Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • My understanding is that they won't provide the name to me whether the investigation is Live or Closed, & I have no legal rep as I didn't have P.I. Cover on my policy, & am intending to claim using OIC.org.uk, but remain completely stuck as they 100% cannot open a claim on the portal without both the Reg. No. & Name of the other driver.  
    • thanks again ftmdave, your words are verey encouraging and i do appreciate them. i have taken about 2 hours to think of a letter to write to the ceo...i will paste it below...also how would i address a ceo? do i just put his name? or put dear sir? do you think its ok?  i would appreciate feedback/input from anybody if anything needs to be added/taken away, removed if incorrect etc. i am writing it on behalf of my friend..she is the named driver  - im the one with the blue badge and owner of the car - just for clarification. thanks in adavance to everyone.       My friend and I are both disabled and have been a victim of disability discrimination on the part of your agents.   I have been incorrectly 'charged' by your agent 'excel parking' for overstaying in your car park, but there was no overstay. The letter I recieved said the duration of stay was 15 minutes but there is a 10 minute grace period and also 5 minutes consideration time, hence there was no duration of stay of 15 minutes.   I would like to take this oppertunity to clarify what happend at your Gravesend store. We are struggling finacially due to the 'cost of living crisis' and not being able to work because we are both disabled, we was attracted to your store for the 10 items for £10 offer. I suffer dyslexia and depression and my friend who I take shopping has a mobility disability. We went to buy some shopping at your Gravesend branch of Iceland on 28th of December 2023, we entered your car park, tried to read and understand the parking signs and realised we had to pay for parking. We then realised we didnt have any change for the parking machine so went back to look for coins in the car and when we couldnt find any we left. As my friend has mobility issues it takes some time for me to help him out of the car, as you probably understand this takes more time than it would a normal able bodied person. As I suffer dyslexia I am sure you'll agree that it took me more time than a normal person to read and understand the large amount of information at the pay & display machine. After this, it took more time than an able bodied person to leave the car park especially as I have to help my friend on his crutches etc get back into the car due to his mobility disability. All this took us 15 minutes.   I was the driver of my friends car and he has a blue badge. He then received a 'notice to keeper' for a 'failure to purchase a parking tariff'. On the letter it asked to name the driver if you wasnt the driver at the time, so as he wasnt the driver he named me. I appealed the charge and told them we are disabled and explained the situation as above. The appeal was denied, and even more so was totally ignored regarding our disabilities and that we take longer than an able bodied person to access the car and read the signs and understand them. As our disabilities were ignored and disregarded for the time taken I believe this is discrimination against us. I cannot afford any unfair charges of this kind as I am severely struggling financially. I cannot work and am a carer for my disabled Son who also has a mental and mobility disability. I obviously do not have any disposable income and am in debt with my bills. So its an absolute impossibility for me to pay this incorrect charge.     After being discriminated by your agent my friend decided to contact 'iceland customer care team' on my behalf and again explained the situation and also sent photos of his disabled blue badge and proof of disability. He asked the care team to cancel the charge as ultimately its Iceland's land/property and you have the power over excel parking to cancel it. Again we was met with no mention or consideration for our disability and no direct response regarding the cancellation, all we was told was to contact excel parking. He has replied over 20 times to try to get the 'care team' to understand and cancel this but its pointless as we are just ignored every time. I believe that Ignoring our disability is discrimination which is why I am now contacting you.     I have noticed on your website that you are 'acting' to ease the 'cost of living crisis' : https://about.iceland.co.uk/2022/04/05/iceland-acts-to-ease-the-cost-of-living-crisis/   If you really are commited to helping people in this time of crisis ..and especially two struggling disabled people, can you please cancel this charge as it will only cause more damage to our mental health if you do not.  
    • I've also been in touch via the online portal to the Police's GDPR team, to request the name of the other Driver. Got this response:   Dear Mr. ---------   Our Ref: ----------   Thank you for your request which has been forwarded to the Data Protection Team for consideration.   The data you are requesting is third party, we would not give this information directly to you.   Your solicitor or legal team acting on our behalf would approach us directly with your signed (wet) consent allowing us to consider the request further.   I note the investigation is showing as ‘live’ at this time, we would not considered sharing data for suggested injury until the investigation has been closed.   If you wish to pursue a claim once the investigation has been closed please signpost your legal team to [email protected]   Kind regards   ----------------- Data Protection Assistant    
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • Hi everyone, Apologies for bringing up the same topic regarding these individuals. I wish I had found this forum earlier, as I've seen very similar cases. However, I need your help in figuring out what to do next because we've involved our partners/resellers. I work as an IT Manager in a company outside of the UK. We acquired a license from a certified reseller (along with a support agreement) and also obtained training sessions from them. The issue arose when we needed to register two people for the training sessions, so we used an external laptop for the second user to keep up with the sessions for only a month. During this period, the laptop was solely used for the training sessions. After two weeks, my boss forwarded an email to me from Ms Vinces, stating that we are using illicit software from SolidWorks. Since this has never happened to me or anyone we know, I went into panic mode and had a meeting with her. During the meeting, we explained that we were using an external laptop solely for the training sessions and that the laptop had not been used within the company since her email. She informed us that for such cases, there are demos and special licenses (though our reseller did not mention these types of licenses when we made our initial purchase). She then mentioned that we had utilized products worth approximately €25k and presented us with two options: either pay the agreed value or acquire SolidWorks products. We expressed that the cost was too high, and our business couldn't support such expenses. I assured her that we would discuss the matter with the company board and get back to her. After the meeting, we contacted the company reseller from whom we purchased the license, explained the situation, and mentioned the use of an external laptop. They said they would speak to Maria and help mediate the situation. We hoped to significantly reduce the cost, perhaps to that of a 1-year professional license. Unfortunately, we were mistaken. The reseller mediated a value €2k less than what Maria had suggested (essentially, we would need to acquire two professional lifetime licenses and two years of support for a total of €23k). This amount is still beyond our means, but they insisted that the price was non-negotiable and wouldn't be reduced any further. The entire situation feels odd because she never provided us with addresses or other evidence (which I should have requested), and she's pressuring us to resolve the matter by the end of the month, with payment to be made through the reseller. This makes me feel as though the reseller is taking advantage of the situation to profit from it. Currently, we're trying to buy some time. We plan to meet with the reseller next week but are uncertain about how to proceed with them or whether we should respond to the mediator.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help! Apparently I'm not entitled to JSA!


NH123
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5229 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello

 

I graduated in July, and have been living in a house with 5 other people since. In November I applied for JSA and housing benefit, only to be told that I'm not entitled to anything because of my living arrangements. This is the situation:

 

My girlfriend lives with us in the house. She makes over the £100 a week threshold that prevents a 'partner' from claiming JSA.

 

This is ridiculous; she has her own room, pays her own rent (the same amount as the other 5 of us) in a 6 bed flat. We do not share any money and she in no way supports me, and even if she wanted to she can barely afford rent as is it.

 

In terms of money or bills or everything else she is exactly the same as my 4 other house mates. She just happens to be my girlfriend. It's not like we're married or anything.

 

I'm so annoyed about this... Does anyone have any advice that can help before I lose my mind!?

Link to post
Share on other sites

did you tell them she is your girlfreind if not or go back tell them you are not boyfreind girlfreind ...erika may be on later she can advise but you will need to put more information on here like did you inform them you were a couple ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

When I was giving information for the claim over the phone I mentioned that she was my girlfriend; I don't want to lie about anything! I had no idea that it would mess everything up so badly.

 

I was actually later told that I didn't need to supply any of the information about my other housemates at the time, which is annoying because that was when I mentioned that she was my girlfriend. It did seem a bit weird going through 4 other people and their incomes etc when they have nothing to do with me except sharing the same roof.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry Patrick but I would not in any manner encourage this gent to lie about his situation, that's fraudulent no matter which way it's looked at, and as you know CAG cannot promote this.

 

NH123; being your girlfriend does not in itself constitute a partnership because you live in the same house. You must be living in the same household. When considering if a couple are LTAHAW (living together as husband and wife) they must take a whole range of factors into account in looking at your relationship, including the fact that within the house you and your girlfriend have seperate accomodations. They need to consider whether you are LTAHAW rather than just assuming you are because you are in a relationship with her; each LTAHAW case if disputed, must be looked at on its own merits.

 

Have you applied and had a letter informing you of the decision or did they just tell you that you would not qualify and end the application process?

 

This guide contains the considerations of LTAHAW

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think my application was formally declined; I was just advised by a chap at the job centre that I would not get anything, and left it at that. I imagine this means that I can still pursue the same application, have it formally declined and then appeal? It would be great if I could just talk to them before it gets declined. I don't want to have to apply again because I'll lose the back payments.

 

Thanks to everyone for being so helpful!

 

I am able to get a copy of our tenancy agreement that shows each of the 6 of us named on the lease. I could also get bank statements from each of us showing the same amount of rent being paid for a month...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right. It doesn't sounds as if you have "duly made" a claim in that case. It isn't the jobcentre which decide this and he should NOT have told you that. What he should have said, is that she may be classified as a partner and that it could disentitle you, but he should not have told you "you won't get it" - this is NOT his decision to make, and they are not allowed to tell people that they won't get anything. Only the Decision Maker in the processing centre can do that with all of the supporting information in front of them. What you can do is ask for a backdate on the basis that you believe you were given incorrect information. No-one here can say whether you would be classified as LTAHAW as your situation is not so straightforward, and this is a case which must be looked at by a decision maker and decided on the facts. You believe you should be able to claim as a single man, so:

 

Call this number 0800 055 6688. It's free from landlines, and it's free from the following mobile providers:

 

From 25th January it will also be free from T-Mobile and Virgin Mobile. That number is the JSA claim line, open mon to fri 8am to 6pm. This is how you make your claim. They will ask if you have a partner. Tell them that you have a girlfriend whom lives in the same property but you do not accept that you are partners. If they ask you to explain why, go ahead and explain. Then tell the advisor of what happened at the Jobcentre. That you believe that you can claim as a single person and feel you were given the wrong advice and thus want to request a backdate. No matter how they try to put you off, make it clear you wish to proceed with the application. Because you must apply and formally receive a refusal before you can appeal. If the application is withdrawn, cancelled or defective a formal decision will not be issued and there is no recourse of appeal.

 

I am not in any manner suggesting you will be accepted as a single man - I'm not in a position to judge this one. But this is the route you must take if you believe you are entitled. The decision maker will look at your claim and decide whether you and your girlfriend are LTAHAW. If they decide that you are (and you are only eligible for income based JSA) you will receive a letter advising you that your household income is above the threshold, and you can appeal this within one month. If they decide you are not, they will award the benefit but will remind you of your duty to inform them if your relationship develops into a partnership.

 

You should tell them about your girlfriend, because if you do not and they later decide you have been commiting fraud, their case will be made all the more stronger by the fact that you did not declare your situation, and it may well be noted that the Jobcentre advised you she was a "partner" which would go against you as it would look very much like you set out to defraud them by changing your "story". Declare her but make it absolutley clear that you do not accept that she is a "partner" and give your reasons.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

following on from Erika's good advice I would just say that you should state you live in a multiple occupancy and when you send in any supporting documents send in the copy of tenancy agreement. Don't worry about the bank statements until such time as they ask for them. Also do not allow them to put your girlfriend on the claim as your partner as that will immediately disallow you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with Erika's advice with the addition that the mandatory text that you should be read out by the telephony staff will run along the following lines:

 

Do you have a partner?* We use partner to mean a person you are married to, a civil partner of or living together as if you are married to them or a civil partner of them. They also need to be:

 

Aged 16 or over

A member of the same household

Temporarily not living at the address

What often happens is that people interrupt at the point where I put an asterisk with their answer. As tempting as it is for you to start your explanation at that point I would wait until the end of the definition and then explain the circumstances. The staff member will then know that you have heard the full government definition of the term "partner" and supported by your experience so far are making an informed statement that you do not have one.

 

By the way can you recall what you answered to the above question over the phone when you first made the claim?

Edited by privatehudson
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the sound advice everybody!

 

When I first made the claim I answered 'no' to the do you live with a partner.... bit, but when giving the information about everyone else I lived with, i happened to mention that one of them was my girlfriend (becuase I knew some of her details), and the person at the end of the phone told me that I had to restart the claim and say 'yes' to the partner bit. I didn't foresee the problems unfortunately; especially as he pretty much answered that part for me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the sound advice everybody!

 

When I first made the claim I answered 'no' to the do you live with a partner.... bit, but when giving the information about everyone else I lived with, i happened to mention that one of them was my girlfriend (becuase I knew some of her details), and the person at the end of the phone told me that I had to restart the claim and say 'yes' to the partner bit. I didn't foresee the problems unfortunately; especially as he pretty much answered that part for me.

 

Hmm.

 

Well frankly the problem lies more with the person who insisted on you restarting your claim than the person in the job centre. The advisor in the jobcentre has received what is to all intents and purposes a claim from a couple which involves taking into account the couple's income and circumstances. Whilst they could have checked your circumstances and been able to inform you of much that Erika has said the problem lies with the person who took the call over the phone.

 

They should (at the point you mentioned your girlfriend) have gone back over with you the definition of partner and given you the opportunity to re-asses your original answer. They should only have rebuilt the claim if you decided to change your original answer. The role of the people who take the claims over the phone is to provide the questions and definitions and then enter the answers you give. It is not their job or responsibility to tell you what the answer should be.

 

Be firm and polite when you call the 08000 number, the person you speak to may have their own ideas of what your answer should be but it is your claim and your decision what answer to give to each question. Make sure though that you allow the advisor to finish giving the full text of each question.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think my application was formally declined; I was just advised by a chap at the job centre that I would not get anything, and left it at that.

 

When I first made the claim I answered 'no' to the do you live with a partner.... bit, but when giving the information about everyone else I lived with, i happened to mention that one of them was my girlfriend (becuase I knew some of her details), and the person at the end of the phone told me that I had to restart the claim and say 'yes' to the partner bit. I didn't foresee the problems unfortunately; especially as he pretty much answered that part for me.

 

 

Sorry, can you clarify whether you were told this at the Jobcentre, or on the claim line? (the telephone number I gave in my last post).

 

If on the claim line, did you then re-claim, declaring your girlfriend as a partner, or was it how you first described, was it a call to the Jobcentre rather than the claim line and you were told you wouldn't get anything?

 

It's hard to advise unless this part is made clear; we need to establish whether the claim has actually been made and a decision formally been made or not.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I called the claim line to start a claim, went through everything then had to have that claim scrapped and a new one started because of me mentioning my girlfriend. This was on the phone.

 

I was then given a meeting time at the job centre that I attended and was told that I would not receive anything, so there was no point pursuing the claim. As far as I am aware, I was not told this by the person who makes these decisions, i believe he was merely going over my claim before it was moved further along the chain. I have never had a letter of rejection or anything that would show that this was an official denial.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right. As I thought. That isn't on. I'd ring tomorrow and find out if your claim has been withdrawn or cancelled - it shouldn't have been unless you agreed to that. If it has been, you will need to claim afresh, to get a decision and then appeal if it is not in your favour.

 

If this claim is still active, ask for a note to be place on system that you want it made clear that you do not accept your girlfriend is a partner. They may want to arrange a LTAHAW interview. If this claim is still active, wait for a decision to be issued, you can appeal that decision once it comes through if not in your favour.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you do now claim and are succesful, your benefit should be backdated to the day you first contacted them. This is because they have no power to refuse to make a decision on the claim.

 

A recent Court of Appeal case has held that just making contact will initiate a claim as long as all necessary information is eventually supplied.

Post by me are intended as a discussion of the issues involved, as these are of general interest to me and others on the forum. Although it is hoped such discussion will be of use to readers, before exposing yourself to risk of loss you should not rely on any principles discussed without confirming the situation with a qualified person.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...