Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • A never ending torrent of **it Outrage as ‘tidal wave’ of sewage floods historic market town’s unique chalk river WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Exclusive: Water firm pumps sewage into river Misbourne, Amersham on 21 ‘dry days’ during nearly five month period  
    • Worth noting that all of these firms - either the alleged EIS investment, the rebate company themselves or the payee were all registered to the same address. Clavering House is 3 miles away from HMRC Benton Park view offices.   Wardrop - unfortunately unsuccessful due to late appeal - assessments opened by HMRC in March 2019. Scammed by Richard Hall (Capital allowances consultants ltd - Clavering House) investments into Cryoblast Limited 15/16 (Paul Huggins - Clavering House) and Eco Cooling solutions 16/17 (Anthony Fitches - Clavering House).    Mccuminsky - scammed by Capital Allowances after providing his details to Stefan Brown Alpha Tax Consultants (Clavering House) payment made to Eco Cooling Solutions.    Robson - scammed by Capital Allowances - 15/16 paid to Cryoblast 16/17 paid to Eco Cooling.    Myself - scammed by Allan Maxwell - MaxTax (other business Maxwell electronics) registered to Clavering House.   Cryoblast Solutions and Fast Tax - Alan O’Hara    Please note there are two Cryoblasts involved - Cryoblast limited (Paul Huggins and Clavering House) and Cryoblast Solutions Limited (Alan O’Hara also director of Fast Tax).    My return simply said “Cryoblast” another thing that should have been clarified as part of HMRC guidelines before paying out the claim.    Cryoblast limited was already suspected to be involved in fraudulent claims before my investment as Huntly had open assessments issued in November 2018.    Cryoblast Solutions, the same company director as Fast Tax where my money was sent was dissolved before my claims were submitted. 
    • On the d-day issue, * we know sunaks shameful self-interest preferring a hope at using lies for self-promotion over honoring our heroes, * we know Starmer demonstrated his statesmanship with other statesmen and women,  ** BUT where was Farage? Was he in a pub looking for self-promotion? .. Surely as a wannabe statesman - he should have spent a bit of his (someone elses?) cash attending the ceremonies? or wasn't he offered a seat near enough the front to interest him?   mind you .. "I said I wanted my county back. Well now I want my life back ... I am not a career politician... I won't be changing my mind again, I promise you" - Nigel Farage, stepping down from public life. 5 July 2016  
    • dont need them.   let the defendant play the terms game
    • I am reading the thread now and think although its probably very similar to my predicament,  I have no way of obtaining the terms anymore due to MyParcelDelivery having being dissolved and their website not being active now. I have nothing to quote from and they didn't send me a copy at the time of order, the website that I believe they reinvented themselves as P4D has terms I am looking at now but however similar they may be I wont be able to quote from them in this case. Thanks 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

dlc trying to get a Charging Order


00765
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5227 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Morning everyone,

 

I'd be grateful if someone could please ahve a read thru the letter below which i have drafted to go to Aplins & let me know if it's OK. Thanks

 

 

'Dear Sirs

 

Further to your correspondence, I can confirm that I have already communicated to dlc requesting for proof of my liability for the alleged debt in question.

Please find attached a copy of my correspondence to dlc.

I would be grateful if you would please ask your clients to supply the information requested within 7 days.

Yours faithfully,'

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anything you send to Hillsden/DLC must be sent by recorded delivery and keep a copy of the letter together with your proof of posting. They are notorious for ignoring letters and going straight for CCJ's. You'll need to keep your eye on the ball with them, they don't play straight !!

 

 

thats interesting to know, they "haven't received" my 2 CCA requests or 2 letters of dispute, despite me having four signatures saying they have :|

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rmember to send by recorded delivery and keep a copy of the letter.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can anyone please tell me what i do if dlc do NOT respond to my 'prove it' letter? Thanks

 

There is no need to do anything, the "prove it" letter is putting the alleged debt into dispute. If they were to try it on in court, then you have an absolute defence right there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi all,

I received a letter from Hillesden Securities yesterday 12 February 2010 which said as follows

"Thank you for your letter dated 6 January 2010 regarding the above account. I apologise for the delay in responding.

I can confirm that the above account relates to a loan taken out on 7 May 2004 with the Finance.

This account defaulted on 30 April 2007 & was passed to ourselves for collection in December 2009. There remains an outstanding balance on this account of £11963.92.

We are happy that the information provided by the original lender is correct & currently we have no reason to believe there are any errors in the data we hold. however should you have concerns regarding the validity of the account please provide full details along with any documentation you have to support your claim.

I hope the above is of assistance to your enquiries and should you require any further information please contact our offices"

Should i reply & if so what do i say?

It's taken them over a month to respond to my 'proof it' letter. Does that make any difference and does their letter prove anything?

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

their letter proves absolutely nothing, and how the hell are you supposed to supply them with documentation!!! they are unbelievable, just because they say you owe it..then you owe it.. i should start sending letters like this out and see if anyone pays me...should be so lucky.. send them a letter requesting the cca, costs a pound. when it arrives post on here removing identifying names etc and people can check validity

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Cretins

 

Obviously my Legal Request was too difficult for your ill educated threat monkeys to comprhend so i will make it simple.

 

I have made a formal request for a copy of my properly executed Consumer Credit Agreement. You have failed to supply it.

 

Put even simpler

 

NO CCA = NO ENFORCEABLE AGREEMENT = NO COURT CASE

 

Therefore there is nothing you can do other than issue empty threats.

 

My advice to you is to stick with plucking chickens because as a DCA you are CRAP

 

yours etc

Link to post
Share on other sites

You do not need to send a CCA request, you have asked for proof that you owe the alleged debt, and they have failed to supply it. If you feel you must write back, you can send them the "in dispute" letter, though you'll need to modify it, as there is no timescale involved.

 

http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/571-failiure-to-provide-a-copy-of-the-agreement-within-the-prescribed-timescale

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's usually the name of the game, they make silly demands and you ignore, until they get fed up and go away. They generally do after a while.

 

But if you get fed up with the threatograms, then you can complain to Trading Standards and the OFT about them chasing a disputed alleged debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Huff&Puff.

 

Somehow i think that with £11,000+ at stake, they'll probably keep huffing & puffing for a while but since i have a load more debtors chasing to deal with, i'll just ignore them.

 

For now thanks to all of you for your advice. The consumeractiongroup is a real source of invaluable information & guidance for me, which continues to assist in containing my stress levels in my numerous battles with debt companies.

 

Thank you, each & all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Pinky69.

 

If a debt is deemed unenforceable how do u repair your credit?

 

Right now i'm trying to go gradually through all my debtors and whereever possible, i want to try & repair my currently completely ruined credit. Right now, i barely have a bank account because of all my debts ccjs defaults etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having defaults removed is not easy. You have to ask whoever entered the default to remove it on the grounds that 1) the default does not relate to an agreement in your name 2) you did not give them permission to process your data (usually given on an application form) 3) the default is inaccurate (the amount is wrong) 4) the agreement was rescinded (terminated without prior issue of a default notice) before the entries were made (rescission meaning all clauses pertaining to the processing of personal data are rescinded with the agreement). You send a copy of your request to the OC/DCA to the credit reference agencies as they have to investigate any dispute. If asking the OC/DCA to remove them doesn't work, you can then take your case to the Information Commissioner - and they take months to investigate. If that fails, you can ask a court to have them removed. I am now at the ICO stage - they have had 3 cases of mine since October - and I started requests to have them removed (3 cases) 10 months ago. Good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...