Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you. I expect that @dx100uk will be along soon to give advice. Meanwhile, I really wonder whether the default date – as being the starting point of the six years – something which has been decided in law. It has always seemed to me to be extremely unfair. According to the limitation act, the six year period begins from the date on which the cause of action accrued. This normally means that the breach of contract occurred. Section 6 of the limitation act says that in terms of loans, the cause of action begins on the date that the debt was "demanded". Over the past two years this has come to mean the date that the default notice was issued – but I have to say I don't find that very satisfactory. If you received demands for payment before then then I don't see why section 6 shouldn't refer to that date. Did you not receive any correspondence at all in 2017/2018? What was the value of the original loan – and how much you pay off? I see that there was some kind of instalment agreement. Tell us about that. See what my colleague @dx100uk says but anyway, if I were you I would send off an SAR immediately both to the claimant and also to the original creditor. It costs you nothing. There is no downside. Get in the post straightaway with some kind of utility bill establishing your identity. You can even include a copy of the claim form as well as proof of your identity
    • £749.69 court fee £70 legal fee £70 total £889.68 MyJar TM.pdf
    • Please read and complete the following posting your responses back here for further advice.  
    • Thank you. I'm going to say that the photographs really don't say very much and once again it's a real shame that you didn't take lots of photographs of all the issues including the Windows and the state of the inside of the room. You can certainly bring a claim here if you want and we will help you but I'm really not sure of your chances of success. It sounds to me as if the manager you spoke to was dismissive and nothing was particularly agreed or admitted. If you want to bring a claim then I would start off by establishing a paper trail where you point out the things that were wrong and the fact that you discuss this with the duty manager who appeared to be dismissive. You could ask them then in general terms if they have any proposals to make. I think you're in weak position. I don't think you should start threatening them with legal action or anything at the moment and even if you did bring a legal action for the full amount I would probably advise you to negotiate a settlement of maybe 50% – if you're lucky – at mediation. Have you tried putting up Google reviews and reviews on trust pilot? This could also be a good way to start. I'm very sorry but when you deal with these kinds of issues then you need to collect evidence as quickly as possible. It is the first thing you always do when there is a poor hotel, a stone in your cornflakes or a motor accident. I'm afraid that you have to think this way and maybe it doesn't come naturally – but having run the consumer action group for 18 years, this is rather second nature. If you have any phone calls with them then you should read our customer services guide first and then confirm any admissions they might make in writing.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Advent Computer Training (Barclays Partner Finance)Info and discussion thread


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3936 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 5.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Hey Lowdown that template letter you sent for mercers is deed of assignment from BPF or Mercers. I know they are same company I just wasnt sure which one to put.

 

I sent mercers a letter via Barclays in Cardiff.. Barclays answered :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Today I received 2 identical letters from BPF telling me I was behind with my payments (I am foolishly still paying and havent missed a payment yet). The payments I apparently 'missed' were....... oh, the three months whilst my account was on hold!!!!!!! So I rang them up to be told I had perfect payments and that all was fine and it was another letter sent out by mistake. No apology though, no recognition that they are once again being foolish and that they cant keep up with their own decisions or track of whats what. Its beyond ridiculous. Meh.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Today I received 2 identical letters from BPF telling me I was behind with my payments (I am foolishly still paying and havent missed a payment yet). The payments I apparently 'missed' were....... oh, the three months whilst my account was on hold!!!!!!! So I rang them up to be told I had perfect payments and that all was fine and it was another letter sent out by mistake. No apology though, no recognition that they are once again being foolish and that they cant keep up with their own decisions or track of whats what. Its beyond ridiculous. Meh.

 

I think they just assume every customer on the list is not paying them and they just send out letters its easier than checking the list..

 

Though I was thinking that maybe they have lost your paperworks and was just checking to see if you knew anything??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well..i too received three identical letters with nice table explaining arrears since march..to my surpeise they added £22 default charge for the cost of sending arrear letters:lol:..i received letter last month saying they clear up all arrears and now they are asking of double the amount. Amazed with their actions...feels like no one is there to stop their crucial business tactics:evil:.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If debt collectors phoned to you just say them that you not sure who is calling and you do not want to confirm your personal details with them.

 

Also tell them you will only speak to them when they have provided you with 'a deed of assignment' and a copy of the original lenders contract stating that the debt has been sold/passed over to a third party.Otherwise it could be anyone asking you for money.

Remember BPF have managed to let the entire Advent database enter into public domain.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got my decision from FOS today - a predictable B**t sorry but Barclays are wonderful in taking a quarter of a year to find you such an excellent trainer as Computeach....:-x

 

I'll appeal it, just so it's on record. Can't say I'm surprised at such a toothless organisation!

 

Scanner's not working, otherwise I'd post it up for a laugh!:evil:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

 

I was in this Forum about 5-6 months ago and I was desparate to figure out what is the best course of actions and what is not. I didn't waste my time and I joined with new IT Training established since 1960s in Midland which I found they were extremely helpful and excellent training provider. I have already passed two exams and I am back in the track with no fear, stress or dolldrums. I blame both Advent and Barclays Partner Finance in getting thousand of students in the mess like most of you and their case handling is the worst in the history of such a professional business entprenuers. Also I have started paying gradually my loan and back in track but Customer Communication Manger is still sending me harrassing letter in missing payment ie. ''This Arrears Notice is given in compliance with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 because you are behind with your repayments''. I rang BPF and asked them why they are threatening me then they started saying ''Sorry for any inconvenience and it was a mistake''. Some people in some companies are crooks and they are stupid as far as it could go. I suggest better NOT TO WASTE TIME AND CRACK ON WITH WHAT YOU HAVE HOPED FOR OR AT LEAST LEAVE IT BEHIND IF YOU CAN. Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

FUZZBUTT ANNOUNCEMENT:

Regarding the best thing we can do in the background while negotiations are going on between Hausfeld and BPF, our lawyer suggests everyone write to your MP and include for background information a copy of Hausfeld's letter and Hogan Lovell's reply.

Let's all make an effort please to do this as suggested (if you haven't already). It will take 10 mins of your time!

The letters can be downloaded from my website and copied. I'll post later today a template letter there for those not confident in writing their own. You can find your MP here http://findyourmp.parliament.uk/

Link to post
Share on other sites

FUZZBUTT ANNOUNCEMENT:

Regarding the best thing we can do in the background while negotiations are going on between Hausfeld and BPF, our lawyer suggests everyone write to your MP and include for background information a copy of Hausfeld's letter and Hogan Lovell's reply.

Let's all make an effort please to do this as suggested (if you haven't already). It will take 10 mins of your time!

The letters can be downloaded from my website and copied. I'll post later today a template letter there for those not confident in writing their own. You can find your MP here http://findyourmp.parliament.uk/

 

Thanks for the link Fuzzbutt.

And a template letter would be great.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just posted template letter - PLEASE all do this! MPs have to ask questions in Parliament, especially if MPs around the country are getting bombarded by similar complaints from their constituents - they WILL take note and ask for answers from BPF.

I work in a Central Government planing dept and get many inquiries from MPs daily, asking for advice and information in response from letters they've received from individuals in their constituency about planning issues.

It's all too easy to be cynical about MPs these days but they do follow it up. My own MP has been great and really on the ball.

 

Nothing to lose and it will cost you nothing but time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey y'all. Hope everyone's coping. I've not been on for a wee while, been having computer probs..booo. Anyway I thought I'd give a wee update on my situation.

 

It has now been over 30 days since I spoke to Carl at BPF who acknowldeged the letter that they had received a few weeks before. He apologised on behalf of the customer relations team who were dealing with my letter and froze my account for 30 days until they investigate and told me I would hear from them within a couple of weeks....that was a month ago and I have had zero response, by phone or letter. Then there was The One Show....unbelievable the cheek of Barclays.

 

Fuzzbutt, I believe you said something about evidence in regards to Barclays response i.e the fact they supposedly froze everyones account for three months. This morning I got my yearly statement through, which created some mixed emotions shall we say, similtaneous rage and hysterical laughter ensued

I had to call them in february after the first letter, where they told us that advent had gone under and that they wanted us to keep paying, that was when they put my account on hold AT MY REQUEST. (I have mislaid this letter but I am on the hunt, I'm not sure if I sent that to Ingrid or not). In my statement there is a payment at the end of february, did they not say in The One Show that they put everyones account on hold in January automatically? mmm.

Should I send this to Ingrid?

 

cheers

G

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi fuzz just sent my MP a letter using your template thanks for the help i sent it along with hausfelds letters and hogan lovells reply via e-mail , do you think ishould send a paper copy aswell?

Once again thanks for all your help i dont think we could do this with out you:wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had to call them in february after the first letter, where they told us that advent had gone under and that they wanted us to keep paying, that was when they put my account on hold AT MY REQUEST. (I have mislaid this letter but I am on the hunt, I'm not sure if I sent that to Ingrid or not). In my statement there is a payment at the end of february, did they not say in The One Show that they put everyones account on hold in January automatically? mmm.

Should I send this to Ingrid?

 

cheers

G

 

Yes please. She has quite a few statements and so on now but the more evidence she has the better, illustrating what a lie Barclays statement was about freezing accounts. Her details are on my website.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm getting seriously worried over this guarantor issue

 

I signed up for the course but it was my fiance who signed for the loan.

Im sure the contract she signed specifically states advent on it doesnt the prove it was a loan for training?

 

As for the miss-selling point we cannot prove it but the guy who sold us the course kept saying it was study at your own pace and take as long as you want but I dont have anything written down.

As for the end date on the contract he said that was left blank because there wasnt one.

 

We are curruntly paying £200 a month that we just cannot afford.

If it the loan was just cancelled we would be happy. but a part of me says the way barclays has treated us that we should be entitled to a full refund.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone, just poking my head in (at 3am), I've been registered for some time with Hausfield etc. I am currently composing a letter to Barclays to try and get Mercers off my back and see if they will suspend my acc untill Hausfield and Hogans come to an aggreement either in or out of court. Will let you know how it goes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

it dont look like anyone will be getting anything back he administraters are charging 15000.00 for their help £390.00 an hour for a partner. Any ideas anyone

 

Unfortunately if you are unsecured creditor with Advent there is no chance you will money back.

 

The administrators have already stated that all assets that could be realised have been.

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3936 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...