Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi BankFodder, Thanks for the reply.  I will take your advice and read through more thoroughly. To answer your question, the value of the laptop is £255.  When filling in the online form to prepare the shipment it asked what the contents of the parcel was and the value and I specified "laptop" and "£255". Thanks.
    • Before you start this claim you need to have a lot more confidence in what you're doing which means that you need to understand the way forward in the principles involved more thoroughly. We will help you and you will probably get your money back but this is a self empowerment forum and so you have to do your bit as well. Please will you spend at least the next couple of days reading through the stories on this sub- forum. Try to understand them thoroughly. We have lots of stories very similar to yours but even those which are not similar, have principles in them which apply. In particular you need to read and understand the information in the pinned topics at the top of the sub- forum. I know that you have been reading around here for the past couple of hours but it needs a lot more. You aren't in a huge hurry. Wait a few days before sending a letter of claim and also that needs some amendment as well. Come back here when you've done your reading and then we will have a look at your letter of claim and help you to refine it Also, please tell us the value of the laptop. Was it properly declared as a laptop – and was the value properly declared
    • Unsure what would be classed as appeal I first contacted the applicant then IAS. I am not aware I could appeal again as Bank state I was informed that is news to me. I would have to look through the paper work, I apologise I forget so much due to my caring duties wish I had quality time to get so much done. Will try and look tomorrow, appreciate everyone's time and input.
    • Regular savings accounts are accounts designed for savers who put money aside every month and reward them with a generous interest rate.View the full article
    • Hi, I've been reading the invaluable advice on this forum and reading about the problems with Evri and lost delivery of items.  From what I gather the initial steps after having exhausted every's own lost item claim process is to draft a Letter of Claim, I think it is called and to register with the government Money Claims.  I have got a login for Money Claims and have made an initial stab at the letter but I'm not certain I have got it right. Am I right to assume that having exhausted Evri customer service's claims process and having received the denial of any compensation because the laptop I was sending is on the non-compensatory list that my next step would be to send the Letter of Claim to them? Let me provide some basic details which I hopefully have addressed in the letter. I purchased a laptop through Amazon.co.uk which a business in Belfast sold refurbished laptops through.  They had a 30 day money back guarantee for a full refund if you have any issues with the laptop.  I have the invoice from Amazon showing the purchase.  On 27 April, 2024 before the end of the 30 day period I used their ParcelShop (inside a Tesco) to send the laptop back and have the tracking reference mentioned in the letter.  As mentioned in the letter there was they advised they could not give me or sell me any insurance because laptops are on the non-compensatory list so I just paid the normal delivery cost.  It was scanned as leaving the ParcelShop on 29 April and the tracking has been like that ever since.  After a 28 working day Evri claim process they gave the expected response that they could not provide any compensation and simply could not proceed with my claim. I was hoping to get some advice on whether I go ahead now and email this to Customer Services straightaway and should I send a hard-copy to the Evri address as well?  Or are there any steps I have missed out on first?  I believe 14 days is the reasonable period of time for them to respond so if I were to send it tomorrow, for example 12 June then I should expect a reply by 26 June, is that correct and fair?  And assuming they don't reply with a full refund then I would then go down the government Money Claims site to proceed with that? Sorry for all the questions, I want to make sure I go about it properly.  I'll continue to read through other cases on here so I can get an even better handle on the process. I attached a LOC, happy for any edits or updates that will make it even better. Thanks so much for anyone's help! Regards, Matt Evri letter of claim.docx
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Advent Computer Training (Barclays Partner Finance)Info and discussion thread


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3935 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Can those of you who want to take legal action with CAG assistance, please identify yourselves :D

 

Those of you who have made complaints to Trading Standards/OFT/Consumer Direct, can you let us know what responses you received.

 

If any of you have received communication from DCAs, can you let us know.

 

Thanks :)

yes i would like legal action with gag assistance pls

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 5.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Lewis

Click the red triangle report button under your username on your post and give a outline of your situation to the site team.

Thanks if you've had any demands for payment or yet to begin paying post an outline of that on Advent/Barclays Partner Finance/hitachi+payment demands

thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can those of you who want to take legal action with CAG assistance, please identify yourselves :D

 

Those of you who have made complaints to Trading Standards/OFT/Consumer Direct, can you let us know what responses you received.

 

If any of you have received communication from DCAs, can you let us know.

 

Thanks :)

 

hi i would like help with legal action from CAG please.

 

great job guys. heads up :smile:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone, I know this has been mentioned before and I was a bit sceptical before I looked into it, but you may be able to get your legal costs covered by your existing insurance policies. e.g. my home insurance covers me for "Family Legal Protection" and this doesn't just cover home issues. It states, "This section covers legal expenses", "You can ring the helpline to discuss any private legal problem". I'd recommend everyone check to see if you can get legal fees covered in similar insurance policies whether they're your own policies or a family member.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks-more reports acknowledged.

List is building steadily so please be patient.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

Been following this thread now for a while. I'm an Advent mcse student also.

My situation is a little different to most of the post here tho. I don't owe BFP anything as i paid the full amount up 2 days before the £4750 became £9500ish…But, i ain't had anything like my money's worth as yet. I was lead to believe by the slick Advent salesman that there was NO time limit on studying. So, when family issues hit me, i put studying on the back burner. The time factor was the main reason i chose Advent.

I've had the template letter from BPF about CPT becoming the new provider. I've also had a reply from BPF in response to the complaint i sent to them about being in breech of CCa1974, and having no right to saddle me with a training supplier that i have already dismissed as unsuitable. They say that they are conducting an 'investigation' into my complaint. I don't hold out much hope tho.

I found some information at the OFT that may be useful, it relates to Consumer Credit Act 2006.

 

The unfair relationships provisions

Section 140A of the 1974 Act (as amended) provides that a court may determine that the relationship between a lender and a borrower arising out of a credit agreement (or the agreement taken with any related agreement) is unfair to the borrower because of:

any of the terms of the credit agreement or a related agreement

the way in which the lender has exercised or enforced its rights under the credit agreement or a related agreement, or

any other thing done (or not done) by or on behalf of the lender either before or after the making of the credit agreement or a related agreement.

The courts have a wide range of powers where a credit relationship is found to be unfair, including:

altering the terms of the credit agreement or a related agreement

reducing the amount payable by the borrower

requiring the lender to refund money to the borrower

removing any duty placed on the borrower under the agreement, and

imposing requirements on the lender or an associate.

In addition, where unfair relationships harm the collective interests of consumers, the OFT and other enforcers (including local authority trading standards services) can take enforcement action under Part 8 of the Enterprise Act 2002.

I thought that the statement about, 'the way in which the lender has exercised or enforced its rights under the credit agreement or a related agreement', stood out.

Maybe the CAG team may know if this act could be of help.

 

Unfair relationships - The Office of Fair Trading

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

Been following this thread now for a while. I'm an Advent mcse student also.

My situation is a little different to most of the post here tho. I don't owe BFP anything as i paid the full amount up 2 days before the £4750 became £9500ish…But, i ain't had anything like my money's worth as yet. I was lead to believe by the slick Advent salesman that there was NO time limit on studying. So, when family issues hit me, i put studying on the back burner. The time factor was the main reason i chose Advent.

I've had the template letter from BPF about CPT becoming the new provider. I've also had a reply from BPF in response to the complaint i sent to them about being in breech of CCa1974, and having no right to saddle me with a training supplier that i have already dismissed as unsuitable. They say that they are conducting an 'investigation' into my complaint. I don't hold out much hope tho.

I found some information at the OFT that may be useful, it relates to Consumer Credit Act 2006.

 

The unfair relationships provisions

Section 140A of the 1974 Act (as amended) provides that a court may determine that the relationship between a lender and a borrower arising out of a credit agreement (or the agreement taken with any related agreement) is unfair to the borrower because of:

any of the terms of the credit agreement or a related agreement

the way in which the lender has exercised or enforced its rights under the credit agreement or a related agreement, or

any other thing done (or not done) by or on behalf of the lender either before or after the making of the credit agreement or a related agreement.

The courts have a wide range of powers where a credit relationship is found to be unfair, including:

altering the terms of the credit agreement or a related agreement

reducing the amount payable by the borrower

requiring the lender to refund money to the borrower

removing any duty placed on the borrower under the agreement, and

imposing requirements on the lender or an associate.

In addition, where unfair relationships harm the collective interests of consumers, the OFT and other enforcers (including local authority trading standards services) can take enforcement action under Part 8 of the Enterprise Act 2002.

I thought that the statement about, 'the way in which the lender has exercised or enforced its rights under the credit agreement or a related agreement', stood out.

Maybe the CAG team may know if this act could be of help.

 

Unfair relationships - The Office of Fair Trading

 

i too was told i had no time limit on the course i signed up 2 years ago paid £1,800 up to now and still owe about £4,500 and i also had to put studying on a back burner due to unforeseen family issues the only reason i went with advent is because the sales guy told me i could do this at my own pace and with no time limit so if computeach are putting a time limit on our contracts this is not like for like and i think we good grounds for breach of contract and mis-selling as we most of us was told there was no time limit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys, I've been following this thread for a while (I'm finally caught up). It's been great to see I'm not alone in all this.

 

I started the MSCE + CCNA course in August last year. As I am unemployed, my friend signed the BPF credit agreement for me. When All this happened in January I phoned CAB, but they said as my friend was on the credit agreement, they needed to speak with him. Unfortunately he's been away with work, so I've been having to sit on my hands waiting (not a pleasant time for me).

 

My repayment is due in August, before the crazy interest kicks in, I don't want to do anything that would jeopardize my friend (or his credit rating). However, he is back form work now and so I am in a position to start fighting BPF and their attempts to force CT on me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there a standard letter for the FOS?

 

I have the forms from the website and 4 pages of complaints (I had an open grievence with Advent prior to them going out of business)

 

I dont want it to be too long winded.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bluedo,

Could you please post a template letter that I should send to FOS? My situation is similar to yours: BPF, 5000k, bla bla....hate this situation!!! :evil:

 

Thank you

 

 

I would appreciate this also. Today I have sent a CCA request letter to both Marehill Finance and BPF requesting a copy of my credit agreement. In the hope that maybe they won't be able to provide it and I get a quick exit out of this mess.

 

Once they have provided the documents requested, I am then going to send a letter to the FOS, and OFT, and also my local MP who may wish to side with myself against these jokers.

 

Also I sent a dispute letter to BPF around 4 weeks ago and have heard nothing from them? Not even a letter to confirm they have logged my complaint? Is this anything I could use against them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello to all! I've just signed up today & im in the same boat with BPF. I've made quite a few payments already. My account is currently on hold & I've recieved the letter stating my account is in arrears. I'm also not happy with CT taking over the training.

 

Thanks for all the info in this thread, its been very helpful & im looking forward to seeing how this all turns out!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a bit of clarification needed!

 

I rang the FO a couple of weeks ago, lodging my complaint! - They then sent me a complaints form that i needed to fill in, after the 8 weeks had expired, if BFP had not written to me with a satisfactory response (is this right or should i fill in the complaints form now?)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I am writing this again I cant see my post

I just got a letter from computeach telling me that they are now my training provider.

They give a website address to access my "records" and login and confirm my details and courses.

I think that they are fishing.. they only have our contact details and want us to tell them what we have been doing.

this is in my letter..

"here you will be able to confirm that the contact details we for you are correct, you will also be able to update your email and postal address as well as telephone numbers at this site.

By doing so, we will assume that you want to continue your training(and are happy for us to use your records as set out below)".

 

I will not be logging on and I do not wish to be trained by them.. and I do not wish barclays to give any money in my name to this company.. I would rather burn it.. it means the same thing to be "trained" by this company. :evil:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I am writing this again I cant see my post

I just got a letter from computeach telling me that they are now my training provider.

They give a website address to access my "records" and login and confirm my details and courses.

I think that they are fishing.. they only have our contact details and want us to tell them what we have been doing.

this is in my letter..

"here you will be able to confirm that the contact details we for you are correct, you will also be able to update your email and postal address as well as telephone numbers at this site.

By doing so, we will assume that you want to continue your training(and are happy for us to use your records as set out below)".

 

I will not be logging on and I do not wish to be trained by them.. and I do not wish barclays to give any money in my name to this company.. I would rather burn it.. it means the same thing to be "trained" by this company. :evil:

 

It's a joke mate..the whole thing is! - i havent had the letter yet but i've had the email. I just dont understand why we as students dont have a say on whats going on. It's like we're just being pawned off, we signed contracts with advent for our training, and bfp for the finance. Advent go bust, we dont get what we paid for, we get money back?! its simple?!?!?! But bfp are tight and dont want to give money back so they'll just pawn us off on computeach who are nothing like advent just to save cash. I think the computeach idea is clearly for people not fighting and just be told what to do, the people who fight (like us) will eventually get something!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another one for the CAG help list. For some reason Im having issues posting on here hence keeping this short coz its about the 5th time i've written something............

 

Edit: Its working. This is what I intended to write.........

 

Howdy. long time reader/first time poster etc. Am just adding my name to the list of the ****ed off and disenfranchised. Was an advent student doing the advanced database specialist course, paying via the BPF three year interest free direct debit thing.

As with everyone else, I have no intention of getting involved with Computeach and am looking to get on the CAG list of those looking for help.

Again i'd like to echo other people on here by saying thanks to the site crew and the few guys that have been working really hard trying to figure this stuff out.

Edited by DonnieB
Link to post
Share on other sites

Here here i just received my letter too as far as i am concerned it is junk mail. I will not pay barclays!!!!!!!!!!

 

I totally agree with you.

 

I've just got my letter too. It's pretty much the same as the email they sent. Although, they do seem keen to get me to log-in and "accept them" as my new training provider. Personally, I'd rather have Hannibal Lecter giving me cooking tips ;).

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3935 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...