Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • In answer to your questions yes even though it wasn't called that, it was the NTK. Had it been a windscreen ticket you would not have received the NTK until 28 days had elapsed. In earlier times if the warden was present then a windscreen ticket would have been issued. It nows seems that the DVLA and the Courts don't see a problem  with not issuing a ticket when a warden is on site. A period of parking must mean that ther e has to be a start time and a finish time in order for it to be considered a period. A single time does not constitute a period. I am not sure what you mean by saying it could be taken either way.  All they have mentioned is  the incident time which is insufficient. There are times on the photos about one minute apart which do not qualify as the parking period because they are not on the PCN itself. The reason I asked if the were any more photos is that you should be allowed 5 minutes Consideration period for you to read the signs and decide whether you want to accept them and you do that by staying longer than 5 minutes. if  more  do not have photos of your staying there for more than 5 minutes they are stuffed. You cannot say that you left within the 5 minute period if you didn't , but you can ask them, should it get to Court , to provide strict proof that you stayed longer than the statutory time. If they can't do that, case over.
    • I recently bought some trainers from Sports Direct and was unhappy with them and their extortionate delivery and return postage charges. I tweeted about being unhappy, and received a reply from someone claiming to be from Sports Direct asking me to send my order number and email address by pm, so a claim could be raised. Which I (stupidly) did. The account used Sports Direct's name and branding, and a blue tick.  The following day I received a call from "Sports Direct Customer Service", and with a Kenyan number. They asked for details of the issue, and then sent me an email with a request to install an app called Remitly. They provided me with a password to access the app then I saw that it had been setup for me to transfer £100, and I was asked to enter my credit card number so they could "refund" me. I told them I was uncomfortable with this (to say the least), and was just told to ring them back when I did feel comfortable doing it. Ain't never gonna happen.  I just checked my X account, and the account that sent the message asking for my details is gone. I feel like a complete idiot falling for what was a clear scam. But at least I realised before any real damage was done. if you make a complaint about a company on social media, and you get a reply from someone claiming to be from that company and asking for personal details, tread very carefully.   
    • The good news is that their PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012  Schedule 4.. First under Section 9 (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; (b)inform the keeper that the driver is required to pay parking charges in respect of the specified period of parking and that the parking charges have not been paid in full; The PCN does not specify the parking period. AS you rightly say the ANPR times do not include driving to the parking space and then from there back to the exit. And once you include getting children in and out of cars especially if seat belts are involved the time spent parked can be a fair bit less than the ANPR times but still probably nowhere near the time you spent. But that doesn't matter -it's the fact that they failed to comply. Also they failed to ask the keeper to pay the charge.  Their failure means that they cannot now transfer the charge from the diver to the keeper . Only the driver is now liable. As long as UKPA do not know who was driving it will be difficult for them to win in Court as the Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. Particularly as anyone can drive any car if they have the correct insurance. It might be able to get more reasons to contest the PCN if you could get some photos of the signs. both at the entrance and inside the car park. the photos need to be legible and if there are signs that say different things from others that would also be a help.
    • Farage rails and whines about not being allowed on the BBC ... ... but pulls out at the last minute of a BBC Panorama interview special. It was denied it was anything to do with his candidates being outed as misogynists and Putin apologists, or that farage was afraid Nick Robinson might throw some difficult questions at him ... despite farages recent practice at quickly cowering in fear.   It was claimed 'it wasn't in Nigels diary'     Nigel Farage pulls out of BBC interview at last minute amid Hitler row WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK ‘Panorama’ special postponed as Reform UK party faces row over candidate who claimed UK would have been ‘better off’ if it had...   Waaahhhh
    • i'd say put lowells to strict proof of where the payment came from. cant hurt to send SB letter, even if proved not. at least they get your correct address. they'd have to link the old IVA times scale to a payment  these IVA F&F pots (if thats where it came from) most mugs dont even know they are not only taking most of your payments on fees but also creaming money off to supposedly offer F&F's.  funny when the IVA fails or is complete these sums of money in F&F pots never get given back or even mentions... these IVA firm directors esp with regard to knightsbridge and creditfix were fined and struck off more times than Paul Burdell of Link Fame and still managed to continue to scam people.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

frank galler - kubic investments ltd


princess5
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4975 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 772
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi all, well he did not turn up, I did, and found out that this man just lies and lies. I cannot , well i can understand that we all want to blame some one , natasha sorry not the one, she to has been taken in by mr FG. If you have been in the company of mr FG then you will undrestand, he is the best at what he does. This man has no money in this country, FACT. He may have money abroad , but not here. FG is the only one to blame. As i have said how many of us are there . 2500 as mr FG said x £2400 average person is what.................. But where is the money not here. FACT and i have the proof..........

Link to post
Share on other sites

caroline i have letter headed paper that you speak of and also with national finance headed, i have not recieved any of my files back for my loan either which iam concerned about as people who worked for frank now have my personal details and bank details!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

caroline i have letter headed paper that you speak of and also with national finance headed, i have not recieved any of my files back for my loan either which iam concerned about as people who worked for frank now have my personal details and bank details!!

Thanks Princess, the police are wanting this information.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all, well he did not turn up, I did, and found out that this man just lies and lies. I cannot , well i can understand that we all want to blame some one , natasha sorry not the one, she to has been taken in by mr FG. If you have been in the company of mr FG then you will undrestand, he is the best at what he does. This man has no money in this country, FACT. He may have money abroad , but not here. FG is the only one to blame. As i have said how many of us are there . 2500 as mr FG said x £2400 average person is what.................. But where is the money not here. FACT and i have the proof..........

 

 

What do you mean in the company of him? He is an ugly little s...t.

I am only 5ft and he was not much taller than me. He would probably be on most women's totally unshaggable list.

He was not driving a micra when I met him but his car did not reflect any level of success. Because of his age he easily forgot what he had said previously and he would answer the same question with different answers. This always made me question in my mind what was going on.

 

The amount of time he spent in Spain always concerned me because he could fly off there to safety when matters became too hot for him.

 

For a normal woman, I would say he was not a charmer because his looks were so unattractive. I can see how some men can charm people into conning them but as I said he is an ugly little so and so. Sorry this is an objective fact.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well i hope we get both, only time will tell. from what i have seen here in england, not much chance. If the money is abroad in spain, or where ever, it would be nice to find it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Natasha

 

I am new to this forum and I have read through all of the posts, yours in particular and so I put the following to you like this;

You claim that you only worked with the CCA, but I believe this to be untrue, are you saying DID NOT use the Bill of Exchange act at all?

You said that due to not being able to get hold of and lack of payment, you had the worst Christmas ever, is it not true that there are pictures of you on a social networking site on holiday in January of this year?

You claimed that you do not want to take any more money from anyone, yet in a post by another user, they said that you would be willing to negotiate their claim but they would need to pay £200, a slight contradiction don't you think?

You stated in an earlier post that you have never used another company's name unlawfully; again I have the incentive to disbelieve you!

You noted on one of your posts that you sometimes were paid as little as £16 per card which then went to £50, didn't you later say that you were receiving £200 per case, how is there such a wide gap between figures, surely you knew what you were being paid?

 

How do you know that Kubic were not negotiating payments, apart from the disappearance of Mr Galler, what exactly has Kubic got away with?

You say in another post that obtaining an MOJ licence is "not" a difficult task, but is it not true that you and you previous company (Tate-Lloyd Legal Services LLP, which is listed as still active with Companies House but is not registered to Metropole Chambers) had its application rejected?

I suggest that this is possibly why you were using names of company's which did not belong to you but had MOJ licences granted to them?

You say that you did not personally send out any paperwork for clients to fill out - did you not send out Affidavits to be signed, sworn by a solicitor and sent back to you?

You mention that the problem with Tate-Lloyd was that the company was not licensed; I thought you said that it was not difficult to get a licence and if Tate-Lloyd were told to stop trading, why are you still listed as an active company with Companies House and not as a dissolved company?

You claimed Frank was already there, when you joined the company and that you were there for only 2 months. Surely you were there longer?

I assume that the reason as to why Frank's new girl doesn't answer her telephone is because she saw what was going on and decided to get out of the situation that she had been put in, before she got dragged in any further and also it could be because she probably doesn't want to talk to you and have to listen to any of your nonsense?

You say that you will try and get in contact with Jessica, how do you propose to do this?

 

Were you directly involved with her meetings with Frank in order to suggest that you be a witness for her, what is the truth behind this?

You say that Frank is not responsible for the system that was used, in that case who is responsible, weren't you working for him?

I would like to point out that if you were doing things wrong, the police are not likely to tell you in a letter, they would monitor your activity in order to obtain any relevant facts that they require!![/font

If you have resigned from doing any work associated with Kubic, surely you are no longer in a position to give updates on cases or have the need to have any communications with people that you are no longer involved with?

 

Why, if you wanted to show that you were no longer associated or working for Kubic Investments, did you use another company's name?

 

What would you achieve other than unnecessary confusion for clients of which you were trusted (along with Frank) to handle cases for?

If you were no longer working (if you ever were) for Kubic investments did you not just say so, maybe there wouldn't be so much resentment and anger if there had been honesty from the beginning?

It strikes me as amazing as to how Finance Angles and National Finance to which I both have letters, states clearly that correspondence be sent to Metropole Chambers in Swansea and uses the same telephone contact details as Tate-Lloyd once did also, when National Finance isn't a registered company and Finance Angels is registered to Newcastle, can you elaborate on this?

 

Was anybody aware that Frank isn't even British as well, he is in fact Hungarian!!

You said and I quote - I want to make clear I can support everything that I am saying in this forum"

In my opinion Natasha, your contradictions are visible for all to see, it would be suggested given the rising anger among disgruntled clients that you tell us the truth for here on in!!

Edited by tinkers
Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by natasha123

I am a bit angry with martin now, as I really try hard with this, there is no need to post this to stir up things, it is almost like a talk show were the talkmaster provokes to mess up things on purpose.

 

Anyway I am sorting a fom out which i will email to you, I just need your email address.

 

I had no intention to ignore you, but i find it hard to keep track of things.

 

I will email you them from my other email account.

 

Kind regards

Natasha

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done Tinkers!

One matter of great amusement to all, when Natasha finally accepted that the Bill Of Exchange Act route was not working she started the cca route using letter templates from this site!!

 

She thought she was going to be as big as Cartel. I have an email stating such.

 

Natasha is responsible for most of the issues faced here. Frank, however, should have realised she was well out of her depth and she did not have the intelligence or integrity to admit such. Most likely because living in Swansea jobs are difficult to find and in law an impeccable career history is essential.

 

Most people posting on here have had issues with the loans and credit cards which Natasha dealt with. The mortgages are another matter and were routed elsewhere. No idea where although I know many contacts in the industry would not touch Frank, I made sure of it not because I had dealings with him but because I failed to understand why he continued to get Natasha to do the legal paperwork when she was not qualified to do so. It just did not make any sense at all.

 

It also concerned me that Natasha walked away from all the Claim Management Clients so easily.

 

If Frank had integrity why would he use someone useless and unqualified? I think he wanted to help her, no doubt but is still does not make any sense.

Could it be that law firms would not deal with him because they felt he was not squeaky clean?

It really does not add up.

 

Could it be that he was uncomforable using a law firm because further down the line he intended to do a runner with people's money.

This would make sense.

Edited by Caroline2009
Link to post
Share on other sites

whos kevin jones as found this on on a notice of default and opportunity to cure letter sent to my bank?

 

Yes I wondered about that.

 

I think it is Natasha's son.

Strange though, because I also have a William Waters on some aswell.

Could he be Russell Water's son?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello tinkers-welcome to the site.

You raise some interesting questions,lets hope Natasha will respond.

 

For the record,I think it not wise to be posting named officers from Suffolk Police,since we have not had this clarified as fact.

Until we are given such evidence to support it,those names will remain edited.

If it is the case that this officer IS requesting information,perhaps someone could give the team some proof of this.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are we sure that Frank is Hungarian ?

I think the name is actually Romanian.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are we sure that Frank is Hungarian ?

I think the name is actually Romanian.

 

 

This becomes stranger by the day.

 

Natasha and Bianca Klinkmuller question raised on this site by another poster

Frank and whatever his name is?

 

How more bizarre can this get?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Can i ask tinkers, what were you doing with my paper work, had you to had meetings wiyh FG. You had had these papers for 2 or 3 weeks, You returned them to natasha with nothing done, why... My wife and i rang the police and the officer came to my home , this was around the same time you had my paper work. We gave him the lot, he returned and in writing said nothing could be done, go down the route of the moj..

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...