3000 they are due me, interest at 31.9% the rate they are charging me at just now. I have also included default charges for the last year and it brings it all within the Scottish Small Claims Court.

 

I also reminded them of my request to why my interest rate had gone from 7.7% up to 31.9%?????? on this they have become obstructive, saying I have to SAR them along with £10.

 

I have already all statements and my account logs and I cannot see any reasons for rate increases on the log and the statements do not show interest rates.

 

I am not paying them another penny, their call centre in The Far East keeps phoning me regarding payments, I as them if they are phoning to tell me when they are sending me the money????

 

They can't understand that response, not in the script!!!

Don\'t let the B**tards grind you down

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whole ground like a graveyard now, still that's Scottish football, full of divers, allegedly.

 

Anyway Capone say last letter was their final response, so on to court we go, though the interest rate question seems to have been forgotten by them, have e-mailed them to remind them.

 

I think that they are avoiding the rates question so it really should go to the OFT/FSA not sure which.

 

Getting my barristers wig shampooed as I type.

Don\'t let the B**tards grind you down

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking for some template for court papers, links above lead me nowhere, anyone point me in the right direction, reclaiming default charges.

 

Using Scottish Small claims route, but wording will be the same.

Don\'t let the B**tards grind you down

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well wrote back to them to say the interest rates were not on statements and their phone/account logs could not be translated. I am going to court regarding default charges but understand that the FOS may not touch UTCRR problems if I have case at court.

E-mailed them twice since letter and still they are not revealing the interest rate mystery.

Don\'t let the B**tards grind you down

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well after writing to them again for interest rate tracking on my account and a further 2 e-mails chasing them up for a reply, I finally get an answer.

 

They say account opened in 1997 and rates have been increased under their changes to T&C's, have been informed of rises and had chance to decline rises by paying off card, or just not use it and pay balance up at new rate.

 

Since I asked for dates and rate increases with reasons, they have really just said that it is none of my business and given me leaflet for FOS.

 

Good customer service my arse, complaint form going in.

Don\'t let the B**tards grind you down

Link to post
Share on other sites

Beware that when you get a letter from Crapone that they are that short of money page 2 is on the rear of page one!!!!!!

 

Found second page by accident last night, they say my rate has gone from 7.7% to 37.7% in 4 increases over the lifetime of the card, 14 years.

 

As a gesture of goodwill they have refunded all default charges since July 2011 plus a further goodwill contribution of a further £40, this comes to a total of £124.00 (whoopedoo)

 

Maybe they think they can wriggle off the hook with that?

 

I don't think so.

Don\'t let the B**tards grind you down

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well keeping this claim back just now, POC's ready to go , but I am going for details of interest they are charging, going through FOS for this so court will have to wait.

 

They say in their letter that rate for purchases is 37.7% which is different from the rate shown on statements.

 

Thread below gives interest rate fight.

Don\'t let the B**tards grind you down

Link to post
Share on other sites

Last increase January 2010 according to Crapone, 37.07% for purchases and 31.32% for cash transactions.

 

Statement gives rates of Purchase 31.95% and Cash 27.56%

 

Obviously copying and pasting from another customer's case correspondence,you couldn't make it up.

Don\'t let the B**tards grind you down

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I know what you are saying, but the original question to them was,

 

Date of Interest Rise?

 

Amount of rise?

 

Reason for rise?

 

They are deliberately concealing this information and it is noticeable that there has been no rate reduction, this in my opinion is unfare considering where interest rates are at this point in time.

 

T&C's state rates can rise and fall in line with BOE base rates, coincidentally now stated on the front of your CC statement.

Don\'t let the B**tards grind you down

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Well FOS could not get the information either, fobbed them off with the claim that reason for rises are commercially sensitive and would give competitors unfair advantage.

 

Surprise, FOS sides with Crapone.

 

Well on to Small Claims Court to get back charges.

Don\'t let the B**tards grind you down

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Actually stopped paying them whilst this dispute plus default charges was ongoing, so they have defaulted me and say that they are sending someone round to collect payment, this they have landed in iQOR's lap.

 

Despite telling them that doorstep callers are only by invite, they say that will not stop a visit, they were also told that all communication should only be in writing, they say phone calls will continue!!!!!

 

My case with FOS is still ongoing, Crapone have given list of statements with dates and the rate applied, unfortunately they have failed to supply the first 3 years of statements, FOS are banging their heads of the wall. The suggestion is that we appoint case to an Ombudsman in the FOS, maybe then Crapone will take notice.

 

Will now proceed to small claims court next week, will have to check if it is a holiday on Monday.

 

Don't some Financial Institutions just **** you off, considering they supplied an application form in response to my SAR, I don't think they have much leverage.

Don\'t let the B**tards grind you down

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...