Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi, I have the Sims 4 on Macbook. Over the last year I have paid for multiple add on packs spending a lot of money on them. I bought them all in good faith as my Mac met all the minimum requirements to play them. I have been playing happily for about a year and bought my latest pack just over a week ago. The games were all working fine yesterday. Then suddenly today EA released a new app to launch the games and this new app requires a MAC OS that my computer cannot use. Now suddenly none of my games are accessible and I am unable to play anything. They did not warn us about this change in requirements and if I had known they would be doing this I wouldn't have bought all these add ons as they are now all totally unusable. The games themselves have not changed, only their app to launch them and I can't afford to buy a brand new mac just to play. So my question is how can they change the minimum requirements after I have paid for a game? I agreed to pay for them based on the fact my mac met their requirements and was not informed when purchasing that this would be an issue in the future. I understand new games (like Sims 5 which is to be released next year) might not be compatible but this is a 10yr old game that they have suddenly made inaccessible due to their new launch app. Does anybody know if I can do anything or anyway to get a partial refund from them? Thanks   Here are their T&C... I can't find anything in there about them being able to do this so not sure what to do https://tos.ea.com/legalapp/WEBTERMS/US/en/PC/
    • OK. Thank you all for the input.  I'll ignore their letters of demand but NEVER ignore a letter of claim. I'm bracing myself for the stress as their demands £££ goes up and the case gets sent to debt collectors. 
    • OK.  It was worth a try. Their case is still pants and they have broken their own Code of Practice numerous times.
    • @BankFodder sorry for the delay and thank you for the lengthy reply. Yes, I agree. It's a small business and the guy is very very decent. I know someone else said my priority shouldn't be worrying whether he gets shafted but I'm not here to try and screw him over because I feel like if someone behaves decently and gets exploited, they might not behave so kindly in the future. I know DX mentioned he thinks I've caused the issue by leaving multiple instructions, but I have already explained why and both instructions were to leave it with a neighbour and there was nothing advising the driver to abandon the parcel on my doorstep. I don't think leaving it there could be considered a safe place.  I am still waiting on the retailer to respond. Ultimately, I wanted to know how he would proceed if DPD's response isn't favourable. I am certainly not looking to cause any problems. I just want my laptop. I will read the other posts for sure. I've been a bit preoccupied with family stuff. I have nothing in writing from DPD as I phoned them, but they did advise it should be the retailer that liaises with them. I tried contacting the driver straight after deliver via Whatsapp, as that's an option, but it said I couldn't send him a message and I have kept that log. We all know who took the parcel on our street, because that person has a history of parcel theft, but I don't have a doorbell camera or cctv. Police are refusing to intervene, despite the fact that I, along with several other people, spotted another's neighbour's parcel in said "suspect's" car and confronted her to get the parcel back. If the police had acted sooner, I might have had a better chance of getting the parcel back, but I suspect the laptop has long been sold on.  When the retailer responds, I will send him the link to this thread. Hopefully, he will benefit from the information on here as well.
    • @dx100uk none of the instructions advised them to leave the parcel on my door step and without such instructions., I'm struggling to see why they think it's ok to just dump it there.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Threatening Letter


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5175 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi my son received a letter this morning from a company called Jacobs Debt Recovery it is for a gym subscription he used to have with the local council. There was a three months cancellation period but because of numerous disputes he cancelled the subscription and also cancelled the direct debit, the main reason for this was due to the fact the times he went to swim he was unable to do this because the pool was cordened off for none subscribing patrons mainly schools. This was mentioned to the manager on numerous occasions and was told it was unlucky and we would have to put up with it.I wrote to the local council and explained what had happened and what i was going to do, heared nothing so i thought everything was okay until this morning, I havent responded to the letter yet could someone please advise what to do next

 

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

i would think your first response should be a 'prove it' letter..this should give you the paperwork you are going to require in order for them to say they can legally collect on this debt..letters in template section

Link to post
Share on other sites

i would think your first response should be a 'prove it' letter..this should give you the paperwork you are going to require in order for them to say they can legally collect on this debt..letters in template section

 

Hi, thanks for the quick reply, this might sound thick but I cant for the life of me find the letter in the templates section, any chance you could post me a link.

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi here is the prove it letter

 

 

Name/Address:

 

Date:

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

You have contacted me/us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself/ourselves.

 

I/we would point out that I/we have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to (insert company name).

 

I am/we are familiar with the CPUTR 2008 and the Office of Fair Trading's Guidance on debt collection, which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

 

I/we would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. AND in not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

 

Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment.

 

I/we would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my/our liability for the debt in question.

 

I/we await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed. Otherwise I will have no option but to make a complaint to Trading Standards and also inform the Office Of Fair Trading of your actions.

 

I/we look forward to your reply.

 

Yours faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

a side thought would be to complain to your local councilor about the gym ie the pool always being cordond off as well as complaining to the councilor whom is in charge of the gyms for you local council and ask them to have the debt witten off.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi, this morning my son received another letter from Jacobs (it seems as if they totally ignored the prove it letter), this letter is from a welfare adviser from Jacobs and it says:-

 

Dear Mr XXXXXXX XXXXXX

 

My name is Susan Walker I work as welfare adviser for Jacobs Debt Recovery. Your case is due to be passed to our collections team for doorstep collection.

My job is to try to help you and make arrangements to pay the debt without the need for further action.

It is in your intrest to contact Jacobs in the next seven days and make an offer of payment THIS DEBT WILL NOT GO AWAY AND MUST BE PAID.

JACOBS CAN ONLY HELP IF YOU CONTACT US NOW ON 0845 601 2692

 

Whats my next step?Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Sir or Madam,

 

Account Ref xxxx

 

Please be advised that I will only communicate with you in writing. I have noted your repeated attempts to contact me by telephone over the past few weeks/months and these have been duly logged by time and date.

 

Furthermore, should it be your intention to arrange a “doorstep call”, please be advised that under OFT rules, you can only visit me at my home if you make an appointment and I have no wish to make such an appointment with you.

 

There is only an implied license under English Common Law for people to be able to visit me on my property without express permission; the postman and people asking for directions etc (Armstrong v Sheppard & Short Ltd [1959] 2 QB 384

. per Lord Evershed M.R.). Therefore take note that I revoke license under Common Law for you, or your representatives to visit me at my property and, if you do so, you will be liable to damages for a tort of trespass and action will be taken, including but not limited to, police attendance.

 

In Scotland change the last paragraph to :-

There is only an implied license under Scots Common Law for people to be able to visit me on my property without express permission; the postman and people asking for directions etc. Therefore take note that I revoke license under Common Law for you, or your representatives, to visit me at my property and if you attempt to send such a collector to my home, you will also be reported for harassment and I shall seek damages for a delict of trespass. You would also be liable for conspiring in a delict of trespass by acting in defiance of my instructions and sending someone to visit me nevertheless. Should it be necessary, I will obtain an interdict from the Court to prevent you carrying out your threat.

Yours faithfully,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok thanks Harrassed Senior, I sent the letter this morning, I also received a letter from them this morning and it goes like this:-

 

Dear mr xxxxxxx xxxxxxxx

 

We acknowledge the receipt of your letter dated xxxxx xxx xxxxx and note the contents herein.

We write to advise you that we have been instructed by your Local Authority to pursue you in respect of Sundry Debts, this being a xxxxx xxxx membership with an invoice date of xx xxxxxxx 2009

If you are disputing this account, we would respectfully suggest you contact your Local Authority to discuss the matter further. However, we are unable to hold any action whilst you do so.

 

We would also take this opportunity to advise you that we are not governed by the Office of Fair Trading. Therefore, their guidelines do not apply to us.

 

After reviewing your account the minimum payment we are able to accept is £30.00 every 30 days, please note the requested amount is not negotiable therefore, we look forward to receiving your first installment by xxx March 2010 and a final payment by xxxx April 2010.

 

Failure to comply with the above may result in further action being taken.

 

Jacobs.

 

 

So whats the next step ?

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Complaining to the Office of Fair Trading.

The Office of Fair Trading issues Consumer Credit Licences to companies that are in business as Debt Collectors. This is certainly a “grey” area, with some bailiff companies denying that they require a licence because they are enforcing a warrant, not collecting a debt. For this reason, many claim that they do not have a Licence…..this is not true!!! Most bailiff companies do have a Consumer Credit Licence.

If you are considering issuing a complaint to the Office of Fair Trading, you can only do so, if the company that you wish to complain about currently hold a valid Consumer Credit Licence. By visiting the Bailiff’s Complaints section in our Downloads area, you will find full details of the many bailiff companies who do have a current Consumer Credit Licence, together with their licence number, expiry date and details of where you should address any complaint. This information was provided to us by the Public Register Department of the Office of Fair Trading.

In July 2003, the OFT published it's long overdue Debt Collection Guidance, (details of which are below). This guide caused concern within the Enforcement Profession, as it became clear that there could be serious consequences on those bailiff companies that hold a Consumer Credit Licence if there are a large number of complaints made by the public.

This is because the OFT can issue a warning letter, impose restrictions on their licence, or; in extreme cases: suspend their Licence altogether. As the majority of bailiff companies provide other debt related services that do require them to have a Licence, they would wish to avoid complaints, if at all possible.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Inform these clowns that they are subject to the same rules & regulations that everyone is.

Its not for these muppets to say what they will and wont accept and when.

Thats between you and a county court if it ever went that far.

Demand that they go forth and multiply otherwise you will have them reported to every authority in the land including if need be the police.not on 999

Link to post
Share on other sites

just go through TRADING STANDARDS AND ALSO OFT with your complaint,and see your local councillor before you make any further contact with the Balliffs.....they will come down to earth with a very nasty bump and a severe reprimand ,then you can set about your defence of the issues,it makes no sense to go charging in like a wild bull ,a judge will see the threats for what they are intimidation and harrassment so you will be afforded the full weight of the law on your side...

patrickq1..make the TS AND OFT urgent though

patrickq1

Link to post
Share on other sites

Contact your local police force as well on their none emergency number.

Refuse to be fobbed off if they wont help you out.

They are tax payer funded public servants after all.

If they will help you then the police can warn them off for you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...