Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I've received this notice to keeper. I work for the NHS and was delayed due to patient care. I park here regular and and have never had any issues. I've looked at the evidence on the portal and other than showing that i entered at 12.59.33 and departed at 17:14:14 it doesn't state how long i overstayed for. I paid for 4 hours parking over the phone which i wont have done till i got parked but as its over the phone i have no receipt or record but it is not possible for me to have been in excess of 15mins from the photos alone but I'm unsure having read other threads whether grace periods are 10 or 15 minutes. I havent appealed yet but and was about to but in appealing i'm showing i'm the driver which i gather is something you state we must never do. I don't like confrontation but £60 seems extortionate. Hope you can help. 🤞   1 Date of the infringement 30th May 2024   2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 30th May 2024    [scan up BOTH SIDES as ONE PDF- follow the upload guide] please LEAVE IN LOCATION AND ALL DATES/TIMES/£'s   3 Date received 5th June 2024   4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] No reference to schedule 4 just says"...we the creditor reserve the right to recover unpaid parking charges from the registered keeper in accordance with POFA 2012."   5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes   6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No   Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up NA   7 Who is the parking company? Carpark securities   8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Northgate, Halifax Former Dews Car Park HX1 1XJ   For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. IAS   There are two official bodies, the BPA and the IAS. If you are unsure, please check HERE               Notice to Keeper.pdf
    • It never seems to amaze me how the chuckleheads think that No Stopping can ever offer a contract when it is prohibitory. In any case you did not accept the contract by entering the land, you entered the land to get to the airport for goodness sake. In most car parks there is a Consideration period that allows motorists to decide whether they want to stay in the car park . Here on a road, there is no consideration period and whether the motorist finds the terms agreeable or not even assuming that they are able to understand that they are being hoodwinked into believing they are being offered a  contract they cannot turn back. They have a plane to catch and even if they did turn back because they didn't accept the  No Stopping term of   the so called contract they would still have had to stop to turn around. Plus there is a question of Frustration of Contract. You had to stop at a pedestrian crossing .    
    • Just a couple paragraphs their WS that it might be useful to refer to specifically in the OP's WS... Para 6 A contract was formed with "the driver" of the vehicle. Para 8 "The driver" accepted the contract. (The "driver" is not named, or identified anywhere in the WS). Para 7 WHY would there ever be a "no stopping" restriction in a car park? (In Para 10, they specify that it is a "car park"). Para 11 "The Defendant" became liable." Again, they have not shown that the Defendant was "the driver", simply the keeper. Para 20 "It is a matter of agreement"? Not really sure what they're trying to say here...
    • Thank you for relying so quickly! That is what I had concluded was the reality of the situation.. I'm still waiting for the call within my time slot.. I will try to fill this thread with more info, find original letters and show the docs of the pack I was sent, a pack with no real covering letter to show what it was in response to or from whom..
    • at this point nothing else really matters. wait for the form to come back theres no need to talk about what's right/wrong if you don't even have PTA bundle directions
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Fighting A Charging Order MBNA/RESTONS after Redetermination


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5125 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Everyone,

 

I think I need to get my objections to the final charging order completed and sent tomorrow as we now have 1 week left before the final charging order hearing which shouldnt be happening as we have been granted the set aside hearing in August.........but my gut instinct is telling me to get something down on paper and send it just in case as we still havent heard of it being 'stayed'.

 

So, as the objector (remember the debt is my husband's) and the co owner of the house, is it ok to just write simply stating my reasons for the final charging order or are there any bits of law that I would need to quote? I'm going to go through my thread again and see what I can pick up from there but if there are any other pointers please that I can add then I would be most grateful, I have pretty much reached saturation point now :(

Huge thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 315
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Heres some stuff below cut & pasted from threads to use as you see fit...hope it gives some format for you to pad out/delete accordingley as all may not be relevant in your case. Hopefully others may contribute there thoughts for you too. Heres hoping you get the CO adjourned on the 24th. Good luck MDAW x

 

 

FOR THE ATTENTION OF THE COURT MANAGER

 

CLAIMANT vs YOURNAME

In the NAME County Court

Case No XXXXX

 

 

Court Address,

 

Date,

 

Your Address

 

 

Dear Sir Or Madam,

 

Please find attached a copy of my response to the application for a charging order. I have served a copy upon the claimant.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

XXX.

 

 

Response to application for a Charging Order

 

In X County Court CREDITOR (Applicant)

Between and YOUR NAME(Respondant)

 

 

I am giving notice that I object to the Charging order being made final and I intend to attend the hearing at the above date and court.

 

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIONS TO APPLICATION

1. I request that proceedings on the CO hearing should be stayed subject to the outcome of the set aside hearing on the xxxx

 

2. When I ran into severe financial difficulties I sought help from the National Debt line. I was advised to correspond with the Consumer Credit Counselling Service, (which I did) and a Debt Management Plan (DMP) was set up with all my creditors in XXX 2009. I have kept up all payments to date. Within the DMP I was paying MBNA £XXX per month.

After MBNA obtained a county court Judgement regarding my debt I was ordered to pay instalments of £20.00 per month which I have kept up to via Standing Order from my Bank Account.

 

According to a case called Mercantile Credit Co Ltd v Ellis in 1987, a charging order should only be made if the payments on a judgment are in arrears. Payments are being made according to the payment arrangement made between the parties to the debt.

 

3. MBNA are also aware that my Debt Management Plan, administered by the Consumer Credit Counselling Service has a number of Creditors;

Creditor

Name

 

Payment

 

This Month

Payments

To Date

Current

Balance

 

A charging order in favour of one creditor would give MBNA unfair priority over other my unsecured creditors.

As you can see I already have a payment arrangement in place with all my other creditors via the Consumer Credit Counselling Service. This would be upset by an order being made.

Furthermore I would like to draw your attention to the fact that all of the debts are larger??? than MBNA debt and all other creditors have frozen the interest amounts.

4. We have two young children, one aged and a second who is old. My family would suffer severe hardship if a charging order was to lead to the sale of our home. More so when the debt that MBNA are requesting a Charging Order for is in my name but I our home is owned jointly so it is not even my partner's debt.

 

Yours faithfully,

CAG NEEDS FUNDS PLEASE DONATE AS MUCH OR AS LITTLE WHERE POSSIBLE

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/paypal.php?go=donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, this is my first post so Hi everyone.

My father died in December at the age of 76 years of age. when my dad was about 73 years old Restons took him to Northampton County Court. I think he took out a variation order to get the court changed to a more local court, Watford, I think. Unfortunately, the day of the hearing it snowed and we couldn`t get there. Restons were granted a charging order in January 2007 under "the slip rule CPR 40.12" against my dad even though he was in a repayment plan with Payplan. They stated at court that he still had a mortgage which he didn`t. They were very underhand, in my opinion. My dad worked 3 days a week till his death of a heart attack - he couldn`t fight anymore. I would urge anyone to be very quick and fight to appeal against a charging order as quickly as possible.

My mother, now 76 years old herself, who knew nothing of this debt (it was in my dad`s name and he handled the finances in their marriage) now has to deal with the charging order on her property. The claimant was HFC bank, a "lovely" group of bankers and she now faces having to pay nearly £14,000 if she wants to sell her property and downsize. My father also left her with joint debts of about £40,000 (she knew nothing of these either). I think she may be able to come to some arrangement with her other creditors as she is in a repayment scheme. I don`t know whether HFC will drop the charging order. I have checked with the land registry and it`s still there. any advice on the charging order would be much appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Need tro start your own thread Kraig Welcome to Cag.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to hear you are going through similar Kraig, best start your own thread as Andy suggested then you can get all the advice you need. Good luck with it.

 

 

Ok, little update from us.....with only a handful of days to go until the final charging order hearing.......which shouldnt happen because we have the set aside granted for 3 months time........but we will still go because we havent heard from the court yet about it being stayed......I came home now to find a message on the answer machine from RESTONS!!!!!!! Please can you call us back.........errrrrr NO!!!! My husband specifically requested they dont phone many months ago and they put everything in writing.......

should we just ignore it?

Any advice? What could they possibly want?!!!!

 

Many thanks

 

p.s. the post just arrived, letter from the court , just one line to say that our letter has been referred to the district judge who has stated - REMAINS LISTED

 

Please what does this mean?

Edited by Northstar68
Link to post
Share on other sites

Northstar, have started my own thread. Just a quickie to say best of luck and I know what you`re going through, believe me. I feel extremely sorry for you and your young family - How do Restons sleep at night ? good luck anyway - I know you`ll be ok in the end. God bless. I`m thinking of you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

aww thx Kraig

 

anyway, this is what I got today from our friends at Restons!

 

 

Anyway, Restons have now written to say that 'IN LIGHT OF YOUR RECENT APPLICATION (SET ASIDE OBVIOUSLY) WE BELIEVE IT IS IN THE INTEREST OF BOTH PARTIES TO HAVE THE HEARING VACATED. THE COURT WOULD NOW BE IN A POSITION TO DEAL WITH THE FINAL CHARGING ORDER AND WILL MOST LIKELY ADJOURN THE MATTER. ATTENDANCE BY BOTH PARTIES WILL NOT ONLY BE A WASTE OF TIME BUT WILL RESULT IN UNNECESSARY COSTS BEING INCURRED.

IN THESE CRICUMSTANCES, THE BEST APPROACH WOULD BE TO REQUEST THAT THE ABOVE HEARING BE RELISTED FOR A DATE AFTER THE xxxx DATE. IN ORDER FOR THE COURT TO VACATE THE HEARING CONSENT FROM BOTH PARTIES IS REQUIRED. THEREFORE, IF YOU ARE IN AGREEMENT PLEASE CAN YOU SEND WRITTEN CONFIRMATION TO EITHER THE COURT OR US AS A MATTER OF URGENCY.

There's not time now.......plus what does REMAINS LISTED mean (previous post)

Huge thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

aww thx Kraig

 

anyway, this is what I got today from our friends at Restons!

 

 

Anyway, Restons have now written to say that 'IN LIGHT OF YOUR RECENT APPLICATION (SET ASIDE OBVIOUSLY) WE BELIEVE IT IS IN THE INTEREST OF BOTH PARTIES TO HAVE THE HEARING VACATED. THE COURT WOULD NOW BE IN A POSITION TO DEAL WITH THE FINAL CHARGING ORDER AND WILL MOST LIKELY ADJOURN THE MATTER. ATTENDANCE BY BOTH PARTIES WILL NOT ONLY BE A WASTE OF TIME BUT WILL RESULT IN UNNECESSARY COSTS BEING INCURRED.

IN THESE CRICUMSTANCES, THE BEST APPROACH WOULD BE TO REQUEST THAT THE ABOVE HEARING BE RELISTED FOR A DATE AFTER THE xxxx DATE. IN ORDER FOR THE COURT TO VACATE THE HEARING CONSENT FROM BOTH PARTIES IS REQUIRED. THEREFORE, IF YOU ARE IN AGREEMENT PLEASE CAN YOU SEND WRITTEN CONFIRMATION TO EITHER THE COURT OR US AS A MATTER OF URGENCY.

There's not time now.......plus what does REMAINS LISTED mean (previous post)

 

Huge thanks

 

 

 

What a poor letter, backside and elbow, who ever did this letter is a child...

 

Just go back to them and ask for clarification of their position and now you see what you are up against not a lot

 

Lilly

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Lilly,

 

There is no time now, the letter only came yesterday and the final charging order hearing is on Monday.......so we will go to court armed with our set aside hearing letter and this letter from Restons and the Judge will.......probably adjourn until the set aside hearing? (3 months away)

 

Still wondering what Remains Listed means please?

Many thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They seem to want to have the chance to get you again later on, that is what they mean by having the case 'remain listed'.

 

Show that letter to the judge and explain that you do NOT consent to anything in it due to costs and the fact that they are abusing the courts processes.

 

Don't forget to take a summary list of costs with you just in case, and put them to the judge should HFO start waffling on about costs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi MDAW!

 

Awww thank you so much. I was totally drained by the end of it and havent been well since but here I am with the news..........

 

MBNA didnt show up to this hearing either!! The Judge saw the letter about the Set Aside and simply said it makes sense not to do anything until the set aside hearing but she also said that they will do the final charging order at the same time as the set aside...........???

Then we were out! It took about 2 minutes, we waited 2 hours 45 to get in there!!

 

So that's it really. The court already have our reasons for the set aside but I need to know now what else I need to go armed with in August.

What should I be doing now and preparing? Or have I done it already?

 

Many thanks again everyone. It's not over yet but we are a step closer. I now need to make sure we wint the set aside and get MBNA/RESTONS off our backs for good (legally)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Northstar, glad you got this bit over with,reward yourself with anything that makes you happy, have a good rest over Whitsun and then you can make sure you've got everything you need for August, well done, it really is quite a scary experience.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...